Proceedings of the 12th International Congress
on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East
Volume 2
Proceedings
of the 12th International Congress
on the Archaeology
of the Ancient Near East
06-09 April 2021,
Bologna
Edited by
Nicolò Marchetti, Francesca Cavaliere, Enrico Cirelli,
Claudia D’Orazio, Gabriele Giacosa, Mattia Guidetti,
Eleonora Mariani
2023
Harrassowitz Verlag · Wiesbaden
Proceedings of the 12th International
Congress on the Archaeology
of the Ancient Near East
Volume 2
Field Reports
Islamic Archaeology
2023
Harrassowitz Verlag · Wiesbaden
Cover illustration: © David Hawkins and Giulia Roberto
Typesetting: Federica Proni
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (BY-SA)
which means that the text may be used for commercial use, distribution and duplication
in all media.
For details go to: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en.
Creative Commons license terms for re-use do not apply to any content (such as graphs,
figures, photos, excerpts, etc.) not original to the Open Access publication and further
permission may be required from the rights holder. The obligation to research and clear
permission lies solely with the party re-using the material.
Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek
The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie;
detailed bibliographic data are available on the internet at https://www.dnb.de/.
For further information about our publishing program consult our website
https://www.harrassowitz-verlag.de/
© by the authors, when not credited otherwise.
Published by Otto Harrassowitz GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden 2023
Printed on permanent/durable paper.
Printing and binding: Hubert & Co., Göttingen
Printed in Germany
ISBN 978-3-447-11903-0
Ebook ISBN 978-3-447-39354-6
DOI 10.13173/9783447119030
Contents of Vol. 2
Nicolò Marchetti, Francesca Cavaliere, Claudia D’Orazio, Gabriele Giacosa,
Eleonora Mariani
Foreword to the Section “Field Reports”
1
Field Reports
Adelheid Otto
A New Archaeological Response to an Old Question: When and how Did
Ur Recover in the Old Babylonian Period?
5
Alexander Ahrens
Preliminary Report on the Results of the Excavations at Tall Bleibil in 2018
and 2019
19
Firas Al-Haj Ali
The Church Mosaic Pavement of Tell Bajer (Syria)
33
Michel Al-Maqdissi, Georges Mouamar
The Akkar Plain during the Bronze Age: Preliminary Notes
45
Anna Anguissola, Silvana Costa, Antonio Monticolo
Growth, Ownership, and Circulation: New Research in the Northern
Necropolis of Hierapolis, Phrygia (Turkey)
55
Simone Arnhold, Paata Bukhrashvili, Shorena Davitashvili Zurab Tskvitinidze
New Data on the East Georgian Late Iron Age
67
Edward B. Banning, Kevin Gibbs
A Yarmoukian Site in Wadi Quseiba, Northern Jordan
81
Shay Bar
Tel Esur: Ten Seasons of Excavations and a Long-Lasting Community
Archaeology Project
89
Felix Blocher, Paata Bukhrashvili, Shorena Davitashvili
Excavations at Nazarlebi (East Georgia) 2017–2019: A Late Bronze/Early
Iron Age Sanctuary
103
VI
Alessandra Caselli
Jebel al-Mutawwaq and the Middle Wadi az-Zarqa Region during the
4th Millennium BC: Results of a Comprehensive Research Based on the
Reanalysis of the Hanbury-Tenison’s Survey
115
Antonietta Catanzariti, Terri Tanaka, Amy Richardson
Results from the 2018 and 2019 Excavation Seasons at Ban Qala, Iraqi
Kurdistan
129
Hanan Charaf
The Akkar Plain Survey, Lebanon (1997, 1999): The Late Bronze Age
143
Franco D’Agostino, Philippe Quenet, Anne-Caroline Rendu Loisel
Tell Abu Shahrayn – Eridu: Les nouvelles recherches de l’équipe AMEr
(2018-2021)
161
Roberto Dan, Annarita S. Bonfanti, Priscilla Vitolo, Soseh Aghaian,
Artur Petrosyan
From Urartu to the Orontids: Seven Years (2013-2019) of Armenian – Italian
Excavations at the Site of Solak-1/Varsak (KSP016), Hrazdan River Valley,
Armenia
177
Rita Dolce
A Look Upstream from Qasr Shemamok. Soundings at the Site of Kandara
Qal (Iraqi Kurdistan)
191
Itai Elad, Yitzhak Paz
‘En Esur: An EB IB Urban Center in the Coastal Plain of Israel and its Role
in the Early Urbanization of the Southern Levant
203
Peter M. Fischer
Hala Sultan Tekke, Cyprus: A Trade Centre’s Intercultural Contacts in the
Bronze Age
217
Elisabetta Gallo, Romel Gharib, Licia De Vito, Gaia Cecconi, Michele De Marco,
Lorenzo Nigro
Khirbet Al-Batrawy in North-Central Jordan: New Discoveries in the Early
Bronze Age Palace, 2018-2020
229
Boris Gasparyan, Roberto Dan, Levon Aghikyan, Priscilla Vitolo, Soseh Aghaian,
Ani Adigyozalyan, Chiara Zecchi, Annarita Bonfanti, Artur Petrosyan
Preliminary Results of the Excavation of an Urartian Burial in
Aghavnadzor, Vayots Dzor, Armenia
243
Francesca Giusto
The Sanctuary of Kal-e Chendar (Shami) and its Setting
257
VII
Giuseppe Guarino, Daniele Alaimo
Magnetometry in the Outer Town of Karkemish: New Discoveries
271
Hidemasa Hashimoto, Hisao Kuwabara, Takuzo Onozuka, Shuichi Hasegawa
Excavating at the Lower Shelf of Tel Rekhesh
281
Kristen Hopper, Elena Rova, Davit Kvavadze
Kurgans, Churches and Karvasla: Preliminary Results from the First Two
Seasons of the Lagodekhi Archaeological Survey, Georgia
293
Krzysztof Jakubiak
From Catastrophe to Catastrophe. Changes, Destructions, and Other
Factors. Research on the Small Iron Age Town of Metsamor (Aras Valley
Armenia)
305
Vakhtang Licheli, Roberto Dan, Tamar Chogovadze, Priscilla Vitolo,
Tornike Chilingarashvili, Andrea Cesaretti
The Samtskhe-Javakheti Project: Preliminary Results of the 2019 GeorgianItalian Archaeological Expedition in Southern Georgia
319
Carlo Lippolis
Some Considerations on the Archaeological Area of Tulūl Al-Baqarat
(Wasit, Iraq)
333
Romolo Loreto
Dūmat al-Jandal, Ancient Adummatu. An Appraisal of 12 Years
of Archaeological Activities in a North Arabian Oasis: from the Prehistory
to the Assyrian Period
349
Eleonora Mariani, Giulia Roberto
Digging in the Excavation Records: The Case of Woolley’s 1913 Yunus
Notebook
363
Maria Grazia Masetti-Rouault
Qasr Shemamok: Late Bronze Levels, and Before. A Report about the 2018
and 2019 Campaigns
373
Davide Nadali, Andrea Polcaro
Tell Zurghul, Ancient Nigin, Iraq: Preliminary Report of the New Results
from Recent Excavations
387
Lorenzo Nigro
Jericho. From the Neolithic to the Bronze and Iron Ages: The Urban
Diversity
399
VIII
Takahiro Odaka, Osamu Maeda, Kazuya Shimogama, Yuichi S. Hayakawa,
Yoshihiro Nishiaki, Nawshirwan A. Mohammed, Kamal Rasheed
Late Prehistoric Investigations at Shakar Tepe, the Shahrizor Plain, Iraqi
Kurdistan: Preliminary Results of the First Season (2019)
415
Aynur Özfırat
The Region of Mount Ağrı during the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age
(Kura-Araxes)
429
Nino Pataridze, Davit Darejanashvili
Paravani Archaeological Project, Expedition Results (2018-2020)
449
Metoda Peršin
The Lebanon Mountain Range in the Middle Bronze Age: The Case of
Qornet ed-Deir, Jabal Moussa Biosphere Reserve
461
Artur Petrosyan, Andrea Cesaretti, Priscilla Vitolo, Boris Gasparyan,
Onofrio Gasparro, Roberto Dan
Kaghsi-2, Meghradzor-1 and Berdi Glukh: Three Recently Discovered
Kura-Araxes Sites in the Kotayk Region, Armenia
475
Luca Peyronel
The Italian Archaeological Expedition in the Erbil Plain (Kurdistan Region
of Iraq). A Summary of Four Seasons of Excavations at Helawa (2016-2019)
487
Andrea Polcaro, Juan Ramon Muniz
The 2018 and 2019 Spanish-Italian Archaeological Campaigns at Jebel alMutawwaq: the Early Bronze I Site and the Megalithic Necropolis
499
Babak Rafiei-Alavi, Ali Shojaee-Esfahani, Yaser Jebreili
The Center of the Iranian Plateau during the Early Bronze Age: New
Archaeological Excavations in the Eastern Zone of the Zāyandehrud River
Basin, Varzaneh
511
