Academia.eduAcademia.edu

New drug targets for Mycobacterium tuberculosis

2003, The Indian journal of medical research

In spite of the availability of effective chemotherapy and Bacille-Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine, tuberculosis remains a leading infectious killer world-wide. Many factors such as, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection, drug resistance, lack of patient compliance with chemotherapy, delay in diagnosis, variable efficacy of BCG vaccine and various other factors contribute to the mortality due to tuberculosis. In spite of the new advances in understanding the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and availability of functional genomic tools, such as microarray and proteomics, in combination with modern approaches, no new drug has been developed in the past 30 yr. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify new drug targets in mycobacteria and eventually, develop new drugs. The release of the complete genome sequence of M. tuberculosis has facilitated a more rational, and directional approach to search for new drug targets. In general, gene products involved in mycobacteri...

Review Article Indian J Med Res 117, January 2003, pp 1-9 New drug targets for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Puneet Chopra, L.S. Meena & Yogendra Singh Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology, Delhi, India Received January 3, 2003 In spite of the availability of effective chemotherapy and Bacille-Calmette -Guerin (BCG) vaccine, tuberculosis remains a leading infectious killer world-wide. Many factors such as, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection, drug resistance, lack of patient compliance with chemotherapy, delay in diagnosis, variable efficacy of BCG vaccine and various other factors contribute to the mortality due to tuberculosis. In spite of the new advances in understanding the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and availability of functional genomic tools, such as microarray and proteomics, in combination with modern approaches, no new drug has been developed in the past 30 yr. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify new drug targets in mycobacteria and eventually, develop new drugs. The release of the complete genome sequence of M. tuberculosis has facilitated a more rational, and directional approach to search for new drug targets. In general, gene products involved in mycobacterial metabolism, persistence, transcription, cell wall synthesis and virulence would be possible targets for the development of new drugs. The exploitation of host cell signaling pathways for the benefit of the pathogen is a phenomenon that deserves to be looked into with a new perspective in the current scenario to combat M. tuberculosis. Reversible phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, which are carried out by specific protein kinases and phosphatases have been shown to modify the host proteins and help in the establishment of disease by several pathogenic bacteria. In this review, we discuss some possible drug targets for M. tuberculosis. Key words Dormancy - drugs - kinases - Mycobacterium tuberculosis - phosphatases Tuberculosis continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Five decades of tuberculosis control programmes using potentially efficacious drugs and the availability of BCG vaccine, have failed to reduce the prevalence of infection in most parts of the world. It has been reported that more than 3 billion people have been vaccinated with BCG, but still TB kills more than 50,000 people every week and approximately one-third of the world population is asymptomatically infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis1. It has been estimated that TB accounts for around 32 per cent deaths in HIV infected individuals 2. The situation has exacerbated because of the presence of some complicating factors like, emergence of multidrugresistant TB3, HIV co-infection 4 , lack of patient compliance with chemotherapy, and varia ble efficacy of Bacille -Calmette Guerin (BCG) vaccine. A prerequisite for the effective control of tuberculosis is to understand the host-pathogen interactions and its contribution towards the development of disease. Understanding host-pathogen interactions would give an important clue for developing new drugs, vaccine and diagnostic tests. The release of complete genome sequence of M. tuberculosis has facilitated the development of more rational and specific methods to search for new drug targets and vaccine candidates. The success of mycobacteria in producing disease relies entirely on its ability to utilize macrophages for its replication and more importantly, the maintenance of viability of host macrophages that sustain mycobacteria. M. tuberculosis has evolved several mechanisms to circumvent the hostile environment of the macrophage, its primary host cell. In spite of extensive research, our knowledge about the virulence factor(s) of M. tuberculosis is inadequate. A variety of mechanisms have been suggested to contribute towards the survival of mycobacteria within macrophages. These mechanisms include (i) inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion 5; (ii) inhibition of phagosome acidification6, (iii) recruitment and retention of tryptophan/aspartate containing coat protein on phagosomes to prevent their delivery to lysosomes 7; and (iv) hostinduced expression of members of the PE-PGRS family of proteins 8. The recent rise in TB cases and especially the increase of drug resistant mycobacteria indicate an urgent need to develop new anti-TB drugs. The long duration of TB therapy is a consequence of persistent M. tuberculosis, not effectively killed by current anti-TB agents. Recent advances in the knowledge of the biology of the organism and the availability of the genome sequence give an opportunity to explore a wide range of novel targets for drug design. It is expected that the application of functional genomic tools, such as microarray and proteomics, in combination with modern approaches, such as structure-based drug design and combinatorial chemistry will lead to the development of new drugs that are not only active against drug resistant TB but can also shorten the chemotherapy schedule. Status of current tuberculosis drug therapy Drugs available for the treatment of tuberculosis can be classified into two categories; first line drugs such as, isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PZA), ethambutol (EMB) etc., and second line drugs like para amino salicylate (PAS), kanamycin, cycloserine (CS), ethionamide (ETA), amikacin, capreomycin, thiacetazone, fluoroquinolones etc. Current TB therapy, also known as DOTS (directly observed treatment, short-course) consists of an initial phase of treatment with 4 drugs, INH, RIF, PZA and EMB, for 2 months daily, followed by treatment with INH and RIF for another 4 months, three times a week9. The targets of these drugs are varied. INH, inhibits synthesis of mycolic acid, a cell well component10; PZA targets cell membrane whereas rifampin and streptomycin interferes with the initiation and streptomycin interferes with the initiation of RNA and protein synthesis respectively 11. EMB blocks biosynthesis of arabinogalactan, a major polysaccharide present in the mycobacterial cell wall12 and kanamycin and capreomycin, like streptomycin, inhibit protein synthesis through modification of ribosomal structures at the 16S rRNA 13. Cycloserine prevents the synthesis of peptidoglycan, a constituent of cell wall14. Limitations of current drug therapy and need for new drug targets In the present scenario, due to the emergence of multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and association between HIV and TB, DOTS is becoming rapidly ineffective in controlling tuberculosis. Recent reports indicate that, areas where there is a high incidence of MDR-TB, DOTS is failing to control the disease15. In such circumstances, the second line drugs are prescribed in combination with DOTS. However, this combination of drugs is very expensive, has to be administered for a longer duration and has significant side effects. One major drawback of current TB therapy is that the drugs are administered for at least 6 months. The length of therapy makes patient compliance difficult, and such patients become potent source of drug-resistant strains. The second major and serious problem of current therapy is that most of the TB drugs available today are ineffective against persistent bacilli, except for RIF and PZA. RIF is active against both actively growing and slow metabolizing non-growing bacilli, whereas PZA is active against semi-dormant non-growing bacilli16. However, there are still persistent bacterial populations that are not killed by any of the available TB drugs. Therefore, there is a need to design new drugs that are more active against slowly growing or non-growing persistent bacilli to treat the population at risk of developing active disease through reactivation. Secondly, it is important to achieve a shortened therapy schedule to encourage patient’s compliance and to slow down the development of drug resistance in mycobacteria. Impact of genome sequence on identification of new drug targets The complete genome sequence of M. tuberculosis17 provides an opportunity for a more focussed and planned approach towards the identification of new drug targets. Genome sequence helps in compilation of all the potential gene products encoded by a particular organism, identification of functions (enzymes and pathways) that are missing or unique in a particular organism, and finally identifying the genes that are common to all (or most) prokaryotes and eukaryotes. An important advantage of this analysis is the possibility of identifying a novel target that is present in many bacteria and subsequently designing an antibiotic that could be active against a wide range of bacteria. In addition, availability of human genome sequence can help in eliminating the potential drug targets that have close human homologues. Thus, the possibility of using complete genome sequences for target identification are virtually unlimited. Possible drug targets In recent years, a number of new genes and their products in M. tuberculosis have been identified, which can be possible drug targets for tuberculosis. The gene products that control vital aspects of mycobacterial physiology like, metabolism, persistence, virulence, signal transduction and cell wall synthesis would be attractive targets for new drugs. A large number of genes are being studied in the search for new drug targets using various approaches. Some genes and their products reported in literature that can serve as drug target are discussed below. Genes involved in dormancy or persistence Mycobacteria has the unique property of becoming persistent or dormant for very long periods. This stage of mycobacteria poses a significant problem for effective therapy as these persistent bacilli are resistant to most of the currently available drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis. The mechanism of mycobacterial persistence or dormancy is far from being understood. Isocitrate lyase (ICL), a key enzyme of glyoxylate shunt has been shown to be involved in the persistence of M. tuberculosis in mice 18. The interesting point is that ICL is not essential for the viability of tubercle bacilli in normal cultures or in hypoxic conditions, but is important for persistence of bacilli in mice. Recently, pcaA gene, which encodes a novel methyl transferase has also been shown to be involved in the persistence in mice. This gene is involved in the modification of mycolic acids of mycobacterial cell wall. The pcaA knockout strain of mycobacteria grew normally in vitro and replicated in mice similar to the wild type strain initially but was not able to persist19. Nevertheless, the role of icl and pcaA genes in the persistence of M. tuberculosis in vivo and the absence of homologous genes in the host make them good drug targets, which would potentially eliminate persistent bacilli in vivo. Genes involved in cell wall synthesis Mycobacteria including M. tuberculosis have a unique cell wall structure. A variety of unique lipids like lipoarabinomannan (LAM), trehalose dimycolate, and phthiocerol dimycocerate which form non covalent anchorage with the cell membrane have been documented to play an important role in the virulence of M. tuberculosis20. Lipids such as cord factor have been suggested to play an important role in the virulence of M. tuberculosis by inducing cytokine mediated events21. LAM is also a major constituent of the mycobacterial cell wall and has been shown to induce TNF release from the macrophages22 which plays a significant role in bacterial killing. Because of the reasons cited above, genes involved in cell wall synthesis of mycobacteria have been exploited as targets for many anti-mycobacterial drugs. Several important TB drugs such as INH, ETA and EMB target mycobacterial cell wall synthesis. Enzymes involved in this pathway have always been preferred targets in drug development efforts. For example, enzymes (RmlA to RmlD) which are involved in the synthesis of dTDP-rhamnose, an essential structural component of the cell wall of M. tuberculosis, have been selected for an in vitro screening with chemical library of 8,000 compounds 23. Thiolactomycin (TLM) targets two β-ketoacyl-acyl-carrier protein synthases, KasA and KasB enzymes that belong to the fatty acid synthase type II system involved in the fatty acid and mycolic acid biosynthesis 24. TLM has also been shown to be active against MDR-TB clinical isolate. Several TLM derivatives have been found to be more potent in vitro against fatty acid and mycolic acid biosynthesis25. Cerulenin, an inhibitor of fatty acid synthesis, has also been shown to inhibit mycobacterial lipid synthesis and is active against M. tuberculosis in vitro with an MIC of 1.5-12.5 mg/ml26. Octanesulphonyl acetamide (OSA) has recently been identified as an inhibitor of fatty acid and mycolic acid biosynthesis in mycobacteria 27. The inhibitor was found to be active against both slow growers such as M. tuberculosis and also MDR-TB strains with a MIC of about 6.25-12.5 mg/ml. Interestingly, OSA was found to be less active against fast growers such as M. smegmatis and M. fortuitum28. These reports clearly suggest that several genes of the cell wall synthesis pathway and enzymes involved in fatty acid and mycolic acid synthesis could be good candidates for further drug development. Virulence genes On the basis of the genome sequences of pathogens, using bioinformatics approach, a few genes have been proposed to play an important role in the virulence of mycobacteria. In recent years, a number of techniques have been developed to delineate the differences between related pathogens and non-pathogens. These techniques include PCR-based subtractive hybridization that can be used to specifically amplify DNA sequences that are present in one (e.g., virulent) but not in the other (e.g., avirulent) strain. The other established method is signature tagged mutagenesis (STM), which provides a means for identific ation of genes which are important for bacteria to survive and proliferate in vivo. A number of genes have been identified, using different techniques like allelic exchange, signature tagged mutagenesis, and anti-sense RNA, that show a role in the virulence of M. tuberculosis. Some of these genes include, erp (extracellular repeat protein), which has been shown to be essential for the multiplication of mycobacteria during the acute phase of infection in the mouse model29. The most important point is that this gene has no homologues in other organisms, making it an attractive drug target. Recently, two gene clusters were identified and shown to be important for the growth of mycobacteria in the lungs during the early phase of infection. This gene cluster is involved in the synthesis (fadD28) and export (mmpL7) of a complex cell wall associated lipid30 , phthiocerol dimycocerosate. The approach of targeting virulence factors, like other approaches suffers from some serious drawbacks, like virulence factors ma y not be necessarily survival genes. Therefore, inhibition of virulence factors may not be lethal to the pathogen. The other very important hurdle in this approach is that drugs that target virulence factors may be of very little or of no use if the disease has already been established. However, inhibitors of these virulence gene products may be used in combination with existing drugs to improve the regime of chemotherapy 31. Genes of signal transduction The exploitation of host cell signaling pathways for the benefit of the pathogen is a phenomenon that deserves to be looked into with a new perspective in the pathogenesis and drug target identification of M. tuberculosis. Reversible phosphorylation and dephosphorylation is the key mechanism by which extracellular signals are translated into cellular responses. These processes are carried out by specific protein kinases and phosphatases32. It has been shown that, upon infection, the phosphatases and kinases of several pathogenic bacteria modify the host proteins that helps in the establishment of disease. Phosphorylation generally takes places at histidine, serine, threonine or tyrosine residues. Lipoarabinan (LAM) from the virulent species of M. tuberculosis has been shown to modulate host signaling pathways linked to bacterial survival by phosphorylation of an apoptotic protein (Bad) in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3K)dependent pathway in THP- 1 cells 33. Earlier, it had been shown that a major antiphosphotyrosine reactive protein was present only in mycobacteria belonging to the M. tuberculosis complex34. Serine/threonine protein kinases: Serine and threonine kinases have been found to coordinate stress responses, developmental processes and pathogenicity in several microorganisms 32. Serine/ threonine kinase (YpkA) of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis helps in the virulence of pathogen by disrupting and reprogramming the host signaling network35. These kinases have also been suggested and control the late stages of development, sporulation or secondary metabolite production in bacteria 32. Unlike Yersinia, Listeria monocytogenes invades mammalian cells and alters the host signaling by directly stimulating mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase upon attachment to epithelial cells36. Another example of an active interaction between invasive bacteria and the host is provided by the human gastric epithelial pathogen Helicobacter pylori which induces cytoskeletal rearrangements following attachment to gastric cells, as well as inducing phosphorylation of two host protein 37. The genome sequence of M. tuberculosis suggested the presence of eleven putative serine/threonine protein kinases17. Presence of these kinases, in such a large number in M. tuberculosis indicates a likely role for these proteins in the specific signal transduction events with host ligands. It has been suggested that protein kinase G and F may change the phosphorylation pattern of host proteins upon infection, thereby, promoting the bacterial survival38. Recently PknA has been shown to have a role in cell growth, division, and elongation 39. Moreover, kinase inhibitors, genistein, staurosporin and K252a have been shown to inhibit the development of few bacteria like, Myxococcus xanthus40. Recently, it has been shown that an isoquinoline inhibitor reduces the growth of two mycobacterial species, M. smegmatis mc2 155 and M. bovis Bacille Calmette Guerin (BCG). This inhibitor also blocked the activity of PknB, a serine