The truth is nobody wins in wars except the #MilitaryIndustrialComplex and the #WarMachine financing banking systems sucking in billions of taxpayer dollars into the coffers of weapons manufacturers, infra builders and corrupt politicians.
China 🇨🇳 is shining green lasers down to Earth from space from their own satellites, this was near Hawaii
Are we entering the age of #StarWars
now that terrestrial wars are boring🤷♂️
#Ukranian channels celebrating use of chemical weapons on #Russian soldiers. After release of the phosgene canister the soldiers appear to have spasms and neurological complications and eventually die.
The U.S. military suffered a staggering 25% enrollment deficit last year. This is not surprising: young Americans do not want to risk their lives for a country they’re taught to be ashamed of.
Listening to this #Warmonger John Bolton talk about Russia Ukraine was because of Ukraine not joining NATO sooner… WTF, it’s people like these that destroy world peace and they want an endless war from our… #MilitaryIndustrialComplex
There’s never a war in history that Hillary Clinton hasn’t loved. She’d love to be the commander in chief when the trigger needs to be pushed for a #NuclearWar#WWIII
ENTIRE UKRAINE WAR FUNDING IS A MASSIVE COVERUP & CLEANUP OP
Do you know the reasons why US is so adamant in helping Ukraine with 100s of billions of dollars and weapons aid, it’s more than just helping the poor people of Ukraine. It’s to protect themselves from biological… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Then along came Seymour Hersh with an article detailing US involvement in blowing up the Nordstream pipelines. EU and the western NATO allies are still not investigating these war crimes
Q: Did you just fire $400,000 missiles at $12 local hobby club balloons
A: No… we made sure to attach Chinese tags to the balloons 🎈 😂
Seymour Hersh one of the best reporter with journalistic integrity in the world reports that USA blew Nordstream pipelines with help from Norway and the EU is totally silent.
Ukraine's Zelenskyy: "If China allies itself with Russia, there will be a world war."
What Zelensky fails to understand is the seeds of #WWIII have already been sowed by USA & NATO when they blew up #NordStream pipelines. Ukraine is a collateral damage in this proxy war with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Do you know the real reason why Vladimir Putin has wide support in Russia?
After the fall of Soviet Union, there was rampant corruption, chaos, death and destruction everywhere. The entire society crumbled in Russia. Putin was seen as a strong leader who … twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The warmongers are trying to drag us into WW3, which can only end in one way: nuclear annihilation and the suffering and death of all our loved ones. Zelensky, Biden, NATO, congressional leaders and media neocons are insane. And we are insane if we … twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Legacy Media often twists or hides the truth to fit the narratives of the establishment or their corporate sponsors and owners
Two compelling arguments by which they spread disinformation and propaganda are…
🚩🚩Selective Reporting & Framing
The media often engages in selective reporting and framing to align with establishment narratives, manipulating public perception by:
🎯 Omission of Facts: Media outlets might choose to omit or downplay information that does not fit the narrative. For instance, during political campaigns, stories that could negatively impact a favored candidate might be under-reported or buried in less visible sections of news coverage. This selective coverage ensures that the audience is only presented with a version of the story that supports the establishment's viewpoint.
🎯 Framing the Narrative: The way stories are framed can dramatically alter their interpretation. By choosing certain images, headlines, or angles, media can emphasize aspects that support the establishment's position while ignoring others. An example is the portrayal of economic policies where positive outcomes might be highlighted for one administration, whereas similar actions by another might be criticized, based on political alignment rather than objective analysis.
🎯 Use of Experts: Media often uses experts or pundits who are known to align with establishment views, thereby creating an echo chamber where only one side of an argument is given weight. This selective use of experts can skew public understanding by presenting a one-sided narrative, especially on complex issues like economic policy or international relations, where nuanced debate is necessary.
🎯 Context Stripping: Presenting events without their full context can mislead the audience. For instance, reporting on protests might focus solely on instances of violence without explaining the underlying causes or peaceful aspects, thus framing the event in a light that supports law enforcement or government action over the protesters' grievances.
The result is a public discourse that is heavily influenced by what the establishment deems important or beneficial, often at the expense of a more balanced or truthful representation of events.
🚩🚩Sensationalism & Agenda Setting
Media outlets sometimes twist truth through sensationalism and agenda-setting practices, which include:
🎯 Sensational Headlines: To capture attention, media might use sensational or misleading headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article. This practice can lead readers to form opinions based on headlines alone, which are often crafted to support narratives favored by the establishment or to generate more clicks and views for profit.
🎯 Amplification of Minor Events: By focusing disproportionately on minor events that align with a particular narrative, media can inflate their significance. This might involve over-covering stories that fit into pre-existing political or social narratives, thereby distracting from more substantial issues or giving undue weight to incidents that serve political ends.
🎯 Manufacturing Crises: Both media and government can benefit from crises, real or perceived. Media sometimes exaggerate or create a sense of urgency around issues that might not be as critical or immediate as portrayed. This tactic can be used to push policy agendas or to rally public support behind establishment figures or parties, particularly during elections or when legislation is at stake.
🎯 Echo Chamber Effect: By predominantly covering stories that confirm the biases of their audience, media outlets can reinforce rather than challenge public opinion, aligning with establishment narratives. This selective reporting creates an environment where alternative viewpoints are seldom aired, thus bending the truth to fit an agenda.
These practices not only shape public perception but can also influence political and social outcomes.
The term "Military-Industrial Complex" (MIC) was popularized by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his farewell address in 1961. Here's an explanation of what it entails and how it functions:
### Definition:
The Military-Industrial Complex refers to the relationship between a nation's military, its government defense establishment, and private industry involved in producing arms, military technology, and other defense-related products. This complex has evolved to include think tanks, universities, and other institutions that also contribute to or benefit from defense policy and spending.
### Components:
1. **Government (Military and Defense Departments):**
- The government sets defense policy, determines military needs, and allocates budgets. In the U.S., this primarily involves the Department of Defense (DoD), but also other agencies like the Department of Homeland Security, the CIA, and others involved in national security.
2. **Defense Contractors:**
- These are private companies that design, produce, and sell military hardware, software, and services. Examples include Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, and many others. These companies depend on government contracts for a significant portion of their revenue.
3. **Congress:**
- Members of Congress influence defense spending through their ability to authorize and appropriate funds. Defense spending can be a significant economic driver for districts with military bases or defense manufacturing facilities, leading to what's often called "pork barrel" projects.
4. **Think Tanks and Lobbying Groups:**
- These organizations often receive funding from defense companies and advocate for policies that would increase defense spending or favor specific military technologies or strategies.
### How It Works:
- **Budget Cycle:**
- Defense spending is part of the federal budget, which Congress must approve. Lobbying efforts by defense contractors, military leaders, and related interest groups can influence these budgetary decisions.
- **Revolving Door:**
- There's a notable "revolving door" phenomenon where individuals move between positions in the military, defense companies, and government. This can lead to policies that benefit former or future employers due to personal relationships or future career prospects in the defense industry.
- **Research and Development:**
- Significant R&D in military technology is often funded by the government, sometimes through contracts that promise future purchases if the technology proves viable. This intertwines the interests of the military with those of the companies developing these technologies.
- **Economic Impact:**
- Defense spending can significantly impact local economies, especially in areas with defense installations or manufacturing plants. This economic dependency can lead to political support for continued or increased military expenditure.
- **Lack of Accountability:** The complexity and secrecy often associated with defense projects can lead to less accountability regarding costs, effectiveness, and ethical considerations.
- **War as Business:** There's a concern that wars or conflicts might be prolonged or initiated for economic benefits to the defense industry.
- **Influence on Foreign Policy:** The MIC might push for policies that secure markets for defense products, potentially affecting diplomatic relations and international peace.
In essence, while the Military-Industrial Complex has been pivotal in maintaining military readiness and technological superiority, it also poses challenges regarding governance, transparency, and the ethical distribution of public resources. Its operation reflects a deep integration between economic interests, national security, and political power, with significant implications for both domestic policy and international relations.