Suzanne Richard, Jesse C. Long, Marta D’Andrea
Shedding Light on the Urban/Rural Nexus about 2500 BCE: The 2019
Excavations at Khirbat Iskandar, Jordan
523
Giulia Roberto
The Evidence for Iron Age II Funerary Rituals in the Necropolis of Yunus
in Light of the Turco-Italian Excavations
537
Licia Romano, Franco D’Agostino
Abu Tbeirah: Preliminary Report on the 2018-2019 Excavations
549
IX
Elena Rova, Davit Kvavadze
Two Seasons of Excavations at the Chalcolithic Site of Tsiteli Gorebi 5
(Lagodekhi Municipality, Georgia)
559
Mahnaz Sharifi
New Evidence of Early, Middle and Late Chalcolithic Periods at Chelamiran
Gheshlagh in the 5th Millennium BC
573
Hakob Ye. Simonyan, Gregory E. Areshian
Empire Beyond its Palaces: New Discoveries at the Urartian Necropolis of
Karmir-Blur (Armenia)
587
Aline Tenu
Kunara: An Early Bronze Age City in the Zagros Foothills. The 2018 and
2019 Seasons of Excavations
603
Stefano Valentini, Bakhtiyar Jalilov, Nicola Laneri, Guido Guarducci,
Lorenzo Crescioli
A Preliminary Report on a Mid-Late Fourth Millennium BC Kurgan in
Western Azerbaijan
619
Regis Vallet
Larsa and Tell El ‘Uwaili (Iraq), Preliminary Results (2019-2021)
629
Margherita Andrea Valsecchi Gillmeister
Landscape Survey in Cross-check. Comparing the Late Bronze Age Survey
Assemblage, Excavation Data and Geophysical Prospections at Oymaağaç
Höyük/Nerik (Turkey)
647
Mattia Guidetti
Foreword to the Section “Islamic Archaeology”
661
Islamic Archaeology
Daniel Varga, Federico Kobrin
A Settlement from Late Antiquity and the Beginning of the Middle Ages at
Sderot
665
Ignacio Arce
Two New Umayyad Mosques at Abila of the Decapolis and at Shuqayra alGharbiyye, Jordan
679
X
Martin Gussone
Umayyad New Urban Palatial Satellite Settlements. The Caliphal Residence
of Resafa – Rusafat Hisham in the Context of Early Islamic Transcultural
Urbanism
699
Itamar Taxel, Joel Roskin
An Early Islamic Groundwater-Harvesting Plot-and-Berm Sand
Agroecosystem to the South of Caesarea: Preliminary Results of Its 2020
Survey and Excavation
717
Alastair Northedge
Akyrtas, Early Islamic Architecture in Central Asia, and its Near Eastern
Models
735
Andrea Luigi Corsi
A Morphological and Technical Analysis of the Architectural Stuccoes
from the Early Abbasid Friday Mosque of Isfahan (767 CE)
749
Ana Marija Grbanovic
Between Tradition and Innovation: the Art of Ilkhanid Stucco Revetments
in Iran
763
Marco Rossi
La phase islamique de Tell Deinit (Idlib), Syrie
779
Valentina Gallerani, Valentina Vezzoli
Islamic Europos: Preliminary Results of the Turco-Italian Archaeological
Excavations
793
Vadim V. Gorbunov, Alexey A. Tishkin, Nikolay N. Seregin
An Early Medieval Sword from Altai: Comprehensive Analysis and
Analogies
805
Iman Aghajani, Maryam Moeini, Moslem Mishmastnehi
Imāmzāda ‘Abdallāh at Kūdzar, Iran: New Insights Regarding
its Architectural Revetments
819
Lorenz Korn
The Earliest Monumental Dome Chambers in Iranian Mosques.
Archaeological Evidence for the History of Architecture
837
Christian Fuchs, Bahram Ajorloo
The Rab‘-e Rashīdī Site in Tabriz (Iran) and its Architectural Remains
851
XI
Thomas Lorain, Bahram Ajorloo, Lorenz Korn
Preliminary Results of the Iranian-German Archaeological Campaign at the
Rab‘-i Rashīdī Complex in Tabriz
867
Soraya Afshari, Leila Afshari, Mohammad Rahmatpour
Emergency Excavations in the Area Around the Kabood and Modavar
Towers in Maragheh, North-West Iran
879
Amin Moradi, Marco G. Brambilla
The Mega-Structure of Ali-Shah at Tabriz: Mosque or Mausoleum?
887
Karel Nováček, Miroslav Melčák
Meaning in Flux: A Reconsideration of the Shrines of Badr al-Din Lu’lu’ in
Mosul
905
Valentina Bruccoleri, Jacopo Bruno
Timurid Imitations of Chinese Porcelain in Turkmenistan
917
Luca Colliva, Serenella Mancini
The Erbil Citadel Ceramic Corpus: A preliminary Analysis of the Main
Productions and Their Relationships with Archaeological Stratigraphy
931
Stephanie Döpper
Mud-Brick Villages and Open-Air Mosques: The Late Islamic Landscape of
the Al-Mudhaybi Region in Central Oman
945
Foreword to the Section “Field Reports”
Nicolò Marchetti, Francesca Cavaliere, Claudia D’Orazio, Gabriele Giacosa
and Eleonora Mariani
Field reports generally represent the largest relative share of papers at the ICAANE.
Reassessments of old excavations fall in this category as well. In Bologna, 95 papers were
presented in four parallel sessions and 49 of them are published here. They have been simply
arranged according to the alphabetic order of first authors (with the exception of course of
the keynote paper, opening this section). They attest to a diversity of agencies, methods,
perspectives and urgencies which represent a singular asset of our field.
While new digital architectures of knowledge are about to deeply transform the ways
of our scientific dissemination, these reports do supply in the meanwhile loads of new information on near eastern sites, as well as on neighbouring areas, which are all too often
insufficiently considered in our discussions.
DOI: 10.13173/9783447119030.001
Field Reports
The Akkar Plain Survey, Lebanon (1997, 1999):
The Late Bronze Age
Hanan Charaf1
Abstract
Of the 89 sites examined within the Akkar Plain Survey (1997 and 1999), only 11 yielded
Late Bronze Age (LBA, c. 1550– c. 1200 BCE) pottery attesting to a substantial – but not
surprising – reduction in human occupation of the plain during this period. Out of the hundreds of sherds found at those 11 sites, only 66 dated to the LBA. Most of the LBA pottery
collected from the survey came from the sites of Tell Humaira and Tell Biri, both located by
the Nahr el-Kebir River (ancient Eleutheros). As it is typical of ceramic material from surveys, most of the pottery was in sherd form. The only complete objects were from a looted
tomb at Tell Humaira that yielded local and imported material. Study of the ceramic material shows a ceramic repertoire that belongs to the productions of the Akkar Plain known
from the site of Tell Arqa, indicating that these 11 eleven sites belong to a homogeneous
local cultural sphere.
The Akkar Plain Survey Project took place in 1997 and 1999 in the Akkar Plain in northern Lebanon2. The Akkar Plain is the largest coastal plain in the Levant covering an area of
more than 450 km2. Today, it is divided between Lebanon and Syria, and the river Nahr el-Kebir River (the ancient Eleutheros) acts as the dividing border between the two countries. The
German-Lebanese survey project was directed by Karin Bartl (Freie Universität, Berlin)
and Anis Chaaya (Directorate General of Antiquities-DGA and the Lebanese University).
This joint expedition followed a Lebanese field survey in 1996 directed by A. Chaaya on
behalf of the DGA in the southern and eastern parts of the plain. The two survey campaigns
covered the coastal plain of Akkar and the surrounding hilly region. They revealed extensive human occupation of this coastal area throughout history. This is not exceptional as the
strategic location of this plain offers with its surrounding hilly area, one of the rare natural
openings in the Mount Lebanon-Ansariyeh mountain chains towards inland Syria, an opening traditionally known as the Homs Gap. This study presents the archaeological results
from the Late Bronze Age, focusing primarily on the pottery collected from the field surveys. Historically, the three-city political system that prevailed over the Akkar in the Middle
Bronze Age (MBA) and during the first part of the LBA, collapsed and was replaced, by
the Egyptians, by a central administration that ruled from the city of Simira/Sumur (Tell
Kazel). Archaeologically, Level 12 of Tell Arqa witnesses total destruction that can be rea1
2
Lebanese University.