threonine kinase of M. tuberculosis in a dose dependent manner. It has been speculated that this inhibitor may be active against other members of this family of kinases as well41. Tyrosine phosphatase : Pathogenic bacteria Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, secretes YopH, a tyrosine phosphatase in the host42 in order to down regulate the cell signaling pathways of macrophages that are involved in phagocytosis 43 and generation of the respiratory burst44. Similarly, another important intracellular pathogen, Salmonella typhimurium also secretes tyrosine phosphatase, SptP in the host through type III secretion system. Secreted SptP binds and activates the intrinsic GTPase activity of GTP binding proteins Rac and Cdc42 leading to the disruption of host cytoskeletal network required for bacterial internalization 45. The molecular basis of the pathogenicity of M. tuberculosis is far from being understood. However, both entry and subsequent survival of M. tuberculosis in the host cell appears to involve a specific cross talk between the host and pathogen. This is validated by the fact that the uptake of M. tuberculosis by the macrophage is associated with a number of early signaling events such as recruitment and activation of Src family protein tyrosine kinases. Recruitment of these proteins results in increased tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple macrophage proteins, and activation of phospholipase D(PLD) 46. Similarly, activation of protein tyrosine kinases appears to enhance stimulation of PLD activity and the associated increase in phosphatidic acid (PA). It has been shown that increased phosphorylation may trigger a number of down stream processes necessary for membrane remodeling during phagocytosis and intracellular survival of M. smegmatis in the host cells 47. It is known that M. tuberculosis has two functional secretary tyrosine phosphatases. Moreover, of these two tyrosine phosphatases, one phosphatase MptpB is present exclusively in the members of M. tuberculosis complex suggesting that MptpB might play a role in the survival of mycobacteria. These phosphatases may dephosphorylate some of the host proteins which may be helpful in the invasion and establishment of disease 48. Genes of two-component systems: Two-component systems (TCS) are vital components of signal transduction systems in a number of organisms. It consists of a sensor kinase that senses external signals and transmits the signals to the response regulator. The response regulator interacts with transcription factors which in turn will switch on/off a number of genes49. It has been reported that disruption of a multitude of TCS in Streptococcus pneumoniae greatly reduced the ability of the pathogen to cause disease49. In addition, TCS have also been shown to be involved in the regulation of bacterial virulence in a number of organisms. The genome sequence of M. tuberculosis has shown the presence of at least 12 two-component system homologues with 8 unlinked sensor kinases or response regulators17. However, the exact physiological role of most of these proteins is far from being understood. It has been shown that the inactivation of mtrA component of mtrA-mtrB complex of M. tuberculosis H37Rv was possible only in the presence of a functional copy of mtrA, suggesting that this response regulator is essential for the viability of M. tuberculosis50. Interestingly, another two-component system, devR-devS, was found to be over expressed in a virulent strain, H37Rv51. Disruption of the phoP component of the PhoP/PhoR (TCS that controls transcription of virulence genes in a number of intracellular bacterial pathogens such as Salmonella, Shigella and Yersinia) in M. tuberculosis, resulted in a mutant strain with impaired multiplication in the host. This mutant was also found to be attenuated in vivo in a mouse model52 , suggesting that PhoP is required for intracellular growth of M. tuberculosis. These observations collectively suggest that TCS in M. tuberculosis could be important drug targets. Transcription factors Gene products that are involved in transcription regulation have long been used as target for drugs in a number of pathogens. For example rifampin, a well-known drug for tuberculosis, targets RNA polymerase. The sigma factors have been shown to regulate gene expression in response to numerous environmental conditions in a number of bacterial species. Genome sequence of M. tuberculosis revealed the presence of 13 sigma factors. Sigma factors of mycobacteria like other bacteria also perform a multitude of functions. Sigma factor RpoV (same as SigA) has been shown to be a virulence factor in M. bovis, as point mutation (arginine 522 to histidine) in RpoV has been shown to cause attenuation of virulence in a guinea pig model53. It has been speculated that attenuation of virulence caused by the RpoV mutation might be due to the inability of the mutant RpoV to switch on certain virulence genes. Besides the virulence genes, RpoV also controls many other housekeeping genes. SigB has been shown to be induced during stationary phase54. Similarly, SigE is involved in heat stress, oxidative stress, stress due to exposure to SDS and survival in macrophages55. Expression of both SigB and SigE is under the control of SigH 56. Both SigE and SigH play a role in the resistance of M. smegmatis to various stress stimuli, including elevated temperature and oxidative stress. Moreover, expression of SigE and SigH of M. tuberculosis is markedly enhanced when the pathogen is inside the macrophages. Another sigma factor, SigF, has been shown to control the expression of Acr protein, which is induced in the macrophages and is necessary for the persistence of M. tuberculosis57. These observations clearly suggest that sigma factors especially the centrally important SigH, SigF and SigA are potential drug targets. Genes of other metabolic pathways Genes of some other metabolic pathways can also serve as possible targets for developing drugs against tuberculosis. Some of these genes include, mgtc, which codes for a putative Mg+2 transporter protein. This protein has been shown to be essential for the survival of mycobacteria both, in macrophages and mice. The ∆-mgtc mutant showed in vitro growth defects58. Similarly ∆-mbtB mutant deficient in synthesis of siderophores was unable to replicate within the macrophages. Failure of mycobacteria to survive in the absence of specific iron uptake system suggests the scarcity of this important nutrient in phagosomal environment 59. Members of PE-PGRS family of proteins that are highly expressed within tissue granulomas have been shown to be essential for the virulence of mycobacteria 8. Therefore, the members of this category of genes also constitute potential drug targets. Conclusion Major obstacle in the cure and prevention of tuberculosis is posed by the latent or persistent M. tuberculosis infection. This is due to the fact that most of the currently available drugs are ineffective against latent infection. In spite of better understanding of the physiology of M. tuberculosis, our knowledge about the state of the bacillus during the latent period is far from being complete. Moreover, a true representative model of latent tuberculosis in the laboratory setting is not available. Establishment of such a system would certainly accelerate the efforts to understand the physiology of mycobacteria during the latent period and eventually it will help in the identification of new drug targets that can act on the persistent mycobacteria. Recent advances in modern biology, in combination with bioinformatic tools, proteomics and microarray technology would further facilitate the search of new drug targets agains t tuberculosis. These exciting techniques are providing new avenues for understanding the biology of mycobacteria. The result of better understanding of the physiology of mycobacteria is manifested by the fact that the list of possible drug targets for tuberculosis is increasing day by day, the utility of these targets, however, cannot be predetermined. The list of potential drug targets encoded in the genome of M.tuberculosis include genes involved in persistence or latency, cell wall synthesis, virule nce, signal transduction, genes encoding transcription factors and enzymes of other intermediary metabolic pathways. All these targets should be explored to identify new drugs against tuberculosis that will overcome the limitations of existing drugs such as, prolonged chemotherapy, failure against persistent infection and multidrug resistance. References 1. Dye C, Williams BG, Espinal MA, Raviglione MC. Erasing the World’s slow stain : strategies to beat multidrugresistant tuberculosis. Science 2002; 295 : 2042-6. 2. Kochi A. WHO Global Tuberculosis Programme TB : Groups at Risk. WHO report on the tuberculosis epidemic. Geneva : World Health Organization; 1996. 3. Culliton BJ. Drug-resistant TB may bring epidemic. Nature 1992; 356 : 473. 4. Butler D. New fronts in an old war. Nature 2000; 406 : 670-2. 5. Armstrong JA, Hart PD. Phagosome-lysosome interaction in cultured macrophages infected with virulent tubercle bacilli. Reversal of the usual non-fusion pattern and observations on bacterial survival. J Exp Med 1975; 142 : 1-16. 6. Sturgill-Koszycki S, Schlesinger PH, Chakraborty P, Haddix PL, Collins HL, Fok AK, et al. Lack of acidification in Mycobacterium phagosomes produced by exclusion of the vesicular proton-ATPase. Science 1994; 263 : 678-81. 7. Ferrari G, Langen H, Naito M, Pieters J. A coat protein on phagosomes involved in the intracellular survival of mycobacteria. Cell 1999; 97 : 435-47. 8. Ramakrishnan L, Federspiel NA, Falkow S. Granuloma-specific expression of mycobacterium virulence proteins from the glycine-rich PE-PGRS family. Science 2000; 288 : 1436-9. 