Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2024/Votes/EPIC

< Stewards | Elections 2024
Warning

The 2024 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

EPIC

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: sv-N, en-3, no-2, de-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi there! For those who are not familiar with me; I am EPIC, a native speaker of Swedish and advanced speaker of English. I have been a Wikimedian since 2019, and I’m currently a sysop on the Swedish Wikipedia, a sysop at Wikidata, a VRT member (with access to the info-sv, renamers and wikidata queues), as well as a global renamer since a while back.

    At first, I didn’t have the intention to run for steward, as I’m not interested in gaining more roles and as I didn’t really have use for the permissions. Until quite recently, I got an encouragement from one of the current stewards in which they thought I should go for it. After that, I thought about it for quite a while, and have since realized that I’ve had use of the tools in multiple situations, and would have use of the tools in future situations too.

    So, after a lot of careful consideration, I am here today. I will start off with an answer to what will likely be one of your first questions; What would be my area of stewardry, if elected? Well, my most active areas would be helping out on IRC (mainly #wikimedia-stewardsconnect) and other counter-vandalism/LTA/spambot work, as well as the Steward requests backlog, mostly SRG and SRP. I am a daily user of SWViewer and frequently report ongoing vandals or cross-wiki abusers to stewards, most of them via IRC and also at SRG. In those cases, where I have approached an insistent vandal or LTA, particularly on smaller wikis, it would be efficient to be able to take countermeasures myself, instead of having to bother stewards or global sysops about it every time. Furthermore, I have experience with measures which can be useful to know as a steward, such as range blocks and proxy blocks. I have some knowledge in other Scandinavian languages, and thus I’m also able to help other Scandinavian users with some tasks, especially users from Norway or Denmark as we have no stewards from these countries.

    I am, and have the ability to be, active during the school hours, when large parts of the daily vandalism are going on but at the same time often can be a lack of online stewards to take actions. In these scenarios, I am often online and thus available to take actions in urgent situations. I’m quite a night owl and available for the most of the day, and my time zone is UTC+1 during standard time and UTC+2 during summer time. As a steward, I will of course keep my activity as frequent as I can. But, in the scenario I ‘’would’’ instead become inactive, which I hope not to be, I will not be running for confirmation and of course accept losing the tools. I am not perfect, and I have made some mistakes in my past, such as not really abiding by en:WP:NOROLLBACK at a few moments in the past, but I have since of course learned from those mistakes. Being able to help other users also makes me very happy and I enjoy communicating with other people. I am also very grateful to receive feedback, since it is something that makes me improve and learn, and I’m always open to cooperate with other users.

    I have read the stewards policy, CheckUser policy, Oversight policy, Access to nonpublic personal data policy and the privacy policy, and I am of course aware of them and will abide by them. I have signed the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information and enabled two-factor authentication for my account.

    So, with that said, I’m ready to take on the responsibilities of being a steward, and I’m looking forward to potentially serving and helping the community as one. Thank you for taking your time reading this, and thank you for your consideration. Any questions you may have, I’ll happily answer. Cheers! :D
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2024/Questions#EPIC


