This week Americans celebrate Thanksgiving. How did a sixth-century Roman give thanks? One way was a charitable gift that commemorated the event for which the donor was grateful. In this 🧵, two examples: Belisarius and Theodora. #Roman#Byzantine#History#Thanksgiving
1) Perhaps in 537, Belisarius gifted the See of St. Peter, via Pope Vigilius, a jewel-encrusted gold cross weighing 100 pounds. A clue that this was a thanks offering is that the cross was inscribed with the details of Belisarius' recent victory over the Vandals (533-534).
This cross sadly does not survive today, but a processional gold cross from a later era (ca. 1000) may give some indication of what it looked like. This beauty is held in the @metmuseum: metmuseum.org/art/collection…
The timing of the donation, the church that received it, and the nature of the gift all suggest that this cross was meant to demonstrate the gratitude of Belisarius to God (or perhaps St. Peter specifically) for supporting Belisarius in his overwhelming victory over the Vandals.
I tweeted about the first portion of Belisarius' campaign against the Vandals in North Africa back in September. Here is the consolidated thread of his actions in September 533, in case you missed it back then:
2) Belisarius' empress, the renowned Theodora, made a charitable gift of a quite different nature that perhaps expressed her gratitude for salvation from a difficult time in her life, rather than appreciation for assistance in a great victory.
Sometime during her reign as empress (527-548), perhaps as early as 528, Theodora endowed a remarkable convent named Metanoia ("Repentance"), which was to house young women who had been freed from forced sex work ("wretched slavery," as one contemporary called it).
Procopius, in his panegyric "On Buildings," describes the convent as "a refuge for women who repented of their past lives." It is hard not to see in the foundation of this convent and the description of its mission statement an echo of Theodora's own life.
Theodora became an actress at a young age, and it is not unlikely that as such she also engaged in sex work. Procopius describes this sort of work vividly, if possibly fictively, in the Secret History. For young actresses in extreme poverty, prostitution was not uncommon.
But Theodora escaped that life, first by becoming the concubine of a governor, and then ultimately by marrying Justinian and becoming empress. She seems to have never forgotten about young women in trouble, however, and felt moved to help them.
Theodora's foundation of Metanoia can therefore be seen not just as philanthropy but also as a thank offering for her own escape from poverty and forced prostitution. A good reason to give thanks indeed. Fin.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
November 14: #OTD in 565, the emperor Justinian I died at the ripe age of 83, having reigned 38 years. On this anniversary of his death, I warn you all to beware of "Justinophobes." Read on. ⬇️ #Roman#Byzantine#History
First, credit to @mathieugallard, from whom I borrow the term "Justinophobe." What is a Justinophobe? A person who fears or disdains the emperor Justinian to an almost irrational degree.
The first campaign of Belisarius in Italy (535-540) was wildly successful, restoring most of the peninsula to Roman rule. Did the inhabitants of Italy welcome this? One way to answer that question is to visualize how Belisarius took cities in Italy. 🧵 #Roman#Byzantine#History
Today I introduce a small digital history mapping project that does just that. The image shown in the first tweet of this thread is an overview of the map. The map shows every city or region of Italy mentioned during the campaign by the historian Procopius of Caesarea. #dh
The pins for cities and regions are color coded based on how long it took Belisarius and the Roman army to take control of the location. Green represents no effort (instantaneous submission), yellow represents a short siege, orange a medium siege, and red a long siege.
Ostrogothic Italy in 526 was a successful, flourishing kingdom. By the time Roman forces had finished reclaiming the bulk of Italy in 555, the prosperity of the peninsula was ruined. Some modern historians blame Justinian. Is that fair? A 🧵 #Roman#Byzantine#Italy 🇮🇹
First, we start with a brief historical overview. The Ostrogothic Kingdom of Italy, founded by Theodoric the Great (r. 493-526), was an early medieval successor state of the Western Roman Empire. Under Theodoric, the kingdom became rich and prosperous.
The death of Theodoric, followed by the death of his grandson and successor Athalaric in 534, led to political destabilization in the kingdom. Both Athalric's mother, Amalsuntha, and her murderer and successor, Theodahad, contemplated ceding Italy to the Roman Empire.
Welcome to new followers who found me through my thread on whether the Byzantine Empire was Roman! 👋 I am a historian with a research focus on the sixth-century Roman world, although my interests broadly range from the founding of Rome to the fall of Constantinople.
This is a professional account and most of my tweets are about my research. I tweet a lot about my upcoming book, #BelisariusAndAntonina, which analyzes the relationship and careers of this sixth-century power couple: a famous Roman general and his powerful and capable wife.
If you think my book sounds intriguing, you can get an early preview of some of my thoughts on Belisarius and Antonina by listening to my recent interview with the YouTube channel Eastern Roman History here:
I am shocked at the passionate response to my tweets about the Byzantine Empire being the Roman Empire. So today, a related issue: not recognizing the #Roman identity of the #Byzantine Empire creates problems for our understanding of the early Middle Ages. 🧵 #History
While many specialists of Byzantine history may assume that everyone knows that the people we call "Byzantines" were actually Romans, this knowledge has not fully permeated to the level where most people encounter the Byzantines: secondary school and university survey textbooks.
At this level, in classes like European History, Western Civilization, or World History, the early Middle Ages is sometimes presented as the era of the "three heirs" of Rome. These heirs are identified as the Byzantine Empire, the early medieval West, and the Islamic caliphate.
Was the Byzantine Empire really just the Roman Empire? In a word, yes. In this thread, I explore some arguments for and against that answer, as well as alternatives to the use of the term "Byzantine." Read on. 🧵 #Roman#Byzantine#History
The people that modern historians call "Byzantines" referred to themselves as Romans and to their state as the empire of the Romans. They were Romans, through and through. Then why have modern historians adopted the terms "Byzantine" and "Byzantine Empire?"
In the medieval west, standard terms for the "Byzantine" Empire were "empire of Constantinople" and "empire of the Greeks." They were used to avoid calling the "Byzantines" Romans, because westerners wished that label for themselves.