Academia.eduAcademia.edu

The Politics of Trade in Safavid Iran: Silk for Silver, 1600-1730

2001, The American Historical Review

AI-generated Abstract

The book "The Politics of Trade in Safavid Iran: Silk for Silver 1600-1730" by Rudolph P. Matthee presents a comprehensive analysis of the silk trade within the broader political and economic contexts of Safavid Iran. It explores the significant role of silk in state finances, the establishment of trade monopolies, and the influence of Armenian merchants in the silk trade with European and neighboring empires. By examining both new and existing sources, the work sheds light on the complex interactions between the imperial court and foreign merchants, ultimately delving into the factors leading to the decline of the Safavid empire.

148 MESA Bulletin 37/1 (2003) The Politics of Trade in Safavid Iran: Silk for Silver 1600-1730, by RUDOLPH P. MATTHEE. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999. 290 pages, footnotes, plates, maps, appendix, glossary, bibliography, index. $70.00 (Cloth), ISBN 0-521-64131-4 Rudolph Matthee's book is an important contribution to the study of Safavid Iran. Despite its title, the work is not limited to economic history. Rather, for Matthee, silk offers an entree to four broader issues in the history of seventeenth and eighteenth century Iran: political economy, the interaction between the imperial court and foreign merchants, changes in trade routes (both overland and overseas), and the political and economic strains that led to the collapse of the Safavid empire in the early eighteenth century. Since silk was an important source of revenue for the imperial household, a discussion of the silk trade necessarily leads to an examination of Safavid state finances. Here Matthee has untangled the issues surrounding Shah Abbas's establishment of a monopoly on the silk trade. Unearthing the first mention in the Persian sources of this monopoly and tracing its impact on Abbas's reorganization of the Safavid state, Matthee shows the importance of silk not only during the reign of Shah Abbas but during the reigns of his successors as well. The Armenian merchants of Julfa occupy an important place in Matthee's story. Independent traders and brokers, as well as household merchants for the emperors and high-ranking nobles, the Julfans dominated not only the Safavid silk trade but also the wider networks of overland trade with the Ottoman Empire to the west, the Mughal Empire to the east, and the Russian Empire to the north. Matthee demonstrates "that the European East India companies—principally the Dutch and the English—never came close to threatening the Armenians' dominance. For much of the Safavid period, in fact, the Europeans played a rather minor part in the silk trade. Matthee situates his discussion of the silk trade and Safavid decline in the larger political and economic context of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. On the one hand, the European companies had, from about the middle of the seventeenth century, begun to get their silk from Bengal and China; on the other hand, silk continued to be exported overland in considerable quantities right up to the end of the seventeenth century. Thus, fluctuations in the silk trade cannot have been a major factor in the decline of the late Safavid state. MESA Bulletin 37II (2003) 149 In offering a comprehensive and nuanced analysis of the silk trade in Safavid Iran, Matthee has discovered new sources both European and Persian while mining the old sources for fresh insights. His study offers a clearer picture of Iran's role in the early modern Middle East and will enable a new generations of comparative world historians to begin to answer questions about Safavid Iran's relationships with the other two Islamic empires of the day—Mughal and Ottoman. Stephen P. Blake St. Olaf College Islam und Menschenrechte: Sunnitische Muslime zwischen Islamismus, Sakularismus und Modernismus, by LORENZ MULLER (Mitteilungen des Deutschen Orient-Instituts; 54). Hamburg: Deutsches Orient-Institut, 1996. 361 pages, footnotes, bibliography, index. ISBN 389173-044-6 This valuable book provides a systematic survey of some of the major trends in Sunni Muslim legal thought of the 1980s and early 1990s regarding human rights. It deals specifically with writers who base their views on Islamic legal sources. By analyzing how Muslim thinkers have tackled the problems that these sources present to the human rights debate, M Oiler wants to establish whether the sources themselves constitute an insurmountable barrier to the adoption of the idea of human rights (p. 36). He recognizes that socio-economic and political factors play an important role in determining the "acceptability" of the various propositions to a majority of Muslims. In his book, though, he largely concentrates on the potential of his authors' proposed ideas to overcome contentious issues on the basis of genuinely Islamic theological and legal thinking. By highlighting the diversity of positions taken (not least by calling to the attention of Western readers many recent contributions to the debate written in Arabic), Muller lays the basis for a more realistic view of the vexing issue of the "compatibility between Islam and human rights" (p. 25) that continues to serve interested parties as one indicator of a supposedly fundamental opposition between Islam and the west. Muller's book, a 1996 doctoral dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Law of the University of Hamburg, complements the work of others who have described human rights debates in activist circles, for example Kevin Dwyer, Arab Voices: The Human Rights Debate in the Middle East