XXXVIII
IAH Congress
Groundwater Quality Sustainability
Krakow, 12–17 September 2010
Extended Abstracts
Editors:
Andrzej Zuber
Jarosław Kania
Ewa Kmiecik
University
of Silesia
Press 2010
abstract id:
210
topic: 2
Groundwater and dependent ecosystems
2.6
Groundwater in eco-hydrology
title:
Assessment of the groundwater ecosystem
author(s): Thomas Struppe
Struppe & Dr. Kuehn Umweltberatung GbR, Germany,
[email protected]
Stephan Kuehn
Struppe & Dr. Kuehn Umweltberatung GbR, Germany,
[email protected]
Christoph Charlé
Protekum Umweltinstitut GmbH, Germany,
[email protected]
keywords: groundwater, community, ecosystem, microbial, threshold
Krakow, Poland 2010
2. Groundwater and dependent ecosystems
INTRODUCTION
The role of organisms in the groundwater ecosystem for the global turnover of materials and
energy is not known. Estimations that 6–40% of the bacterial biomass of the earth is living
subterranean (Griebler, Lüders, 2008), show that the biomass of this ecosystem has great importance. The groundwater ecosystem plays a role in the global carbon and nitrogen cycles and
has importance for the quality of drinking water resources and surface water.
The groundwater ecosystem is characterized by geological, geochemical and hydrological conditions as abiotical factors. Under the given circumstances a typical biocoenosis is built, which is
fundamentally different from those in surface waters. Due to the darkness in the groundwater
biotop there are no primary production by photosynthesis. Nutrients are not produced on site
but yielded from outside. The area groundwater is largely anaerobic.
The quality of groundwater in Germany are assessed only by chemical criteria, at which toxicological aspects for humans stood in front as standards (Geringfügigkeitsschwellenwerte — no
deterioration clause). A groundwater damage occurred when these human toxicological standards were exceeded. In surface waters the quality is detected since a long time by indicator
organisms. This time research projects deal with the transfer of this system to groundwater and
to find some indicator organisms in groundwater. The EC groundwater directive
(2006/118/EC) demands “Research should be conducted to provide better criteria for ensuring
groundwater ecosystem quality”.
INDICATOR ORGANISMS IN GROUNDWATER
Due to the anaerobic conditions in the groundwater biotop the diversitiy of microorganisms is
much higher than the diversity of invertebrates. Invertebrates needs oxygen for their life and
are not able to exist in anaerobic deeper groundwater. Investigations to detect indicator organisms like crustaceans or nematods in groundwater for an assessment of biocoenosis can only be
used in groundwater areas under aerobic conditions. The research of this groundwater invertebrates are just beginning so this time neither an sufficient amount of species nor the knowledge
of their pretension to habitats and environmental conditions are present. There is a lack of
bioindicators for groundwater habitats.
Another problem is the sampling technique. The conditions in the well water are different from
the environment. So it is necessary to use a sampling technique that collects organisms of the
representative groundwater area. This is much easier for microorganisms than for invertebrates, because one can use a radial pump with high through flow according to the DIN/ISO.
This makes possible one sampling of groundwater for chemical and micro- and molecularbiological investigations. The results of the KORA project show that emissions out of landfills into
the groundwater have an influence of the ecosystem. The DGGE-fingerprints of bacteria in
groundwater influenced by landfill emissions differ, dependent from the concentrations of the
emissions, significantly from those of the not influenced ones (Struppe, 2006). So an assessment
of the groundwater ecosystem has to refer to main and can only refer to microorganisms.
METHODS
In this investigation the groundwater microbiocoenosis in the area of nine German landfills are
characterised by DGGE-Fingerprints and DNA-Microarrays. The DGGE-Fingerprints were done
XXXVIII IAH Congress
2.6. Groundwater in eco-hydrology
as described by Kilb (1999) and Eschweiler (1999). Parallel the emissions from the landfills into
the groundwater are determined.
