Book by Geoffrey Turnovsky
Anxieties about the fate of reading in the digital age reveal how deeply our views of the moral a... more Anxieties about the fate of reading in the digital age reveal how deeply our views of the moral and intellectual benefits of reading are tied to print. These views take root in a conception of reading as an immersive activity, exemplified by the experience of "losing oneself in a book." Against the backdrop of digital distraction and fragmentation, such immersion leads readers to become more focused, collected, and empathetic.
How did we come to see the printed book as especially suited to deliver this experience? Print-based reading practices have historically included a wide range of modes, not least the disjointed scanning we associate today with electronic text. In the context of religious practice, literacy's benefits were presumed to lie in such random-access retrieval, facilitated by indexical tools like the numbering of Biblical chapters and verses. It was this didactic, hunt-and-peck reading that bound readers to communities.
Exploring key evolutions in print in 17th- and 18th-century France, from typeface, print runs, and format to punctuation and the editorial adaptation of manuscript and oral forms in print, this book argues that typographic developments upholding the transparency of the printed medium were decisive for the ascendancy of immersive reading as a dominant paradigm that shaped modern perspectives on reading and literacy.
University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010
Papers by Geoffrey Turnovsky
Anciens et modernes face aux pouvoirs. L'Église, le Roi, les Académies. Ed by Christelle Bahier-Porte and Delphine Reguig (Paris: Honoré Champion), 2022
Exploration of the publishing trajectories of a number of key texts of the Querelle des anciens e... more Exploration of the publishing trajectories of a number of key texts of the Querelle des anciens et modernes.
Romanic Review, 2021
Régis Sauder's touching 2011 documentary, Nous, Princesses de Clèves, which follows a group of Ma... more Régis Sauder's touching 2011 documentary, Nous, Princesses de Clèves, which follows a group of Marseille high school students over the course of a year as they read La Fayette's novel while preparing for the Baccalauréat exams, juxtaposes two distinct types of reading: a reading in which the students are able to see themselves in the characters of the novel and a more difficult classroom-based reading that seeks to instill in the students, through conventional pedagogical exercises such as the explication de texte, an appreciation for the literary art and importance of the text. This essay explores the tensions between these two literacies, which become manifest in the film, especially in scenes where the students, who so easily relate to the novel's characters, struggle with the more formal analysis. In a second part, inspired by the writings of Priscilla Ferguson, the essay explores the sociological and pedagogical implications of what seems, in the film, the incompatibility of these distinct appropriations of the text, as it pertains to the students in the documentary and to US-based French programs built on the literary curricula developed by pedagogues such as Gustave Lanson in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
French Historical Studies, 2018
This article revisits the letters written by readers of the Mercure galant responding to the “gal... more This article revisits the letters written by readers of the Mercure galant responding to the “gallant question" posed by the periodical's editor in an April 1678 issue, regarding a central plot twist of Madame de Lafayette's novel La Princesse de Clèves. Highlighting the expansive, democratic, and participatory nature of these readers as they connected with the unprecedented complexity of the novel's characters, whose dilemmas they "identified" with, scholars have imputed to this 1670s public a modernity reflecting that of the novel itself, often considered “the first modern novel” in French. This essay analyzes the letters in light of their arguments as well as of the novel's editorial history, exploring the implications of a disconnect existing between the work and the readers in question, who, in reality, did not generally empathize with its protagonist's dilemma as presented by the Mercure, and moreover, who did not seem to have read the text. This disconnect highlights a number of realities that a "history of reading" approach to late 17th-century literary culture can bring out. One is that, in the summer of its publication, the work was perhaps not accessible in the provincial towns that produced the new readers of this modern public and who wrote in to the Mercure. Second, literary demand in the late 1670s, even as it was growing and touching new kinds of readers, expanded through a continuing interest in the didactic and romanesque genres of the 1630s-50s, rather than the "modern novel" of Lafayette. In the 1680s, excerpted texts from Scudéry's early romances, condensed as guidebooks for ideal comportment and sociability, were published in numbers that far exceeded copies of the Princesse de Clèves in circulation; and ultimately, the Mercure galant of the 1670-80s specialized in the former literary stylings more than the latter.
Les Dossiers du Grihl, 2017
When Louis Belmont discussed the bound collection of manuscript letters and verse known as the "C... more When Louis Belmont discussed the bound collection of manuscript letters and verse known as the "Chroniques du samedi," he described it as a “luxurious specimen,” whose lavish (in his view) material forms – “good paper,” gilded edges, and blue velvet binding – echoed the refined sphere that its texts, a "register" of the activities of Madeleine de Scudéry’s Saturday salon, evoked. He called it “le livre bleu de la préciosité.” Yet the history of the "Chroniques" as a document is more complex. This article explores some of the contexts through which the manuscript may have passed in its trajectory from the Scudéry group in the 1650s to the Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal today, and which may have shaped the book. I highlight two specifically: the world of 19th-century autograph collecting typified by Feuillet des Conches, collector and forger, who owned the manuscript and signed his name on its endsheets, and the political, religious, and secretarial framework of the early 18th century, when Pellisson’s papers were administered (published, archived) for posterity.
These contexts are obscure and to a degree, unknowable. But they have left discernible traces on the bound manuscript that, despite or because of the uncertainties encountered, may help us view it in a new light: created over time, invested in distinct and often contradictory ways, and materially altered for a variety of purposes.
Translated by Cécile Soudan. Original English version posted here, too.
Romanic Review, 2016
This article revisits the 18th-century trope of “sentimental reading,” as described in the famous... more This article revisits the 18th-century trope of “sentimental reading,” as described in the famous fan-mail sent by readers to Rousseau and Bernardin de Saint-Pierre. It reinterpets the accounts offered by these readers of the emotional, exalting experiences generated by La Nouvelle Héloïse, Paul et Virginie, and other key works, in light of the contradiction presented by a book historical context that determined these experiences – by delivering to the readers the texts in question, for instance – and yet was defined by attributes ostensibly antithetical to them: the sense of intimate communication with an author taken to be a personal friend whom the reader could imagine hearing or seeing was mediated by an expanding, commercialized trade and by an increasing standardization of typographic forms and methods, allowing more and more individuals to read the same work and respond in the same way. This article contends that, as perhaps a representational exercise more than a real reading practice, sentimental reading was a function of this paradox. I am delighted that it is included in a volume of contributions dedicated to celebrating the life, work and influence of Gita May, in whose seminar on Diderot, as a first year graduate student, I first really discovered the endlessly enriching intellectual culture of the 18th century.
Precarious Alliances: Cultures of Participation in Print and Other Media, eds. Martin Butler, Albrecht Hausmann, Anton Kirchhofer (Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag, 2016), 2016
XVIIe Siècle, 2016
Short studies of three readers of the Mercure Galant, based on the letters they sent to the edito... more Short studies of three readers of the Mercure Galant, based on the letters they sent to the editor, Donneau de Visé in 1678, and other archival traces. These readers include a counselor in the presidial court of Bourg-en-Bresse named Brossard de Montaney; the daughter of a military governor of Brie-Comte-Robert and (possibly) _fille du roi_ sent to Quebec named (Marie-Angélique) Portas; and the possibly pseudonymous "De L'Isle" of Ile de Ré, sub-delegate of the Intendant of the province of Aunis-Saintonge. The essay highlights the political and socio-professional context of this readership.
Romanic Review, Vol. 103, numbers 3-4, 2012
Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 72, Number 4, 2011
The Cambridge Companion to Voltaire, 2009
Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture, 2004
SVEC (Studies in Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century) 2004:10, 2004
Eighteenth-Century Studies 36, 3 (2003): 387-410, 2003
SVEC (Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century) 2003:01, 2003
This article reassesses Diderot’s _Lettre sur le commerce de la librairie_ as an effort to concep... more This article reassesses Diderot’s _Lettre sur le commerce de la librairie_ as an effort to conceptualize a complicated, fraught, and modernizing literary market (viewed through the central perspective of authorship), rather than as an ideological statement in favor or against Old Regime guild regulations elaborated in the interests of guild booksellers and the State.
Reviews and Review Essays by Geoffrey Turnovsky
Eighteenth-Century Studies, 2004
Eighteenth-Century Studies, 2006
Reviewed Works: Le Monde des salons: Sociabilité et mondanité à Paris au XVIIIe siècle by Antoine... more Reviewed Works: Le Monde des salons: Sociabilité et mondanité à Paris au XVIIIe siècle by Antoine Lilti; Lettre à Rousseau sur l'intérêt littéraire by Alain Viala
Uploads
Book by Geoffrey Turnovsky
How did we come to see the printed book as especially suited to deliver this experience? Print-based reading practices have historically included a wide range of modes, not least the disjointed scanning we associate today with electronic text. In the context of religious practice, literacy's benefits were presumed to lie in such random-access retrieval, facilitated by indexical tools like the numbering of Biblical chapters and verses. It was this didactic, hunt-and-peck reading that bound readers to communities.
Exploring key evolutions in print in 17th- and 18th-century France, from typeface, print runs, and format to punctuation and the editorial adaptation of manuscript and oral forms in print, this book argues that typographic developments upholding the transparency of the printed medium were decisive for the ascendancy of immersive reading as a dominant paradigm that shaped modern perspectives on reading and literacy.
Papers by Geoffrey Turnovsky
These contexts are obscure and to a degree, unknowable. But they have left discernible traces on the bound manuscript that, despite or because of the uncertainties encountered, may help us view it in a new light: created over time, invested in distinct and often contradictory ways, and materially altered for a variety of purposes.
Translated by Cécile Soudan. Original English version posted here, too.
Reviews and Review Essays by Geoffrey Turnovsky
How did we come to see the printed book as especially suited to deliver this experience? Print-based reading practices have historically included a wide range of modes, not least the disjointed scanning we associate today with electronic text. In the context of religious practice, literacy's benefits were presumed to lie in such random-access retrieval, facilitated by indexical tools like the numbering of Biblical chapters and verses. It was this didactic, hunt-and-peck reading that bound readers to communities.
Exploring key evolutions in print in 17th- and 18th-century France, from typeface, print runs, and format to punctuation and the editorial adaptation of manuscript and oral forms in print, this book argues that typographic developments upholding the transparency of the printed medium were decisive for the ascendancy of immersive reading as a dominant paradigm that shaped modern perspectives on reading and literacy.
These contexts are obscure and to a degree, unknowable. But they have left discernible traces on the bound manuscript that, despite or because of the uncertainties encountered, may help us view it in a new light: created over time, invested in distinct and often contradictory ways, and materially altered for a variety of purposes.
Translated by Cécile Soudan. Original English version posted here, too.
Link to the essay: https://www.europenowjournal.org/2022/04/17/exploring-the-challenges-of-the-digital-revolution-in-a-new-minor-in-textual-studies-and-digital-humanities-at-the-university-of-washington/