Charles Pyle
Address: Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
less
Related Authors
Pisit P. Maneewong
University of the West
Dr. Andrus Kahn (Ṭhitañāṇa bhikkhu)
MahaChulalongkornRajavidyalaya University
Sam Grey
University of Victoria
InterestsView All (7)
Uploads
Papers by Charles Pyle
It was presented at The International Conference on Tai Studies was held on July 29-31, 1998, at the Royal River Hotel in Bangkok.
It was published in The International Conference on Tai Studies, edited by Somsonge Burusphat. Bangkok, Thailand, 2000, 33-60. Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University.
Posted on the SEA Lang web site http://www.sealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/pyle1998toward.pdf
Drafts by Charles Pyle
1. The assumption that symbolic logic is valid a priori is false, as are the corollaries implicit in this assumption, namely, that symbolic logic is the one and only logic; that it is the logic of effective practical reasoning and action; and, that it is the logic that governs natural language.
2. Typological logic, such as that explored by C. S. Peirce, is the necessary and natural logic that governs natural language, and it is the logic that governs effective reasoning, and it is the logic that governs the dynamics of human interaction.
3. Following from the false premise in 1., it has been assumed that there is one and only one type of opposition; Contrary to this assumption, it follows from 2. that there are two logical types of opposition.
4. From typological logic a law can be deduced and stated in terms of the second type of opposition which predicts the phenomena of markedness in language.
It was presented at The International Conference on Tai Studies was held on July 29-31, 1998, at the Royal River Hotel in Bangkok.
It was published in The International Conference on Tai Studies, edited by Somsonge Burusphat. Bangkok, Thailand, 2000, 33-60. Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University.
Posted on the SEA Lang web site http://www.sealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/pyle1998toward.pdf
1. The assumption that symbolic logic is valid a priori is false, as are the corollaries implicit in this assumption, namely, that symbolic logic is the one and only logic; that it is the logic of effective practical reasoning and action; and, that it is the logic that governs natural language.
2. Typological logic, such as that explored by C. S. Peirce, is the necessary and natural logic that governs natural language, and it is the logic that governs effective reasoning, and it is the logic that governs the dynamics of human interaction.
3. Following from the false premise in 1., it has been assumed that there is one and only one type of opposition; Contrary to this assumption, it follows from 2. that there are two logical types of opposition.
4. From typological logic a law can be deduced and stated in terms of the second type of opposition which predicts the phenomena of markedness in language.