Falcone et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2015) 34:32
DOI 10.1186/s13046-015-0148-3
REVIEW
Open Access
Signaling by exosomal microRNAs in cancer
Germana Falcone1*, Armando Felsani1,2 and Igea D’Agnano1*
Abstract
A class of small non-coding RNAs, the microRNAs (miRNAs), have recently attracted great attention in cancer
research since they play a central role in regulation of gene-expression and miRNA aberrant expression is found in
almost all types of human cancer. The discovery of circulating miRNAs in body fluids and the finding that they are
often tumor specific and can be detected early in tumorigenesis has soon led to the evaluation of their possible
use as cancer biomarkers and treatment-response predictors. The evidence that tumor cells communicate via the
secretion and delivery of miRNAs packed into tumor-released microvesicles has prompted to investigate miRNA
contribution as signaling molecules to the establishment and maintenance of the tumor microenvironment and the
metastatic niche in cancer. In this review we highlight the recent advances on the role of exosomal miRNAs as
mediators of cancer cell-to-cell communication.
Keywords: Small non-coding RNAs, Tumor, Exosomes, Cell-to-cell communication
Introduction
microRNAs (miRNAs) are a family of endogenous, noncoding, tiny RNA molecules which modulate gene expression functioning both by targeting messenger RNA
degradation and suppressing protein translation. Thousands of human protein-coding genes are regulated by
miRNAs, indicating that miRNAs are master regulators
of diverse biological systems, facilitating a rapid response
of body physiology. miRNAs have been shown to regulate every aspect of cellular activity, including differentiation and development, metabolism, proliferation and
apoptosis. In addition, the biogenesis and function of
miRNAs are related to the molecular mechanisms of
various diseases including cancer. The intensive research
of the past years have demonstrated that miRNAs are
not only contained into cells, but are also detectable outside them, secreted in various body fluids (e.g. serum,
plasma, saliva, urine) routinely examined in patients
[1,2]. It is known that extracellular miRNAs are included
in small membranous vesicles or packaged with RNAbinding proteins [3]. miRNAs contained into microvesicles, and in particular into exosomes, have been shown
to function as secreted signaling molecules that
influence the recipient cell phenotypes. Furthermore,
* Correspondence:
[email protected];
[email protected]
1
Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, CNR, Via Ramarini 32-00015,
Monterotondo, RM, Italy
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
secreted exosomal miRNAs may reflect the molecular
changes of the cells from which they originate and can
therefore be seen as potential indicators for early recognition of the onset of disease. In addition, since they are
relatively stable, disease-specific and can be efficiently
detected in body fluids and amplified by means of molecular biology tools such as real-time PCR, they can be
seen as ideal biomarkers in many pathological states including cancer.
Thanks to their unique properties and functions,
miRNAs play a crucial role in human cancer development and tumorigenesis as their expression is frequently
deregulated in many types of tumors, functioning either
as tumor suppressors or as oncogenes (oncomiRs). Furthermore, miRNAs were shown to be responsible for
cancer-related inflammation, cancer drug resistance, and
regulation of cancer stem cells. Therefore, miRNAs have
generated great interest as a novel strategy in cancer
diagnosis and therapy [4].
Exosomal miRNAs
The first observations that mature miRNAs are present
in cell-free blood plasma and serum was made in 2008
by several independent research groups [5-8]. Later, nuclease resistant extracellular miRNAs have been found
in all known biological fluids [9-12]. Since then, accumulated reports have consistently shown that extracellular miRNAs can be shielded from RNAse degradation
© 2015 Falcone et al.; licensee BioMed Central. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain
Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article,
unless otherwise stated.
Falcone et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2015) 34:32
by: (1) packaging in microvesicles (MVs) such as
apoptotic bodies, shedding vesicles and exosomes; or
(2) solely by complexing with AGO proteins [13-15].
Most miRNAs present in biological fluid have been
found MVs-free and associated with proteins of the
Ago family, which appear remarkably stable even in protease rich environment [16,17]. Some miRNA species
were also found in purified fractions of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) from human plasma [18,19], although the
analyzed HDL-miRNAs constituted only a minor proportion of the total circulating miRNAs. Circulating miRNAs
bound by Ago proteins are apparently non-specific remnants resulting from physiological activity of the cells
and cell death [15,17]. On the contrary, extracellular
miRNAs included within MVs can be transferred to recipient cells, alter gene expression and mediate functional effects [20-25].
Exosomes
Exosomes are membrane vesicles of an average 30–
100 nm diameter, are formed within the multivesicular
bodies (MVBs), also known as late endosomes, and released upon fusion of MVBs with the plasma membrane
[26] from many different cell types in the body, such as
red blood cells, platelets, lymphocytes, dendritric cells,
and tumor cells. Exosome composition does not merely
reflect the cells of origin, but is enriched in specific proteins, lipids and RNAs, indicating the existence of specialized sorting mechanisms, most of which are not fully
understood [27]. Exosome membranes are enriched in
cholesterol, sphingolipids, glycerophospholipids and ceramide [28], and bear both intraluminal and transmembrane proteins, with the same polarity as the plasma
membrane. Proteins enriched in exosomes include tetraspanins (CD63, CD81) and associated proteins such as
integrins, immunoglobulins and growth factor receptors;
cytoskeletal proteins (tubulin, actin); ESCRT-related proteins (Alix, Tsg101); heat-shock proteins (hsp70, hsp90),
and proteins involved in vesicle trafficking such as Rab
GTPases, annexins and flotillin [29,30]. Exosomes are
also enriched in mRNAs and small RNA species, including vaultRNA, tRNAs and miRNAs [31]. Recently,
tumor-derived exosomes have been shown to carry single and double stranded DNA [32,33].
The profile of miRNAs in exosomes is specific, since
particular repertoires of miRNAs are selectively sorted,
while others are usually excluded. Moreover, profiling
studies have revealed that exosomes of different cellular origin contain a unique expression profile of
mRNAs and miRNAs, which may also differ from the
signatures of their parent cells [24,34,35]. Hence,
exosome content reflects the nature and even the
state of the producer cell. A searchable compendium of
exosomal proteins and RNA is now accessible at ExoCarta
Page 2 of 10
(http://www.exocarta.org/). A recent study on exosomes
released from human colon carcinoma cells and purified
by immunocapture with different antibodies revealed two
different exosome populations distinct for both protein
and miRNA composition [36]. Interestingly, miRNA passenger strands were particularly enriched in one exosomal population, suggesting that miRNA biogenesis
may be interlinked with endosomal/exosomal processing [36].
The exosome composition is crucial in determining
the outcome of the communication between donor and
recipient cells. The mechanism of exosome-mediated
cell-to-cell communication is particularly important in
cancer, since tumor cells constitutively secrete exosome,
which can target locally adjacent cells of the same type
(autocrine effect), neighboring cells of different types
(paracrine effect), or reach cells located at distant organs
after entering the blood stream (endocrine effect). These
exosomes play a key role in the modulation of the immune response against the tumor [37-41], the induction
of angiogenesis [24,42], cell invasion and metastasis
[43,44]. Tumor cells are continuously subjected to a
range of stressors such as hypoxia, starvation or chemotherapeutic agents, and cancer progression depends on
the ability of cells to sense and adapt to these situations.
miRNA-based intercellular communication relies on
critical processes. First, miRNAs must be selectively and
actively secreted from cells and packaged into appropriate carriers. Second, miRNAs must be protected from
circulating RNAses and transferred to targeted or
receptor-specific recipient cells. Finally and most importantly, miRNAs must retain the ability to recognize
and repress mRNA targets in recipient cells [45].
miRNA sorting into exosomes
Exosome biogenesis [34,46], material cargo sorting
[46,47], and release [48] involve the endosomal sorting
complex required for transport (ESCRT complex), acting
together with associated proteins. The ESCRT complex
recognizes ubiquitinated membrane proteins and promotes their internalization into the MVBs [49]. The lipid
content of exosomes appears also to play an important
role in both the packaging of exosomes and their delivery to downstream tissues. The tetraspanin family of
proteins, which appears specifically enriched in exosomes among extracellular vesicles, has a high affinity
for both sphingolipids and cholesterol, and brings along
these lipid molecules during exosome packaging [28,50].
