
Julio Gimenez
https://worldsofenglish.com/
less
Related Authors
Miguel Antezana
Universidad ESAN
Terence (Terry) Flynn
McMaster University
Louis de Saussure
University of Neuchâtel
Cor Baerveldt
University of Alberta
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
John Sutton
Macquarie University
Erika Darics
University of Groningen
Ismaeil Fazel
University of British Columbia
Emma Guion Akdağ
Heriot-Watt University
Tim Anderson
University of Victoria
Uploads
Books by Julio Gimenez
Supported by current learning theories, key teaching methodologies and assessment materials, the chapters address the challenges that non-native English speakers may face in the international English-speaking workplace. Areas of focus include:
Job hunting
Job applications
Interviews
Interpersonal, written and spoken communication
Performance appraisals
Applying for promotions
Written for pre-service, practicing and future teachers, with specific guidance for each role, this is an essential resource for all educators who want to confidently address the challenges that non-English speakers may encounter at work, including linguistic proficiency, cultural awareness and the use of technology.
The collection includes a wealth of effective strategies, varied research methodologies, and resources for practice making it an invaluable reference for practitioners, students, and researchers in the field of academic English, ESL/EFL, and online language instruction.
PART 1: THE ESSENTIALS OF ACADEMIC WRITING
An Introduction to Academic Writing
Exploring Academic Genres
Processes in Academic Writing
PART 2: WRITING GENRES IN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY
How to Write a Reflective Essay
How to Write a Care Critique
How to Write an Argument
How to Write Other Genres
PART 3: WORKING WITH TEXTS
Variety in Writing
Avoiding Plagiarism
Referencing Systems
Conclusion: Putting it all Together
Achievements Chart
Glossary of Key Terms
Further Readings and Resources
Suggested Answers to Activities
References
Index
JULIO GIMENEZ is a Lecturer in English Language and Academic Writing at the Centre for English Language Education, University of Nottingham, UK. His research interests are in the areas of academic literacies, workplace communication, and discourse analysis. His publications have appeared in international journals and edited collections in his areas of interest.
Papers by Julio Gimenez
Supported by current learning theories, key teaching methodologies and assessment materials, the chapters address the challenges that non-native English speakers may face in the international English-speaking workplace. Areas of focus include:
Job hunting
Job applications
Interviews
Interpersonal, written and spoken communication
Performance appraisals
Applying for promotions
Written for pre-service, practicing and future teachers, with specific guidance for each role, this is an essential resource for all educators who want to confidently address the challenges that non-English speakers may encounter at work, including linguistic proficiency, cultural awareness and the use of technology.
The collection includes a wealth of effective strategies, varied research methodologies, and resources for practice making it an invaluable reference for practitioners, students, and researchers in the field of academic English, ESL/EFL, and online language instruction.
PART 1: THE ESSENTIALS OF ACADEMIC WRITING
An Introduction to Academic Writing
Exploring Academic Genres
Processes in Academic Writing
PART 2: WRITING GENRES IN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY
How to Write a Reflective Essay
How to Write a Care Critique
How to Write an Argument
How to Write Other Genres
PART 3: WORKING WITH TEXTS
Variety in Writing
Avoiding Plagiarism
Referencing Systems
Conclusion: Putting it all Together
Achievements Chart
Glossary of Key Terms
Further Readings and Resources
Suggested Answers to Activities
References
Index
JULIO GIMENEZ is a Lecturer in English Language and Academic Writing at the Centre for English Language Education, University of Nottingham, UK. His research interests are in the areas of academic literacies, workplace communication, and discourse analysis. His publications have appeared in international journals and edited collections in his areas of interest.
The presentation will briefly look at the theoretical and analytical principles of microethnography, and discuss how microethnographies can be used to research workplace communication. A variety of data sets from my own experiences as a microethnographer (Gimenez, 2002; 2013; in preparation) will be used to illustrate ethnographic microanalysis and what this theory and methodology can tell us about the ‘immediate ecology’ (Erickson, 2009: 284) of the communication practices of three specific contexts of interactions:
a. A cement conglomerate subsidiary based in Cordoba, Argentina;
b. A satellite communications multinational headquartered in London; and
c. A medium-sized enterprise based in Cataluña, Spain.
The presentation will end with a discussion of possible ways in which we can use these “slices of reality” to inform and shape communication practices in the contexts observed.
I will present a critique of the current approaches to teaching academic writing in higher education and offer a number of discipline-specific pedagogical interventions which provide better opportunities for writers to examine the relationship between epistemology and academic writing.
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/education/research/have/seminars/disciplinaryepistemologies.aspx"
In the second part of my presentation, I will examine theoretical and pedagogic affordances created by recent technological developments. Exciting opportunities for both teaching and research are being offered by multimodal artefacts like websites, podcasts and video clips; enterprise social networking (ESN) such as YouTube, twitter and facebook; and applications like Skype and Google Voice; to mention but a few.
I will finish the presentation by outlining an agenda for future research in the field of EMC. I will delineate how the topics and activities in the agenda can be linked to the four epistemological axes of the conference: language and discourse, didactics, culture, and technology.
References
Cottrell, S. (2005). Critical thinking skills. Developing effective analysis and argument. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gimenez, J. (2008). Beyond the academic essay: Discipline-specific writing in nursing and midwifery. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(3), 151–164.
Gimenez, J. (forthcoming). Disciplinary epistemologies, generic attributes and undergraduate academic writing in nursing and midwifery. Higher Education, DOI 10.1007/s10734-011-9447-6.
Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21(3), 385–395.
Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. London: Continuum.
Jones, A. (2009). Redisciplining generic attributes: The disciplinary context in focus. Studies in Higher Education, 34(1), 85–100.
Leveson, A. (2000). Disparities in perceptions of generic skills: Academics and employers. Industry and Higher Education, 14(3), 157–164. Skills Portal for Oxford University Researchers (2010). http://www.skillsportal.ox.ac.uk/transferable_skills.php
This presentation examines the experiences of a group of undergraduate students who were faced with these challenges when writing assignments for a module outside their degree programmes. In particular, it focuses on the lived experiences of two engineering and two nursing students who took a business module at the same university. The presentation looks at the way the three disciplines (engineering, nursing and business studies) epistemologically conceptualise criticality, voice and evidentiality and how their conceptualisations determine their forms (texts), processes and practices of disciplinary writing, creating a significant challenge for these four students. Findings provide further evidence to previous research which has argued against the validity of terms such as ‘essay’ (Gimenez, 2008; Lillis, 2001), adding a new set of terms like ‘critically examine’ and ‘use supporting evidence’ to the argument.
The presentation concludes with an analysis of the pedagogical implications for the writing class and a number of suggestions for supporting student writers at undergraduate level.
In a recent study on how scientific knowledge is disseminated in contemporary society we identified a number of historical factors relating to science, the media, and academia that seem to have contributed to this state of affairs over the last twenty years, and that do not seem to have been broken-down with the advent of the above mentioned social platforms.