daytura // ladon n.

Jun 20 • 7 tweets • 3 min read

#JOY: "Do you still want to do your party?"
#EVELYN: "We can do whatever we want."

[Everything Everywhere All at Once]

// SPOILERS //

Wikipedia: As Deirdre talks, Evelyn's attention is momentarily drawn to her alternate selves and the multiverse, before she grounds herself back in her home universe.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everythin…

https://twitter.com/visakanv/status/1517170639731585024

https://twitter.com/ArchLeucoryx/status/1522118893237506048

https://twitter.com/ArchLeucoryx/status/1534434685593366535

"You may seek to understand your decisions and look for justice in their consequences.

[...]

Strictly speaking, there is only one path to successful propagation. But it still permits you to make choices."

homestuck.com/story/4771

#ARANEA to #TEREZI: You killed a friend and understandably feel regret. / But it's done. She is gone and you are still here. / Now what?

homestuck.com/story/4773

"I was asked to choose between my child and my church.

"I chose my child."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @ArchLeucoryx

daytura // ladon n.

@ArchLeucoryx

Jun 21

staring at the ripe fig that says "dipping out of PKM because hands hurty from typing"

THERE IS SO MUCH WRITING IN PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

note-taking is economic for conveying thought i guess but you can 100% overdo it

constantly revising your atomic notes or constantly making permanent notes means that you're moving away from the rough pre-writing of true outlining and into "regular writing".

what's the line between pre-writing and writing in note-taking? be alert

Read 5 tweets

daytura // ladon n.

@ArchLeucoryx

Jun 19

a converse to the PKM ideal of "maximum viable recursive indexicality, per fundamental unit":

only the whitespace determines intrinsic, intra-note/intra-concept navigation

atomization brute-forces whitespace and distance between ideas/concepts/models where there isn't naturally any, for the sake of maximizing the degrees of freedom by which the user navigates the knowledge base

atomization is the equivalent of shredding a contiguous Minecraft world into a Skyblock map, IN SURVIVAL.

imagine the time and energy it would take to shred a biome down to bedrock, and then arrange those blocks as randomly as possible throughout the entire map. holy cow:

Read 5 tweets

daytura // ladon n.

@ArchLeucoryx

May 26

i think i've got it...

the knowledge remains the same.

only the vantage points and abstractions change.

https://twitter.com/ArchLeucoryx/status/1524211743638966273

example: sequence-branch duality.

sequences and radial branches of notes are intrinsically related. all sequences can be read as radial branches of a larger/prime idea. all radial branches can be read in a linear, unidirectional sequence.

ladon notes: hard emphasis on "can be read as".

Read 7 tweets

daytura // ladon n.

@ArchLeucoryx

Jan 8

talking to myself aloud and i wonder if atomization actually IS the ultimate solution--should we perfectly atomize our individual notes? i feel like we need some "sweetner" and light context around each atomized context, so that it's understandable by itself. 🧵

the organizational idea of "atomization by dispersion" stands on the implicit notion that we *can* perfectly atomize ideas, into discrete containers of notes. in perfect atomization, context does not exist in a note; context exists outside a note, in the linked notes around it.

we can interpret this a couple of ways

- atomization by dispersion is a great model for the stream of consciousness

- atomization by dispersion shreds and crushes context that we normally use every day

i do not know if these are mutually exclusive.

Read 18 tweets