The miRNA maturation process seems to be associated
to the formation and maturation of exosomes. Whether
packing of miRNAs into exosomes takes place at the
pre- or mature-miRNA level has to be yet fully understood. Some authors reported that sequence motifs
present in mature miRNAs are able to control their
Falcone et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2015) 34:32
sorting into exosomes. The ubiquitous heterogeneous
nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2B1 (hnRNPA2B1) recognizing these motifs specifically binds exosomal miRNAs
and controls their loading into exosomes [51].
It has been suggested that sorting of pre-miRNAs into
exosomes could also be occurring in a sequencedependent manner and, indeed, pre-miRNA as well as
mature miRNAs are found in exosomes (Figure 1;
[52-55]). A very interesting work has recently revealed
that breast cancer exosomes, differently from normal
cell-derived exosomes, contain pre-miRNAs along with
the core RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) proteins, namely Dicer, Ago2 and TRBP, and display cellindependent capacity to process pre-miRNAs into mature
miRNAs (Figure 1; [56]). In addition to miRNAs, exosomes
carry mRNAs [25], which also show a selective enrichment
[24]. Exosomes content in mRNAs seems to be enriched in
3’UTR fragments [18], and this might be important for the
sorting of specific mRNAs into these vesicles [57].
Recently, it has been shown that miRNA availability
for exosomal secretion is controlled, at least in part,
by the cellular levels of their targeted transcripts, implying that exosomal miRNA secretion is a mechanism
whereby cells rapidly dispose miRNAs in excess of their
targets to adjust miRNA:mRNA homeostasis [58]. While
these findings suggest that miRNA sorting may be a passive mechanism, increasing data indicate that exosomes
can be actively internalized by recipient cells, resulting
in miRNA transfer among cells of both homo- and heterotypic nature [21,24,25,59-61].
Page 3 of 10
Exosomal miRNAs in cell-to-cell communication
The fact that exosomes are protected from the environment by their lipid bilayer makes them ideal delivery vehicles for RNAs [62]. In fact, exosomal miRNAs are
more stable and resistant to degradation than cellular
miRNAs [63]. In addition, exosomes can deliver multiple
messages simultaneously, which make them an attractive
way of exchanging specific subsets of mRNA, miRNA,
or proteins between donor and recipient cells, also at a
distance.
The modality of interaction of exosomes with selected
target cells is still unclear. Both direct and indirect evidences exist to suggest that EVs are internalized into recipient cells, the first relying on the use of exosome
fluorescent labeling, the second based on the transfer of
functional miRNAs on target cells [64]. Exosomes display exquisite target cell selectivity in vitro and in vivo,
which is based, at least in part, on target cell ligand
interactions with exosomal tetraspanin-associated receptors. Maintenance of internalization complexes and reuse of these complexes for exosome uptake appear to be
a common theme [65,66]. Importantly, the engagement
of protein complexes in internalization prone membrane
domains provides an explanation for the target cell
selectivity that is difficult to imagine relying exclusively
on single adhesion molecules, which frequently are
expressed on many cells [67]. The binding of exosomes
to the surface of recipient cells is mediated by the classical adhesion molecules involved in cell–cell interactions, such as integrins and ICAMs. However, other
Figure 1 Schematic representation of miRNA sorting into tumor cell-derived exosomes and release to recipient cells.
Falcone et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2015) 34:32
molecular pairs more specific to the exosome membrane,
such as TIM-binding phosphatidylserines, carbohydrate/
lectin receptors and heparan sulfateproteoglycans (HSPGs),
could be involved as well [67]. To deliver their content,
exosomes attached to a recipient cell can either fuse with
the cell membrane, directly releasing their cargo into the
cytoplasm, or get internalized by endocytic pathways. Depending in the phagocytic and endocytic capacity of the
recipient cells, exosomes can be internalized by clathrindynamin-caveolae-dependent endocytosis, pinocytosis, or
phagocytosis [67].
Accumulating evidences from the literature support
the idea that exosomal miRNAs can act as regulators of
gene expression in distant cells. Particularly in cancer,
exosomes have multiple functions including promotion
of local and systemic processes that lead to cell growth
and dissemination, or impairment of the immune system
response. miRNAs can act either as tumor suppressors
or oncogenes (oncomiRs), depending on target genes
and cancer types. Furthermore, a particular miRNA can
exploit both tumor-suppressive and oncogenic functions
depending on the cellular context of its target genes in
different cancers [68].
Table 1 and Figure 2 epitomize most significant exosomal miRNAs in cancer.
Functions of exosomal miRNAs in cancer
Exosomes have been found to act as vehicles for suppressive signals and have suppressive effects on antitumor immune responses [35,69]. For instance, miR-9 that
is over-expressed in many cancers is able of inhibiting
the transcription of the MHC class I gene thus preventing the recognition of tumor cells by the patient immune
system [70]. Yet, miR-222 down-regulates the expression
on tumor cell surfaces of intracellular cell adhesion
molecule 1 (ICAM-1) whose binding to lymphocyte
function-associated antigen (LFA-1) is essential for optimal activation of cytotoxic T cells, which in turn mediate
tumor cell lysis [71].
In some cases, exosomal pathways might discard
tumor-suppressor miRNAs that restrict metastatic progression. For example, the let-7 miRNA family was
shown to be expressed at higher levels in exosomes derived from metastatic gastric cancer cells, compared to
non-metastatic parental cells, suggesting that the exosomal mechanism may be used by metastatic cells to eliminate miRNAs having tumor suppressive functions, thus
strengthening their aggressive behavior [72]. Another example comes from a recent paper showing that metastatic cells from bladder carcinoma secrete increased
levels of miRNAs with tumor-suppressor functions (e.g.
inhibition of invasion, angiogenesis, and pulmonary metastasis), including miR-23b, miR-224, and miR-921.
Moreover, miRNAs, such as miR-23b, highly exocytosed
Page 4 of 10
from metastatic cells were reduced in lymph node metastases compared with patient-matched primary tumors
[73]. These results suggest that exosome-mediated secretion of tumor-suppressor miRNAs is selected during
tumor progression as a mechanism to coordinate activation of a metastatic cascade. An alternative hypothesis
has been proposed to justify the relative abundance of
miRNAs with predominant tumor suppressor activity in
the blood of healthy individuals. According to this hypothesis, tumor-suppressor circulating miRNAs might
work as a surveillance mechanism exerting continuous
inhibition on tumor formation, complementing cancer
immune surveillance [74]. It should be noted, however,
that, in other instances, miR-23b may act as tumor promoting [75].
