Timeline for How should one use std::optional?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2014 at 21:43 | history | edited | utnapistim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| May 31, 2013 at 16:42 | comment | added | utnapistim | You-re right; it was a poor example; I have modified my example for "parse first block if available". | |
| May 31, 2013 at 16:37 | history | edited | utnapistim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
addressed comment from @BenVoigt
|
| May 31, 2013 at 16:26 | comment | added | Ben Voigt | This strikes me as a poor example, since if multiple blocks were completed only one could be returned and the rest discarded. The function should instead return a possibly-empty collection of blocks. | |
| May 31, 2013 at 16:24 | comment | added | utnapistim |
Thanks - I corrected it (I used boost::optional because after about two years of using it, it is hard-coded into my pre-frontal cortex).
|
|
| May 31, 2013 at 16:21 | comment | added | David G |
I know they're basically the same, but why are you using boost:: instead of std::?
|
|
| May 31, 2013 at 16:19 | history | answered | utnapistim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |