Eastern Arc and the Heritage Network

2009

MPP: industrial heritage Extractive 31. Lead industry 32. Coal industry 33. Alum industry 34. Tin, copper and non-ferrous metal industries 35. Iron mining and iron and steel production 36. Stone quarrying 37. Salt industry 38. Clay industries 39. Underground extraction features Low Low Low Medium/High Medium/High Low /Medium Low /Medium Medium/High Low /Medium Manufacturing 40. Gunpowder 41. Brass 42. Glass 43. Lime and cement 44. Chemicals Low Low Medium Medium Low/Medium Agricultural processing 45. Dove Farming 46. Ice houses Low Low Power and Utilities 47. Electricity industry 48. Water and sewage industry 49. Gas industry 50. Oil industry Medium High High High Transport 51. Bridges High Other MPP thematics Settlement and Field Patterns of England Later prehistoric and Roman Settlement Ecclesiastical Rapid Coastal Zone Assessment Surveys High High Medium High MPP: Area-based studies 52. New Forest 53. Non-Tidal River Thames Rock Art Medium High Low Registers 54. Parks and Gardens and Battlefields Registers High 3.2 Structure of the report: an aid to navigation This report with its appendix and summary is a long document but it is set out with a view to providing easy access for those searching for specific projects. The main

2015

In this section we will focus on the notion of the Heritage Chain and its possible uses through two case studies: the Horse and Chariot discovery in Luoyang, China, and the heritage system in

This paper will explore the possibilities of reactivating the disused site of Coryton Oil Refinery in Thurrock, UK as a cultural heritage site through analysis of its relationship with landscape, people and their interrelated processes. The oil refinery was closed in 2012, leaving behind an impressive 586 acres of industrial as well as cultural history. The tangible and intangible factors effected by the industrial sites, as well as people’s perceptions and awareness towards industrial heritage as places of production, collective and personal memory and place identity will be investigated in this research paper.

Archaeology International, 2018

Since January 2017, the UCL Institute of Archaeology has been the institutional base of the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) Heritage Priority Area Leadership team. The team, led by AHRC Heritage Priority Area Leadership Fellow and Professor of Heritage Studies at the UCL Institute of Archaeology Rodney Harrison, are funded to undertake their work initially for a period of three years until the end of 2019. This brief research update provides an overview of the work of the priority area and AHRC’s investment in world leading heritage research, with particular reference to the AHRC’s Heritage Priority Area: Future Directions research strategy, which was updated in consultation with the team in March 2018.

"A Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan (CHAMP) was undertaken for Highways Agency Managing Agent Contractor Area 7 (HA MAC Area 7) between July and December 2009. It assesses the condition of heritage assets within and immediately adjacent to the HA estate, and identifies those that are the responsibility of the HA and at risk of damage and/or loss of significance due to the environmental, operational and development impacts of the MAC’s current and predicted programme. Area 7 comprises approximately 700km of national trunk roads in the East Midlands. A total of 1189 heritage assets were identified, of which 155 were statutorily designated assets. The report is accompanied by a CHAMP Area 7 Project Geographical Information System (GIS), designed in accordance with the Highways Agency Environmental Information System (EnvIS) and populated with a subset of data from the Highways Agency Geographical Information System (HAGIS). This GIS provides data on the 1189 assets within or adjacent to the Highways Agency estate, including links to condition survey asset visit sheets and photographs."

Structural Survey, 2014

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.

Proceedings of a conference organised by the Farsons Foundation in collaboration with the Department of the Built Heritage, Faculty for the Built Environment, University of Malta on 1st February 2013

2018

Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.

This paper will look at the requirements for a future vision of networked, digital heritage inventories to support heritage protection in England. The present loose network presents several challenges for multiple organizations maintaining similar datasets on disparate IT software: Duplication of content; ownership of content and different approaches to recording practice and standards. This paper will discuss the potential use of the Arches Heritage Inventory and Management System as part of the vision for better operation of this network. Arches was developed by the Getty Conservation Institute, World Monuments Fund and Farallon Geographics as an open source web-based geographic information system (GIS) to help inventorize and manage immovable cultural heritage. The system is based around internationally recognized standards from both the heritage and IT sectors. These include: ISO 21127: 2006, commonly referred to as the CIDOC-CRM (Conceptual Reference Model); the CIDOC Core Data Standard for Archaeological and Architectural Sites; Core Data Index to Historic Buildings and Monuments of the Architectural Heritage as well as Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) standards. The proposed use of Arches as a data collection and exchange platform would provide effective and useful recording systems for small heritage projects lacking in-house IT support and the finances and skills to support their development. In addition it would promote standards to support cross-searching, data exchange and digital archiving and through its use of open source a community of IT developers, standards developers and content specialists can be developed to sustain the network.