However, most literature reports a tumor promoting
role of exosomal miRNAs, likely because tumor suppressor miRNAs are downregulated in many tumors, as well
as in cancer stem cells. Many oncomiRs have been described in the past decade. For example, IL-4 activated
macrophages have been shown to regulate invasiveness
of breast cancer cells through exosome-mediated delivery of the miR-223 highlighting a novel communication
mechanism between tumor-associated macrophages and
cancer cells [76]. miR-21 has been found up-regulated in
a wide range of solid tumors [77,78], and secreted in
plasma exosomes from patients affected by different cancer types, such as ovarian, lung and colon carcinomas,
pancreatic cancer and others, its presence being always
positively correlated with tumor progression and aggressiveness [79-82]. Up-regulation of miR-21 was shown to
promote cellular proliferation, survival, invasion and migration in different cancer cell lines [83], while its knockdown decreased tumor cell survival in vitro and tumor
growth in vivo in a murine xenograft model, accompanied
by enhanced apoptosis [84]. Interestingly, miR-21 and -29a
secreted by tumor cells via exosomes have been shown to
bind to toll-like receptors (TRL) on immune cells, leading
to TLR-mediated NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chainenhancer of activated B cells) activation and secretion of
prometastatic inflammatory cytokines that may ultimately
lead to tumor growth and metastasis [85].
It is becoming clear that tumor released exosomes
contribute to both progression of primary tumors and
metastases. The central role of exosomes in tumor
promotion has been recently highlighted by the discovery
that breast cancer exosomes can perform cell-independent
miRNA biogenesis and stimulate non-tumorigenic epithelial cells to form tumors, by altering their transcriptome in a Dicer-dependent manner [56]. The metastatic
process involves the manipulation of the cellular microenvironment to optimize conditions for deposition
and growth both locally and at a distance for tumor
colonization [86,87].
Falcone et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2015) 34:32
Page 5 of 10
Table 1 Most relevant miRNAs in cancer
miRNA
Tumor
Main target genes
miR-15a
Multiple Myeloma
BCL2, MYB, MYC, KRAS, CCND1, CDC25A, Oncogene Inhibition, Cell Cycle [97-100]
ERBB2, TP53, PTEN, ITGA2, VEGFA,RAB21, Control, Inhibition of Angiogenesis
CADM1, DICER1
Function
Reference
miR-34a
Breast, Prostate, Bladder, and
Brain Cancer
BCL2, MYC, MET, MEK1, E2F3, CDK4,
CDK6, CD44
Cell Cycle Control, Apoptosis,
Senescence, Angiogenesis
[116,117,118]
let-7 family
Breast, Colon, Gastric, Liver, Lung,
Prostate, Ovarian Cancer, Chronic
Myelogenous Leukemia, B Cell
Lymphoma
NF2, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, LIN28, MYC,
DICER1, HMGA2, CASP3
Oncogene Inhibition, Cell Cycle
Control, Cancer Stem Cell
Regulation
[72,119-124,125]
miR-21
Ovarian, Lung, and Colon Carcinoma, TPM1, NFIB, PDCD4, CDKN1A, FAS,
Pancreatic and Breast Cancer
TIMP3, SOX5, PTEN, BMPR2
Promotion of Cancer Cell
Proliferation, Survival and
Migration
[79-83,126-128]
miR-17-92 cluster Leukemia
DICER, PTEN, E2F1, E2F2, E2F3, CDKN1A,
PTEN, BCL2, CCND1, BMPR2, HOXA9
Induction of Angiogenesis,
Enhance Endothelial Cell
Migration
[94,129]
miR-494
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma,
Breast Cancer
PTEN, CDH17, MAL
Inhibition of Apoptosis,
Induction of Chemoresistance,
Cell Adhesion
[89,130]
miR-210
Breast Cancer, Renal, Prostate, and
Pancreatic Cancer, Lymphoma
MYC, STAT5A, HIF1A, TP53, E2F3, VEGFA, Metastasis, Angiogenesis,
EGFR, CDKN1A, AKT1, DICER1, PTEN,
Hypoxia, Tumorigenesis
CDKN1B, ERBB2, CD40, BCL2, CASP8AP2,
KRAS, NOTCH1
miR-200 family
Breast Cancer
ZEB1, ZEB2, SIP1, CCND1, CDC25C, MYC,
MYCN, PTEN, SIRT1, VEGFA, MET,
CDKN1B, TP53, PROM1, EGFR, CD44
Tumorigenesis and Tumor
Progression, Metastasis, Invasion
[92,93]
miR-9
Melanoma, Glioblastoma,
Neuroblastoma
MYC, MYCN,VEGFA, MMP9, CDH1
Metastasis, Drug Resistance,
Angiogenesis
[95,110,134,135]
Drug Resistance, Metastasis,
Invasion, Cell Growth
[108,136-143]
miR-221/miR-222 Breast, Colorectal, Renal, Pancreatic, KIT, PTEN, CDKN1A, CDKN1B, KRAS,
DICER1, MMP1
and Ovarian Cancer, Melanoma,
Glioblastoma, Leukemia
VHL, PTEN, FAS, NISCARI, PAK2, ATG12,
ZEB1, SRC, AKT
[7,96,131-133]
Cell Proliferation, Chemoresistance, [73,75]
Inhibition of Invasion and
Angiogenesis
miR-23b
Breast, Renal, Pancreatic, Bladder,
and Prostate Cancer Thymic
Lymphoma
miR-542-3p
Pancreatic, and Cervical Carcinoma, CDH17, TRAF4, ANGPT2, ILK, SURVIVIN
Neuroblastoma, Colon Cancer
Decreased Cell Adhesion,
Induction of Apoptosis,
Inhibition of Proliferation
and Angiogenesis
[89,144,145]
miR-125b
Breast, and Liver Cancer
LIN28B, CCND1, SOX2, MYC, CDK6,
Increase Drug Resistance,
Decreased in Resistant Cells,
Inhibits Cell Proliferation
[146-149]
miR-105
Breast, Ovarian, Gastric, and Prostate
Cancer, Glioma, Hepatocellular
Carcinoma
TJP1 DNTT, PCNA, BAX, CCND1, CDK6
Regulation of Migration,
Metastasis, Proliferation,
Apoptosis
[91,150-153]
miR-29
Breast, Lung, and Cervical Cancer,
BACE1, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, CDC42,
Neuroblastoma, B Cell Chronic and CDK6, TGFB3, IFNG
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Modulation of Immune
Response, Tumor Growth and
Metastasis, Tumor Suppressor
Function
[85,154-156]
It was recently reported that melanoma exosomes can
modify distant lymph nodes to facilitate melanoma
growth and metastasis even in the local absence of
tumor cells [88]. Exosomal miRNAs derived from metastatic adenocarcinoma cells were also involved in modulation of premetastatic organ stroma cells toward
supporting tumor cell hosting. Exosomal mRNAs and
miRNAs derived from tumor cells were recovered in
lymph node stroma and lung fibroblasts, and were
shown to significantly affect mRNA translation in the
target cells, exemplified by abundant recovery of exosomal miR-494 and miR-542-3p, which targeted cadherin17 [89]. In addition to modulation of stromal cells,
recent data have also demonstrated a pivotal role for
cancer cell–derived exosomes in the organization of the
extracellular matrix (ECM). Being rich in proteases,
Falcone et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2015) 34:32
Page 6 of 10
Figure 2 Cancer cell-secreted exosomal miRNAs contribute to the formation of the metastatic niche.
exosomes can modulate the ECM for degradation of collagens, laminin, and fibronectin, and this may have severe consequences on tumor and host cell adhesion,
motility, and invasiveness [90].
Exosomal miRNAs can also participate in cancer metastasis by adapting the tumor niche cells. miR-105,
which is characteristically expressed and secreted by
metastatic breast cancer cells, is a potent regulator of
migration through targeting the tight junction protein
ZO-1. In endothelial monolayers, exosome-mediated
transfer of cancer-secreted miR-105 efficiently destroys
tight junctions and the integrity of these natural barriers
against metastasis. Overexpression of miR-105 in nonmetastatic cancer cells induces metastasis and vascular
permeability in distant organs, whereas inhibition of
miR-105 in highly metastatic tumors alleviates these
effects [91]. It has been recently shown that miR-200
family members, which regulates the mesenchymal-toepithelial transition, within extracellular vesicles secreted
from highly metastatic tumor cells can be internalized
by weakly metastatic cells and confer the capability of
tumor growth at metastatic lesions [92,93].
