Skip to main content
replaced http://tex.stackexchange.com/ with https://tex.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I have again been tempted to answer a bad question with an encyclopedia-style answer. (Questions regarding the distinction between XeTeX and XeLaTeX and how they relate to TeX and LaTeX?Questions regarding the distinction between XeTeX and XeLaTeX and how they relate to TeX and LaTeX?) Would it be better to post this as an additional answer to the linked dupe?

I have again been tempted to answer a bad question with an encyclopedia-style answer. (Questions regarding the distinction between XeTeX and XeLaTeX and how they relate to TeX and LaTeX?) Would it be better to post this as an additional answer to the linked dupe?

I have again been tempted to answer a bad question with an encyclopedia-style answer. (Questions regarding the distinction between XeTeX and XeLaTeX and how they relate to TeX and LaTeX?) Would it be better to post this as an additional answer to the linked dupe?

added actual link
Source Link
barbara beeton
  • 89.8k
  • 2
  • 41
  • 86

I have again been tempted to answer a bad question with an encyclopedia-style answer. (tex.stackexchange.com/…Questions regarding the distinction between XeTeX and XeLaTeX and how they relate to TeX and LaTeX?) Would it be better to post this as an additional answer to the linked dupe?

I have again been tempted to answer a bad question with an encyclopedia-style answer. (tex.stackexchange.com/…) Would it be better to post this as an additional answer to the linked dupe?

I have again been tempted to answer a bad question with an encyclopedia-style answer. (Questions regarding the distinction between XeTeX and XeLaTeX and how they relate to TeX and LaTeX?) Would it be better to post this as an additional answer to the linked dupe?

Source Link
musarithmia
  • 12.7k
  • 12
  • 14

Answer in search of a question

I have again been tempted to answer a bad question with an encyclopedia-style answer. (tex.stackexchange.com/…) Would it be better to post this as an additional answer to the linked dupe?