User talk:Kidlat

Hello, Kidlat, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia!

You should begin by reading these pages:

If you want some ideas of which pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested articles or the list of wanted pages.

Remember to be bold and edit any pages you want! Any changes you make that are not perfect can be fixed later. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Simple talk. You should always sign your messages on Talk pages by typing "~~~~" (four tildes) at the end of your words.

Good luck and happy editing!—Giggy 08:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Philippines as part of "Western civilization"

Hello, Kidlat. What definition do you use for "Western civilization" to include the Philippines as part of it, and what sources can you provide to support this claim? It is not part of the Western hemisphere (see map), so you must be using a different definition of Western civilization than I do. Jonas D. Rand ^T 09:19, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added the reference to the article: Toynbee, Arnold A Study of History Volume XI—Historical Atlas and Gazetteer London:1959 Oxford University Press Map, Page 93 “Civilization Current in AD 1952” –Western Civilization is shown as including the Americas, Europe, Russia, Australia, New Zealand, and the Philippines (that part of the world where those who practice the Christian religion constitute a majority of the population). Kidlat (talk) 09:52, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I do not have this book personally, so I'll have to trust you. It seems plausible (considering the popularity of Catholicism in the Philippines). Jonas D. Rand ^T 10:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for all the edits. I hope you stick around :) —MC8 (b · t) 20:08, Tuesday May 26 2009 (UTC) (I ♥ Kennedy)

Barnstar

Congratulations: You have been given a Barnstar!

For your work on the color articles. Good work :)-- † CR ₉₀ 10:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it's an exciting thing when you get your first one.-- † CR ₉₀ 10:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will tell you if you come on my IRC channel as wikipedia is not the place to socialize. :)-- † CR ₉₀ 10:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Service Award

This editor is a **Journeyman Editor** and has the right to show this **Wikipedia Little Red Book**.

For some one who has done so much work on color, it is great to be able to give you this Little Red Book, congratulations, Peterdownunder (talk) 11:41, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

You are doing good work. Sometimes articles we start are nominated for deletion... even some of mine are. This happens from time to time. It is not a reflection of you as an editor, but a reflection of the nominators opinion on some aspect of the page. I have nominated for deletion an article you started with a deletion discussion on this page You are free to comment on that discussion if you like. Very kindly, Jon@talk:~$ 15:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

QD request

Hi, I tagged Periwinkle (color) for quick deletion as a transwiki page. That means the writing are an exact copy from English Wikipedia. This is Simple English Wikipedia, so we can't just copy and paste. We have to rewrite articles to be simple. Thanks, Gotanda (talk) 08:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New Award

This editor is a **Yeoman Editor** and has the right to show this **Wikipedia Pocket Edition**.

An impressive achievement of over 2500 edits, almost all on the subject of color. Sorry this new book is not as bright as the last, but it has mellowed (like me) over time.--Peterdownunder (talk) 03:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hi Kidlat! I hope you are doing well. There is a discussion on Simple talk that might interest you, at Wikipedia:Simple talk#List of colors, change into sortable wikitables proposal (permanent link). It's about formatting lists of colours into tables. Osiris (talk) 03:23, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]