M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
Available Online through
www.ijptonline.com
ISSN: 0975-766X
CODEN: IJPTFI
Research Article
MICROSPHERE: A NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM
R. R. Thenge, M. P. Chandak, V. S. Adhao
Dr.Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Malkapur-443101, Maharashtra, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Received on: 15-02-2019
Accepted on: 24-03-2020
Abstract:
Microspheres are normally free flowing powders contains proteins or synthetic polymers which has
biodegradable in nature and having a particle size but 200-500 μm. Number of techniques for the
preparation of microspheres offers a spread of opportunities to regulate aspects of drug administration and
enhance the therapeutic efficacy of a drug. A neat controlled drug delivery system can overcome a number
of problems of conventional therapy and enhance therapeutic efficacy of the drug. There are various
approaches in delivering therapeutic substance to the target site in sustained and controlled release fashion.
These are prepared by methods like Single emulsion, Double emulsion, Polymerization, Phase separation
coacervation, Emulsion solvent evaporation and solvent diffusion. Microspheres are having wide selection
of applications due to controlled and sustained release.
Keywords: Microsphere, evaluation, Novel drug delivery system.
Introduction:
To obtain maximum therapeutic efficacy, it becomes necessary to deliver the agent to the target tissue within
the optimal amount within the right period of your time there by causing little toxicity and minimal side
effects. There are various approaches in delivering a therapeutic substance to the target site during a
sustained controlled release fashion. One such approach is using microspheres as carriers for drugs. the
event of latest delivery systems for the controlled release of medicine is one among the foremost interesting
fields of research in pharmaceutical sciences.[1]A neat controlled drug delivery system can overcome a
number of the issues of conventional therapy and enhance the therapeutic efficacy of a given drug. to get
maximum therapeutic efficacy, it becomes necessary to deliver the agent to the target tissue within the
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31955
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
optimal amount within the right period of your time there by causing little toxicity and minimal side effects.
There are various approaches in delivering a therapeutic substance to the target site during a sustained
controlled release fashion. the method of targeting and site-specific delivery with absolute accuracy are
often achieved by attaching bioactive molecule to liposome, bioerodible polymer, implants, monoclonal
antibodies and various particulate. One such approach is using microspheres as carriers for drugs.
Microsphere are often used for the controlled release of medicine, vaccines, antibiotics, and hormones.
[2,
Microspheres are defined as “Monolithic sphere or therapeutic agent distributed throughout the matrix
3]
either as a molecular dispersion of particles” or are often defined as structure made from continuous phase
of 1 or more miscible polymers during which drug particles are dispersed at the molecular or macroscopic
level. Microspheres are small spherical particles, with diameters within the micrometer range (typically 1
μm to 1000 μm). Microspheres are sometimes mentioned as microparticles. Biodegradable synthetic
polymers and modified natural products like starches, gums, proteins, fats and waxes. The natural polymers
include albumin and gelatin, the synthetic polymer include poly carboxylic acid and polyglycolic
acid.[4]Some of the issues of overcome by producing control drug delivery system which enhance the
therapeutic efficacy of a given drug for obtain maximum therapeutic efficacy and minimum side effects it
necessary to deliver the agent to the target tissue within the optimal amount. a spread of drug are used as
drug carrier, including immunoglobulin’s serum proteins, liposome’s, microspheres, microcapsules,
nanoparticles and even cells like erythrocytes.[5]
Fig.1: PLGA Microsphere.
History:[6]
They were first reported in 1959 by Sidney Fox, K. Harada, and J. Kendrick who proposed that
microspheres might represent a significant early stage in precellular evolution. It has been suggested that
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31956
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
their greater stability makes them a better proposition during this regard than coacervates. The concept of
packaging materials within microsphere dates back to the 1930s with work of Bungenberg de jong and
coworkers on entrapment of drugs within coacervates. The first commercial applications of encapsulation
were by National Cash Register Company for the manufacture of carbonless copying paper in 1957. The
technology and applications have advance over last several decades this technology use for medical, food,
cosmetic, Agricultural, graphics, and household products industry.
ADVANTAGES:[7]
•
For Taste and odour masking.
•
To delay the volatilization.
•
For Separation of incompatible substances.
•
For Improvement of flow properties of powders.
•
To extend the steadiness of the drug against the external conditions.
•
For Safe handling of toxic substances.
•
To enhance the solubility of water insoluble substances by incorporation dispersion of such
Material in aqueous media.
•
To reduce the dose dumping potential compared to large implantable devices.
•
For conversion of oils and other liquids to solids for simple handling.
DISADVANTAGES: [8]
•
The costs of the materials and processing of the controlled release preparation, are substantially
above those of ordinary formulations.
•
The fate of polymer matrix and its effect on the environment.
•
The fate of polymer additives like plasticizers, stabilizers, antioxidants and fillers.
•
Reproducibility is a smaller amount.
•
Process conditions like change in temperature, pH, solvent addition, and evaporation/agitation may
influence the steadiness of core particles to be encapsulated.
•
The environmental impact of the degradation products of the polymer matrix produced in response
to heat, hydrolysis, oxidation, solar radiation or biological agents.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31957
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
Methods of Preparations:
Double emulsion technique: [11, 12, 13]
This method of microspheres preparation involves the formation of the multiple emulsions or the double
emulsion of type w/o/w and is best suited to aqueous soluble drugs, peptides, proteins and the vaccines. This
method can be used with both the polymers. The aqueous protein solution is dispersed in a lipophilic organic
continuous phase. The protein solution may contain the active substances Continuous phase is generally
consisted of the polymer solution that eventually encapsulates of the protein containing in dispersed aqueous
phase. The primary emulsion is subjected to the homogenization or the sonication before addition to the
aqueous solution of the poly vinyl alcohol. This results in the formation of a double emulsion. The emulsion
is then subjected to removal either by solvent evaporation or by solvent extraction method. A number of
hydrophilic drugs like luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist, vaccines, proteins and
conventional molecules can be successfully incorporated into the microspheres using the method of double
emulsion solvent evaporation/ extraction method.
Fig. 2: Microspheres by Double Emulsion Technique.
Single emulsion technique: [14, 15]
The micro particulate carriers of natural polymers i.e. those of carbohydrates and proteins carbohydrates are
prepared by single emulsion technique. The chemical cross linking agents used are as followings:
•
glutaraldehyde,
•
formaldehyde,
•
di acid chloride
Heat denaturation is not suitable for heat sensitive substances. Chemical cross linking have disadvantage of
excessive exposure of active pharmaceutical ingredient to chemicals if added at the time of manufacturing
and then subjected to centrifugation, washing, separation.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31958
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
Fig.3: Microspheres by Single Emulsion Technique.
Polymerization techniques: [17,18]
The polymerization techniques conventionally used for preparing the microspheres are mainly classified as:
I. Normal polymerization II. Interfacial polymerization. Both are administered in liquid phase.
Normal polymerization:
It is administered by using different techniques as bulk, suspension, precipitation, emulsion and micellar
polymerization methods. In bulk, a monomer or a composition of monomers alongside the initiator or
catalyst is typically heated to initiate polymerization. Polymer so obtained may be moulded as microspheres.
Drug loading could also be done during the polymerization process. Suspension polymerization also referred
as bead or pearl polymerization. It is carried out by heating the monomer or composition of monomers as
droplets dispersion in a continuous aqueous phase. Droplets can also contain an initiator and other additives.
Emulsion polymerization deviates from suspension polymerization as due to the presence initiator within the
aqueous phase, which afterwards diffuses to the surface of micelles. Bulk polymerization has merits of
formation of pure polymers.
Interfacial polymerization This involves the reaction of various monomers at the interface between the two
immiscible liquids to form a film of polymer that essentially envelops the dispersed phase.
Fig.4: Microsphere by Polymerization Technique (a) normal polymerization, (b) Interfecial
Polymerization.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31959
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
Spray drying and spray congealing: [19]
These methods are supported drying of the mist of the polymer and drug within the air counting on the
removal of the solvent or cooling of the answer the 2 processes are named spray drying and spray
congealing. one among the main merits of the method is feasibility of process under aseptic conditions.
Spray drying process is employed to encapsulate various penicillins. Thiamine mononitrate and sulpha
ethylthiadizole are encapsulated during a composition of mono- and di glycerides of hexadecanoic acid and
octadecanoic acid using spray congealing.
Fig .5: Microspheres by Spraying Drying Technique.
Phase separation or coacervation technique: [20]
This method based on the principle of decreasing the solubility of the polymer in non-aqueous phase to
affect the formation of polymer rich phase called the coacervates. Here, the drug particles are dispersed in
the solution of the polymer and an incompatible polymer is then added to the system which makes first
polymer to separate and engulfment of the drug particles. Addition of organic results in the solidification of
polymer. Poly lactic acid (PLA) microspheres have been manufactures by this method by using butadiene as
incompatible polymer. The process variables are very useful because the rate of achieving the coacervates
denotes the distribution of the polymer film, the size of particles and agglomeration of the formed particles.
The agglomeration must be avoided by continuous stirring of the suspension using an optimum speed stirrer
because as the process of microspheres formation starts the formed polymerize globules start to stick and
form the agglomerates. So, the process variables are critical as they control the kinetic of the particles
because there is no defined state of equilibrium attainment.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31960
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
Fig. 6: Phase separation coacervation technique.
Solvent extraction: [21]
Solvent evaporation method is employed for manufacturing of microparticles, involves removal of the
organic phase by extraction of the or non-aqueous solvent. This method involves water miscible organic
solvents as isopropanol. Organic phase is often removed by extraction with water. This process decreases
the hardening time for the microspheres. One variation of the method involves direct incorporation of the
drug or protein to polymer organic solution. Rate of solvent removal by extraction method depends on the
temperature of water, ratio of emulsion volume to the water and solubility profile of polymer.
Fig.7: Solvent extraction Method.
Quasi emulsion or solvent diffusion:[22]
A novel quasi-emulsion solvent diffusion method to manufacture the controlled release microspheres of
drugs with acrylic polymers has been reported in the literature. Microsponges can be manufactured by a
quasi-emulsion solvent diffusion method using an external phase containing distilled water and polyvinyl
alcohol. The internal phase is consisting of drug, ethanol and polymer is added at an amount of 20% of the
polymer in order to enhance plasticity. At first, the internal phase is manufactured at 60ºC and then added to
the external phase at room temperature. After emulsification process, the mixture is continuously stirred for
2 hours. Then the mixture can be filtered to separate the microsponges. The product is then washed and
dried by vacuum oven at 40ºC for a day.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31961
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
Fig.8: Quasi emulsion solvent diffusion.
Ionic Gelation Method:[23]
In Ionic Gelation technique are two methods by which hydrogel beads can be generated using ionotropic
gelation technique as fallow:
1) Internal gelation:
These methods differ from one another within the source of the cross-linking ion. In one of the methods, the
cross linker ion is positioned externally shown in (Fig. 10) where as in the other method, the cross linker ion
is incorporated within the polymer solution in inactive form shown in (Fig.10) External cross- linking
produced thinner films with smoother surface, greater matrix strength, stiffness and permeability than
internally cross-linked films.
2) External Gelation:
Externally cross-linked micro pellets were also capable of greater drug encapsulation efficiency and slower
drug release rate. Their kind of natural and synthetic polymeric systems that are been investigated for the
controlled release of drug.
A variety of natural polymers and their derivatised products have been successfully employed in hydrogel
system for various pharmaceutical applications. In this review the potential of sodium alginate and chitosan
to make the highly cross-linked structure and its pharmaceutical applications is discussed. As compared to
other natural polymers, sodium alginate and chitosan shows no variations in viscosity and hence produces
more uniform gel structure which forms stronger cross-linked structure and more loading of entrapped
material.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31962
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
Fig.9: a) Internal and b) External Gelation technique.
Evaluation of Microspheres: [24-39]
Particle size and shape:
The foremost widely used procedures to see microparticles are conventional light microscopy (LM) and
scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Both are often wont to determine the form and outer structure of
microparticles LM provides an impression over coating parameters just in case of double walled
microspheres.The microspheres structures are often visualized before and after coating and therefore the
change are often measured microscopically.
SEM provides higher resolution in contrast to the LM. SEM allows investigations of the microspheres
surfaces and after particles are cross-sectioned, it also can be used for the investigation of double walled
systems.
Conflocal fluorescence microscopy is used for the structure characterization of multiple walled
microspheres. Laser light scattering and multi size coulter counter aside from instrumental methods, which
may be used for the characterization of size, shape and morphology of the microspheres.
Infrared Spectroscopy:
FT-IR is used to figure out the degradation of the polymeric matrix of the carrier system. The surface of the
microspheres is investigated measuring alternated total reflectance (ATR). The IR beam passing through the
ATR cell reflected repeatedly through the sample to supply IR spectra mainly of surface material. The ATR
FTIR provides information about the surface composition of the microspheres depending upon
manufacturing procedures and conditions.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31963
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
Differential Scanning Calorimetric (DSC):
DSC analysis is to spot the compatibility study between the drug and excipients. The DSC analysis of pure
drug, 1:1 physical mixture of drug and excipients were administered using mettler Toledo DSC 821.
Samples (2-8 mg) were accurately weighed and heated in sealed aluminum pans at a rate of 100c/min
between 0-3000C temperature ranges under nitrogen atmosphere.
Density determination:
The density of the microspheres is often measured by employing a multi volume pychnometer. Accurately
weighed sample during a cup is placed into the multi volume pychnometer. Helium is introduced at a
continuing pressure within the chamber and allowed to expand. This expansion leads to a decrease in
pressure within the chamber. Two consecutive readings of reduction in pressure at different initial pressure
are noted. From two pressure readings the quantity and hence the density of the microsphere carrier is
decided.
Percentage yield of microspheres:
Dried microspheres were collected and weighed accurately. The percentage yield was then calculated using
formula given below,
% Yield = mass of microsphere obtained / total weight of drug & polymer X 100
Isoelectric point:
The micro electrophoresis is an apparatus used to measure the electrophoretic mobility of microspheres
from which the isoelectric point is often determined. The mean velocity at different P H values starting from
3-10 is calculated by measuring the time of particle movement over a distance of 1 mm. By using this data
the electrical mobility of the particle can be determined. The electrophoretic mobility is often associated
with surface contained charge, ionisable behaviour or ion absorption nature of the microspheres.
Capture efficiency:
The capture efficiency of the microspheres or the percent entrapment can be determined by allowing washed
microspheres to lyses. The lysate is then subjected to the determination of active constituents as per
monograph requirement. The percent encapsulation efficiency is calculated using following equation:
% Entrapment = Actual content/Theoretical content x 100 Angle of contact:
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31964
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
The angle of contact is measured to see the wetting property of a small particulate carrier. It determines the
character of microspheres in terms of hydrophilicity or property. This physical science property is particular
to solid and full of the presence of the adsorbate part. The angle of contact is measured at the solid/air/water
interface. The advancing and receding angle of contact area unit measured by putting a drop during a
circular cell mounted higher than objective of inverted magnifier. Contact angle is measured at 200C at
intervals a second of deposition of microspheres.
Drug Release:
In vitro methods:
There is a need for experimental methods which permit the discharge characteristics and permeability of a
drug through membrane to be determined. For this purpose, a number of in vitro and in vivo techniques have
been reported. In vitro drug release studies have been employed as a top-quality control procedure in
pharmaceutical production, in development etc. Sensitive and reproducible release data derived from
physicochemical and hydro dynamically defined conditions are necessary.
The influence of technologically defined conditions and difficulty in simulating in vivo conditions has led to
development of a number of in vitro release methods for buckle formulations; however, no standard in vitro
method has yet been developed. Different workers have used apparatus of varying designs and under
varying conditions, depending on the shape and application of the dosage form developed.
In vivo methods:
Methods for studying the permeability of intact mucosa comprise of techniques that exploit the biological
response of the organism locally or systemically and those that involve direct local measurement of uptake
or accumulation of penetrants at the surface. Some of the earliest and simple studies of mucosal
permeability utilized the systemic pharmacological effects produced by drugs after application to the oral
mucosa. However, the most widely used methods include in vivo studies using animal models, buccal
absorption tests, and perfusion chambers for studying drug permeability.
Angle of contact: The angle of contact is measured to determine the wetting property of a micro particles. It
determines the nature of microspheres in terms of hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity, and it is measured at the
solid/air/water interface.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31965
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
Beaker method:
The dosage form in this technique is made to adhere at the bottom of the beaker containing the suitable
medium and stirred consistently using overhead stirrer. Volume of the medium used in the literature for the
studies varies from 50-500 ml and the stirrer speed form 60-300 rpm.
Animal models:
Animal models are used mainly for the screening of the series of compounds, investigating the mechanisms
and usefulness of permeation enhancers or evaluating a set of formulations. A number of animal models
have been reported in the literature, however, very few in vivo (animal). Animal models such as the dog,
rats, rabbits, cat, hamster, pigs, and sheep have been reported. In general, the procedure involves
anesthetizing the animal followed by administration of the dosage form. In case of rats, the oesophagus is
ligated to prevent absorption pathways other than oral mucosa. At different time intervals, the blood is
withdrawn and analyzed.
Drug Formulated In the Form of Microsphere:
Ref
Sr no. Drug
Type of microsphere
Use
No.
1
Aspirin
Nano hydroxyapatite microsphere
NSAID’S Activity
40
2
Cephalosporin
Chitosan Microspheres Technique
Antibacterial Activity
41
solvent evaporation /Diffusion
Antitubercular Activity
42
3
Ciprofloxacin
43
microsphere
Chloromphinic
Chitosan Microspheres
Broad spectrum
ol HCl
Technique
Antibiotics
Chlorhexidie
Chitosan Microspheres
Anti-microbial Activity
44
buccal tablets.
Technique
Cold Congelating Method of
Antimalarial
45
microspheres.
Activity
Diclofenac
biodegradable and biocompatible
Treatment of arthritis
sodium
polymer microsphere
4
5
6
Chloroquinone
46
7
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31966
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
Magnetic Dispersion Extraction
8
Antibiotics Activity
47
Antitubercular Activity
48
Hypertension Activity
49
Anticancer Activity
50
Biodegradable Type of
Antibiotic of Chronic
51
Microsphere
prostatitis
Solvant Diffusion microsphere,
Antitubercular Activity
52
Aminoglycoside
53
Doxycycline
Method of microspheres
Solvent Evaporation method of
9
Ethambutol
Microsphere
Losartan
solvent evaporation /Diffusion
Potassium
microsphere.
10
Biodegradable Type of
11
Methotrexate
Microsphere
Ofloxacin
12
13
Rifamycin
by Eudragid Polymer
Albumin & Gelatin Microspheres
14
Streptomycin
Antibiotics
Sulfasalazine
Pectin Gel Microspheres
NSAID’S Activity
54
Biodegradable Type of
Anti-microbial Activity
55
Antibiotics Activity
56
Antifungal activity
57
NSAID’S Activity
58
High ceiling loop
59
15
Potassium
16
Sulfonamides
Microsphere
Spray drying technique for
Tetracycline
17
formation of polymers of
HCl
microsphere
Solvent Evaporation method of
18
Tolnaftate
Microsphere
Diclofenac
W/O/W double emulsion solvent
Sodium
evaporation method
Furosemide
Solvent Evaporation method of
19
20
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31967
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
21
Paracetamol
Microsphere
Diuretic activity
Ionotropic gelatin method
Antipyretic activity
60
Applications: [27]
•
For Taste and odour masking.
•
To delay the volatilization.
•
For separation of incompatible substances.
•
For safe handling of toxic substances.
•
To increase the stability of the drug against the external condition.
•
To Improve the solubility of water insoluble substances by incorporating dispersion of such
material in aqueous media.
•
To reduce the dose dumping potential compared to large implantable device.
Conclusion:
Microsphere is one of the recently used Novel Drug Delivery for a variety of Active pharmaceutical
ingredients. It has been great potential for site specific / Targeted delivery of drug. The high molecular
weight compounds such as Proteins and Peptides are formulated successfully in the form of Microsphere.
Therefore microsphere has great potential as a “Novel
Drug Delivery System”.
References:
1. N. K. Jain, Controlled and Novel drug delivery, CBS Publishers New Delhi, India; 21(4) 236-237.
2. Y. W. Chein, Oral Drug Delivery Systems: In Novel drug delivery systems. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New
York.1992;50:139-77.
3. Mathew Sam T., Devi Gayathri S., Prasanth V. V., Vinod B; NSAIDs as microspheres, The Internet J. of
Pharma.2008;6(1):67-73.
4. Li, S.P., Kowalski C.R., Feld K.M., Grim W.M. Recent Advances in Microencapsulation Tech. and
Equipment, Drug Dev Ind. Pharma.1988;14:353-76.
5. P.M. Dandagi, V.S. Mastiholimath, M.B. Patil, M.K. Gupta, Biodegradable micro particulate system of
captopril. Int. J. Pharm. 2006; 307:83-88.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31968
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
6. N.K. Jain. Introduction to Novel drug delivery system, Vallabh Prakshan,177-193.
7. Sree Giri Prasad B., Gupta V. R. M., Devanna N., Jayasurya K., Microspheres as drug delivery system A
Rev., JGTPS. 2014;5(3):1961-72.
8. Mohan M., Sujitha H., Dr. Rao V. U. M., Ashok M., Arun kumar B., A brief Rev on mucoadhesive
microspheres, IJRRPAS. 2014;4(1):975-86.
9. Trivedi P. Verma A.M.L. Garud N, Preperation and Charecterization of Aceclofenac Microspheres,
Asian J. Pharma.2008; 2(2):110-115.
10. Mathew Sam T., Devi Gayathri S., Prasanth V.V., Vinod B; NSAIDs as microspheres, The Int. J. of
Pharma.2008; 6(1): 67 – 73.
11. Pradesh T.S., Sunny C.M., Varma K.H., Ramesh P., Preperation of microstuctured hydroxyapatite
microspheres using oil in water emulsion, Bull Matter. Sci. 2005; 28(5):383-390.
12. Diane J. Burgress and Anthony J. Hickey, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina,
U.S. A, Encyclopedia of Pharma Tech, 2328 -2337.
13. Koff US patent (March21963) 3,080,292.
14. John P.M and Becker. C.H. J. Pharma. Sci.,1968;57: 584.
15. J.C. Sworbrik and J.C.Boylen (Ed), Marcel Dekker, New York (Basel), Encyclopedia of pharma
Tech.1988;10:1
16. J.H Ratcliff, I.M Hunnyball, A. Smith and C.G Wilson. J. Pharmacol., 431-436.
17. Fujimoto S. and Miyazaki M. Biodegradable motomycin C microspheres, Given intraarterially for
hepatic cancer,1984: 2404- 2410.
18. Improved patient compliance and comfort compared with intravenous administration Rapid absorption,
higher bioavailability.
19. Davis S.S. and Illum L. Microspheres as drug carrier in drug carrier system, F.H Roerdink and A.M.
Kron (Eds), John Wiley and sons Ltd.,1.1989
20. S.P. Vyas and R.K. khar “Targeted and Controlled Drug Delivery: Novel Carrier System CBS
publication and distributors, New Delhi, 2002;1:81-121.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31969
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
21. J.C Sworbrik and J.C. Boylen (Ed), Marcel Dekker, New York (Basel), Encyclopedia of
Pharma.Tech.,1988;10:1-29.