My deepest thanks go to Karin Bartl for entrusting me with the study of the Late Bronze Age results
from the surveys. I am indebted to the late Anis Chaaya for involving me in this project.
DOI: 10.13173/9783447119030.143
144
Hanan Charaf
sonably attributed to Thutmose III, as testified to in his Annals (Pritchard 1955: 241). Level
11 of Tell Arqa, dated to the LB II, marks a noticeable shift from a prosperous city to a
rural settlement. The cities of Irqata (Arqa) and Simira/Sumur are cited several times in the
Amarna tablet which mention also the Habiru, disenfranchised West Semitic and other peoples, many evidently semi-nomadic, who lived on the outskirts of the cities and in the hills
of Syria-Palestine, and posed a significant threat to cities in the Akkar region like Tell Kazel
and Tell Arqa killing eventually the king of this latter city, Aduna (Moran 1987: 253, EA75).
Internal politics during the reign of Amenhotep IV (Akhenaten) and Tutankhamun contributed to a shift of focus away from the Levant that benefited the Hittites and the kingdom of
Amurru, that included the northern hills and mountains of Lebanon and the northern part
of the Bekaa Valley (Van de Mieroop 2004: 156). Abdi-Ashirta and his son Aziru were the
first known princes of this kingdom. A study based on petrographic analysis of the Amarna
tablets suggests that Ardata (modern Arde in northern Lebanon) was “the capital of Amurru
during the later years of Abdi-Ashirta and the early years of Aziru” (Goren, Finkelstein and
Na’aman 2003: 9). Aziru will then transfer his seat of power to Irqata from where he will
conduct destructive raids into Simira/Sumur and Tunip (modern Tell Asharneh in Syria).
Settlement Patterns of the Late Bronze Age in the Plain of Akkar
The German-Lebanese surveys identified 89 sites divided into tells, tombs and necropoleis, dwellings/farms/hamlets, and areas with cut rocks that could be unfinished tombs or
quarries. The 1997 survey was published in several preliminary articles (Bartl 1998-1999;
2002a; 2002b) but the final results of the entire project are still awaiting publication. Out of
the 52 surveyed sites in 1997, 42 were labeled as archaeological. Out of those, 18 were ancient mounds or tells easily recognizable in the flat landscape of the plain (Fig. 1). The 1999
survey added 47 new identified archaeological sites but those results are still unpublished.
Of the 89 sites surveyed in 1997 and 1999, only eleven yielded LBA pottery (Tell Bibi,
Tell Biri, Tell Cheikh Mohammad, Dahr es-Sultan, el-Qlouaa, Tell Hayat I, Tell Humaira,
Khirbet Jindi, Tell Kiri, Tell Arqa and Tell Sebeel). However, since three sites (Tell Cheikh
Mohammad, Tell Hayat I, and Dahr es-Sultan) had very few LBA material, their proper
existence in the LBA period can be reasonably questioned. The 1986-1987 surveys in the
Syrian part of the plain conducted by J.-P. Thalmann and M. al-Maqdissi identified 17 sites,
all of them tells, and six of those sites (Mandara, Qubaibe, Abou Abid, Frach, Bseise, and
Jamous3) yielded LBA material (al-Maqdissi and Thalmann 1989). The distribution of the
LBA sites in the Lebanese part of the Akkar revealed that nearly all sites were located either
by a river (Tell Biri and Tell Humaira by Nahr el-Kebir, Tell Bibi and Tell Abbas el-Gharbi
by Nahr el-Estouene, Tell Arqa by Nahr Arqa), or at the foot of the hills (el-Qlouaa). These
locations provided means of subsistence (river) or shelter (hills). Except for Tell Sebeel and
Tell Kiri, other sites in the proper plain and not located by a river seem abandoned during the
LBA. This settlement pattern is replicated in the Syrian Akkar where the sites of Jamous,
Frach, Bseise, Abou Abid and Tell Kazel are located by rivers while Mandara and Qubaibe
occupy the northern edge of the plain. Note that in the entire plain, only one site, Cheikh
Zenad, was found by the seashore and dates to the Iron Age and the classical period (Bartl
2007–2008). All the sites that exhibit timid LBA presence were quite prosperous during
3
The prominent site of Tell Kazel, probably the most important tell for the LBA in the Akkar Plain, was
not surveyed since it was already under excavations by the American University of Beirut Museum.
The Akkar Plain Survey, Lebanon (1997, 1999): The Late Bronze Age
145
the previous Early Bronze Age (EBA) II–III and MBA periods, the two main occupation
periods in the Akkar Plain as attested in both Syrian and Lebanese-German surveys. For
example, the excavations at Tell Arqa have revealed a prosperous city during the EBA and
MBA but also during the LB I (Charaf 2016: 734-735; Thalmann 2000: 63-71; 2006: 69-79),
and the city’s decline came immediately after its destruction, presumably by Thutmose III.
Level 11 dated to the end of the LBA uncovered flimsy structures indicating a sharp decline
in occupation of the site (Charaf 2020: 46-53).
The settlement pattern in the Akkar plain resembles that of the Levant during the LBA,
when the region witnessed a dramatic change. The southern Levant was affected early on
in the LB I with the destruction and abandonment of numerous MBA sites (Gonen 1992:
216-217; Bunimovitz 1995). During the LB II, more cities were resettled or were newly
established but their average size of 5 ha, far less than the large MBA settlements, denotes
probably also a decrease in the size of the population (Mazar 1992: 240). By contrast, studies
of the LBA settlement patterns in Syria and Lebanon are still rare and do not provide a very
thorough picture of human occupation. However, they do confirm the low levels of occupation during the LBA. For example, surveys of the Bekaa Valley revealed a 50% decline
in occupation during the LBA with only 46 sites with LBA pottery (Marfoe 1995: maps 22
and 23; Bonatz 2002: 300). The reasons for settlement decline in the Akkar in the latter part
of the LB I and in the LB II are still unknown even if several theories have been suggested
(climatic, political or military). The restructuring of the plain led to the establishment of one
center, Tell Kazel, which controlled the entire plain until the end of the LBA. At this time,
Tell Arqa and Tell Jamous are small rural sites administratively dependent on Kazel. The
smaller sites that lived in the shadow of the three main sites during the Early and Middle
Bronze Age periods were abandoned. Excavations of the LB II levels at Tell Arqa (Level 11)
and at Tell Kazel (Level 6) confirm this pattern.
The Late Bronze Age pottery
Most of the LBA pottery collected from the survey came from Tell Humaira (36 vessels) and
Tell Biri (18 vessels). As is typical to ceramic material from surveys, all the recovered pottery was unfortunately in sherd form. The only complete objects were from a looted tomb at
Tell Humaira that were stored in a villager’s house. Luckily, K. Bartl was able to take some
pictures of these objects on display (Fig. 4: 8–14). The pottery gathered from the survey
was sorted according to period. Out of the hundreds of sherds found on the various sites,
only 66 were dated to the LBA (Fig. 2). This amount included nine Cypriot sherds and one
Mycenaean fragment. Rims and handles constitute the bulk of shapes found in the survey
along with some bases (Fig. 3). Other well-attested forms are pithoi (9 examples) and cooking pots (5 rims). Even on stratified sites, cooking pots are rarely preserved in their entirety,
unless they are found in situ. This is best explained by their friable fabric made with a coarse
temper that resists badly the hard taphonomic conditions and by their repeated exposure to
high temperatures fragilizing the vessel.
Plates
Three plates came from three sites: Tell Kiri, Tell Humaira and Tell Biri. The two rims from
Tell Humaira (Fig. 4: 1) and Tell Kiri (Fig. 4: 2) belong to large platters that span the entire
LBA. These platters appear already in the Levant during the MBA, but with incurved rims
146
Hanan Charaf
and frequent radial burnishing. The Tell Humaira vessel is made from fine buff clay that
was completely oxidized. It has straight sides and a round rim, and most probably had a flat
base according to examples from Tell Arqa (Charaf 2004: fig. 4). Parallels for this type of
plate are found all over the Levant from Tell Ajjul (Fischer and Sadeq 2002: fig. 51: 1, H1),
Megiddo (Loud 1948: pl. 54: 2, 7-9, 12, pl. 61: 13-16), Hazor (Ben-Tor and Bonfil 1997:
fig. II.20: 2, 5; fig. II.27: 17), Pella (McNicoll, Smith and Hennessy 1982: pl.111: 10), Beth
Shan (Oren 1973: fig. 188: 2, 8, 11), Kamed el-Loz (Marfoe 1995: fig. 84: 4), Tell el-Ghassil
(Doumet-Serhal 1996: pl. 52: 1), Tyre (Bikai 1978: pl. LIIA: 8), Sidon-Dakerman (Saidah
2004: fig. 13: 22, fig. 32: 75), Sidon-College Site (Doumet-Serhal 2011-2012: pls. 23-26,
pl. 34: 2-7, 10), Sarepta (Anderson 1988: pl. 23: 7, pl. 24: 10, pl. 27: 12), Beirut (Badre 1997:
fig. 23: 10-11, 13), Arqa (Charaf forthcoming: fig. 6: 1-4; Thalmann 2000: fig. 59), Tell Kazel
(Badre et al. 1994: fig. 62), Tell Afis (Mazzoni 2002: pl. VIII: 8), Ugarit (Monchambert
2004: figs. 1, 9-10, 12; Schaeffer 1949: fig. 54: 2, fig. 58: 2), Alalakh (McClellan 1989:
fig. 35: 3b) to Tarsus (Goldman 1956: fig. 384: 1125). The Tell Kiri plate has an interior-thickened rim found more frequently in the LB II and similar to parallels found at Hazor
(Yadin et al. 1958: pl. CV: 7; 1961: pl. CCLXXXVIII: 5; Ben-Tor and Bonfil 1997: fig. II.16:
3, fig. II.20: 8-9), Dan (Ben-Dov 2002: fig. 2.54: 2-3), Kamed el-Loz (Hachmann 1980:
pl. 1: 2), Sidon-Dakerman (Saidah 1977: pl. 11: 16, pl. 15: 24, pl. 42: 108-109), Sidon-College
Site (Doumet-Serhal 2011-2012: pl. 15: 12–20), Sarepta (Anderson 1988: pl. 21: 18, pl. 23:
17, pl. 24: 1), Beirut (Badre 1997: fig. 23: 13) and Ugarit (Schaeffer 1949: fig. 82: 12; 1969:
fig. 4: j). In the Akkar region, such plates were found at Tell Kazel (Badre et al. 1994: fig. 42:
e), Tell Arqa (Thalmann 2006: pl. 117: 11) and in the megalithic tombs of Haklet Bou Dib 1,
Mellul Bur 4, Djabouriyeh and Kseir (Steimer 1996: pl. XI: 3).
Closed bowls
Closed bowls were not found in quantity in the survey material. Only three closed bowls
came from two sites: Tell Humaira and Cheikh Mohammad. The bowl from Tell Humaira
(Fig. 4: 3) is made from an orange fabric popular during the LB II in the Akkar Plain. The
tapered upper body could belong to smooth-carinated bowls that appeared during the 13th
century BCE. Outside of the Akkar region, Dan produced a similar bowl in a LB II context
(Ben-Dov 2002: fig. 2.30: 7). It could also be a pedestal bowls similar to examples found
at Hazor (Yadin et al. 1958: pl. LXXXVII: 8, pl. CVII: 10; 1960: pl. CXVIII: 25). Another
closed bowl from Tell Humaira (Fig. 4: 4) doubtlessly belongs to the Akkar Plain, and especially to one peculiar stylistic pattern from this region most likely imported from northeastern Syria. The rim of this bowl is incised with three fine lines on leather-hard clay. Such
décor is known at Tell Arqa since the MBA on the shoulders of cooking pots or jars and the
neck or rims of globular or carinated closed bowls (Thalmann 2006: pl. 87, pl. 95: 11, pl. 99:
1, 4, pl. 100: 5-8, pl. 105: 1-6, pl. 107: 13-20, pl. 110: 5-6). This type of decoration was also
found on MB II closed bowls in the collective tomb at Tell Sukas (Thrane 1978: fig. 59).
It continues into the LB I on carinated bowls (Charaf 2004: fig. 4) and small closed bowls
(Charaf 2004: fig. 5), but it ceases to exist in the LB II.
Jugs and Juglets
Six jugs and juglets were found in the Akkar Plain Survey. They all belong to shapes known
elsewhere in the Levant. The jug from Tell Bibi (Fig. 4: 5) has a rim typical to all the jugs and
juglets from LB I contexts at Tell Arqa with oval body, flat base and vertical strap handle
The Akkar Plain Survey, Lebanon (1997, 1999): The Late Bronze Age
147
(Charaf 2004: fig. 5; Thalmann 2000: fig. 58; 2006: pl. 109: 1–5). Such rim can be circular or
pinched to form a spouted mouth. The jug from Tell Humaira (Fig. 4: 7) belongs to the same
type but with a simple rim that has good parallels in the LB II at Levantine sites like Pella
(Smith 1973: pl. 51: 155), Lachish (Tufnell 1958: pl. 75: 695), Hazor (Yadin et al. 1960: pl.
CXXXIX: 14), Dan (Ben-Dov 2002: fig. 2.57: 30-31), Sidon-Dakerman (Saidah 1977: pl. 9:
12), Kamed el-Loz (Hachmann 1970: pl. 6: 6; 1980: pl. 33: 1), Tell Kazel (Badre et al. 1994:
fig. 47: c), Tell Nebi Mend (Bourke 1993: fig. 22: 2) and Ras Ibn Hani (Bounni, Lagarce and
Lagarce 1998: fig. 152: 2).
A private collection kept in the home of a villager at Tell Humaira contained four juglets.
Two were complete in form and two had the neck missing. These jugs must have come from
a looted tomb on the tell since many robber trenches were identified on the mound during the
survey. These juglets have an orange to red clay tempered with coarse grits of limestone. Since
I was not able to see these objects in person the present description is based on photos provided
by K. Bartl. The juglet with ovoid body and flat base (Fig. 4: 8) has a wide, tall neck, a pinched
mouth and a strap handle. It is simply wet smoothed. Such juglets, though rare, were found on
Levantine coastal sites such Tell Kazel (Badre and Gubel 1999-2000: fig. 9: g, fig. 11: g-j, fig.
24: l-n) and Alalakh (McClellan 1989: fig. 34: 50). However, a perfect parallel was found in
the tomb of Tell Jatt which was dated by the excavators to the LB I (Yannai 2000: fig. 4: 54).
Based on petrographic analysis, E. Yannai, A. Gorzalczany and M. Peilstocker believe that
this type of juglet reached Palestine from the Syro-Lebanese coast (Yannai, Gorzalczany and
Peilstocker 2003: pl. 1: 18). If true, then this might support a northern origin for this shape.
Unfortunately, given a lack of thorough analysis of the fabric composition, I can neither confirm nor rule out its Akkar origin. Two sites in the southern Levant, Dan and Hazor, known to
gravitate towards the northern cultural sphere have yielded similar juglets, but with a narrower
neck and dated to LB I/II (Ben-Dov 2002: fig. 2.30: 18; Ben-Tor and Bonfil 1997: fig. II.15).
The similar juglet but with a narrower base (Fig. 4: 11) is well attested in LB II contexts at
Sidon-Dakerman (Saidah 2004: fig. 11: 19, fig. 40: 106) and Ugarit (Schaeffer 1939: 82, fig.
74: ZA). The wet-smoothed juglet with ovoid body and button base (Fig. 4: 10) is a popular
shaped during the MB II and the LB I. It was mainly found in MBA tombs at Megiddo (Loud
1948: pl. 20: 12, pl. 24: 8), Hazor (Ben-Tor and Bonfil 1997: fig. II.10: 3) and Pella (McNicoll
et al. 1982: pl. 107: 12, pl. 110: 10). However, this type of juglet is not limited to the MBA and
continues into the LB I at Tell Arqa where it was also found mainly in tombs (Charaf 2004:
fig. 7). The last juglet from the villager’s collection belongs to the dipper juglet type with an
ovoid body, round base and a round mouth instead of a pinched one (Fig. 4: 9). Similar juglets
were found in the tombs of Sidon-Dakerman (Saidah 2004: fig. 7: 7).
Cooking pots
Five cooking pots were recovered from the survey material at four sites: Tell Humaira, Tell
Kiri, Tell Biri and el-Qlouaa (one vessel each). All the cooking pots present the same MBLB typological form: a short neck and a triangular externally folded rim. The orientation of
these rims can be everted or somewhat vertical, although the former tend to appear more in
LB I than in LB II. The cooking pots from el-Qlouaa (Fig. 5: 1) and Tell Humaira (Fig. 5: 2)
illustrate perfectly an LB I cooking pot from the Akkar Plain. In the MB II, the rim was often
slightly everted and of round shape. In the LB I, the rim begins to take on a more triangular
form. By LB II, the rim is fully formed in its distinctive triangular shape. Parallels to this
148
Hanan Charaf
cooking pot were found at Hazor (Ben-Tor and Bonfil 1997: fig. II.14: 24, 27, fig. II.15: 12;
Yadin et al. 1958: pl. XCVIII: 22, pl. CXXXVIII: 1-3, 10, pl. CXXXIX:12, 13, 17), Tyre
(Bikai 1978: pl. XLIX: 23) and Arqa (Charaf 2004: fig. 8), all dated to the LB I. However,
this type continues to be attested until the end of the LB II at Kamed el-Loz (Penner 2006:
fig. 6, 1, fig. 147: 6, 1), Sidon-College Site (Doumet-Serhal 2011-2012: pl. 30: 3) and Arqa
(Charaf forthcoming: fig. 12: 5). The three other cooking pots have tapered upper body and
straight and fully formed rectangular rims (Fig. 5: 3–5). This type of cooking pot appears
already in the LB I at Hazor (Yadin et al. 1961: pl. CCLXV: 7) but is better attested in the LB
IIA (Yadin et al. 1960: pl. CXIX:15). The Tell Kiri example (Fig. 5: 3) has a perfect parallel
at Tell el-Ghassil (Doumet-Serhal 1996: pl. 56: 8) and in the LB I at Tell Afis (Mazzoni 2002:
pl. LIX: 26). It continues into the LB IIA at Tell el-Ghassil (Doumet-Serhal 1996: pl. 56: 4)
and Tyre (Bikai 1978: pl. XLVIII: 1) and in the LB II at Dan (Ben-Dov 2002: fig. 2.55: 2021), Kamed el-Loz (Marfoe 1995: fig. 90: 6) and Tell Kazel (Badre et al. 1994: fig. 42: g-h,
fig. 47: i). It is still attested at Arqa in a level dated to the beginning of the 12th century BCE
(Charaf forthcoming: fig. 12: 17). The cooking pot from Tell Biri (Fig. 5: 5) has sharper-edged
triangular rim. It appears timidly during the LB I at Hazor (Yadin et al. 1958: pl. CXXXIX:
18; 1961: pl. CCLXV: 9, pl. CCLXXXI: 1), Pella (McNicoll et al. 1992: pl. 45: 4) and Kamed
el-Loz (Marfoe 1995: fig. 77: 1) before it spreads widely in the Levant during the LB II, at
Megiddo (Finkelstein and Zimhoni 2000: fig. 9.11: 9) and Kamed el-Loz (Hachmann 1980:
pl. 15: 3, pl. 17: 8-9; Marfoe 1995: fig. 90: 6). It particularly shows up during the latter part of
the LB II at Beth Shan (James and McGovern 1993: fig. 43: 6), Hazor (Yadin et al. 1961: pl.
CCXCII: 3, 5-6), Tell Kazel (Badre 2011: fig. 7: e, fig. 8: a), Tell Nebi Mend (Bourke 1991:
fig. 23: 4-6), Ugarit (Montchambert 2004: fig. 90: 1249) and Alalakh (McClellan 1989: fig.
36: 152a), and well into the 12th century BCE at Sarepta (Anderson 1988: pl. 30: 3), Tell
Kazel (Badre et al. 1990: fig. 41: f) and Tell Afis (Venturi 1998: fig. 9: 11).
Jars
Twenty-four jar fragments were found in the survey: 18 handles and 6 rims from Khirbet
Jindi, Tell Biri and Tell Humaira. The jars found at Tell Humaira and Tell Biri (Fig. 5: 6-7)
are typical of the Canaanite LB I jar. They retain many MB II features in the tall neck and
triangular rim. The bodies are ovoid with flattened or round bases and they have two handles
attached to the middle of the body. The bases are usually flattened or slightly rounded. Both
jars are simply wet smoothed. But at Tell Arqa, jars with similar rims are usually vertically
burnished, which is another carry-over from the MBA period. Such jars are extensively
distributed in the Levant, most without burnishing, such as at Tell Ajjul (Fischer and Sadeq
2002: fig. 17: 9), Dan (Ben-Dov 2002: fig. 2.56: 24), Hazor (Yadin et al. 1958: pl. CXXIV:
14), Pella (Smith 1973: pl. 54: 269, pl. 56: 132), Kamed el-Loz (Marfoe 1995: fig. 77: 3, fig.
98: 10), Tyre (Bikai 1978, pl. XLVIIA: 10, pl. XLIX: 8), Beirut (Badre 1997: pl. 22: 4), Arqa
(Charaf 2004: fig. 9; forthcoming: fig. 15: 2) and Tell Nebi Mend (Bourke 1993: fig. 22: 2). A
coarser version of this jar appears at Tell Humaira (Fig. 5: 8) with thicker walls. Evidence of
the rills from wheel turning is visible on the interior wall of the neck. The crude appearance
of this jar suggests a later date in the LBA. Similar jars were found at Megiddo (Finkelstein
and Zimhoni 2000: fig. 9.12: 11), Tell el-Ghassil (Doumet-Serhal 1996: pl. 53: 7) and Sarepta
(Anderson 1988: pl. 23: 21) – all in LB II levels – as well as in tombs at Ugarit dated to the
end of the LB I and to the LB II (Schaeffer 1949: fig. 62: 17). Jars with narrow openings and
rolled rims (Fig. 5: 9) are quite popular during the second half of the LB II. They were found
The Akkar Plain Survey, Lebanon (1997, 1999): The Late Bronze Age
149
in the northern Levant at Sarepta (Anderson 1988: pl. 26: 3), Sidon-College Site (DoumetSerhal 2011-2012: pl. 28: 43) and Tell Afis (Venturi 1998: fig. 7: 5).
Painted vessels are not common in the Akkar Plain, at least in the early part of the LBA.
Tell Arqa did not produce enough decorated vessels to consider painting a characteristic of
the LBA at the site. The excavations at Tell Kazel, on the other hand, have produced several
painted vessels dated to LB II. But most of these came from Area IV (the Temple Area) and
Area II (the Residential Area) suggesting targeted (élite?) productions. It seems that painting
in the Akkar Plain is not a striking characteristic of the pottery productions and cannot be
compared at any level with the profusion of painting to the north at Ugarit, for example,
or to the south at Timnah (Kelm and Mazar 1995: fig. 4.14). Two painted vessels from the
Akkar Survey came from Tell Humaira and Tell Kiri: a jar covered with white wash and
painted with black and red horizontal bands on the neck (Fig. 5: 10) that has a perfect parallel at Megiddo (Loud 1948: pl. 43: 2, pl. 34: 17) and Arqa, and a fragment of a closed pot
burnished vertically and painted with two horizontal red bands (Fig. 5: 15).
Pithoi
Ten pithoi were found in the Akkar Plain Survey, at Tell Humaira (6), Tell Biri (2), Tell Kiri
(1), Tell Sebeel (1) and el-Qlouaa (1). The pithos from Humaira (Fig. 6: 1) is a typical LBA
pithos from the northern Levant even though earlier examples are attested timidly in the MB
II at Kamed el-Loz (personal observation) and Tell el-Ghassil (Doumet-Serhal 1996: pl. 39:
15). Similar pithoi were found during the LB I in abundance at Hazor (Yadin et al. 1958: pl.
LXXXVIII: 11, pl. CXLI: 8; 1960: pl. CXXII: 6, pl. CXLV: 3) and Tel Dan (Ben-Dov 2002:
fig. 2.31: 14) and are believed to be of northern influence. These pithoi are well attested at
Arqa (Charaf 2004: fig. 10; forthcoming: fig. 17: 1-4, 6) in the LB I and continue throughout
the LB II. They are present in the LB II at Hazor, Kamed el-Loz (Marfoe 1995: fig. 89: 2),
Tell el-Ghassil (Doumet-Serhal 1996: pl. 55: 2), and as far north as Tarsus (Goldman 1956:
fig. 390: D). Another north-Levantine pithos is the one from Tell Biri (Fig. 6: 2) and Tell
Humaira (Fig. 6: 3, 6). This type is characterized by a macehead-type rim. It is made from
a fabric rich in chaff to reduce the firing time. This type of pithos was also found in LB II
levels at Kamed el-Loz (Kulemann-Ossen 2010: pl. 8: 3), Sarepta (Anderson 1988: pl. 26: 5),
and as far south as Tel Dan (Ben-Dov 2002: fig. 2.30: 5) and as far north as Ugarit (Schaeffer
1949: fig. 56: 6, fig. 86: 21-22). In the Akkar Plain, it is attested at Tell Kazel (Badre et al.
1994: fig. 41: c-e), Arqa (Charaf forthcoming: fig. 17: 7-9) and in the Haklet Bou Dib megalithic tomb in Akkar (Steimer 1996: pl. IX: 3). Square-rim pithoi exist also in the plain of
Akkar, precisely at Tell Humaira (Fig. 6: 4) and Tell Biri (Fig. 6: 5). Even though their shape
appears during the MB I/II in the Bekaa Valley at Tell el-Ghassil (Doumet-Serhal 1996: pl.
7: 9-11) and Douris (Charaf 2021: fig. 27: 4-5), square-rim pithoi were found all over the
Levant during the LBA at Megiddo (Finkelstein and Zimhoni 2000: fig. 9.12: 24), Hazor
(Ben-Tor and Bonfil 1997: fig. II.32: 4), Tell el-Ghassil (Doumet-Serhal 1996: pl. 55: 4) and
Tarsus (Goldman 1956: fig. 379: B).
The Imported material
Amongst the dozens of local vessels from the Akkar Plain Survey were ten sherds of imported pots. They belong to vessel types that were widely imported and distributed in the Levant
during the MB II and especially in the LB. They originate from Cyprus and Mycenae.
150
Hanan Charaf
The Cypriot pottery
One of the best known imports to the Levant is Cypriot White Slip II (WSII). It was distributed throughout the Levant and reached the wider Mediterranean (Greece and Sicily). The
bowl is the most common imported WSII vessel, but tankards and juglets have also been
found in the Levant. The WSII bowl from Tell Kiri (Fig. 5: 12) is a standard hemispherical
handmade bowl, covered in a thick cream slip inside and outside, and painted in brown color
on the exterior. It has one handle in the form of a wishbone. The Tell Kiri sherd exhibits
one of the typical WSII decorations made of a horizontal ladder and a vertical dotted line.
Dozens of similar bowls were found in tombs at Ugarit and Minet el-Beida (Schaeffer 1949:
fig. 51: 6, fig. 54: 18, 20, fig. 57: 2, fig. 65: 8; Yon 2001: fig. 4), Tarsus (Goldman 1956: fig.
329: 1248) in the northern part of the Levant,4 at Tell Arqa (Charaf-Mullins 2006: pl. 130:
20-21) and Tell Kazel (Yon and Caubet 1990: fig. 4: 96; Badre et al. 1994: fig. 54: a) in the
Akkar region, in the tombs of Byblos (Salles 1980: pl. 9: 6) and Beirut (Saidah 1993-1994:
pl. 27: 3a+b), at Sarepta (Koehl 1985: fig. 2: 52), Tyre (Bikai 1978: pl. XLIII: 9, pl. XLVIIA:
32), Lachish (Tufnell 1958: pl. 79: 833-834) and Tell Ajjul (Fischer and Sadeq 2000: fig. 8:
2). WSII bowls that resemble the bowl of Tell Kiri were found in major LBA sites in Cyprus,
mainly in tombs at Enkomi (Dikaios 1969: pl. 195: 18-19, 22, 27; Courtois 1981: fig. 134: 6),
Kazaphani (Nicolaou and Nicolaou 1989: pl. XXV: 255) and Kition (Karageorghis 1974: pl.
XI: 2-3, 6-7, 9, 12, 15-16).
The collection of the villager’s tomb at Tell Humaira has three Red Lustrous Wheel
Made Ware (RLWMW) bottles (Fig. 4: 12-14). It is impossible from the pictures to know if
one of the two necks fits on the body of the bottle in the collection. It is also impossible to
know if these bottles were made from Levantine fabrics or imported ones or if the base of
the bottle bears any Cypro-Minoan sign as some of these bottles do. Much has been written
on the RLWMW in the archaeological literature. This ware attracted the curiosity of many
archaeologists mainly because of its fabric and manufacture. The RLWMW, as its name
indicates, is wheelmade from fine well fired orange levigated clay. The body is completely
covered with a thick bright orange slip burnished to a high luster. RLWMW bottles have
been found all over the Levant and Egypt, mainly in tomb contexts such as at Ras el-Bassit
(Courbin 1977-1978: fig. 19), Ugarit (Schaeffer 1949: fig. 51: 17, 19, fig. 113 for a summary of
the RLWMW bottles found in the tombs), Tyre (Bikai 1978: pl. LIIA: 9), Enkomi (Courtois
1981: 90) or Kazaphani (Nicolaou and Nicolaou 1989: 95). But they do also exist in cultic
structures at Tell Kazel (Badre and Gubel 1999-2000: 25) and Lachish (Tufnell 1940: pl. 51:
273), or in residential areas at Alalakh (Woolley 1955: pl. CXXVI: ATP/38/184), Tell Kazel
(Badre and Gubel 1999-2000: fig. 25: p), Tell Arqa (Charaf-Mullins 2006: pl. 132: 1), Beirut
(Badre 1997: fig. 29: 5) and Kamed el-Loz (Hachmann 1970: pl. 23: 9). The RLWMW dates
to the LB I and LB II contexts. It disappears at the end of the 14th century BCE.
Earlier Cypriot material was found at Tell Humaira. Two handmade White Painted V/VI
(WPV/VI) sherds highly burnished and decorated with red bands were found at Tell Kiri (Fig.
5: 14-15). They belong to jars or large jugs commonly imported to Egypt and the Levant. WP
V/VI material was found in large quantities in Lebanon in the Bronze Age levels of Tell Arqa
(Charaf-Mullins 2006: pl. 130: 1-7) and Sidon (Charaf 2022: fig. 4: 2, 10, 13-18).
4
For a full survey on the White Slip Ware in the northern Levant, see Yon 2001.
The Akkar Plain Survey, Lebanon (1997, 1999): The Late Bronze Age
151
The Mycenaean pottery
Only one sherd identified as Mycenaean was found at Tell Kiri (Fig. 5: 13). It belongs to a
closed pot, most likely a stirrup vase. It is lustrated and painted with thin red lines and large
bands, a décor characteristic of stirrup vases dated to LH IIIA:2 or LH IIIB. Stirrup vases
are common in the Levant during the LB II. They were found in the cella of the LB II temple
at Sidon-College Site (Karageorghis 2011-2012: 375, no S/38026/1202), in the Necropolis K
of Byblos (Salles 1980: pl. 12: 4), and in Cypriot tombs at Enkomi (Courtois 1981: fig. 147:
1, 5, fig. 144: 5-6, fig. 177: 3) and Stephania (Hennessy 1963: pl. XXV: 4).
The study of the LBA ceramic material from the Akkar Plain Survey Project shows an equal
representation of the LB I and LB II even though less than 13% of the sites surveyed in the
plain yielded surface material dated to the LBA. Tell Humaira yielded the largest quantity of
LBA material mostly dating to the LB I. This strongly suggests a large settlement judging from
the material and the presumable tomb found on the site. Similarly, Tell Kiri and Tell Biri have
solid LBA evidence but anchored more in the LB II according to the cooking pots with triangular rims, macehead rim pithoi, Cypriot and Mycenaean pottery. The LBA ceramic repertoire
from the Akkar Plain survey adheres to the shapes and manufacturing traditions known from
the excavations of Tell Arqa and Tell Kazel. Straight side plates, cooking pots with everted
rims, ovoid juglets with button bases and pithoi with folded rims are well attested in Level
12 at Arqa dated to the LB I, and cooking pots with triangular rims and macehead pithoi are
abundant in Level 6 at Tell Kazel and Level 11 at Arqa dated to the LB II. Even though human
occupation of the Akkar Plain was considerably reduced during the LBA, the characteristics
of its material productions carried a homogeneity attested in the pottery traditions.
References
Al-Maqdissi, M. and Thalmann, J.-P.
1989 Prospection de la trouée de Homs: les sites de la plaine du Akkar syrien. In: Contribution
française à l’archéologie syrienne, 1969-1989, Beyrouth, 98-101.
Anderson, W.
1988 Sarepta I. The Late Bronze and Iron Age Strata of Area II, Y, Beirut.
Badre, L.
1997 Bey 003 Preliminary Report. Excavations of the American University of Beirut Museum
1993-1996. Bulletin d’Archéologie et d’Architecture Libanaises 2, 6-94.