The contribution of exosome in induction of angiogenesis to promote cancer metastasis is also described.
For instance, it was shown that miRNA-enriched exosomes released by CD105 cancer stem cells from renal
carcinomas may modify the tumor microenvironment by
triggering angiogenesis and may promote formation of a
pre-metastatic niche [42]. Specific exosomal miRNAs,
such as those of the miR-17-92 cluster, have an important role in neoplasia-to-endothelial cell communication
for regulating endothelial gene expression during tumor
angiogenesis in leukemia cells [94]. It was also shown
that tumor-secreted miR-9 encapsulated into microvesicles promotes endothelial cell migration and tumour
angiogenesis participating in intercellular communication and function [95]. Moreover, exosomal angiogenic
miR-210, known to be increased in the serum of cancer
patients with malignant breast cancer, regulate the metastatic ability of cancer cells through suppression of
specific target genes, which resulted in enhanced angiogenesis [96]. In addition, neutral sphyngomyelinase 2
(nSMase2) was required to regulate exosomal miRNA
secretion from cancer cells and promote angiogenesis
within the tumor microenvironment as well as metastasis [96]. These findings suggest that the horizontal transfer of exosomal miRNAs from cancer cells can dictate
the microenviromental niche for the benefit of cancer
progression. Some studies also suggest that the microenvironment may play a crucial role in regulating the
pathogenesis of some tumors by modulating the expression of exosomal miRNAs. Bone marrow stromal cells
modulate miR-15a, which act as putative tumor suppressor in multiple myeloma cells thus facilitating the progression of this tumor [97-100].
The exosomal miRNA profiling of sera from cancer
patients versus healthy individuals has often revealed important differences in relation to tumor progression,
Falcone et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2015) 34:32
highlighting a possible use of these miRNAs as disease
prognostic biomarkers [101,102]. In addition, many tumors displaying drug resistance show alterations in the
expression of miRNAs. The up- or down-regulation of
miRNAs affects the expression of several target proteins
(drug targets, transporters, cell cycle- and apoptosisrelated components, key signaling pathway components
involved in drug response), determining changes in drug
sensitivity through different molecular mechanisms
[103,104]. Moreover, different studies indicate that exosomes act as vehicles for exchange of genetic cargo
between heterogeneous populations of tumor cells, generating a way of transmitting drug resistance [105-107].
Recently Chen and colleagues reported that exosomes
from drug resistant breast cancer cells are capable of delivering a subset of miRNAs (miR-100, miR-222 and
miR-30a) to sensitive cells [108]. miR-34a, detected as
both intracellular and exosomal biomarker, was recently
found also to influence prostate cancer cell response to
docetaxel by regulating anti-apoptotic BCL-2 gene [109].
In addition, the inhibition of miR-9 expression in
chemoresistant glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells,
by transferring to GBM cells miR-9 microvesiclesencapsulated inhibitors, resulted in reversed expression of
the multidrug transporter and sensitized GBM cells to the
treatments [110].
Conclusions
Intensive research effort is spent to find out new cancer
diagnostic and prognostic tools. Representing a noninvasive approach, measurement of extracellular miRNAs in biological fluids might prove a valuable strategy.
In addition, since dysregulation of miRNAs is fundamental to the pathogenesis of many cancers, they are attractive candidates for clinical application as therapeutic
targets in both solid and hematological malignancies
[111]. Down-regulation of target oncogenes by reexpression of tumor suppressor miRNAs, or re-expression
of tumor suppressor genes by silencing oncomiRs is expected to impair tumor growth and metastasis [112].
Noteworthy, miR-34 mimic has become the first cancertargeted miRNA drug (MRX34) entering Phase I clinical
trials (ClinicalTrials.govidentifier: NCT01829971) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma [113]. A
new class of drugs that specifically target miRNA pathways are being currently developed. They work either via
replacement of tumor suppressed miRNAs with synthetic
or viral vector encoded miRNA mimics, or via antisensemediated inhibition of oncogenic miRNAs. However, offtarget effects must be evaluated before such therapies can
be safely applied to the clinic. Recently, a novel system for
miRNA or antagomiR delivery applicable for both local
and systemic administration with the use of mesenchymal
stem cell microparticles was developed in in vitro models
Page 7 of 10
[110,114,115]. The use of miRNA-containing exosomes as
cancer prognostic biomarkers and vehicles for miRNAbased therapy could be feasible and easily exploitable in
clinical practice, with the goal of developing a personalized
anticancer therapy.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
GF, AF and ID conceived the study. GF and ID searched the literature and
drafted the manuscript. All the authors participated in the discussion,
provided conceptual input, have read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The financial support of Telethon - Italy (Grant n. GGP14092 to G. Falcone)
and of the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research in the
framework of the Flagship Project NanoMAX (to A. Felsani and I. D’Agnano)
is gratefully acknowledged.
Author details
1
Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, CNR, Via Ramarini 32-00015,
Monterotondo, RM, Italy. 2Genomnia srl, Via Nerviano, 31/B – 20020, Lainate,
MI, Italy.
Received: 6 February 2015 Accepted: 16 March 2015
References
1. Ciesla M, Skrzypek K, Kozakowska M, Loboda A, Jozkowicz A, Dulak J. MicroRNAs
as biomarkers of disease onset. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;401:2051–61.
2. Ma R, Jiang T, Kang X. Circulating microRNAs in cancer: origin, function and
application. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2012;31:38.
3. Liang H, Zhang J, Zen K, Zhang CY, Chen X. Nuclear microRNAs and their
unconventional role in regulating non-coding RNAs. Protein Cell.
2013;4:325–30.
4. Liu J, Zheng M, Tang YL, Liang XH, Yang Q. MicroRNAs, an active and
versatile group in cancers. Int J Oral Sci. 2011;3:165–75.
5. Chen X, Ba Y, Ma L, Cai X, Yin Y, Wang K, et al. Characterization of
microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer
and other diseases. Cell Res. 2008;18:997–1006.
6. Chim SS, Shing TK, Hung EC, Leung TY, Lau TK, Chiu RW, et al. Detection
and characterization of placental microRNAs in maternal plasma. Clin Chem.
2008;54:482–90.
7. Lawrie CH, Gal S, Dunlop HM, Pushkaran B, Liggins AP, Pulford K, et al.
Detection of elevated levels of tumour-associated microRNAs in serum
of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol.
2008;141:672–5.
8. Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan
EL, et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer
detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:10513–8.
9. Hanke M, Hoefig K, Merz H, Feller AC, Kausch I, Jocham D, et al. A robust
methodology to study urine microRNA as tumor marker: microRNA-126
and microRNA-182 are related to urinary bladder cancer. Urol Oncol.
2010;28:655–61.
10. Kosaka N, Izumi H, Sekine K, Ochiya T. microRNA as a new immuneregulatory agent in breast milk. Silence. 2010;1:7.
11. Park NJ, Zhou H, Elashoff D, Henson BS, Kastratovic DA, Abemayor E, et al.
Salivary microRNA: discovery, characterization, and clinical utility for oral
cancer detection. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5473–7.
12. Weber JA, Baxter DH, Zhang S, Huang DY, Huang KH, Lee MJ, et al. The
microRNA spectrum in 12 body fluids. Clin Chem. 2010;56:1733–41.
13. Chen X, Liang H, Zhang J, Zen K, Zhang CY. Secreted microRNAs: a new
form of intercellular communication. Trends Cell Biol. 2012;22:125–32.
