Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Refocusing ethnographic museums through oceanic lenses

2020, International Journal of Heritage Studies

AI-generated Abstract

Philipp Schorch's monograph explores the intersection of ethnographic museums and Pacific Island studies, focusing on multi-vocality and co-curation. Through case studies of three significant institutions in Oceania, Schorch highlights the shared cultural histories and epistemologies of the region. The work advocates for a more inclusive, dialogical approach to museum practices, drawing on Enlightenment influences as a process of global dialogue. Schorch's insights contribute to ongoing discussions in museology and interdisciplinary fields related to Pacific studies.

International Journal of Heritage Studies ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjhs20 Refocusing ethnographic museums through oceanic lenses by Philipp Schorch, with Noelle M.K.Y. Kahanu, Sean Mallon, Cristián Moreno Pakarati, Mara Mulrooney, Nina Tonga, and Ty P. Kāwika Tengan, Honolulu, University of Hawai’i Press, 2020, 316 pp., $72.00 USD (hardcover), ISBN 978-0824881177 Theodore S. Gonzalves To cite this article: Theodore S. Gonzalves (2020): Refocusing ethnographic museums through oceanic lenses, International Journal of Heritage Studies, DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2020.1805790 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1805790 Published online: 10 Aug 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 16 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rjhs20 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HERITAGE STUDIES BOOK REVIEW Refocusing ethnographic museums through oceanic lenses, by Philipp Schorch, with Noelle M.K.Y. Kahanu, Sean Mallon, Cristián Moreno Pakarati, Mara Mulrooney, Nina Tonga, and Ty P. Kāwika Tengan, Honolulu, University of Hawai’i Press, 2020, 316 pp., $72.00 USD (hardcover), ISBN 978-0824881177 Philipp Schorch’s new monograph is an insightful and thought-provoking addition to the growing body of scholarly literature on museum studies in the Pacific. Both areas of study – Pacific Island studies and museum studies – are witnessing active and field-changing discussions. While this is technically his first monograph, the work itself is an exemplar of what so many in the field of museology are attempting to describe when they refer to multi-vocality and co-curation. Readers will find the individual case studies fascinating, ranging from the founding and administration of museums in settler colonial settings to the reimagining of curatorial work. Here, I highlight three important aspects of the volume. The first concerns the proper geographic framing of the study. To enter into the subject, Schorch provides us with a conceptual anchoring in comprehending disparate locations that are interchangeably referred to as Oceania, the Pacific, and Polynesia. Schorch structures the study around three storied cultural institutions: the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum in Hawai‘i, the Museo Antropológico Padre Sebastián Englert in Rapa Nui, and the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa in Aotearoa New Zealand. While these institutions are knitted together through his analysis of and participation in various projects, Schorch engages the larger region of the ‘Polynesian triangle’. The three locales share ‘a common cultural history clearly discernible in languages, stories, genealogies, and cosmologies’ (5) and ‘a common genealogical foundation that manifests itself in shared cosmologies, epistemologies, and ontologies that framed the research design’ (9). This recognition of shared histories reminds me of the kind of work that cultural workers enacted more than a generation ago when referring to the ‘five sisters’ of Central America: El Salvador, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Honduras, and Costa Rica. In the liner notes for their 1985 album titled, Por Eso Luchamos (‘This is Why We’re Fighting’), members of the group, Cutumay Camones (1985, 10), wrote: ‘History has united their aspirations for liberty and justice. Central America’s independence struggle against the Spanish crown in 1821 was one struggle carried out by all five countries’. Shared histories aside, to the casual observer there would appear a distinction to be made between relatively contiguous nation-states in Central America and the geographically dispersed archipelagos throughout the Pacific. Readers will find that Schorch’s analysis is productively informed by a distinction between the topological and the topographic. The latter, by definition, privileges land masses and the relief of surfaces. The former is ‘the study of the properties that are preserved through deformations, twistings, and stretchings of objects. Tearing, however, is not allowed’ (Weisstein n.d.). Referencing Epeli Hau‘ofa, Schorch (9) takes heed the topological injunction not to tear the location asunder: ‘We perceive Oceania as a spatial entity that remains intact despite ongoing transformations: being deformed but not ripped apart, maintaining its integrity within flexible boundaries through processes of what Hau‘ofa calls “world enlargement”’. I am reminded here of Okihiro’s (2009) premium on centring any analysis of the Pacific from the perspectives of those on the islands instead of continents, the latter of which has enjoyed historiographical privileging in Western culture at the expense of the former. 