2011 The Cooking Pot Tradition at Tell Kazel. In: V. Karageorghis and O. Kouka (eds.), On cooking Pots, Drinking Cups, Loomweights and Ethnicity in Bronze Age Cyprus and Neighbouring
Regions, Nicosia, 149-166.
Badre, L. and Gubel, E.
1999-2000 Tell Kazel, Syria. Excavations of the AUB Museum, 1993-1998. Third Preliminary
Report. Berytus 44, 123-203.
Badre, L., Gubel, E., Capet, E., and Panayot, N.
1994 Tell Kazel (Syrie). Rapport préliminaire sur les 4e- 8e campagnes de fouilles (1988-1992).
Syria 71, 259-346.
Badre, L., Gubel, E., al-Maqdissi, M., and Sader, H.
1990 Tell Kazel (Syria). Excavations of the AUB Museum, 1985-1987. Preliminary Reports.
Berytus 38, 9-124.
152
Hanan Charaf
Bartl, K.
1998-1999 Akkar Survey 1997. Archaeological Surface Investigations in the Plain of Akkar/
Northern Lebanon. Preliminary Results. Bulletin d’Archéologie et d’Architecture Libanaises 3,
169-179.
2002a Archäologische Untersuchungen der südlichen Akkar-Ebene, Nordlibanon. Vorläufige
Ergebenisse einer Oberflächenprospektion. In: R. Eichmann (ed.), Ausgrabungen und surveys im
Vorderen Orient I, Rahden, 23-48.
2002b Ancient Settlements in the Plain of Akkar/Northern Lebanon. First Results of
Archaeological Survey Work in 1997 and 1999. Occident et Orient, March 2002, 2-4.
2007–2008 Sheikh Zenad Reconsidered. Archaeology and History in the Lebanon 26-27, 130-140.
Ben-Dov, R.
2002 The Late Bronze Age “Mycenaean Tomb. In: A. Biran and R. Ben-Dov (eds.), Dan II. A
chronicle of the excavations and the Late Bronze Age “Mycenaean” Tomb, Jerusalem, 35-177.
Ben-Tor, A. and Bonfil, R.
1997 Hazor V. An Account of the Fifth Season of Excavation, 1968, Jerusalem.
Bikai, P.
1978 The Pottery of Tyre, Warminster.
Bonatz, D.
2002 Preliminary Remarks on an Archaeological Survey in the Anti-Lebanon. Bulletin d’Archéologie et d’Architecture Libanaises 6, 283-300.
Bounni, A., Lagarce, E. and Lagarce, J.
1998 Ras Ibn Hani, I. Le palais Nord du Bronze Récent. Fouilles 1979-1995, synthèse préliminaire, (Bibliothèque Archéologique et Historique CLI), Beyrouth.
Bourke, S.
1991 The Transition from the Middle Bronze to the Late Bronze Age in the Northern Levant: the
Evidence from Tell Nebi Mend, Syria, PhD dissertation, London.
1993 The Transition from the Middle to the Late Bronze Age in Syria: The Evidence from Tell
Nebi Mend. Levant 25, 155-195.
Bunimovitz, S.
1995 On the Edge of Empires-Late Bronze Age (1500-1200). In: T. Levy (ed.), The Archaeology
of Society in the Holy Land, London, 321-329.
Charaf, H.
2004 An Assessment of the Continuity and Change in the LB I Pottery at Tell Arqa, Lebanon. In:
M. Bietak (ed.), Ågypten und Levante XIV. Proceedings of the Late Bronze Age Conference, Wien,
30 Jan – 1st Feb 2003, Vienna, 231-248.
2016 The Pottery of Level 12 from Tell ‘Arqa in North Lebanon. In: I. Thuesen (ed.), Proceedings
of the Second International Congress on Archaeology in the Ancient Near East, May 22 – 26,
2000, Copenhagen (OrientLab Special Issues), Bologna, 733-744.
2020 The Architectural and Material Characteristics of the Late 13th-early 12th century BC Level
at Tell Arqa, Lebanon. In: H. Charaf and L. Welton (eds.), The Iron Age I in the Levant: A View
from the North, Part 2 (Archaeology and History in the Lebanon 52-53), Beirut, 47-72.
2021 Looking for Cultural Borders during the MBA in Lebanon: Preliminary Observations. In: M.
Bietak and S. Prell (eds.), Changing Clusters and Migration in the Near Eastern Bronze Age. Acts
of the International symposium held at the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, December 4 – 6,
Wiesbaden, 175-221.
2022 Disentangling the Relationships between Cyprus and Lebanon during the Second Millennium
BCE: What Sidon Can Bring to the Table. In: G. Bourogiannis (ed.), Acts of the International
Symposium Beyond Cyprus: Investigating Cypriot Connectivity in the Mediterranean from the Late
Bronze Age to the end of the Classical Period, Athens, 89-107.
The Akkar Plain Survey, Lebanon (1997, 1999): The Late Bronze Age
153
forthcoming Ceramic Manufacture Traditions at Tell Arqa, Lebanon during the Late Bronze
Age: From Traditionalism to Regionalism. In: S. Mazzoni, M. Pucci and F. Venturi (eds.), Ceramic
Identities at the Edges of Empires: The Regional Dimension of Pottery Production in Late Bronze
Age Northern Syria and Anatolia, Acts of the international symposium, Florence January 14 – 17,
2015, Pisa, 9-48.
Charaf-Mullins, H.
2006 Les céramiques importées de l’Ouest. In: J.-P. Thalmann, Tell Arqa-I. Les niveaux de l’âge
du Bronze (Bibliothèque Historique et Archéologique 177), Beyrouth, 173-192.
Courbin, P.
1977-1978 Rapport sur la sixième campagne de fouille (1976) à Ras el-Bassit (Syrie). Annales
Archéologiques Arabes Syriennes 27-28, 29-31.
Courtois, J.-C.
1981 Alasia II. Les tombes d’Enkomi. Le mobilier funéraire. (Fouilles C.F.A. Schaeffer 19471965), Paris.
Dikaios, P.
1969 Enkomi. Excavations 1948-1958, Mainz.
Doumet-Serhal, C.
1996 Les fouilles de Tell el-Ghassil de 1972 à 1974. Etude du matériel (Bibliothèque Archéologique
et Historique 146), Beyrouth.
2011-2012 Sidon’s “Holy of Holies”: the Late Bronze Age Underground Cella. In: C. DoumetSerhal (ed.), And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn... A tribute to Dr. John Curtis on his 65th birthday, (Archaeology and History in the Lebanon 34-35 ), Beirut, 297-309.
Finkelstein, I. and Zimhoni, O.
2000 The Pottery from the Late Bronze Gate. In: I. Finkelstein, D. Ussishkin and B. Halpern,
(eds.), Megiddo III: The 1992-1996 Seasons, Tel Aviv, 223-243.
Fischer, P. and Sadeq, M.
2000 Tell El-Ajjul 1999. A Joint Palestinian-Swedish Field Project: First Season Preliminary
Report. Ågypten und Levante 10, 211-226.
2002 Tell Ajjul 2000: Second Season Preliminary Report. Ägypten und Levante 12, 109-153.
Goldman, H.
1956 Excavations at Gözlü Kule, Tarsus. From the Neolithic through the Bronze Age, New Jersey.
Gonen, R.
1992 The Late Bronze Age. In: A. Ben-Tor (ed.), The Archaeology of Ancient Israel, New HavenLondon, 211-257.
Goren, Y., Finkelstein, I. and Na’aman, N.
2003 The Expansion of the Kingdom of Amurru according to the Petrographic Investigation of
the Amarna Tablets. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 329, 1-11.
Hachmann, R.
1970 Kamed el-Loz 1966/1967, Bonn.
1980 Bericht über die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen in Kamid el-Loz in den Jahren 1968 bis
1970, Bonn.
Hennessy, J. B.
1963 Stephania. A Middle and Late Bronze Age Cemetery in Cyprus, London.
James, F. and McGovern, P. E.
1993 The Late Bronze II Egyptian Garrison at Beth Shan: A Study of Levels VII and VIII,
Philadelphia.
Karageorghis, V.
1974 Excavations at Kition I. The tombs, Nicosia.
154
Hanan Charaf
2011-2012 Mycenaean, Cypriote and Related Material. In: C. Doumet-Serhal (ed.), And Canaan
begat Sidon his firstborn... A tribute to Dr. John Curtis on his 65th birthday, Special volume of
(Archaeology and History in the Lebanon 34-35), 372-382.
Kelm, G. and Mazar, A.