  Yes

edit
  1. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  --Stïnger （会話） 14:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nemoralis (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Nemoralis (talk) 14:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Osps7 (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  — Osama Eid (talk) 14:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ján Kepler (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Ján Kepler (talk) 14:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Fenikals (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Telaneo (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Telaneo (User talk page) 14:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. RadiX (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  RadiX∞ 14:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
       Endersslay (Not eligible, checked by MdsShakil) •  Endersslay (talk) 15:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  For an excellent answer to Sotiale's question - if I were a candidate, I would struggle to say more than "what EPIC said"! The rest of your application is also fairly good, and I don't care that you're not a global sysop. Leaderboard (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Stryn (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Active, no concerns. Stryn (talk) 15:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Maximillion Pegasus (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  I've seen this user actively monitoring small wikis, and I believe they do very good work. They are active and trusted on multiple projects, and they are also one of the most active global renamers, which indicates a willingness not only to help out with steward duties, but also to be an active steward, which is extremely important. If the user has made mistakes in the past, they seem open and willing to learn from them, which is also very important for any role. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11. M4tinbeigi (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Rick Sanchez (talk) 16:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ferien (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  I did like the answers you provided to the questions, and you're active and trusted. There is no need to go down the path of GRb/GS before going to steward. It is nice to have but not a requirement. --Ferien (talk) 16:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13. SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  and I don't get some of the No votes. SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 16:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Esteban16 (talk) 16:41, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Maybe a bit too early, but I do not see any red flags Ameisenigel (talk) 16:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16. 1108-Kiju (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Perhaps they should have requested a GS first. However, they are active and I am very happy with the answers and have no reason to oppose this. 1108-Kiju/Talk 16:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  -- Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 17:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18. V0lkanic (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  No concerns. V0lkanic (talk) 17:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19. XXBlackburnXx (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  XXBlackburnXx (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 17:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22. W (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 • . Thanks a lot for clarification on implementation of community consensus by stewards, when a bureaucrat obstructs the enforcemnt of such consensus. Best wishes,--W (talk) 18:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23. HouseBlaster (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  to cancel out the oppose rationales ("only" four years? high number of edits? Really?) HouseBlaster (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Chirocca77 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Chirocca77 (talk) 19:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Pppery (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  * Pppery * it has begun 19:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Red-tailed hawk (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2024 •  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2024 •  ToBeFree (talk) 23:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Lightoil (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Lightoil (talk) 02:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  29. USSR-Slav (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  USSR-Slav (СССР-Слав) (talk) 02:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Ruy (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Ruy (talk) 03:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  31. DreamRimmer (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bjelica (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Bjelica (talk) 05:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Svartava (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Svartava (talk) 05:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 07:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (talk) 08:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Andrew Pertsev (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Andrew Pertsev (talk) 08:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Asav (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024 •  Asav (talk) 08:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024 •  Rzuwig► 09:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Tmv (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Tmv (talk) 11:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Lookruk (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024 •  --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 12:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Jon Harald Søby (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  cyrfaw (talk) 13:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  43. DarkMatterMan4500 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 13:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Drummingman (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  LGTM Drummingman (talk) 16:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  46. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Xwiki experience a bit on the lower side, but sufficient for me. Also, good answers to go with it. JavaHurricane 16:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Jeffrey Beall (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024 •  Jeffrey Beall (talk) 16:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Ocelot (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Ocelot (talk) 16:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Moheen (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024 •  ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Matěj Suchánek (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024 •  Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Wutsje (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2024 •  Wutsje (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Neriah (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  Neriah - 💬 - 21:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
