
Karol Czuba
London School of Economics and Political Science, International Growth Centre, Principal Investigator
Related Authors
kennedy agade
United States International University - Kenya
Jürgen Scheffran
University of Hamburg
Blake Barkley
Carleton University
Luke Patey
Danish Institute For International Studies
Marty Branagan
University of New England - Australia
InterestsView All (28)
Uploads
Papers by Karol Czuba
Many aspects of the disarmament process, especially the widespread human rights violations committed by the Ugandan army, the Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF), have been extensively documented by scholars. None of them has examined, however, the causes of the abrupt change of the government’s position towards Karamoja that manifested itself in disarmament. The subsequent extension of the power of the Ugandan state in the region has also attracted little scholarly attention. In this working paper, I endeavour to address these important gaps in the literature. In Part 1, I investigate the objectives of Uganda’s rulers, to whom I refer as “state-managers,” and the ways in which disarmament and other policies implemented by the Ugandan government in Karamoja have contributed to the realization of those objectives. I argue that, in the absence of perceived or real challenges to their continued control of the Ugandan state, the state managers initiated the process of extension of state power in the region with the intention of enriching themselves through exploitation of Karamoja’s natural resources. In Part 2 (Czuba 2017), I consider the interactions between the state managers and the emergent Karamojan political elite; in particular, I examine the role that that the cooptation of this new elite has played in state managers’ efforts to establish control over Karamoja and benefit from the region’s natural resources. The paper is based on field research conducted in Kampala and in Amudat, Moroto, and Nakapiripirit districts between October and December 2016.
This evidence synthesis represents the first ever attempt to identify, synthesize and evaluate existing evidence on both the short- and long-term impacts of in-kind food assistance on pastoralist populations and their livelihoods in humanitarian crises. It forms part of a series of humanitarian evidence syntheses and systematic reviews commissioned by the Humanitarian Evidence Programme.
Many aspects of the disarmament process, especially the widespread human rights violations committed by the Ugandan army, the Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF), have been extensively documented by scholars. None of them has examined, however, the causes of the abrupt change of the government’s position towards Karamoja that manifested itself in disarmament. The subsequent extension of the power of the Ugandan state in the region has also attracted little scholarly attention. In this working paper, I endeavour to address these important gaps in the literature. In Part 1, I investigate the objectives of Uganda’s rulers, to whom I refer as “state-managers,” and the ways in which disarmament and other policies implemented by the Ugandan government in Karamoja have contributed to the realization of those objectives. I argue that, in the absence of perceived or real challenges to their continued control of the Ugandan state, the state managers initiated the process of extension of state power in the region with the intention of enriching themselves through exploitation of Karamoja’s natural resources. In Part 2 (Czuba 2017), I consider the interactions between the state managers and the emergent Karamojan political elite; in particular, I examine the role that that the cooptation of this new elite has played in state managers’ efforts to establish control over Karamoja and benefit from the region’s natural resources. The paper is based on field research conducted in Kampala and in Amudat, Moroto, and Nakapiripirit districts between October and December 2016.
This evidence synthesis represents the first ever attempt to identify, synthesize and evaluate existing evidence on both the short- and long-term impacts of in-kind food assistance on pastoralist populations and their livelihoods in humanitarian crises. It forms part of a series of humanitarian evidence syntheses and systematic reviews commissioned by the Humanitarian Evidence Programme.