1995 Timnah: A Biblical City in the Sorek Valley, Winona Lake.
Koehl, R.
1985 Sarepta III. The Imported Bronze and Iron Age Wares from Area II, X (The University
Museum of the University of Pennsylvania Excavations at Sarafand), Beyrouth.
Kulemann-Ossen, S.
2010 The Pottery of the East-slope: Areas II-2-5/ II-e-6 and II-e-7. Bulletin d’Archéologie et d’Architecture Libanaises 7, 61-74.
Loud, G.
1948 Megiddo II. Seasons of 1935-39, Chicago.
Marfoe, L.
1995 Kamid el-Loz. 13. The Prehistoric and Early Historic Context of the Site, Bonn.
Mazar, A.
1992 Archaeology of the Land of the Bible, 10000-586 B.C.E., New York.
Mazzoni, S.
2002 Late Bronze Age Pottery Production in Northwestern Central Syria. In: M. Maqdissi,
V. Matoïan and C. Nicolle (eds.), Céramique de l’Age du Bronze en Syrie, I. La Syrie du Sud et la
Vallée de l’Oronte (Bibliothèque Archéologique et Historique 161), Beyrouth, 129-151.
McClellan, T. L.
1989 The Chronology and Ceramic Assemblages of Alalakh. In: A. Leonard and B. B. Williams
(eds.), Essays in Ancient Civilization presented to Helene J. Kantor (Studies in Ancient Oriental
Civilization 47), Chicago, 181-212.
McNicoll, A., Edwards, P. C., Hanbury-Tenison, J., Hennessy, B., Potts, T. F., Smith, R. H.,
Walmsley, A., and Watson, P.
1992 Pella in Jordan 2, Sydney.
McNicoll, A., Smith, R. and Hennessy, B.
1982 Pella in Jordan 1. Canberra.
Monchambert, J.-Y.
2004 La céramique d’Ougarit. Campagnes de fouilles 1975 et 1976. (Ras Shamra-Ougarit XV),
Paris.
Moran, W.
1987 Les lettres d’el-Amarna, Correspondance diplomatique du pharaon, Paris.
Nicolaou, I. and Nicolau, K.
1989 Kazaphani. A Middle/Late Cypriot Tomb at Kazaphani-Ayios Andronikos: T.2A, B, Nicosia.
Oren, E.
1973 The Northern Cemetery of Beth Shan, Leiden.
Penner, S.
2006 Kāmid El-Loz. 19. Die Keramik der Spätbronzezeit, Bonn.
Pritchard, J.
1955 Ancient Near Eastern Texts relating to the Old Testament, New Jersey.
Saidah, R.
1977 Sidon et la Phénicie méridionale au XIVème siècle avant J.C. dans le contexte proche-oriental et égéen, PhD dissertation, Paris.
1993-1994 Beirut in the Bronze Age: The Kharji tombs. Berytus 41, 137-211.
2004 Sidon et la Phénicie méridionale au Bronze Récent. A propos des tombes de Dakerman,
(Bibliothèque Archéologique et Historique 170), Beyrouth.
The Akkar Plain Survey, Lebanon (1997, 1999): The Late Bronze Age
155
Salles, J.-F.
1980 La nécropole “K” de Byblos (Recherche sur les grandes civilisations), Lyon.
Schaeffer, C. F. A.
1939 Ugaritica. Études relatives aux découvertes de Ras Shamra, Paris.
1949 Corpus céramique de Ras Shamra: Première partie. Ugaritica II, Paris.
1969 Ugaritica VI, Leiden.
Smith, R.
1973 Pella of the Decapolis. Vol. 1. The 1967 Season of the College of Wooster Expedition to
Pella, London.
Steimer, T.
1996 Les monuments mégalithiques de la région de Mengez (Liban Nord) (Mémoire de DEA de
l’Université de Paris I), Paris.
Thalmann, J.-P.
2000 Tell Arqa. Bulletin d’Archéologie et d’Architecture Libanaises 4, 5-74.
2006 Tell Arqa-I. Les niveaux de l’âge du Bronze (Bibliothèque Historique et Archéologique
177), Beyrouth.
Thrane, H.
1978 Sukas IV. A Middle Bronze Age Collective Grave on Tall Sukas, Copenhagen.
Tufnell, O.
1940 Lachish II: The Fosse Temple, London.
1958 Lachish IV (Tell Ed Duweir): The Bronze Age, Oxford.
Van de Mieroop, M.
2004 A History of the Ancient Near East ca. 3000-323 B.C., Malden.
Venturi, F.
1998 The Late Bronze II and Early Iron I Levels. In: S. M. Cecchini and S. Mazzoni (eds.), Tell
Afis (Siria). Scavi sull’acropoli 1988-1992, Pisa, 123-162.
Woolley, L.
1955 Alalakh. An Account of the Excavations at Tell Atchana in the Hatay, 1937-1949, Oxford.
Yadin, Y., Aharoni, Y., Amiran, R., Dothan, T., Dunayevsky, I., and Perrot, J.
1958 Hazor I. An Account of the First Season of Excavations, 1955, Jerusalem.
1960 Hazor II. An Account of the First Season of Excavations, 1956, Jerusalem.
1961 Hazor IV. An Account of the Third and Fourth Season of Excavations, 1957-1958, Plates,
Jerusalem.
Yannai, E.
2000 A Late Bronze Age Tomb at Jatt. Atiqot 39, 49-82.
Yannai, E., Gorzalczany, A. and Peilstocker, M.
2003 A Group of Vessels from the Syrian Coast found in the Coastal Plain of Israel. Levant 35,
101-116.
Yon, M.
2001 White Slip Ware in the Northern Levant. In: V. Karageorghis (ed.), The White Slip Ware of
Late Bronze Age Cyprus. Proceedings of an International Conference organized by the Anastasios
G. Leventis Foundation, Nicosia, in honour of Malcolm Wiener, Nicosia, 29-30 th October 1998,
Vienna, 117-125.
Yon, M. and Caubet, A.
1990 Les céramiques importées de l’Ouest. Berytus 38, 98-118.
156
Hanan Charaf
Akkar
N
Tripoli
LEBANON
Beirut
SYRIA
Na
hr
el-
SYRIA
Ke
bir
50km
0
Cheikh Ayyash
Tell Humaira
Tell Biri
Tell Bibi
Tell Kindi
Na
hr
el-
Es
Cheikh Zennad
Darine II
Tell Taaleb
to
ue
ne
Tell Saadine
Tell Kiri
Tell Abbas el-Gharbi
Tell el-Qlaiat
AKKAR PLAIN
Mediterranean Sea
Qaabrine
Khirbet el-Jindi
Tell Hayyat
Cheikh Mohammad
Tell Sebeel
d
Na
hr
rn
de
Ar
mo
qa
roa
Tell Arqa
0
2km
Fig. 1: Map of the southern part of the Akkar Plain with the localization of the 18 tells surveyed in
1997 (adapted and updated from Bartl 1998-1999: fig. 3)
The Akkar Plain Survey, Lebanon (1997, 1999): The Late Bronze Age
Fig. 2: Distribution of pottery by site
Fig. 3: Distribution of pottery by type
157
158
Hanan Charaf
3 Tell Humaira
1 Tell Humaira
4 Tell Humaira
2 Tell Kiri
5 Tell Bibi
6 Khirbet Jindi
0
10
7 Tell Humaira
20
30
40 cm
9
8
10
0
10cm
11
13
0
5cm
14
Tell Humaira
12
0
5cm
Fig. 4: LBA pottery: plates (1-2), bowls (3-4), jugs (5-11) and RLWMW bottles (12-14)
159
The Akkar Plain Survey, Lebanon (1997, 1999): The Late Bronze Age
1 el-Qlouaa
6 Tell Humaira
2 Tell Humaira
7 Tell Biri
3 Tell Kiri
8 Tell Humaira
9 Tell Humaira
4 Tell Humaira
10 Tell Humaira
5 Tell Biri
12 Tell Kiri
11 Tell Humaira
13 Tell Kiri
14 Tell Kiri
0
10
16 Tell Kiri
15 Tell Kiri
20
30
40 cm
Fig. 5: LBA pottery: cooking pots (1-5), jars (6-11), WSII bowl (12), Mycenaean stirrup vase (13),
WPV/VI (14-15) and painted (16)
160
Hanan Charaf
1 Tell Humaira
2 Tell Biri
3 Tell Humaira
4 Tell Humaira
5 Tell Biri
6 Tell Humaira
0
10
Fig. 6: LBA pottery: pithoi found in the survey
20
30
40 cm