The sample was taken according to the DIN 38 402 T13 with a Grundfos MP1-pump when the in
situ parameters show constant values and the volume of the well tube was exchanged three
times. Relative high through flow (10–12-L/min.) provides that sessile microorganisms will be
teared from aquifer material and registered. The groundwater sample then were anaerobically
filtered and the DNA was extracted, cleaned amplified by PCR and then separated by denaturing
gel electroohoresis (DGGE). The DGGE-Fingerprints were compared by Sørensen-indices and
Cluster analysis. The resulting dendrograms show the similarity between wells at one landfill.
For more information an additional quantification of the bacteria was done using fluorescent
dyes.
There is a definition of groundwater damage by Kerndorff et al. (2006), which we used too for
influence definition (Fig. 2). To define not influenced groundwater, the background concentrations have to be detected. This is done by adding the 84.1%-percentiles of the groundwater
main ions (Na, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, HCO3, NO3, NH4, Cl, SO4, TOC) of numerous groundwater
(Schleyer, Kerndoff, 1992). The sum is 760 mg/L. So groundwater with concentrations of
groundwater main ions <800 mg/L are defined as not influenced (neutral wells).
RESULTS
5004
5003
5001
4007
4125
5002
The results show that the landfills cause groundwater damages or at least an increase compared to the upstream. Normally the concentrations downstream are higher at the border of the
landfills and were decreasing with distance. A dendrogram of the Sørensen-indices of a landfill
shows that the microbiocoenosis of two wells is separated from the others (Fig. 1).
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
-0,1
-0,2
-0,3
-0,4
-0,5
-0,6
-0,7
Similarity
-0,8
-0,9
-1
-1,1
-1,2
-1,3
-1,4
-1,5
-1,6
-1,7
-1,8
-1,9
7
Figure 1. Clusterdendrogram of Sørensen-Indices from wells of a landfill.
One well (5003) is added to the neutral well (5004) the others are separated from the neutral
well. The concentrations of the main ions in the separated wells ranged from 1100 mg/L up to
Krakow, Poland 2010
2. Groundwater and dependent ecosystems
more than 2500 mg/L. The well 5003 has a concentration of maximal 600 mg/L and the neutral
well 390 mg/L. At all landfills it can be shown that downstream wells with concentrations of
main ions below 900 mg/L in clusterdendrograms of the DGGE-Fingerprints are added to the
neutral wells. If the concentrations of main ions are higher than 1200 mg/L the changes in the
groundwater microbiocoenosis compared to those of the neutral wells are so significant that
the wells are separated in clusterdendrograms (Tab. 1).
Table 1. Addition and separation of wells in clusteranalysis of Sørensen-Indices.
Landfill
Wells added to the
neutral well
Groundwater
main ions [mg/L]
Wells separated
from the neutral well
Groundwater
main ions [mg/L]
1
5003
599
4007, 5001, 4125, 5002
1088–2839
2
none
4653, 4654, 4010*,
4024*, 4042*
942–960
(533–940)*
3
4010, 4024, 4042
—
533–940
4003, 4011, 5008, 5009
1089–1788
4
4019, 5006
969–1015
4002, 4012, 5007, 4001
998–4368
5
none
6
none
—
DE16, DE II, DE VI, DE VIII
1303–1673
—
GWM 8, GWM 9, GWM 12
1733–5400
7
none
1634–5189
MA2a, MA16
—
W08/029, W08/032
8
260–1174
GWM 18
3652
9
P5/01, P4/01
787–808
none
* wells are added at landfill 3 to the neutral well.
Wells with concentrations between 900 and 1200 mg/L are sometimes separated from neutral
and sometimes added to the neutral well. So this is similar to the groundwater damage definition by Kerndorff et al. (2006) (Fig. 2).
Figure 2. Thresholds for assessment of groundwater and groundwater ecosystem damages.
It is possible to define a threshold of non-toxic emissions, which causes significant differences in
the groundwater ecosystem. Of special interest is that the threshold of 900 mg/L is the same for
a groundwater damage and for not influenced groundwater microbiocoenosis. These changes in
assembles of groundwater microorganisms can cause in two effects. First there are toxic effects
of other components in the emissions, which lead to a decrease of bacterial diversity and
amount. Second there are adaptations of the bacterial settlement to the emissions, which lead to
an increase of bacterial amounts, caused by better nutrition situation downstream of landfills.