14. Cortez MA, Bueso-Ramos C, Ferdin J, Lopez-Berestein G, Sood AK, Calin GA.
MicroRNAs in body fluids–the mix of hormones and biomarkers. Nat Rev
Clin Oncol. 2011;8:467–77.
15. Turchinovich A, Burwinkel B. Distinct AGO1 and AGO2 associated miRNA
profiles in human cells and blood plasma. RNABiol. 2012;9:1066–75.
Falcone et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2015) 34:32
16. Arroyo JD, Chevillet JR, Kroh EM, Ruf IK, Pritchard CC, Gibson DF, et al.
Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs
independent of vesicles in human plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2011;108:5003–8.
17. Turchinovich A, Weiz L, Langheinz A, Burwinkel B. Characterization of
extracellular circulating microRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:7223–33.
18. Vickers KC, Palmisano BT, Shoucri BM, Shamburek RD, Remaley AT.
MicroRNAs are transported in plasma and delivered to recipient cells by
high-density lipoproteins. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:423–33.
19. Wagner J, Riwanto M, Besler C, Knau A, Fichtlscherer S, Roxe T, et al.
Characterization of levels and cellular transfer of circulating lipoproteinbound microRNAs. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1392–400.
20. Kosaka N, Iguchi H, Yoshioka Y, Takeshita F, Matsuki Y, Ochiya T. Secretory
mechanisms and intercellular transfer of microRNAs in living cells. J Biol
Chem. 2010;285:17442–52.
21. Mittelbrunn M, Gutierrez-Vazquez C, Villarroya-Beltri C, Gonzalez S, SanchezCabo F, Gonzalez MA, et al. Unidirectional transfer of microRNA-loaded
exosomes from T cells to antigen-presenting cells. Nat Commun.
2011;2:282.
22. Montecalvo A, Larregina AT, Shufesky WJ, Stolz DB, Sullivan ML, Karlsson JM,
et al. Mechanism of transfer of functional microRNAs between mouse
dendritic cells via exosomes. Blood. 2012;119:756–66.
23. Pegtel DM, Cosmopoulos K, Thorley-Lawson DA, van Eijndhoven MA,
Hopmans ES, Lindenberg JL, et al. Functional delivery of viral miRNAs
via exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:6328–33.
24. Skog J, Wurdinger T, van Rijn S, Meijer DH, Gainche L, Sena-Esteves M, et al.
Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote
tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat Cell Biol.
2008;10:1470–6.
25. Valadi H, Ekstrom K, Bossios A, Sjostrand M, Lee JJ, Lotvall JO. Exosomemediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of
genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:654–9.
26. Thery C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and
function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:569–79.
27. Yuana Y, Sturk A, Nieuwland R. Extracellular vesicles in physiological and
pathological conditions. Blood Rev. 2013;27:31–9.
28. Trajkovic K, Hsu C, Chiantia S, Rajendran L, Wenzel D, Wieland F, et al.
Ceramide triggers budding of exosome vesicles into multivesicular
endosomes. Science. 2008;319:1244–7.
29. Gutierrez-Vazquez C, Villarroya-Beltri C, Mittelbrunn M, Sanchez-Madrid F.
Transfer of extracellular vesicles during immune cell-cell interactions.
Immunol Rev. 2013;251:125–42.
30. Villarroya-Beltri C, Baixauli F, Gutierrez-Vazquez C, Sanchez-Madrid F,
Mittelbrunn M. Sorting it out: regulation of exosome loading. Semin
Cancer Biol. 2014;28:3–13.
31. Nolte-'t Hoen EN, Buermans HP, Waasdorp M, Stoorvogel W, Wauben MH,
't Hoen PA. Deep sequencing of RNA from immune cell-derived vesicles
uncovers the selective incorporation of small non-coding RNA biotypes
with potential regulatory functions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:9272–85.
32. Balaj L, Lessard R, Dai L, Cho YJ, Pomeroy SL, Breakefield XO, et al. Tumour
microvesicles contain retrotransposon elements and amplified oncogene
sequences. Nat Commun. 2011;2:180.
33. Thakur BK, Zhang H, Becker A, Matei I, Huang Y, Costa-Silva B, et al. Doublestranded DNA in exosomes: a novel biomarker in cancer detection. Cell Res.
2014;24:766–9.
34. Mayers JR, Audhya A. Vesicle formation within endosomes: An ESCRT marks
the spot. Commun Integr Biol. 2012;5:50–6.
35. Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C. Exosomes/microvesicles: mediators of cancerassociated immunosuppressive microenvironments. Semin Immunopathol.
2011;33:441–54.
36. Ji H, Chen M, Greening DW, He W, Rai A, Zhang W, et al. Deep sequencing
of RNA from three different extracellular vesicle (EV) subtypes released
from the human LIM1863 colon cancer cell line uncovers distinct
miRNA-enrichment signatures. PLoSOne. 2014;9:e110314.
37. Andreola G, Rivoltini L, Castelli C, Huber V, Perego P, Deho P, et al.
Induction of lymphocyte apoptosis by tumor cell secretion of FasL-bearing
microvesicles. J Exp Med. 2002;195:1303–16.
38. Chalmin F, Ladoire S, Mignot G, Vincent J, Bruchard M, Remy-Martin JP,
et al. Membrane-associated Hsp72 from tumor-derived exosomes mediates
STAT3-dependent immunosuppressive function of mouse and human
myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:457–71.
Page 8 of 10
39. Clayton A, Mitchell JP, Court J, Linnane S, Mason MD, Tabi Z. Human
tumor-derived exosomes down-modulate NKG2D expression. J Immunol.
2008;180:7249–58.
40. Szajnik M, Czystowska M, Szczepanski MJ, Mandapathil M, Whiteside TL.
Tumor-derived microvesicles induce, expand and up-regulate biological
activities of human regulatory T cells (Treg). PLoSOne. 2010;5:e11469.
41. Wieckowski EU, Visus C, Szajnik M, Szczepanski MJ, Storkus WJ, Whiteside TL.
Tumor-derived microvesicles promote regulatory T cell expansion and
induce apoptosis in tumor-reactive activated CD8+ T lymphocytes.
J Immunol. 2009;183:3720–30.
42. Grange C, Tapparo M, Collino F, Vitillo L, Damasco C, Deregibus MC, et al.
Microvesicles released from human renal cancer stem cells stimulate
angiogenesis and formation of lung premetastatic niche. Cancer Res.
2011;71:5346–56.
43. Peinado H, Aleckovic M, Lavotshkin S, Matei I, Costa-Silva B, Moreno-Bueno G,
et al. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a
pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat Med. 2012;18:883–91.
44. Taverna S, Amodeo V, Saieva L, Russo A, Giallombardo M, De Leo G, et al.
Exosomal shuttling of miR-126 in endothelial cells modulates adhesive and
migratory abilities of chronic myelogenous leukemia cells. Mol Cancer.
2014;13:169.
45. Salido-Guadarrama I, Romero-Cordoba S, Peralta-Zaragoza O, HidalgoMiranda A, Rodriguez-Dorantes M. MicroRNAs transported by exosomes in
body fluids as mediators of intercellular communication in cancer. Onco
Targets Ther. 2014;7:1327–38.
46. El Lee Y, Andaloussi S, Wood MJ. Exosomes and microvesicles: extracellular
vesicles for genetic information transfer and gene therapy. Hum Mol Genet.
2012;21:R125–34.
47. Raiborg C, Stenmark H. The ESCRT machinery in endosomal sorting of
ubiquitylated membrane proteins. Nature. 2009;458:445–52.
48. Tamai K, Tanaka N, Nakano T, Kakazu E, Kondo Y, Inoue J, et al. Exosome
secretion of dendritic cells is regulated by Hrs, an ESCRT-0 protein. Biochem
Biophys Res Commun. 2010;399:384–90.
49. Wollert T, Hurley JH. Molecular mechanism of multivesicular body
biogenesis by ESCRT complexes. Nature. 2010;464:864–9.
50. Rayner KJ, Hennessy EJ. Extracellular communication via microRNA: lipid
particles have a new message. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:1174–81.
51. Villarroya-Beltri C, Gutierrez-Vazquez C, Sanchez-Cabo F, Perez-Hernandez D,
Vazquez J, Martin-Cofreces N, et al. Sumoylated hnRNPA2B1 controls the
sorting of miRNAs into exosomes through binding to specific motifs. Nat
Commun. 2013;4:2980.
52. Chen TS, Lai RC, Lee MM, Choo AB, Lee CN, Lim SK. Mesenchymal stem cell
secretes microparticles enriched in pre-microRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res.
2010;38:215–24.
53. Li L, Zhu D, Huang L, Zhang J, Bian Z, Chen X, et al. Argonaute 2 complexes
selectively protect the circulating microRNAs in cell-secreted microvesicles.
PLoSOne. 2012;7:e46957.
54. Pigati L, Yaddanapudi SC, Iyengar R, Kim DJ, Hearn SA, Danforth D, et al.
Selective release of microRNA species from normal and malignant
mammary epithelial cells. PLoSOne. 2010;5:e13515.
55. Zhou Q, Li M, Wang X, Li Q, Wang T, Zhu Q, et al. Immune-related
microRNAs are abundant in breast milk exosomes. Int J Biol Sci.
2012;8:118–23.
56. Melo SA, Sugimoto H, O'Connell T, Noritoshi K, Villanueva A, Vidal A, et al.
Cancer Exosomes Perform Cell-Independent MicroRNA Biogenesis and
Promote Tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:707–21.
57. Bolukbasi MF, Mizrak A, Ozdener GB, Madlener S, Strobel T, Erkan EP, et al.
miR-1289 and "Zipcode"-like Sequence Enrich mRNAs in Microvesicles.
MolTherNucleic Acids. 2012;1:e10.
58. Squadrito ML, Baer C, Burdet F, Maderna C, Gilfillan GD, Lyle R, et al.
Endogenous RNAs modulate microRNA sorting to exosomes and
transfer to acceptor cells. Cell Rep. 2014;8:1432–46.
59. Hergenreider E, Heydt S, Treguer K, Boettger T, Horrevoets AJ,
Zeiher AM, et al. Atheroprotective communication between
endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells through miRNAs. Nat Cell
Biol. 2012;14:249–56.
60. Ramachandran S, Palanisamy V. Horizontal transfer of RNAs: exosomes as
mediators of intercellular communication. WileyInterdiscipRevRNA.
2012;3:286–93.
61. Simons M, Raposo G. Exosomes–vesicular carriers for intercellular
communication. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21:575–81.
Falcone et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2015) 34:32
62. Zomer A, Vendrig T, Hopmans ES, van Eijndhoven M, Middeldorp JM,
Pegtel DM. Exosomes: Fit to deliver small RNA. Commun Integr Biol.
2010;3:447–50.
63. Hu G, Drescher KM, Chen XM. Exosomal miRNAs: Biological Properties and
Therapeutic Potential. Front Genet. 2012;3:56.
64. Mulcahy LA, Pink RC, Carter DR. Routes and mechanisms of extracellular
vesicle uptake. J Extracell Vesicles. 2014;3:24641.
65. Bauer M, Pelkmans L. A new paradigm for membrane-organizing and -shaping
scaffolds. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:5559–64.
66. Mathivanan S, Ji H, Simpson RJ. Exosomes: extracellular organelles
important in intercellular communication. J Proteomics.
2010;73:1907–20.
67. Thuma F, Zoller M. Outsmart tumor exosomes to steal the cancer initiating
cell its niche. Semin Cancer Biol. 2014;28:39–50.
68. Chen PS, Su JL, Hung MC. Dysregulation of microRNAs in cancer. J Biomed
Sci. 2012;19:90.
69. Filipazzi P, Burdek M, Villa A, Rivoltini L, Huber V. Recent advances on the
role of tumor exosomes in immunosuppression and disease progression.
Semin Cancer Biol. 2012;22:342–9.
70. Gao F, Zhao ZL, Zhao WT, Fan QR, Wang SC, Li J, et al. miR-9 modulates the
expression of interferon-regulated genes and MHC class I molecules in
human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun.
2013;431:610–6.
71. Ueda R, Kohanbash G, Sasaki K, Fujita M, Zhu X, Kastenhuber ER, et al. Dicerregulated microRNAs 222 and 339 promote resistance of cancer cells to
cytotoxic T-lymphocytes by down-regulation of ICAM-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 2009;106:10746–51.
72. Ohshima K, Inoue K, Fujiwara A, Hatakeyama K, Kanto K, Watanabe Y, et al.
Let-7 microRNA family is selectively secreted into the extracellular
environment via exosomes in a metastatic gastric cancer cell line.
PLoSOne. 2010;5:e13247.
73. Ostenfeld MS, Jeppesen DK, Laurberg JR, Boysen AT, Bramsen JB, PrimdalBengtson B, et al. Cellular Disposal of miR23b by RAB27-Dependent
Exosome Release Is Linked to Acquisition of Metastatic Properties.
Cancer Res. 2014;74:5758–71.
74. Igaz I, Igaz P. Tumor surveillance by circulating microRNAs: a hypothesis.
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:4081–7.
75. Donadelli M, Dando I, Fiorini C, Palmieri M. Regulation of miR-23b expression
and its dual role on ROS production and tumour development. Cancer Lett.
2014;349:107–13.
76. Yang M, Chen J, Su F, Yu B, Su F, Lin L, et al. Microvesicles secreted by
macrophages shuttle invasion-potentiating microRNAs into breast cancer
cells. Mol Cancer. 2011;10:117.
77. Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, Ambs S, Cimmino A, Petrocca F, et al. A
microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene
targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:2257–61.
78. Wang B, Zhang Q. The expression and clinical significance of circulating
microRNA-21 in serum of five solid tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol.
2012;138:1659–66.
79. Cappellesso R, Tinazzi A, Giurici T, Simonato F, Guzzardo V, Ventura L, et al.
Programmed cell death 4 and microRNA 21 inverse expression is
maintained in cells and exosomes from ovarian serous carcinoma effusions.
Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122:685–93.
80. Leidinger P, Backes C, Dahmke IN, Galata V, Huwer H, Stehle I, et al. What
makes a blood cell based miRNA expression pattern disease specific? - A
miRNome analysis of blood cell subsets in lung cancer patients and healthy
controls. Oncotarget. 2014;5:9484–97.
81. Ogata-Kawata H, Izumiya M, Kurioka D, Honma Y, Yamada Y, Furuta K, et al.
Circulating exosomal microRNAs as biomarkers of colon cancer. PLoSOne.
2014;9:e92921.
82. Que R, Ding G, Chen J, Cao L. Analysis of serum exosomal microRNAs and
clinicopathologic features of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:219.
83. Lu Z, Liu M, Stribinskis V, Klinge CM, Ramos KS, Colburn NH, et al.
MicroRNA-21 promotes cell transformation by targeting the programmed
cell death 4 gene. Oncogene. 2008;27:4373–9.
84. Yan LX, Wu QN, Zhang Y, Li YY, Liao DZ, Hou JH, et al. Knockdown of miR-21 in
human breast cancer cell lines inhibits proliferation, in vitro migration and
in vivo tumor growth. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R2.
