For 2,300 years one name has pervaded all discourse on theatre history, theory, and practice in the Western world: Aristotle. Theatre scholars have agreed and disagreed over his "Poetics," and nonetheless touted the work as an appropriate...
moreFor 2,300 years one name has pervaded all discourse on theatre history, theory, and practice in the Western world: Aristotle. Theatre scholars have agreed and disagreed over his "Poetics," and nonetheless touted the work as an appropriate gauge for evaluating theatre. Meanwhile, Egyptologists, classicists, and theatre historians alike have argued for and against the theatrical merits of ancient Egyptian drama: was it theatre, ritual, or both? Aristotle used Greek tragedy as his benchmark for the literary and artistic qualifications that make up "The Poetics." What if his theory were used to evaluate an important ritual drama from ancient Egypt? Those in favor of an ancient Egyptian theatrical tradition might regard "The Triumph of Horus" as the oldest play in existence. The text itself, etched into the outer enclosure walls of the Temple of Horus at Edfu in the south of Egypt, dates to approximately 107-80 BCE. However, this play represents characters, dialogue, and a sequence of events that date much earlier. Dramatic reenactments of the mythical battle between the forces of Horus and the forces of Seth took place annually in Egypt, starting as early as the second millennium BCE. This article evaluates "The Triumph of Horus" and its dramatic forerunners using Aristotle’s theatrical theory in "The Poetics," with the intention of shedding new light on the nature of theatre in ancient Egypt during and prior to the Hellenistic period. Furthermore, the author suggests alternative approaches to identifying and evaluating theatre beyond the Western sphere.