XXXVIII IAH Congress
2.6. Groundwater in eco-hydrology
Quantifications of bacteria at the investigated landfills show that both effects can be observed.
At one landfill the amount of bacteria near the landfill is lower than some 50 meters away, although the concentration of the main ions is higher. This is caused by pesticide containing emissions (Fig 3). At the other landfills the amount of the bacteria show an increase downstream,
which is decreasing with distance and concentration of the main ions and nutrients.
Figure 3. Amount of bacteria in groundwater of a landfill.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
A significant change of groundwater biocoenosis caused by non toxic landfill emissions is possible. Above a threshold of 1200 mg/L main ions in groundwater the assemblage of microorganisms changes. This is an adaptation to the nutrient offer and coupled with an increase of the
amount of bacteria in groundwater. This adaptation and increase is leading to natural attenuation effects. If the change is caused by toxic emissions the abundance of the bacteria decreases.
This is of great importance for the assessment of groundwater biocoenosis. A change in
groundwater micorbiocoenosis together with a decrease of the amount of microorganisms is
considered as a damage. On the other hand an adaptation leading to natural attenuation is a
“positive damage” in microbiocoenosis which reduce the geochemical damage. This is a difference to the assessment of surface water. The DGGE fingerprints allows only the comparison
between influenced and not influenced groundwater microbicoenoses. The fingerprints give no
information about the species behind the bands in the gel but they detect species, so local differences are emphasized to much. Desiderable are an evidence about the biodiversity in
groundwater habitats. This will be possible by using DNA-microarrays which can differentiate
groups of microorganisms with respect to their dependence on metabolism. The outlined investigation could be improved by using DNA-microarrays and is a field proved standard for the
description of the groundwater ecosystem quality.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors wish to thank the BMBF for funding KORA TV 4.1 (FKZ.:0330501) and for funding
the following project PRONABAC (FKZ: 033 R040 A).
REFERENCES
Eschweiler B., 1999: Charakterisierung der mikrobiellen Besiedlung von Grundwässern unterschiedlicher Beschaffenheit mittels molekularbiologischer Methoden (PCR, DGGE). Veröffentlichungen des Inst. f. Wasserforschung GmbH Dortmund und der Dortmunder Energie und Wasserversorgung GmbH, Nr. 57, Dortmund.
Krakow, Poland 2010
2. Groundwater and dependent ecosystems
Griebler C., Lüders T., 2008: Microbial biodiversity in groundwater ecosystems. Freshwater Biology, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Kerndorff H., Kühn S., Minden T., Orlikowski D., Struppe T., 2006: Schutzgutspezifische Bewertung
von Grundwasserkontaminationen durch Altablagerungen mit dem Ziel einer passiven Sanierung
mittels natürlicher Selbstreinigungskräfte (NA). Altlastenspektrum 15, Heft 1/2006, pp. 9–20.
Kilb B., 1999: Analyse mikrobieller Lebensgemeinschaften in anaeroben Grundwassersystemen
mittels molekulargenetischer Methoden. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Wasserforschung
GmbH in Kooperation mit der Wasserwerke Westfalen GmbH, der Westfälische Wasser- und
Umweltanalytik GmbH und der Dortmunder Energie und Wasserversorgung GmbH, Heft 59,
Dortmund.
Schleyer R., Kerndorff H., 1992: Die Grundwasserqualität westdeutscher Trinkwasserressourcen.
Groundwater quality of Western Germany drinking water ressources — VCH Verlag, Weinheim,
New York, Basel, Cambridge, 249 p.
Struppe Th., Kühn St., Kerndorff H., 2006: Development of molecular genetic research methods
for the ecological evaluation of groundwater. Proc. of the Hydro Eco 2006 Conference, Karlovy
Vary, 11.–14 Sept. 2006.
XXXVIII IAH Congress
International Association of Hydrogeologists
AGH University of Science and Technology
2-vol. set + CD
ISSN 0208-6336
ISBN 978-83-226-1979-0