       Honymand (Not eligible, checked by Fehufanga) •  Honymand (talk) 21:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Aca (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024 •  LGTM Aca (talk) 22:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Sakretsu (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Sakretsu (炸裂) 23:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Inokosni organ (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  Inokosni organ (talk) 01:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  57. UA0Volodymyr (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  UA0Volodymyr (talk) 02:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  58. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  dwadieff ✉ 03:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  ミラP@Miraclepine 03:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Baskervill (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Baskervill (talk) 03:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Gharouni (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Gharouni Talk 05:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  Tvcccp (talk) 07:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Sebastian Wallroth (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Valcio (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024 •  Strong support. I thought they were a steward already. valcio ••• 09:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  65. ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 10:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Lemonaka (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024 •  Lemonaka (talk) 13:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Ankermast (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Ankermast (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Carlomorino (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024 •  Carlomorino (talk) 22:09, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Thastp (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Thastp (talk) 10:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024 •  I hope you can resist vandalism for small wiki projects Nurtenge (talk) 10:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 11:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Kelvin (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Kelvin (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC) Good answer and it looks good.[reply]
  73. Julius 12345 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Julius 12345 (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Pinigin (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Pinigin (talk) 14:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Jan Myšák (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Jan Myšák (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Justarandomamerican (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Justarandomamerican (talk) 16:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Victor Schmidt (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by NightWolf1223)2024 •  Bencemac (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Snowmanonahoe (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  I hear stewards complain a lot about how there aren't enough of them. Now is not the time to be picky about tenure. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 22:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  80. ChrisWx (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Seems to have quite a bit of global experience in areas where steward work would be required, and would make a good one overall. ChrisWx 🌀 (talk - contribs) 03:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Filipović Zoran (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Kadı (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Kadı Message 13:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Styyx (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Styyx (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  84. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024 •  My previous interactions with EPIC were positive. Some raised some concerns, like EPIC not being a global sysop or that he takes on too much at once, but he is very active and has a good judgement, and this leads me to believe that he will be good as steward. --NGC 54 (talk｜contribs) 16:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  85. -jkb- (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  -jkb- 18:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 22:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Lionel Cristiano (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024 •  Lionel Cristiano (talk) 22:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  88. K6ka (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  89. 94rain (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  I've had many positive interactions with them. They have always been willing to listen to and act upon feedback. Based on their response to questions especially those pertaining to CU/OS/small wikis, I think they are prepared for the responsibility that comes with the steward toolkit. I'm not too concerned about the high volumes of edits to refine their response, as from what I've observed, they have been using admin tools on Wikidata with great care. I trust that they will approach the steward tools with more caution. 94rain Talk 04:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  90. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  Good work on small wikis. MZaplotnik(talk) 07:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Sumeor 29567 (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 • Sumeor 29567 (talk) 10:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  92. DynamicFolklore (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Folklorelet`s Talk! 11:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Ankry (talk) 13:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Weltenspringerin (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Weltenspringerin (talk) 15:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Miniapolis 16:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Z1720 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Z1720 (talk) 17:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Quinlan83 (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024 •  ☠︎Quinlan83☠︎(𝖄𝖔𝖚 𝖙𝖆𝖑𝖐𝖎𝖓' 𝖙𝖔 𝖒𝖊?) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  98. S60W79 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  S60W79 (talk) 22:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Jusjih (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
       Gqqnb (Not eligible, checked by MdsShakil) •  Gqqnb (talk) 09:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Alfa-ketosav (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Adtonko (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Adtonko (talk) 11:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Elli (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024 •  Elli (talk) 15:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Giraffer (talk) 15:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Eric.LEWIN (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024 •  I am sensitive to SMcCandlish's criticism about your tendency for "hat collecting". Therefore, be mostly dedicated to the steward tasks, so that I'll have to change my mind for this vote. Whatever, thanks for engaging that much. @Éric38fr('tchatting, a good drink in hand), 15:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, and thank you for the feedback. Like mentioned, I don't want to collect hats and I don't have any plans to request further permissions on other wikis. The point of them is to use them, and having too many would burn me out (in this case, the "hat collecting" concerns of SMcCandlish seems to have been built from a misunderstanding of my statement, so hopefully my statement wasn't too unclear or hard to understand, I apologize to the community and to SMcCandlish if it was). EPIC (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  105. 今好きになる (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  今好きになる (talk) 06:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Wolverène (talk) 08:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  —Ah3kal (talk) 11:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Laurent Jerry (talk) 17:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Ulanwp (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024 •  Ulanwp (talk) 07:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Titore (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Titore (talk) 10:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
       Sinatrasona (Not eligible, checked by MdsShakil) •  Sinatrasona (talk) 11:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Skarz (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Skarz (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Meiræ 18:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
       Al Lemos (Not eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) •  Al Lemos (talk) 00:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
       100.undentifieduser (Not eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin) •  100.undentifieduser (talk) 04:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Chrisaliv (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Chrisaliv (talk) 11:01, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Shizhao (talk) 11:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Harlock81 (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Fastily 23:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  117. SunDawn (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  118. The Master of Hedgehogs (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Sounds good! The Master of Hedgehogs (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Masti (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  masti <talk> 16:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Bärbel Miemietz (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Bärbel Miemietz (talk) 16:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Prairie Astronomer (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Prairie Astronomer (talk) 16:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Nastoshka (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2024 •  I've seen them very often and very active in monitoring small wikis, and good answers to all questions. Nastoshka (talk) 20:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Gadir (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2024 •  GL! Gadir (talk) 20:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Ekminarin (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Rin [T · C] 08:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Wieralee (talk) 12:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Saroj (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2024 •  Saroj (talk) 09:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Brewster239 (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2024 •  Brewster239 (T·C·CA) 09:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Eliatxo (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024 •  Eliatxo (talk) 09:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Uncle Bash007 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Uncle Bash007 (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Sleyece (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Sleyece (talk) 01:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Aizenr (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Aizenr (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Natuur12 (talk) 19:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  134. FlyingAce (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  –FlyingAce✈hello 20:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  135. ZERTINHO (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  ZERTINHO (talk) 06:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  136. BRPever (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  The answers here look convincing. I am leaning towards yes. BRP ever 10:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Nicolas Eynaud (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Nicolas Eynaud (talk) 13:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Suyash.dwivedi (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Fredericknoronha (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 •  Good going. Fredericknoronha (talk) 20:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Lazaro d'Aragón (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024 •  Lazaro d'Aragón (talk) 22:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Draken Bowser (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Draken Bowser (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Nella.hohlova (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024 •  Nella (talk) 16:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  143. DonRumata (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  DonRumata (talk) 18:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Spielvogel (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Spielvogel (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Andrew Pertsev (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Andrew Pertsev (talk) 05:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Eraevsky (Eligible, checked by Julius 12345)2024 •  Eraevsky (обс.) 15:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Vituzzu (talk) 15:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Krol111 (Eligible, checked by Julius 12345)2024 •  Krol111 (talk) 15:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  149. DraconicDark (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  DraconicDark (talk) 18:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024 •  Less experience than I usually like to see for the steward role but looks positive overall, and my impression of their work has been positive. – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Antoine.b (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024 •  Antoine.b (talk) 12:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Ericliu1912 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2024 •  —— Eric Liu（Talk） 16:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
       Leništudent (Not eligible, checked by SHB2000) •  Leništudent (talk) 23:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 •  Bio06940 (talk) 00:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  154. AdaHephais (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  AdaHephais (talk) 11:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  155. NgocAnMaster (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  I have read over your answers to candidates' questions. You are always active and trusted; despite mistakes in the past (that's normal, I also made some mistakes before being elected as eliminator in viwiki). Hoping to see you more in global and cross-wiki activities. Anster (talk) 13:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2024 •  Taivo (talk) 14:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Z1KA (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Z1KA (T) 17:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  158. TrinacrianGolem (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  TrinacrianGolem (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  159. ドラみそ (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  doramiso-meta (talk) 01:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Siam2019 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Siam2019 (talk) 13:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  After reading pros, cons and neutral, no red flag, so let's try. — Jules* talk 13:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Ezzex (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Ezzex (talk) 14:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  163. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 •  BrunoBoehmler (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
       Baiji (Not eligible, checked by Elton) •  Baiji --> (Opinión) 21:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  164. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2024 •  DannyS712 (talk) 23:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Chqaz (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Chqaz (talk) 01:36, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Daniel Case (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024 •  Daniel Case (talk) 06:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Kirk39 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Kirk39 (talk) 09:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Darkhan 10:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Albertoleoncio (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024 •  ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 12:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Yahya (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024 •  ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 12:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  171. M7 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  M/ (talk) 13:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  only around for 4 years? sorry not good enough, maybe in 3-5 years...this is stewardship, not adminship. Stemoc 14:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. MdsShakil (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Thank you for volunteering. Your initiation of cross-wiki activity last December and your high number of edits on question pages are a little concerning. I believe you should gain more experience, and I suggest starting with GS. —MdsShakil (talk) 14:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Minilammas (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  --Minilammas (talk) 16:36, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Minorax (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Per MdsShakil. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Wooze (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 • . Wooze (talk) 16:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Alphama (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •   A l p h a m a  Talk 15:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Insufficient tenure. ——SerialNumber54129 19:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Would be good to know what is insufficient - thanks. EPIC (talk) 19:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9. EggRoll97 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  I regret to make this vote, because I do think you'd probably be a pretty good steward. But I'm concerned that you're taking on too much at once, having just gotten global renamer, and jumping to steward after less than 2 months. Like a couple others, I'd recommend global sysop before steward. EggRoll97 (talk) 02:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2024 •  This smacks of "hat collecting", especially with comments like "I should go for it", and a feeling that "I didn't really have use for the permissions" and only thinking up uses for them after the fact. All of us could probably come up with uses for more permissions, but if we haven't already run into a brick wall of needing them in order to do what we need to do, then we don't actually need them. It's not problematic that someone "daily" reporting LTA-vandals to the stewards is creating work for the stewards to do. It's why we have stewards.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  10:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the feedback - will answer it as I feel that it is useful for future voters. As you have left this similar vote for most candidates in this election, my answer is that I do not at all wish to hat collect, and I do not request permissions which I do not have use for. I also think you might have misunderstood my statement - if you didn't understand the context about the comments in question, I will happily explain them.
    Regarding the comments you are concerned about; for the first one, what I actually wrote was that one of the stewards thought I should run for it, and I thought for quite a while before volunteering. For the second comment, what I meant was that I do not want more roles, but have requested steward assistance many times in my cross-wiki work, and I am willing to serve the community and help other users with steward assistance as well, which would be a benefit as a steward, which is what made me run.
    Also including some related to EggRoll's concerns: I don’t necessarily see putting on more workload as a handicap, but rather actually see more workload as a great thing, since I am a quite ordinary guy and don’t really have much other things to do in real life. That’s why Wikipedia is such a great hobby, as there are countless amounts of stuff to do, and the fact that it’s not just an encyclopedia, but also a community. I feel compatible and acquainted with both my current amount of workload and the stewards’ work, which are both set to the area where I mainly work, like mentioned I will start calmly with the more comfortable areas at first before evolving and don’t feel that I will have problems with the additional workload that the steward role involves - I should be able to handle it, and if I can’t, the worst that can happen is having to remove my tools next confirmation. EPIC (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll go over your Q&A material in more detail, and revised if needed, though Nguyentrongphu's concerns below are also of some condideration to me. Steward is a really high-trust position.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  08:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11. DCB (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  DCB (talk) 12:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Too soon too fast. This user has acquired a lot of advanced tools in a relatively short amount of time. This is concerning to me. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 11:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    My best answer I can give to this is that like mentioned, having multiple permissions is not a large problem, as long as they are actively and responsibly used. That's also why the questions page exists, so that the voters can get a clue whether the candidates can actively and responsibly use the tools. I don't want excessive rights either, which is also why I resign from rights I don't have use for, like I just recently did for one of my rights. EPIC (talk) 11:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I respectfully disagree. Your time is limited, so it's impossible for you to do everything. You should focus on a few roles instead of spreading yourself thin. Also like I said, acquiring many advanced tools in a short amount of time is a problem to me. More experience is needed (usually years). Nguyentrongphu (talk) 07:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for your feedback once again. I wouldn't really class five years of experience, four of them as a sysop, as limited time, and I wouldn't really say that two advanced permissions outside of svwiki is many, considering multiple candidates in this election have about the same