2 BOOK REVIEW Schorch threads a second aspect of the work throughout the volume: namely, the need for cultural institutions and curatorial staff to engage in co-curation. The author spins out the various ways in which that kind of work is able to take place in this multi-sited study. Rather than emphasise the role of curators as members of a highly specialised guild that dispenses knowledge from above or serves as a gate-keeper to precious archives, Schorch (45) advances a model of stewardship that places a premium on facilitation, translation, and dialogical exchange. It is also not enough for the author to provide detailed examples of interlocutors, informants, ground-level community-based agents; he has insisted on providing a multi-vocal text. These other voices surface throughout the text at various times to offer their own critical perspectives. For example, Noelle M.K.Y. Kahanu, in the book’s second chapter, asks questions that cut to the bone of producing ethically-grounded curatorial work. While reflecting on her work at the Bishop Museum in Honolulu, Kahanu’s reflexivity represents the kind of thoughtfulness that any curator and scholar should bring with them to the task: ‘Were we being consistent, honest, and transparent . . . ? [W]hen the Bishop Museum began its Hawaiian Hall project, it was within the context of not just a renovation, but a restoration. And what does one restore? One restores trust, a foundation, a nation. Did we succeed?’ (37–38). At the heart of calls for co-curation is the challenge to produce knowledge that does not reproduce the power imbalances that academic work has facilitated between coloniser and colonised. It is not simply a matter of the representational presence of people from communities who had previously been only the subjects of scientific analyses; as Kahanu (40) notes: ‘presence cannot be equated with progress and that progress cannot depend on presence’. The call for co-curation is nothing less than one to democratise cultural institutions. Schorch’s co-curation lessons in Oceania are being internalised well beyond the Polynesian triangle in related and parallel developments. Consider the ongoing work in the Americas and Europe by Nina Simon’s Of/By/For All vision for ‘radical inclusion’ to reshape museums, galleries, and other groups (see www.ofbyforall.org). This not only includes co-creation at the staff and curatorial levels, but also considerations of who sits on administrative, funding, and advisory boards. Turn to the Pacific Northwest and pragmatic examples of co-curation are to be found in the Wing Luke Museum’s handbook for its ‘community-based exhibition model’ (Chin 2006), or in the Smithsonian Asian Pacific American Centre’s Culture Lab Playbook, which emphasises ‘collaborative, participatory, and socially responsible spaces where people can come as their true selves’ (Smithsonian APAC 2018). It is critical that museum professionals follow up on decisions to engage in co-curation and co-creation in order to demonstrate accountability to their publics. Finally, in several places Schorch’s text makes a case for a more dialogical and multi-directional approach for understanding the influence of Enlightenment thinking in the Pacific. He is cautious about the often-rehearsed claim that European values are simply imposed from without. Schorch (41) argues that ‘modernity itself has been internally multiple and radically cross-cultural throughout’, and that ‘the Enlightenment should not be seen as a singular event originating in some European center and radiating out into the global peripheries, but rather as a “process of global circulation, translation, and transnational co-production”’ [drawing on Conrad’s (2012) historiographical critique] (31). This neatly ties the contemporaneous practice of co-curation with his conceptual and historical envisioning of Enlightenment values as co-productive. Philipp Schorch’s Refocusing Ethnographic Museums Through Oceanic Lenses will productively inform interdisciplinary projects that are situated at the crossroads of museology, Pacific Island studies, anthropology, translation, ethnography, and public administration. References Camones, C. 1985. Por Eso Luchamos. New York and Berkeley: Paredon Records. Chin, C. and Wing Luke Asian Museum. 2006. Community-based Exhibition Model. Seattle: Wing Luke Asian Museum. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HERITAGE STUDIES 3 Conrad, S. 2012. “Enlightenment in Global History: A Historiographical Critique.” American Historical Review 117 (4) (October): 999–1027. doi:10.1093/ahr/117.4.999. Okihiro, G. Y. 2009. Island World: A History of Hawai’i and the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press. Smithsonian Asian Pacific American Center. 2018. Culture Lab Playbook. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. https://smithsonianapa.org/culturelab/ Weisstein, E. W. n.d. “Topology.” MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ Topology.htm Theodore S. Gonzalves Smithsonian National Museum of American History, USA [email protected] http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-5921 © 2020 Theodore S. Gonzalves https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1805790