All Questions
14 questions
-1
votes
2
answers
17
views
Why must the total time derivative only be a linear function of velocity? [duplicate]
I'm hung up on page 7 of Landau & Lifshitz Course on Mechanics. They claim,
$$L(v'^2) = L(v^2)+\frac{\partial L}{\partial v^2}2\textbf v\cdot \epsilon \tag{p.7}$$
The second term on the right of ...
7
votes
3
answers
1k
views
In equation (3) from lecture 7 in Leonard Susskind’s ‘Classical Mechanics’, should the derivatives be partial?
Here are the equations. ($V$ represents a potential function and $p$ represents momentum.)
$$V(q_1,q_2) = V(aq_1 - bq_2)$$
$$\dot{p}_1 = -aV'(aq_1 - bq_2)$$
$$\dot{p}_2 = +bV'(aq_1 - bq_2)$$
Should ...
0
votes
1
answer
98
views
Derivation of lagrange equation in classical mechanics
I'm currently working on classical mechanics and I am stuck in a part of the derivation of the lagrange equation with generalized coordinates. I just cant figure it out and don't know if it's just ...
-5
votes
1
answer
141
views
Why is the regular Taylor expansion so similar to the construction of the Hamiltonian from a Lagrangian/Legendre transform?
An example of a first order Taylor expansion of a function with two variables is given by:
$$f\left(x,y\right)=f\left(x_0,y_0\right)+\left(x-x_0\right)\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}+\left(y-y_0\right)\...
1
vote
2
answers
133
views
Lagrangian total time derivative - continues second-order differential
In the lagrangian, adding total time derivative doesn't change equation of motion.
$$L' = L + \frac{d}{dt}f(q,t).$$
After playing with it, I realize that this is only true if the $f(q,t)$ function has ...
1
vote
1
answer
170
views
What does it mean to differentiate a scalar with respect to a vector?
I am reading the special relativity lecture notes that I got from a professor of mine. It says that the Lagrangian is
$$L = \frac{1}{2}m|\dot{\boldsymbol{x}}|^2 - V(\boldsymbol{x}) \tag{1}$$
The notes ...
1
vote
1
answer
48
views
Lagrangian for 2 inertial frames where only Speed is different by small amount
In Landau & Liftshitz’s book p.5, they go ahead and writes down lagrangians for 2 different inertial frames. They say that Lagrangian is a function of $v^2$.
So in one frame, we got $L(v^2)$.
In ...
1
vote
1
answer
85
views
Deriving smoothing kernels
I'm watching a video on smoothed particle hydrodynamics it just blindly claims that these smoothing kernels are pretty good.
$$W(r-r_b,h)\equiv\dfrac{315}{64\pi h^9}\left(h^2-|r-r_b|^2\right)^3$$
$$\...
1
vote
1
answer
77
views
Interpretation of Variation Notes
I would like an explanation to how this Lagragian partial derivative was taken (eq. 3). This probably is more suited for the math Stack Exchange, however this is for a physics course which is why I am ...
0
votes
1
answer
86
views
The use of $x_\varepsilon (t) = x(t) + \varepsilon (t)$ and $x_\varepsilon (t) = x(t) + \varepsilon \eta (t)$ in proving Hamilton's principle
The following Wikipedia page uses $x_\varepsilon (t) = x(t) + \varepsilon (t)$ in the proof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton%27s_principle#Mathematical_formulation
But in my mechanics book (by ...
0
votes
3
answers
624
views
Showing the equivalence between the chain rule's Leibniz and Lagrange Notations
This may seem more math related but this question crossed my mind as I was reading the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange Equation.
In math, we were introduced to the Lagrange notation of the derivative ...
0
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Derivation of generalized velocities in Lagrangian mechanics
So I know that: $$r_i = r_i(q_1, q_2,q_3,...., q_n, t)$$
Where $r_i$ represent the position of the $i$th part of a dynamical system and the $q_n$ represent the dynamical variables of the system ($n$ =...
1
vote
0
answers
260
views
Partial derivative of $v$ w.r.t. $x$ in Lagrangian dynamics [duplicate]
In Lagrangian dynamics, when using the Lagrangian thus:
$$
\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L} }{\partial \dot{q_j}})-
\frac{\partial \mathcal{L} }{\partial q_j} = 0
$$
often we get terms such ...
38
votes
5
answers
9k
views
Equivalence between Hamiltonian and Lagrangian Mechanics
I'm reading a proof about Lagrangian => Hamiltonian and one part of it just doesn't make sense to me.
The Lagrangian is written $L(q, \dot q, t)$, and is convex in $\dot q$, and then the ...