9. World Health Organization (WHO). Tuberculosis. Fact Sheet. No. 104; Geneva : WHO; 2000. Winder FG, Collins PB. Inhibition by isoniazid of synthesis of mycolic acids in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Gen Microbiol 1970; 63 : 41-8. Garvin RT, Biswas DK, Gorini L. The effects of streptomycin or dihydrostreptomycin binding to 16S RNA or to 30S ribosomal subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1974; 71 : 3814-8. 11. Takayama K, Kilburn JO. Inhibition of synthesis of arabinogalactan by ethambutol in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989; 33 : 1493-9. 13. Zhang Y, Telenti A. In : Hatfull GF, Jacobs WR Jr, editors. Molecular genetics of mycobacteria. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2000 p. 235-54. 14. Rando RR. On the mechanism of action of antibiotics which act as irreversible enzyme inhibitors. Biochem Pharmacol 1975; 24 : 1153-60. 15. Kimerling ME, Kluge H, Vezhnina N, Iacovazzi T, Demeulenaere T, Portaels F, et al. Inadequacy of the current WHO re-treatment regimen in a central Siberian prison: treatment failure and MDR-TB. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999; 3 : 451-3. 16. Zhang Y, Permer S, Sun Z. Conditions that may affect the results of susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide. J Med Microbiol 2002; 51 : 42-9. 17. Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, et al. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 1998; 393 : 537-44. 18. McKinney JD, Honer Zu Bentrup K, Munoz -Elias EJ, Miczak A, Chen B, Chan WT, et al. Persistence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in macrophages and mice requires the glyoxylate shunt enzyme isocitrate lyase. Nature 2000; 406 : 735-8. 19. Glickman MS, Cox JS, Jacobs WR Jr. A novel mycolic acid cyclopropane synthetase is required for cording, persistence and virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Cell 2000; 5 : 717-27. 20. Glickman MS, Jacobs WB Jr. Microbial pathogenesis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis dawn of a discipline. Cell 2001; 104 : 477-85. 21. Devergne O, Emilie D, Peuchmaur M, Crevon MC, DiAgay MF, Galanaud P. Production of cytokines in sarcoid lymph nodes: preferential expression of interleukin-1 beta and interferon-gamma genes. Hum Pathol 1992; 23 : 317-23. 22. Schuller-Levis GB, Levis WR, Ammazzalorso M, Nosrati A, Park E. Mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan induces nitric oxide and tumor necrosis factor alpha production in a macrophage cell line : down regulation by taurine chloramine. Infect Immun 1994; 62 : 4671-4. 23. Ma Y, Stern RJ, Scherman MS, Vissa VD, Yan W, Jones VC, et al. Drug targeting Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell wall synthesis: genetics of dTDP-rhamnose synthetic enzymes and development of a microtiter plate-based screen for inhibitors of conversion of dTDP-glucose to dTDP-rhamnose. Antimicob Agents Chemother 2001; 45 : 1407-16. 24. Slayden RA, Lee RE, Armour JW, Cooper AM, Orme IM, Brennan PJ, et al. Antimycobacterial action of thiolactomycin: an inhibitor of fatty acid and mycolic acid synthesis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40 : 2813-19. 26. 25. Zhang Y. Amzel LM. Tuberculosis drug targets. Curr Drug Targets 2002; 3 : 131-54. 27. Parrish NM, Kuhajda FP, Heine HS, Bishai WR, Dick JD. Antimycobacterial activity of cerulenin and its effects on lipid biosynthesis. J Antimicrob Chemother 1999; 43 : 219-26. 27. Jones PB, Parrish NM, Houston TA, Stapon A, Bansal NP, Dick JD, et al. A new class of antituberculosis agents. J Med Chem 2000; 43 : 3304-14. 28. Parrish NM, Houston T, Jones PB, Townsend C, Dick JD. In vitro activity of a novel antimycobacterial compound, N-octanesulfonylacetamide, and its effects on lipid and mycolic acid synthesis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001; 45 : 1143-50. 29. Berthet FX, Lagranderie M, Gounon P, Laurent-Winter C, Ensergueix D, Chavarot P, et al. Attenuation of virulence by disruption of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis erp gene. Science 1998; 282 : 759-62. 30. Cox JS, Chen B, McNeil M, Jacobs WR Jr. Complex lipid determines tissue-specific replication of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. Nature 1999; 402 : 79-83. 31. Alksne LE, Projan SJ. Bacterial virulence as a target for antimicrobial chemotherapy. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2000; 11 : 625-36. 32. Av-Gay Y, Everett M. The eukaryotic-like Ser/Thr protein kinases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Trends Microbiol 2000; 8 : 238-44. 33. Maiti D, Bhattacharyya A, Basu J. Lipoarabinomannan from Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes macrophage survival by phosphorylating Bad through a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. J Biol Chem 2001; 276 : 329-33. 34. Chow K, Ng D, Stokes R, Johnson P. Protein tyrosine phosphorylation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1994; 124 : 203-7. 35. Hakansson S, Galyov EE, Rosqvist R, Wolf-Watz H. The Yersinia YpkA Ser/Thr kinase is translocated and subsequently targeted to the inner surface of the HeLa cell plasma membrane. Mol Microbiol 1996; 20 : 593-603. 36. Tang P, Rosenshine I, Finlay BB. Listeria monocytogenes, an invasive bacterium stimulates MAP kinase upon attachment to epithelial cells. Mol Biol Cell 1994; 5 : 455-64. 37. Segal ED, Lange C, Covacci A, Tompkins LS, Falkow S. Induction of host signal transduction pathways by Helicobactor pylori. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94 : 7595-9. 38. Koul A, Choidas A, Tyagi AK, Drlica K, Singh Y, Ullrich A. Serine/threonine protein kinases PknF and PknG of Mycobacterium tuberculosis : Characterization and localization. Microbiology 2001; 147: 2307-14. 39. Chaba R, Raje M, Chakraborti PK. Evidence that a eukaryotic-type serine/threonine protein kinase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis regulates morphological changes associated with cell division. Eur J Biochem 2002; 269 : 1078-85. 40. Jain R, Inouye S. Inhibition of development of Myxococcus xanthus by eukaryotic protein kinase inhibitors. J Bacteriol 1998; 180 : 6544-50. 41. Drews SJ, Hung F, Av-Gay Y. A protein kinase inhibitor as an antimycobacterial agent. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2001; 205 : 369-74. 42. Bliska JB, Guan K, Dixon JE, Falkow S. Tyrosine phosphate hydrolysis of host proteins by an essential Yersinia virulence determinant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88 : 1187-91. 43. Fallman M, Andersson K, Hakansson S, Magnusson KE, Stendahl O, Wolf-Watz H. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis inhibits Fc receptor-mediated phagocytosis in J774 cells. Infect Immun 1995; 63: 3117-24. 44. Bliska JB, Black DS. Inhibition of the Fc receptor-mediated oxidative burst in macrophages by the Yersinia pseudotuberculosis tyrosine phosphatase. Infect Immun 1995; 63 : 681-5. 45. Fu Y, Galan JE. A Salmonella protein antagonizes Rac-1 and Cdc42 to mediate host-cell recovery after bacterial invasion. Nature 1999; 401 : 293-7. 46. Kusner DJ, Hall CF, Schlesinger LS. Activation of phospholipase D is tightly coupled to the phagocytosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis or opsonized zymosan by human macrophages. J Exp Med 1996; 184; 585-95. 47. De Camilli P, Emr SD, Mcpherson PS, Novick P. Phosphoinositides as regulators in membrane traffic. Science 1996; 271: 1533-9. 48. Koul A, Choidas A, Treder M, Tyagi AK, Drlica K, Singh Y, et al. Cloning and characterization of secretory tyrosine phosphatases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 2000; 182 : 5425-32. 49. Hoch JA. Two-component and phosphorelay signal transduction. Curr Opin Microbiol 2000; 3 : 165-70. 50. Zahrt TC, Deretic V. An essential two-component signal transduction system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 2000; 182; 3832-8. 51. Dasgupta N, Kapur V, Singh KK, Das TK , Sachdeva S, Jyothisri K, et al. Characterization of a two-component system devR-devS, of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuber Lung Dis 2000; 80 : 141-59. 52. Perez, E, Samper S, Bordas Y, Guilhot C, Gicquel B, Martin C. An essential role for phoP in Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. Mol Microbiol 2001; 41 : 179-87. 53. Collins DM, Kawakami RP, de Lisle GW, Pascopella L, Bloom BR, Jacobs WR Jr. Mutation of the principal sigma factor causes loss of virulence in a strain of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92 : 8036-40. 54. Doukhan L, Predich M, Nair G, Dussurget O, Mandic- Mulec I, Cole ST, et al. Genomic organization of the mycobacterial sigma gene cluster. Gene 1995; 165 : 67-70. 55. Wu QL, Kong D, Lam K, Husson RN. A mycobacterial extracytoplasmic function sigma factor involved in survival following stress. J Bacteriol 1997; 179 : 2922-9. 56. Raman S, Song T, Puyang X, Bardarov S, Jacobs WR Jr, Husson RN. The alternative sigma factor SigH regulates major components of oxidative and heat stress responses in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 2001; 183 : 6119-25. 57. Chen P, Ruiz RE, Li Q, Silver RF, Bishai WR. Construction and characterization of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutant lacking the alternate sigma factor gene, sigF. Infect Immun 2000; 68 : 5575-80. 58. Buchmeier N, Blanc-Potard A, Ehrt S, Piddington D, Riley L, Groisman EA. A parallel intraphagosomal survival strategy shared by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Salmonella enterica. Mol Microbiol 2000; 35 : 1375-82. 59. De Voss JJ, Rutter K, Schroeder BG, Su H, Zhu Y. Barry EC 3rd. The salicylate-derived mycobactin siderophores of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are essential for growth in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97 : 1252-7. Reprint requests : Dr Yogendra Singh, Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology Mall Road (Near Jubilee Hall), Delhi 110007, India