... Clayton Neighbors,1 Megan Jensen,2 Judy Tidwell,1 Theresa Walter,2 Nicole Fossos1 and Melissa... more ... Clayton Neighbors,1 Megan Jensen,2 Judy Tidwell,1 Theresa Walter,2 Nicole Fossos1 and Melissa A. Lewis2 ... Social identity The Inclusion of Other in the Self (IOS) scale (Aron, Aron, & Smollan, 1992; Tropp & Wright, 2001) was modified to measure identification of ...
Although research has examined factors influencing understanding of informed consent in biomedica... more Although research has examined factors influencing understanding of informed consent in biomedical and forensic research, less is known about participants' attention to details in consent documents in psychological survey research. The present study used a randomized experimental design and found the majority of participants were unable to recall information from the consent form in both in-person and online formats. Participants were also relatively poor at recognizing important aspects of the consent form including risks to participants and confidentiality procedures. Memory effects and individual difference characteristics also appeared to influence recall and recognition of consent form information.
... Clayton Neighbors,1 Megan Jensen,2 Judy Tidwell,1 Theresa Walter,2 Nicole Fossos1 and Melissa... more ... Clayton Neighbors,1 Megan Jensen,2 Judy Tidwell,1 Theresa Walter,2 Nicole Fossos1 and Melissa A. Lewis2 ... Social identity The Inclusion of Other in the Self (IOS) scale (Aron, Aron, & Smollan, 1992; Tropp & Wright, 2001) was modified to measure identification of ...
Although research has examined factors influencing understanding of informed consent in biomedica... more Although research has examined factors influencing understanding of informed consent in biomedical and forensic research, less is known about participants' attention to details in consent documents in psychological survey research. The present study used a randomized experimental design and found the majority of participants were unable to recall information from the consent form in both in-person and online formats. Participants were also relatively poor at recognizing important aspects of the consent form including risks to participants and confidentiality procedures. Memory effects and individual difference characteristics also appeared to influence recall and recognition of consent form information.
Uploads
Papers by Judy Tidwell