amount, or more, and like mentioned, I don't want to spread myself thin and don't plan to request further permissions on other wikis. Now, I'm not going to comment any further, so thank you for the feedback, again. EPIC (talk) 08:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Gereon K. (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ultratomio (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Ultratomio (talk) 23:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Needs longer cross-wiki activity. Lepricavark (talk) 15:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Mirer (talk) 14:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Intothatdarkness (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 •  Intothatdarkness (talk) 18:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Xania (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024 •  Xania (talk) 09:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Teles (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Has a great potential. Edits looks more thtn fine, and I will be very happy to change the vote to Yes with more experience. The early appearance, only recent involvement with crosswiki matters and lack of experience with advanced permissions made me stick with a "No" for now. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 13:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ideophagous (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Ideophagous (talk) 17:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  The situation at svwiki with OS is concerning, as steward access implies local OS access. Global sysop is a better starting role. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the feedback. I have explained that I will not use OS or CU on any of my home wikis (and that is also backed up by the stewards policy), and was not involved in the incident back in 2017. The other stewards can handle that if there is no one to handle it locally, and like mentioned they are mostly able to act quickly. They have been quick to act when I have requested OS assistance, and there have been no controversial cases for them in the 6 years they have handled it. EPIC (talk) 03:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Maleine258 (talk) 20:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
       Buffs (Not eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) •  Buffs per failure to respond to the question posed about arwiki (talk) 19:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The question has already been striked by ElectCom. There isn't much to do about that. Either way I agree that even though I do think it is OK for wikis to take a side in political matters related to the project, it is best to stay neutral. EPIC (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23. HarleyQuinn (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Need more experience HarleyQuinn❤️ (talk) 13:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. LR0725 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Due to the few mistakes related to rollback. LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 14:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment which I hope is okay, feel free to remove otherwise; I have made mistakes, I do some misclicks sometimes, including with rollback, partially it can be because of clicking the wrong button in SWViewer, but also because I sometimes edit from a slow computer which can sometimes fail me - but of course, I hope to improve. EPIC (talk) 15:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @EPIC: Regardless of this vote, I do appreciate your great activity at GSR. Thanks. LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 17:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Eta Carinae (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Eta Carinae (talk) 14:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. TenWhile6 (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  I would recommend global sysop first. Thanks for your candidacy! TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 14:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Aspere (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Aspere (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. JrandWP (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Although a good, trusted user, you should learn the skills from GRs/GSs and other crosswiki discussions. JrandWP (talk) 15:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Prodraxis (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Excellent user, but I would want more experience before voting - as JrandWP said, some GS experience can't hurt. Prodraxis (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Funkruf (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Funkruf (talk) 16:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 64andtim (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Despite being a very trusted user, you could use some more cross-wiki experience on fighting vandalism and requesting speedy page deletions. I agree with Prodraxis, but I do trust you on defending all of the projects from these pesky vandals and LTAs. – 64andtim (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Enkhsaihan2005 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Queen of Hearts (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024 •  Queen of Hearts (talk) 04:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Sintegrity (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Sintegrity (talk) 12:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  CptViraj (talk) 13:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13. VectorVoyager (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  VectorVoyager (talk) 11:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Hehua (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2024 •  per above Hehua (talk) 12:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by NightWolf1223)2024 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 20:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 04:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hamid Hassani (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Per above. — Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Feels a little early to me too experience-wise. That said, I have no major concerns either, and as I do not want to oppose somebody who at this point is quite likely to pass, I will just say: thanks for volunteering, good luck and take care. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)     00:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Renvoy (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  per others in this section reNVoy (user talk) 21:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zivax (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2024 •  Zivax (talk) 13:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21. 용인 학생 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  ㅡ Joayong (Suggest) 14:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Jphwra (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Jphwra (talk) 11:33, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Daniuu (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Kreuz Elf (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Kreuz Elf (talk) 17:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2024 •  Berlin-George (talk) 03:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  26. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2024 •  PoetVeches (talk) 16:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Nattes à chat (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Nattes à chat (talk) 23:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2024/Votes/EPIC&oldid=26301148"