85. Fabbri M, Paone A, Calore F, Galli R, Croce CM. A new role for microRNAs, as
ligands of Toll-like receptors. RNABiol. 2013;10:169–74.
Page 9 of 10
86. Mittelbrunn M, Sanchez-Madrid F. Intercellular communication: diverse
structures for exchange of genetic information. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol.
2012;13:328–35.
87. Shah MY, Calin GA. The mix of two worlds: non-coding RNAs and hormones.
Nucleic Acid Ther. 2013;23:2–8.
88. Hood JL, San RS, Wickline SA. Exosomes released by melanoma cells
prepare sentinel lymph nodes for tumor metastasis. Cancer Res.
2011;71:3792–801.
89. Rana S, Malinowska K, Zoller M. Exosomal tumor microRNA modulates
premetastatic organ cells. Neoplasia. 2013;15:281–95.
90. Mu W, Rana S, Zoller M. Host matrix modulation by tumor exosomes
promotes motility and invasiveness. Neoplasia. 2013;15:875–87.
91. Zhou W, Fong MY, Min Y, Somlo G, Liu L, Palomares MR, et al. Cancersecreted miR-105 destroys vascular endothelial barriers to promote
metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:501–15.
92. Epstein DM. Special delivery: microRNA-200-containing extracellular
vesicles provide metastatic message to distal tumor cells. J Clin Invest.
2014;124:5107–8.
93. Le MT, Hamar P, Guo C, Basar E, Perdigao-Henriques R, Balaj L, et al. miR200-containing extracellular vesicles promote breast cancer cell metastasis.
J Clin Invest. 2014;124:5109–28.
94. Umezu T, Ohyashiki K, Kuroda M, Ohyashiki JH. Leukemia cell to
endothelial cell communication via exosomal miRNAs. Oncogene.
2013;32:2747–55.
95. Zhuang G, Wu X, Jiang Z, Kasman I, Yao J, Guan Y, et al. Tumour-secreted
miR-9 promotes endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis by activating
the JAK-STAT pathway. EMBO J. 2012;31:3513–23.
96. Kosaka N, Iguchi H, Hagiwara K, Yoshioka Y, Takeshita F, Ochiya T. Neutral
sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2)-dependent exosomal transfer of
angiogenic microRNAs regulate cancer cell metastasis. J Biol Chem.
2013;288:10849–59.
97. Abdi J, Qiu L, Chang H. Micro-RNAs, New performers in multiple myeloma
bone marrow microenvironment. Biomark Res. 2014;2:10.
98. Gao X, Zhang R, Qu X, Zhao M, Zhang S, Wu H, et al. MiR-15a, miR-16-1 and
miR-17-92 cluster expression are linked to poor prognosis in multiple myeloma.
Leuk Res. 2012;36:1505–9.
99. Sun CY, She XM, Qin Y, Chu ZB, Chen L, Ai LS, et al. miR-15a and miR-16
affect the angiogenesis of multiple myeloma by targeting VEGF.
Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:426–35.
100. Roccaro AM, Sacco A, Maiso P, Azab AK, Tai YT, Reagan M, et al. BM
mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes facilitate multiple myeloma
progression. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:1542–55.
101. Ye SB, Li ZL, Luo DH, Huang BJ, Chen YS, Zhang XS, et al. Tumor-derived
exosomes promote tumor progression and T-cell dysfunction through the
regulation of enriched exosomal microRNAs in human nasopharyngeal
carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2014;5:5439–52.
102. Eichelser C, Stuckrath I, Muller V, Milde-Langosch K, Wikman H, Pantel K,
et al. Increased serum levels of circulating exosomal microRNA-373 in
receptor-negative breast cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2014;5:9650–63.
103. Migliore C, Giordano S. Resistance to targeted therapies: a role for
microRNAs? Trends Mol Med. 2013;19:633–42.
104. Zheng T, Wang J, Chen X, Liu L. Role of microRNA in anticancer drug
resistance. Int J Cancer. 2010;126:2–10.
105. Corcoran C, Rani S, O'Brien K, O'Neill A, Prencipe M, Sheikh R, et al.
Docetaxel-resistance in prostate cancer: evaluating associated phenotypic
changes and potential for resistance transfer via exosomes. PLoSOne.
2012;7:e50999.
106. O'Brien K, Rani S, Corcoran C, Wallace R, Hughes L, Friel AM, et al. Exosomes
from triple-negative breast cancer cells can transfer phenotypic traits
representing their cells of origin to secondary cells. Eur J Cancer.
2013;49:1845–59.
107. Safaei R, Larson BJ, Cheng TC, Gibson MA, Otani S, Naerdemann W, et al.
Abnormal lysosomal trafficking and enhanced exosomal export of cisplatin
in drug-resistant human ovarian carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther.
2005;4:1595–604.
108. Chen WX, Liu XM, Lv MM, Chen L, Zhao JH, Zhong SL, et al. Exosomes from
drug-resistant breast cancer cells transmit chemoresistance by a horizontal
transfer of microRNAs. PLoSOne. 2014;9:e95240.
109. Corcoran C, Rani S, O'Driscoll L. miR-34a is an intracellular and exosomal
predictive biomarker for response to docetaxel with clinical relevance to
prostate cancer progression. Prostate. 2014;74:1320–34.
Falcone et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2015) 34:32
110. Munoz JL, Bliss SA, Greco SJ, Ramkissoon SH, Ligon KL, Rameshwar P.
Delivery of Functional Anti-miR-9 by Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived
Exosomes to Glioblastoma Multiforme Cells Conferred Chemosensitivity.
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2013;2:e126.
111. Nana-Sinkam SP, Croce CM. MicroRNAs as therapeutic targets in cancer.
Transl Res. 2011;157:216–25.
112. Krell J, Frampton AE, Stebbing J. MicroRNAs in the cancer clinic. Front
Biosci. 2013;5:204–13.
113. Ling H, Fabbri M, Calin GA. MicroRNAs and other non-coding RNAs as
targets for anticancer drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov.
2013;12:847–65.
114. Lee HK, Finniss S, Cazacu S, Bucris E, Ziv-Av A, Xiang C, et al. Mesenchymal
stem cells deliver synthetic microRNA mimics to glioma cells and glioma
stem cells and inhibit their cell migration and self-renewal. Oncotarget.
2013;4:346–61.
115. Prokopi M, Kousparou CA, Epenetos AA. The Secret Role of microRNAs in
Cancer Stem Cell Development and Potential Therapy: A Notch-Pathway
Approach. Front Oncol. 2014;4:389.
116. Li XJ, Ren ZJ, Tang JH. MicroRNA-34a: a potential therapeutic target in
human cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1327.
117. Ji Q, Hao X, Zhang M, Tang W, Yang M, Li L, et al. MicroRNA miR-34 inhibits
human pancreatic cancer tumor-initiating cells. PLoSOne. 2009;4:e6816.
118. Yu G, Yao W, Xiao W, Li H, Xu H, Lang B. MicroRNA-34a functions as an antimetastatic microRNA and suppresses angiogenesis in bladder cancer
by directly targeting CD44. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014;33:779.
119. Johnson SM, Grosshans H, Shingara J, Byrom M, Jarvis R, Cheng A, et al. RAS
is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family. Cell. 2005;120:635–47.
120. Liu C, Kelnar K, Liu B, Chen X, Calhoun-Davis T, Li H, et al. The microRNA
miR-34a inhibits prostate cancer stem cells and metastasis by directly
repressing CD44. Nat Med. 2011;17:211–5.
