Timeline for using Jasmines spyon upon a private method
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2011 at 11:36 | comment | added | StevenMcD | We can agree is disagree on that. Our javascript codebase is massive and we only expose a handleful of public functions/properties on some of our classes. A lot of logic is handled in those private functions. I only public a private method so the testing framework has access to it. If the constructor is not called correctly then the private function is not returned. | |
| Dec 13, 2011 at 11:10 | comment | added | Andreas Köberle | If you publish your privat method it's not privat anymore. Btw, as I described in my answer it make not much sense to test privat method. | |
| Dec 13, 2011 at 7:31 | history | answered | StevenMcD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |