more #cryptocurrency talk. it seems that there may be (another) #cryptocrash developing; there's been so many of them.
to reiterate my earlier point: the allure of #cryptocurrencies is instant #money in vast volumes, and that's why $BITC and @ETH have a million copycats.
#cryptocurrency (and the related #blockchain money-making gewgaw, the #NFT) are in a sense nothing new. there have been untold millions of #investment scams and #business tricks and other shifty clever ways that at least *pretend* they can guarantee an effortless #profit.
(2/x)
this is an artifact of the extreme #wealth inequality encouraged by #capitalism: once you've got a bunch of elite capitalists *hoarding* all the #money, that means you've got big enough piles to *steal*. all get-rich-quick schemes are ultimately acts of disguised _theft_.
(3/x)
the general pattern is: set up a scam (like a risky #investment#opportunity) that's *so tempting* it lures in people who have a lot of money to burn on risky ventures. if you get a rich enough sucker, hey presto! you are now yourself rich. you've stolen it off someone.
(4/x)
#capitalism has tried its hardest—all that #business and #finance#journalism, all that @BW and @Money and @MSN_Money stuff that's really pure propaganda—to disguise the fact that getting rich from "passive income" means that you're stealing from someone else's hoard.
(5/x)
but *all* methods of making "passive income" (especially if they're quick and "easy") have the moral weight of _theft_. in order for someone to get rich through #investment or #realestate speculation or #cryptocurrency, lots of other people are forced to lose out.
(6/x)
the #investors are like leeches attached to a successful corporation, sucking away #money that ought to be going to the people who made the success possible—not the *owners* of #capitalism, but the *workforce*. they do the work; the venture capitalists rake off their #ROI.
(7/x)
the #realestate speculators drive up the cost of housing, and now the masses aren't able to afford housing—it's not just #landlords like that @ChayaRaichik10 terrorist who have enriched themselves via extortion schemes with housing. the property speculators do the same.
(8/x)
and #cryptocurrency is naked theft: enormous quantities of semiconductors and electrical power and other scarce resources—resources that *could* be directly improving the lives of the general population—are instead eaten up in order to run computer simulations of #money.
(9/x)
that's one reason that #cryptocurrencies have proliferated so rapidly, to the point that @Bitcoin / $BITC (and @ethereum / $ETH, and @dogecoin / $DOGE, and of course all that #NFTCommunity stuff) may very well have *hundreds* of millions of imitators—it's just #software.
(10/x)
*anyone* (with sufficient starting capital, i.e. it helps to be rich first, as with all other ventures cooked up by #entrepreneurs in #capitalism) can make their own electronic play-money. anyone (rich enough) can create their own #blockchain blocks and gamble on them.
(11/x)
that's intrinsic to the allure of the #cryptocurrency scam: the *purpose* of the scam is to draw in a poorer cohort of gamblers, people who don't have enough for other speculative ventures like #investment or #StockMarket stuff. the #crypto game requires smaller stakes.
(12/x)
the fact that #cryptocurrency is designed to lure in people with less money than usual has given $BITC / $ETH / #cryptotrading the false impression of being *democratic*. "anyone can join" isn't quite true—first you have to have money, and the luxury of gambling with it.
(13/x)
that excludes most poorer people: people who are fearful every day about their boss canning half the staff, or getting bankrupted by a flat tire or a broken leg (or a #COVID19 infection), are far less likely to *gamble* what little they have—and #investment is *gambling*.
(14/x)
*ALL* "passive income" is gambling. the #investments aren't *supposed* to be guaranteed to pay. the #realestate market can always crash. the #landlords aren't guaranteed to get tenants into their clutches. *none* of this "passive income" is, intrinsically, a sure thing.
(15/x)
...and that's a MASSIVE problem with #capitalism right in plain sight—though for some reason the fearless "independent" paladins of the Fourth Estate, the intrepid reporters of unpleasant truths like @mtaibbi or @lhfang, ever noticed that capitalism depends on gambling.
(16/x)
an *enormous fraction* of #economic activity in #capitalism, in fact, consists of various ways of *pretending* that purely speculative value, *gambling* value in other words, is in fact a sure thing, something that you can bet the public's bank accounts and pensions on.
(17/x)
#cryptocurrency is the most speculative and aetherial of all the get-rich-quick-on-paper schemes of #capitalism, because it's *betting on #money itself*. it's like capitalism divided up #currency into a million competing pieces and now you can *bet* on their future value.
(18/x)
the very corporate branding of @Bitcoin and @ethereum and the rest of the #cryptocurrencies—all of these things are merely *corporate* in the end, mere #Internet "dot bomb" startups with bigger than usual ambitions—betrays the speculative nature of #cryptocurrency.
(19/x)
@Bitcoin and @VitalikButerin's @ethereum and all the rest of them advertise themselves in *the same way* as any risky #investing scam: they crow about lines going up and down.
they use the dollar-sign typographical convention: $BITC and $ETH are *just another stock*.
(20/x)
the absurd *early* promise of $BITC and $ETH was that they'd be _replacing_ government-backed #currency, which the #marketing pitches all said was old-fashioned and mere "fiat money" and unsafe. only #blockchain technology was safe and had a guaranteed, "intrinsic" value.
the dishonesty was in plain sight; everyone could see that #cryptocurrency was mere *gambling*—and yet, nobody could see it any more than they could see that #blockchain blocks were simply blocks of noise that people bet on.
one more rumination for tonight, I think. this one is about something that's been called "contrarianism"—a word that's been coined in some attempt to describe the perplexing behavior of celebrity 'influencers', specially the more toxic ones like @mtaibbi and @mattyglesias.
(1/x)
but the behavior is probably quite general. just about *all* of the #journalist and #media figures who have some privileged access to the press and to mass audience have learned to behave in this way on @Twitter and social media: they run away from challenging questions.
(2/x)
the blue-checked "influencers" of the @LPDonovan / @StevenTDennis / @JakeSherman sort (I've picked three names almost at random) are the people who have *benefited the most* from the #Internet-ization of #journalism. social media has amplified their social privilege.
the noisemakers at all levels of the #conservative noise machine, from the august @AEI propagandists (like "race scientist" @charlesmurray) to circus sideshows like @Timcast, try to blame "woke", but...
(1/x)
that "woke" game is extremely thin by now. really it's just rebranded Red Scare nonsense. in 1950, it was Commies who were "destroying our youth" with virulent ideas that right-wing ideologues didn't like, like abstract algebra; now @mtracey and @DouthatNYT blame "woke".
(2/x)
but ask any low-level right-wing expert on "woke"—ask @realchrisrufo or @ConceptualJames what "wokeism" actually *is*—and you'll get the word "Marxism" in no time: "woke" is, in other words, nothing new at all. it's the same old paranoia about pinko Rooskies in closets.
#capitalism requires what people call "magical thinking". it requires people to believe that impossible things aren't merely *possible*, but can be done routinely, and turned into a dependable cash flow. #AI / #AGI of the @fchollet / @JeffDean sort is a perfect example.
the very name "#AGI" gives the game away: the #programming boys daydream that they've invented a "general intelligence", a universal thinking machine capable of solving literally any problem—and #capitalism is willing to gamble on that. it's just what #business wants.
(2/x)
remember that the ideal corporation in #capitalism *does nothing*. it produces nothing, it provides no service, it solves no problems for anyone not in the ownership hierarchy—because producing things *costs money* and capitalists hate all expenditures for any reason.
the central lie is that "the markets" (i.e. the sum total of all monetary transactions by all money-seeking entities in #capitalism) are the best possible mechanism for fulfilling every conceivable human need.
if it's not "on the market", then you don't really need it.
I am not a #Christian; my friend Chara (who writes at @KrisAtLarge) is Catholic—albeit a heretical one—but I am no "believer". as I've said, I tend to leave religion to others.
all the same, it's tough *not* to have opinions about #Christianity—we're inundated with it.
(1/x)
in the United States especially, right-wing politics—which infallibly promotes an extremist and hyperpoliticized form of #Christianity—pours enormous effort and money into publicizing #Christian political demands.
@GOP politics and Bible-bashing are practically the same.
(2/x)
in fact, it seems like *all* public spokespersons for Christianity in the U.S. are political figures. #Christian@GOP politicians and activists and corporate executives proudly proclaim their purpose in public office to be the promotion of "Jesus" and "faith" and "values".
#geopolitical tedium is not for me. I like the world of ordinary matter and energy (and physics and chemistry and all of it) far too much. I like tools and instruments and equipment, and knowing how to use them. fretting about #Russia or #China is not my highest priority.
(1/x)
yet American #politics and political #media have completely inundated popular culture—because @jack Dorsey and #MarkZuckerberg permitted the politicization of #Internet#socialmedia. on specious grounds they kicked down the door between "public" and "private" online.