22. J.H Ratcliff, I.M Hunnyball, A. Smith and C.G Wilson, J. Pharmacol.1984;431-43
23. S. Fujimoto, M. Miyazaki et.al. Biodegradable motomycin C microspheres. Given intra arterially for
hepatic cancer, 1985:2404-2410.
24. Schugens C. Larvelle. N. Nihantn., Grandfils C. Jerome R. and Teyssie. P. J.Control.Rel.1994;32:161.
25. Mathews B.R. and Nixon J.R. J. Pharma Pharmacrol.1974;26:283.
26. N.K. Jain, Advances in controlled & Novel drug delivery, 03 Edition, 71.
27. H.V.enkatesh “A buccal delivery system of Salbutamol Sulphate” M. Pharm; Budrinarayan, N. (1991)
“Utilisation and Evaluation of plant products in pharmaceutical formulations”.M.Pharm.1989
28. Tanaka, W. Akito, E.Yoshida, K.Terada, T. and Ninomiya, H. “pharm preparations for oral cavity
administration” US patent No.4059686;1977
29. Ishida, M. Nambu, N. and Nagai, T.“Highly viscous gel ointment containing carbapol for application to
the oral mucosa”. Chem. Pharma Bull.,1983; 31:4561.
30. Yukimatsu, K. Nozaki, Y. Kakumoto, M.and Ohta, M.“Development of a transmucosal controlled
release device for systemic delivery of antianginal drugs pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics”.
Drug Dev. Ind. Pharma,1994; 20(4): 503534.
31. Hussain, M.A. Aungst, B.J. Kearney A. and Shefter, E.“Buccal and oral bioavailability of naloxone and
naltrexone in rats”. Int. J. Pharma.,1987; 36:127.
32. Oh, C.K. and Ritschel., W.A. “Biopharmaceutical aspects of buccal absorption of insulin rabbits I.
Effects of dose, size, Ph & sorption enhancers: in vivo in vitro correlation”. Pharma.Res.,1999; 5(5):100.
33. Oh, C.K. and Ritschel, W.A. “Biopharmaceutical aspects of buccal absorption of insulin in rabbits II.
Absorption characteristics of insulin through the buccal mucosa”. pharma.Res.,1988;5(5):100.
34. Kellaway, I. W. andwarren, S.I. “Mucoadhesive hydrogels”. Proc. Intern. symp. Control. Rel. Bioact.
Mater., 18:73.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31970
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
35. Ishida, M.: Nambu, N.and Nagai, T. “Highly viscous gel ointment containing carbopol for application to
the oral mucosa”. Chem. pharm. Bull., 1983;31:4561.
36. Ishida, M. Nambu, N. and Nagai, T. “Ointment type oral mucosal dosage form of carbopol containing
prednisolone for the treatment of aphtha”. Chem. Pharma. Bull.,1983;31:1010.
37. Hoogstrate, A.J, verhoef, J.C. Tuk., B. Pijpers, A. Vercheijden, J.H.M.; Jungiger, H.E. and Bodde, H.C.
“Invivo buccal delivery of fluorescein iso thiocyanate – dextran 4400 with glycodeoxy cholate as an
absorption enhacer in pigs”. J. Pharma. Sci.,1996; 85(5): 457-460.
38. Burnside, B.A; Keith, A.P. and snipes, W. “micro porous hollow fibers as a peptide delivery system via
the buccal activity” proceed intersymp control RelBioact. mater,1989;16:94.
39. M.J. Rathon, “Human buccal absorption I.A method for Estimating the transfer kinetics of drugs W
cross the human buccal membrane”. Int. J. Pharma.,1991; 69:103.
40. Sen Li, kaun wang, ming jong Preparation and evaluation of Nano hydeoxypeptide poly(sterinybenzene)
porous microspheres, for aspirine carrier, Sci. of china chemistry.2012.
41. Carmen Mariana, Alexandru Mihal. Preparation and evaluation of antibacterial activity of
Cephalosporins drug loaded in magnetic chitosan Microsphere. Int. J. pharma. 2012;202-205.
