Papers by mariella perucca
This paper takes into consideration the distinction between mental and real related to the late p... more This paper takes into consideration the distinction between mental and real related to the late prehistoric landscapes, considering that he idea of landscape is modern. Starting
from Rilke’s way of thinking and going through Simmel’s and Ritter’s, it is demonstrated that more than between mental and real the distinction is between objective and subjective. In the aesthetic experience of the landscape as relational and “trajective” – according to Berque’s terminology – experience stands the equilibrium point between nature – which science and technology tend to objectivate as distinct and separate otherness – and the subject born to the modern way of thinking – which in the wide space of the landscape tries its naturalness and lives itself as integral being, made up of carnality, sense and sensibility. From such thoughts some questioning rose
about the significance of the reconstruction of ancient landscapes and about hypothesis on their “reality”.
Uploads
Papers by mariella perucca
from Rilke’s way of thinking and going through Simmel’s and Ritter’s, it is demonstrated that more than between mental and real the distinction is between objective and subjective. In the aesthetic experience of the landscape as relational and “trajective” – according to Berque’s terminology – experience stands the equilibrium point between nature – which science and technology tend to objectivate as distinct and separate otherness – and the subject born to the modern way of thinking – which in the wide space of the landscape tries its naturalness and lives itself as integral being, made up of carnality, sense and sensibility. From such thoughts some questioning rose
about the significance of the reconstruction of ancient landscapes and about hypothesis on their “reality”.
from Rilke’s way of thinking and going through Simmel’s and Ritter’s, it is demonstrated that more than between mental and real the distinction is between objective and subjective. In the aesthetic experience of the landscape as relational and “trajective” – according to Berque’s terminology – experience stands the equilibrium point between nature – which science and technology tend to objectivate as distinct and separate otherness – and the subject born to the modern way of thinking – which in the wide space of the landscape tries its naturalness and lives itself as integral being, made up of carnality, sense and sensibility. From such thoughts some questioning rose
about the significance of the reconstruction of ancient landscapes and about hypothesis on their “reality”.