America, consciousness, COVID-19, climate change, and migration

Explore 16 (2020) 350 353 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Explore journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jsch Schwartz Report America, consciousness, COVID-19, climate change, and migration Stephan A. Schwartz The Schwartzreport tracks emerging trends that will affect the world, particularly the United States. For EXPLORE it focuses on matters of health in the broadest sense of that term, including medical issues, changes in the biosphere, technology, and policy considerations, all of which will shape our culture and our lives. Historians, medical and otherwise, will be studying the disaster of the American response to the novel Covid-19 Coronavirus compared to other developed nations for generations; it has no parallel in modern history. How in the world could the richest nation in the world, with the greatest medical resources and with only 4.23% of the world’s population, end up with 25% of the world’s coronavirus cases? One person every 80 seconds is dying in America, as I write this sentence. But as bad as this catastrophe is, it doesn’t mean it cannot be instructive and that important insights cannot be drawn from what is happening. As any engineer or physician knows, when you stress a system, mechanical or biological, its faults, flaws, and weaknesses stand out in bold relief. Failure is often a better teacher than success. In this and other journals I have already written extensively about the need for preparedness, and the change in consciousness it requires to deal with what is happening. I have emphasized consciousness because I consider it to be the fundamental change factor.1 In this issue Explore’s Executive Editor, Larry Dossey, has augmented this emphasis by providing his supporting views on the role of consciousness in this pandemic.2 In my opinion it is an inappropriate consciousness at both the Individual and societal level that has resulted in first the existence and, then, the failure of America’s illness profit system, and why, on the basis of the Covid-19 pandemic, it should be obvious that a change of consciousness is required to replace this failed system with a universal birthright single-payer healthcare system.3 It is a lack of consciousness about the importance for fostering wellbeing as a first priority that has led to America’s financial inequality and the racism and police brutality that the pandemic has brought into focus.4,5 It is this same lack of recognition that the function of the state should be to foster wellbeing at every level that is causing climate change.6 This time what I want to talk about is what I hope we will learn from this past year’s experience. I would like to place the Covid-19 pandemic trend in the context of two other trends: climate change and migrations and propose that the world has been confronted with a teaching moment that must not be ignored. How we deal with these three trends climate change, pandemics, migrations will determine what the world will be like probably for several centuries. How it is different, and how we E-mail address: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2020.08.012 1550-8307/© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. deal with the differences we face will determine the quality of life for you, your family, your children, and their children. When the Covid19 pandemic is over it will quite literally be a different world, a different America. And although I am focused here on the United States, the principles. I will discuss all involve a change in consciousness and extend to the entire world. Migrations When we talk about migrations it is almost always in Trumpian terms designed to excite racism. Brown people overrunning the country is the meme Trump cultivates. However, the data suggests that the real migration that is going to transform America is the internal one driven by climate change and either too much or too little water. Let me begin with that, the internal movement of people that is already occurring and is going to become much more pronounced in the next several decades. The key, of course, is to distinguish between historical data, that is the normal baseline movement amongst the states, and that driven by climate change. Thanks to a multi-university study headed by Caleb Robinson of the School of Computational Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, working with Bistra Dilkina of Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, and Juan Moreno-Cruz of School of Environment, Enterprise and Development, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, we actually have some up to date data to examine that distinction. In their study Robinson and his team conclude: “Sea level rise in the United States will lead to large scale migration in the future. We propose a framework to examine future climate migration patterns using models of human migration. Our framework requires that we distinguish between historical versus climate driven migration and recognizes how the impacts of climate change can extend beyond the affected area. We apply our framework to simulate how migration, driven by sea level rise, differs from baseline migration patterns. Specifically, we couple a sea level rise model with a data-driven model of human migration and future population projections, creating a generalized joint model of climate driven migration that can be used to simulate population distributions under potential future sea level rise scenarios. The results of our case study suggest that the effects of sea level rise are pervasive, expanding beyond coastal areas via increased migration, and disproportionately affecting some areas of the United States.”7 Their map reveals this population shift graphically (See Figure 1). 351 S.A. Schwartz / Explore 16 (2020) 350 353 into the context of a pandemic. Is that fair? Is it reasonable to link climate change mediated internal migrations with a pandemic. Well, think about it. Here’s a list going back just six decades: Pandemic Dates World Deaths U.S. Deaths Influenza Pandemic H3N2 Influenza Pandemic HIV Pandemic SARS Pandemic H1N1 Influenza Pandemic Covid-19 Coronavirus Pandemic (as of 10 August 2020) 1956-58 1968 2,000,000 1,000,000 60-70,000 100,000 1976 - present 2002 2009-2010 36,000,000 8,096 151,700-575,400 675,000 <8 12,469 2019 - present 732,000 161,842 Sixty four years of U.S. Pandemics Figure 1. The top panel shows all counties that experience flooding under 1.8m of SLR by 2100 in blue and colors the remaining counties based on the number of additional incoming migrants per county that there are in the SLR scenario over the baseline. The bottom left map shows the number of additional incoming migrants per county in the SLR scenario from only flooded counties. The bottom right map shows the number of additional incoming migrants per county in the SLR scenario from only unflooded counties. Color gradients are implemented in a log scale. Credit: Caleb Robinson, Bistra Dilkina, Juan Morena-Cruz It is estimated that as many as 13 million people will be on the move in a vast internal migration by the end of the century.8 To give this number historical context and to provide a sense of scale, imagine the Dustbowl that began in 1930 and lasted about a decade. How big was the internal migration of the Dust Bowl? The best estimates are that 2.5 million people moved West from the dusty, drought-ridden plains principally to California.9 But that doesn’t really touch the 13 million projected as a result of climate change. So let’s try again. The largest previous internal migration was The Great Migration between 1916 and 1970, when it is estimated about 6 million, mostly Black Americans, moved from the racist South to more tolerant cities in the Northeast, Midwest, and West, and forever changed the culture of those American cities10 But even that migration was less than half of what is predicted as a result of climate change, when hundreds of thousands of homes on both US coasts will be catastrophically and frequently flooded, and a trillion-dollar collapse of the coastal real estate market is projected. Oliver Milman, writing in the British newspaper, The Guardian, put it this way, “By the end of the century, 6ft of sea level rise would redraw the coastline with familiar parts such as southern Florida, chunks of North Carolina and Virginia, much of Boston, all but a sliver of New Orleans missing. Warming temperatures will fuel monstrous hurricanes like the devastating triumvirate of Irma, Maria and Harvey in 2017, followed by Florence this year that will scatter survivors in jarring, uncertain ways.”11 Pandemics But now place the sea rise of climate change, the rise in temperature, the fires plaguing the West as I write, the droughts, and the internal migration these events are going to produce, and place them When you look at this data several things immediately become clear. First, pandemics have been occurring roughly every decade for decades. Second, the social outcome data makes it clear that some of these pandemics have been well handled by the American government while some, well, some have been a disaster. Why is this? I suggest because different consciousnesses, and a sense of the priority of fostering wellbeing, created different government policies. Third, the most comprehensive scientific data makes it clear that Covid-19 is a novel coronavirus resulting from a viral mutation, and other research shows that as climate change progresses, and the environment changes, that other viruses and bacteria will also mutate to accommodate to their new circumstances.12 n of the Department of An international team led by Rafael Sanjua Genetics and Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Unincia in Spain explored this exact issue and concluded: versitat de Vale “Viral mutation rates are determined by multiple processes, including polymerase intrinsic fidelity, replication mode, 30 exonuclease activity, spontaneous nucleic acid damage, access to post-replicative repair, editing by host-encoded deaminases, imbalances in nucleotide pools, template sequence context, and template structure. Some of these processes underlie large-scale patterns of variation among viruses, such as differences between RNA and DNA viruses, between viruses with small and large genomes, and between single-strand and double-strand viruses, but important mechanistic aspects behind these differences still remain uncharacterized. Furthermore, mutation rates are not static and can evolve in response to selective pressures, as exemplified by fidelity variants selected under mutagenic conditions in a variety of viruses. In addition to polymerase fidelity, other mutation rate-determinants such as access to DNA repair may have also changed in response to selective pressures during viral evolution.”13 So new pandemics are not only possible and consistent with history, they are also highly probable and the relative priority given to social wellbeing, the consciousness creating government policy, will determine the social outcome. As I said earlier, I have written at length about how the incompetence of the Trump administration and its failure to plan, and implement a federal approach to Covid-19, is demonstrated by a spectrum of social outcome data which resulted in the demonstrated failure of the American illness profit system. But there is another factor to this that must be considered. The reliability of the data. As I write this on the 15th of September, here in the United States, according to U.S. Facts we have 6,501,352 coronavirus cases, and 192,954 deaths that have been reported.14 Most researchers, 352 S.A. Schwartz / Explore 16 (2020) 350 353 however, think the actual number of cases and the death rate are probably many times greater, and even conservative projections based on hospitalization figures suggest that by the time you read this the number of deaths will be 250,000 or even higher. Trump styles himself repeatedly as a “wartime president.” To continue the metaphor, it is as if we had a wartime president, and he lost the war because of the way he fought it. And why is that? Because of the consciousness underlying what was said and done in response to this novel coronavirus. The problem, of course, with listing numbers in essays like this is that they give little sense of the human. Covid has given us some sense of this with the endless coverage of the Herculean work of tens of thousands of anonymous, physicians, nurses, technicians, and orderlies, who put their lives on the line to provide healthcare for millions of men, women, and children.15 And the recent storms on the East coast and the fires in the West have given us a hint of what climate change in the midst of a pandemic looks like. Now add large internal movements of people. Try this thought experiment: You are part of the heathcare community. Over the course of the next few months thousands of desperate people, some suffering from some medical disorder, be it a new pandemic or just Type I diabetes in need of insulin descended on your town or your city. What would you do? Where would these people all sleep? On your lawn, in your parks, in the gyms of your schools? For how long? How prepared would your local government be to feed these people? Provide sanitation for them? How will they get healthcare? What do you think the Federal government would be ready to do to help you and your community under today’s conditions? Climate change Before you answer, we have to factor in another kind of pandemic, this one not caused by a virus. Consider a research study carried out by a National Bureau of Economics team led by Tamma A. Carleton, and published in July 2020. They reported “the first globally comprehensive and empirically grounded estimates of mortality risk due to future temperature increases caused by climate change. In a very good protocol using 40 countries' subnational data, they “estimate(d) age-specific mortality-temperature relationships that enable both extrapolation to countries without data and projection into future years while accounting for adaptation. . . We combine these components with 33 high-resolution climate simulations that together capture scientific uncertainty about the degree of future temperature change. Under a high emissions scenario, we estimate the mean increase in mortality risk is valued at roughly 3.2% of global GDP in 2100. . . Globally, these empirically grounded estimates substantially exceed the previous literature's estimates that lacked similar empirical grounding, suggesting that revision of the estimated economic damage from climate change is warranted.”16 Or, put another way, consider this study, also published in July 2020, in Scientific Reports, by a team led by Ebru Kirezci. They found, “Global models of tide, storm surge, and wave setup are used to obtain projections of episodic coastal flooding over the coming century. The models are extensively validated against tide gauge data and the impact of uncertainties and assumptions on projections estimated in detail. Global ‘hotspots’ where there is projected to be a significant change in episodic flooding by the end of the century are identified and found to be mostly concentrated in north western Europe and Asia. Results show that for the case of, no coastal protection or adaptation, and a mean RCP8.5 scenario, there will be an increase of 48% of the world’s land area, 52% of the global population and 46% of global assets at risk of flooding by 2100. A total of 68% of the global coastal area flooded will be caused by tide and storm events with 32% due to projected regional sea level rise.”17 And the estimated cost of these migrations: $14.2 trillion.18 What kind of economy will America have in the face of that kind of such a figure? Now let me add one more element emerging from the National Bureau of Economic Research study and other research. The study projects that “climate change’s effect on temperatures could raise global mortality rates by 73 deaths per 100,000 people in 2100 under a continued high emissions scenario, compared to a world with no warming. That level is roughly equal to the current death rate for all infectious diseases—including tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, malaria, dengue, yellow fever, and diseases transmitted by ticks, mosquitos, and parasites—combined (approximately 74 deaths per 100,000 globally).”19 We are, in my opinion, now at a point where we either acknowledge these trends and lay serious track preparing to deal with them, or we are headed for a civilization-threatening series of catastrophes. We know climate change is happening. It may already be impacting your life. We know sea rise is happening. If you live in a coastal county, you may already be living with its consequences. If you live in the West you are all too aware of the cataclysmic fires. And we are now being warned, again based on research data not political bloviation, that more pandemics are on their way. Another one of those multi-institution, multi-disciplinary research teams whose work gets too little attention in the mainstream corporate media, this one led by Elizabeth Loh, looked at this specific issue, and this is what they reported, “We used literature searches and a database of all reported emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) to analyze the most important transmission pathways (e.g., vector-borne, aerosol droplet transmitted) for emerging zoonoses. Our results suggest that at the broad scale, the likelihood of transmission occurring through any one pathway is approximately equal. However, the major transmission pathways for zoonoses differ widely according to the specific underlying drivers of EID events (e.g., land-use change, agricultural intensification).”20 Is this level of current and oncoming catastrophes beginning to scare you? It sure as hell scares me. Particularly given what this pandemic has shown us about our ability to cope with such disasters. As I said at the beginning, any engineer or physician knows that when you stress a system, whether mechanical, electronic, or biological it brings the systems weaknesses and flaws into sharp focus. So, what have we learned, what lessons can we draw from what the news tells us every day? The first and most glaringly obvious lesson is the comparison of the United States response to the Coronavirus pandemic with the rest of the developed world. Just as we are the only developed nation that has a healthcare system based on profit, not wellbeing, so we are the only developed nation that did not immediately enact a national approach to the pandemic; instead everything was left to states and local governments. We are also the only developed nation in which the guiding principles of response are grounded on political not medical considerations. The lesson to be learned. Viruses, climate change, and migrations care nothing for borders, and to be effective it all must be addressed comprehensively and nationally. They also must be anticipated and planned for. No one living in a fact-based world can deny that these trends pose an existential threat to both the United States and the world. The question is are we as Americans smart enough to prepare for what is coming? Are we smart enough to see that American “every-person-for-themselves” individualism, with priority and self-advancement as the only priorities, is not working? Can we as a people and a culture recognize that what is needed is a change in consciousness, and that that can only happen one individual at a time? Can we muster the political will to put into office men and women with sufficient integrity in every policy choice to make wellbeing from the individual, the family, community, state, nation, and the earth itself the guiding priority? By the time you read this, the elections will have occurred in November, and we will know. S.A. Schwartz / Explore 16 (2020) 350 353 References 1. Schwartz S. Climate change, Covid-19, preparedness, and consciousness. Explore. 2020;16 (3):141–144. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S15508 30720301063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2020.02.022. Accessed 8 August 2020. 2. Dossey, L. Mother Nature Speaks: Coronavirus, Connectedness, and Consciousness. Explore, 2020. 3. Schwartz S. Covid-19 and the documented failure of the American illness profit system — We have to stop treating our doctors, nurses, healthcare workers, and ourselves this way. Explore. 2020;16(4):210–213. https://www. https://doi.org/ sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830720301579. 10.1016/j.explore.2020.05.001. Accessed 8 August 2020. 4. Life Schwartz S. Death, Hurricanes, Covid-19, and American Financial Inequality. Journal of Accounting and Finance. 2020;40(4). 5. Schwartz S. Police brutality and racism in America. Explore. 2020;16(5). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830720302172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2020.06.010. Accessed 8 August 2020. 6. War Schwartz S. Climate Change, and Migration. Explore. 2018;14(3):172–176. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155083071830082X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2018.03.006. Accessed 8 August 2020. 7. Robinson C, Dilkina B, Moreno-Cruz J. Modeling migration patterns in the USA under sea level rise. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1):e0227436. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227436. 8. Hauer M. Migrations induced by sea-level rise could reshape the U.S. Population landscape. Nature Climate Change. 2017. https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate3271.epdf. Accessed 2 August 2020. 9. Milman O. We’re Moving to Higher Ground: America’s Era of Climate Mass Migration is here. The Guardian.. 2018. 04.00 EDT. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/sep/24/americas-era-of-climate-mass-migration-is-here". Accessed 2 August 2020. 10. The Great Migration, 1910 to 1970. The U.S. Consensus Bureau. 2012. https://www. census.gov/dataviz/visualizations/020/ . Accessed 2 August 2020. 11. Milman O. Loc Cit. 12. Sanju an R, Domingo-Calap P. Mechanisms of viral mutation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.. 2016;73:4433–4448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-016-2299-6. https://link. springer.com/article/10.1007/s00018-016-2299-6#Sec12. Accessed 8 August 2020. 353 13. Loc Cit. 14. US Coronavirus Cases and Deaths. USA Facts. 2020. https://usafacts.org/visualizations/coronavirus-covid-19-spread-map/. Accessed 15 September 2020. 15. Schwartz S. Covid-19 and the documented failure of the American illness profit system — We have to stop treating our doctors, nurses, healthcare workers, and ourselves this way. Explore. 2020;16(4):210–213. Accessed 2 August 2020. 16. Carleton T, Jina A, et al. Valuing the Global Mortality Consequences of Climate Change Accounting for Adaptation Costs and Benefits. The National Bureau of Economic Research. 2020. NBER Working Paper 27559; https://www.nber.org/papers/ w27599. Accessed 5 August 2020. 17. Kirezci E, Young I, et al. Projections of global-scale extreme sea levels and resulting episodic coastal flooding over the 21st Century. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:11629. Accessed 5 August 2020. 18. Regan H. Flooding from Sea Level Rise Coould Cost Our Planet $14.2 Trillion, study says. CNN. 2020. https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/30/weather/coastal-flooding-sealevel-rise-study-intl-hnk/index.html. Accessed 5 August 2020. 19. Carleton T., Loc Cit. 20. Loh E, Zambrana-Torrelio, et al. Targeting Transmission Pathways for Emerging Zoonotic Disease Surveillance and Control. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 2015;15(7). https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2013.1563. Accessed 6 August 2020. Scientist, futurist, and award-winning author and novelist Stephan A. Schwartz, is a Distinguished Consulting Faculty of Saybrook University, and a BIAL Fellow. He is an award winning author of both fiction and non-fiction, columnist for the journal EXPLORE, and editor of the daily web publication Schwartzreport.net in both of which he covers trends that are affecting the future. For over 40 years, as an experimentalist, he has been studying the nature of consciousness, particularly that aspect independent of space and time. Schwartz is part of the small group that founded modern Remote Viewing research, and is the principal researcher studying the use of Remote Viewing in archaeology. In addition to his own non-fiction works and novels, he is the author of more than 200 technical reports, papers, and academic book chapters. In addition to his experimental studies he has written numerous magazine articles for Smithsonian, OMNI, American History, American Heritage, The Washington Post, The New York Times, as well as other magazines and newspapers. He is the recipient of the Parapsychological Association Outstanding Contribution Award, OOOM Magazine (Germany) 100 Most Inspiring People in the World award, and the 2018 Albert Nelson Marquis Award for Outstanding Contributions.