42. Shivshankae Hardenia, Ankit Jain, Formulation and evaluation of Mucoadhesive Microspheres from
ciprofloxacin. Gaumal National Advance pharma education.
43. Xizhi shi, Sulin Zheng, Dabing Zheng. Preparation and evaluation of Broad-Spectrum antibiotics as
chitosan microspheric method of polymer J. chromatography. 2011:24-30.
44. Elisabetta Gavinia, Massimo Cossua, Milena Sorrentib. Formulation and in vivo evaluation of
chlorhexidine buccal tablets prepared using drug-loaded chitosan microspheres 2001.
45. Benna Saparia Formulation and evaluation of chloroquinone phosphate Microsphere by using cross
linked gelatin for long term drug delivery, at Indian J. Res.
46. christina. e, jawaharlal nehru technological university, hyderabad Preparation of microspheres of
diclofenac sodium by ionotropic gelation technique Int. J. pharmacy and pharm sci.2013;5(1):09751491.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31971
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
47. Li, yan Dong. Preparation of Doxicycline imprented magnetic microsphase by inverse emulsion,
suspension, polymerization for magnetic dispersion extraction of tetracycline 2013.
48. Haw jang, Xiaoyang Pang, Preparation of sheu strecture of microsphere of biological safety. by Int. J.
clinical experimental medicine.
49. T.S. keerthi, S.K. senthil kumar. Formulation and evaluation of microspheres of losartan potassium
using biodegradable natural by Int. bulletin of drug Res:120-131.
50. R. Narayani & K. Panduranga Rao. Control release of anticancer drug Methotrexate from
biodegreedable gelatin microspheres 67-77.
51. Jong yooon bahk, Jae seog Hyun. Concentration of ofloxacin in canine prostrate tissue after
intraprostatic injections of biodegradable sustained release microsphere published by the US J. 123.
52. A.B. Nighute, S.B. Bhise Preparation & evaluation of microsphere of Refamycin eudragit polymers at
Res. J. pharma.2009; 2: 680-686.
53. H. Gurkan, A. A. Hincal. Streptomycin sulphate microsphere formulation in vivo distribution J. of
microencapsulations 2013; 3:101-109.
54. Yukimatsu, K. Nozaki, Y. Kakumoto, M. and Ohta, M. “Development of a transmucosal controlled
release device for systemic delivery of antianginal drugs pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics”.
Drug Dev. Ind. Pharma.1996;20(4):503534.
55. A. K. Das, Determination of physical state of drug in microcapsule and microphase formulation
2011:112-119.
56. S. S. Bansode, S. K. Banarjee, D. D. Gaikwad, S. L. Jadhav, R. M. Thorat: Microencapsulation A
review, Int. J. Pharma Sci Rev. Res. 2010; 1(2):38-42.
57. P. Venkatesan, R. Manavalan and K. Valliappan: Microencapsulation: A vital technique in novel drug
delivery system. J. Pharma Sci and Res. 2009;1(4):26-35.
58. Naveen Chella, Kiran Kumar Yada, Rashmi Vempati: Preparation and Evaluation of Ethyl Cellulose
Microspheres containing Diclofenac Sodium by Novel W/O/O Emulsion Method. J. Pharma Sci. and
Res.2010;2(12):884-88.
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31972
M. P. Chandak*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology
59. Amitava Ghosh, L.K Nathi and Partha Roy: A study on the effect of different acrylic polymers on
Frusemide loaded calcium alginate micropellets prepared by Ionotropic Gelation technique, Priory
Medical J.2007.
60. Nethaji Ramalingam et al. Formulation and Evaluation of Paracetamol Loaded Mucoadhesive
Microspheres. Int J Pharm Pharmacol 2017; 1(2): 106.
Corresponding Author:
M. P. Chandak*,
Email:
[email protected]
IJPT| March-2020| Vol. 12 | Issue No.1 | 31955-31973
Page 31973