121. Sampson VB, Rong NH, Han J, Yang Q, Aris V, Soteropoulos P, et al.
MicroRNA let-7a down-regulates MYC and reverts MYC-induced growth in
Burkitt lymphoma cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:9762–70.
122. Sun X, Jiao X, Pestell TG, Fan C, Qin S, Mirabelli E, et al. MicroRNAs and
cancer stem cells: the sword and the shield. Oncogene. 2014;33:4967–77.
123. Thornton JE, Gregory RI. How does Lin28 let-7 control development and
disease? Trends Cell Biol. 2012;22:474–82.
124. Tsang WP, Kwok TT. Let-7a microRNA suppresses therapeutics-induced
cancer cell death by targeting caspase-3. Apoptosis. 2008;13:1215–22.
125. Kobayashi M, Salomon C, Tapia J, Illanes SE, Mitchell MD, Rice GE. Ovarian
cancer cell invasiveness is associated with discordant exosomal
sequestration of Let-7 miRNA and miR-200. J Transl Med. 2014;12:4.
126. Wang W, Li J, Zhu W, Gao C, Jiang R, Li W, et al. MicroRNA-21 and
the clinical outcomes of various carcinomas: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:819.
127. Zhu W, Xu B. MicroRNA-21 identified as predictor of cancer outcome: a
meta-analysis. PLoSOne. 2014;9:e103373.
128. Song B, Wang C, Liu J, Wang X, Lv L, Wei L, et al. MicroRNA-21 regulates
breast cancer invasion partly by targeting tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3
expression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29:29.
129. Mogilyansky E, Rigoutsos I. The miR-17/92 cluster: a comprehensive update
on its genomics, genetics, functions and increasingly important and numerous
roles in health and disease. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:1603–14.
130. Bai Y, Sun Y, Peng J, Liao H, Gao H, Guo Y, et al. Overexpression of
secretagogin inhibits cell apoptosis and induces chemoresistance in
small cell lung cancer under the regulation of miR-494. Oncotarget.
2014;5:7760–75.
131. Cheng HH, Mitchell PS, Kroh EM, Dowell AE, Chery L, Siddiqui J, et al.
Circulating microRNA profiling identifies a subset of metastatic prostate
cancer patients with evidence of cancer-associated hypoxia. PLoSOne.
2013;8:e69239.
132. Muller V, Gade S, Steinbach B, Loibl S, von Minckwitz G, Untch M, et al.
Changes in serum levels of miR-21, miR-210, and miR-373 in HER2-positive
breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy: a translational
research project within the Geparquinto trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat.
2014;147:61–8.
133. Qin Q, Furong W, Baosheng L. Multiple functions of hypoxia-regulated
miR-210 in cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014;33:50.
134. Ma L, Young J, Prabhala H, Pan E, Mestdagh P, Muth D, et al. miR-9, a MYC/
MYCN-activated microRNA, regulates E-cadherin and cancer metastasis. Nat
Cell Biol. 2010;12:247–56.
Page 10 of 10
135. Guglielmi L, Cinnella C, Nardella M, Maresca G, Valentini A, Mercanti D, et al.
MYCN gene expression is required for the onset of the differentiation
programme in neuroblastoma cells. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1081.
136. Felli N, Fontana L, Pelosi E, Botta R, Bonci D, Facchiano F, et al. MicroRNAs
221 and 222 inhibit normal erythropoiesis and erythroleukemic cell
growth via kit receptor down-modulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2005;102:18081–6.
137. Gillies JK, Lorimer IA. Regulation of p27Kip1 by miRNA 221/222 in
glioblastoma. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:2005–9.
138. Kawaguchi T, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Morimura R, Tsujiura M, Konishi H,
et al. Clinical impact of circulating miR-221 in plasma of patients with
pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:361–9.
139. Park JK, Lee EJ, Esau C, Schmittgen TD. Antisense inhibition of microRNA-21
or −221 arrests cell cycle, induces apoptosis, and sensitizes the effects of
gemcitabine in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2009;38:e190–9.
140. Teixeira AL, Ferreira M, Silva J, Gomes M, Dias F, Santos JI, et al. Higher
circulating expression levels of miR-221 associated with poor overall survival
in renal cell carcinoma patients. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:4057–66.
141. Vaksman O, Stavnes HT, Kaern J, Trope CG, Davidson B, Reich R. miRNA
profiling along tumour progression in ovarian carcinoma. JCell MolMed.
2011;15:1593–602.
142. Yang Y, Gu X, Zhou M, Xiang J, Chen Z. Serum microRNAs: A new
diagnostic method for colorectal cancer. Biomed Rep. 2013;1:495–8.
143. Zhao JJ, Lin J, Yang H, Kong W, He L, Ma X, et al. MicroRNA-221/222
negatively regulates estrogen receptor alpha and is associated with
tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:31079–86.
144. Althoff K, Lindner S, Odersky A, Mestdagh P, Beckers A, Karczewski S, et al.:
miR-542-3p exerts tumor suppressive functions in neuroblastoma by
downregulating Survivin. Int J Cancer. 2014
145. Wang Y, Huang JW, Castella M, Huntsman DG, Taniguchi T. p53 is positively
regulated by miR-542-3p. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3218–27.
146. Jiang JX, Gao S, Pan YZ, Yu C, Sun CY. Overexpression of microRNA-125b
sensitizes human hepatocellular carcinoma cells to 5-fluorouracil through
inhibition of glycolysis by targeting hexokinase II. Mol Med Rep.
2014;10:995–1002.
147. Liang L, Wong CM, Ying Q, Fan DN, Huang S, Ding J, et al. MicroRNA-125b
suppressesed human liver cancer cell proliferation and metastasis by directly
targeting oncogene LIN28B2. Hepatology. 2010;52:1731–40.
148. Zhou M, Liu Z, Zhao Y, Ding Y, Liu H, Xi Y, et al. MicroRNA-125b confers the
resistance of breast cancer cells to paclitaxel through suppression of
pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 antagonist killer 1 (Bak1) expression. J Biol Chem.
2010;285:21496–507.
149. Li Y, Chao Y, Fang Y, Wang J, Wang M, Zhang H, et al. MTA1 promotes the
invasion and migration of non-small cell lung cancer cells by downregulating
miR-125b. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2013;32:33.
150. Honeywell DR, Cabrita MA, Zhao H, Dimitroulakos J, Addison CL. miR-105
inhibits prostate tumour growth by suppressing CDK6 levels. PLoSOne.
2013;8:e70515.
151. Shen G, Rong X, Zhao J, Yang X, Li H, Jiang H, et al. MicroRNA-105 suppresses
cell proliferation and inhibits PI3K/AKT signaling in human hepatocellular
carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:2748–55.
152. Sirotkin AV, Laukova M, Ovcharenko D, Brenaut P, Mlyncek M. Identification
of microRNAs controlling human ovarian cell proliferation and apoptosis.
J Cell Physiol. 2010;223:49–56.
153. Yan W, Li R, Liu Y, Yang P, Wang Z, Zhang C, et al. MicroRNA expression
patterns in the malignant progression of gliomas and a 5-microRNA
signature for prognosis. Oncotarget. 2014;5:12908–15.
154. Schmitt MJ, Margue C, Behrmann I, Kreis S. MiRNA-29: a microRNA family
with tumor-suppressing and immune-modulating properties. Curr Mol Med.
2013;13:572–85.
155. Wang Y, Zhang X, Li H, Yu J, Ren X. The role of miRNA-29 family in cancer.
Eur J Cell Biol. 2013;92:123–8.
156. Wu Z, Huang X, Huang X, Zou Q, Guo Y. The inhibitory role of Mir-29 in
growth of breast cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2013;32:98.