Utilizing a randomized experiment in rural Rajasthan, India, we evaluate the effectiveness of an education program aimed to increase girls' retention, enrollment and learning. While enrollment and community sensitization were specifically...
moreUtilizing a randomized experiment in rural Rajasthan, India, we evaluate the effectiveness of an education program aimed to increase girls' retention, enrollment and learning. While enrollment and community sensitization were specifically aimed at promoting girls education, the learning component of the program involved and targeted boys and girls equally. Approximately 230 primary schools were randomly assigned to the program or to a control and we evaluate the effect after two years of program implementation. We find moderate gains in retention and enrollment after one year of the program, primarily among girls who are most likely to be disadvantaged. After the completion of the second year of the program, we find large gains in learning in Hindi, English, and Math, equivalent to approximately one additional year of schooling with no significant difference in learning across gender. As this program scales up across the state of Rajasthan, we examine the effectiveness of the Educate Girls programs. In particular, through a randomized experiment in which approximately 100 primary schools were randomly chosen as program schools, we compare retention, enrollment, and test scores among boys and girls with approximately 100 control schools. We examine which types of students benefit from the program. We address several main research questions: 1) Given the focus of Educate Girls as a whole, do boys also benefit from the general programmatic activities and from the CLT program-which is not gender specific? 2) If the enrollment drive and emphasis on retention are effective in attracting vulnerable (female) students-potentially increasing class size with lower ability students, what is the net impact of the CLT program on overall test scores? Using rich student-level data over two years and the randomized design, we are able to address these questions without the usual causal concerns that come from analysis with cross-sectional data. In accordance with the program design, we find a gender gap reduction in enrollment and retention, while learning improvements are similar for boys and girls. II. RESEARCH DESIGN AND DATA A. Research Design As part of the rollout of the Educate Girls program into a new district in 2011, 100 villages were selected to be included in the impact evaluation-this included villages located in four administrative blocks of the district (Ahore, Jalore, Jaswantpura and Sayla). Prior to program implementation, rural villages with at least one government primary school were randomly selected; the final participating sample consists of a total of leaving 98 villages which were evenly and randomly divided between treatment and control villages. Randomization was stratified by school size. Because many villages have more than one primary school, our total sample consists of 230 primary schools, of which 117 are assigned to treatment and 113 are assigned to control (Table 1, Panel A). The program was implemented during the 2011/2012 academic year (Running from July 2011 until April 2012) focusing the CLT activities on students in grades three, four, and five. The program continued the next academic year (2012/2013), also focusing on those who were in grades three, four, and five during that academic year. We present results from data available from the second year of the program-2012/2013. B. Data Data for this study were collected from a variety of sources. First, enrollment registers of pupils in grades three, four, and five from each school were collected at the beginning of the 2011/2012 academic school year. Data in the registers include limited information about each student's gender, age, caste and tribe.