Papers by Oleh Shynkarenko
Információs társadalom, Dec 31, 2023
The variability in the genre of Ukrainian science fiction (SF) has always been determined by the ... more The variability in the genre of Ukrainian science fiction (SF) has always been determined by the requirements of the time and the political situation. That is why the fiction of the 1920s promoted the ideology of naive techno-communism, but during the next forty years it became obvious that the Soviet project had reached a dead end, and its positivist component had not brought the desired results. Ukrainian SF writers then turned to mysticism and denial of a rational view of the world.
Index on Censorship, 2016
Metamodernism Manifesto, 2024
The "Metamodernism Manifesto" by Oleh Shynkarenko explores the evolution of consciousness and art... more The "Metamodernism Manifesto" by Oleh Shynkarenko explores the evolution of consciousness and artistic expression in the context of metamodernism. It argues that contemporary individuals, overwhelmed by a surplus of information and impressions, have developed a hybrid consciousness that integrates contradictory phenomena. This new perspective influences artistic methods, creating an oscillation between sincerity and irony, tradition and innovation.
The manifesto contrasts metamodernism with earlier cultural paradigms: romanticism, which trusts what is seen; modernism, which values the unseen; and postmodernism, which trusts nothing. Metamodernism, by contrast, trusts everything, embracing a complexity that defies intuitive understanding. It introduces the concept of "snippets," borrowed from programming, as a method of creating highly detailed and modular artistic representations, exemplified by works like Wes Anderson's films.
Through its discussion of authorial purity and the "Triad of Uncertainty," the manifesto critiques outdated paradigms and calls for a new approach to understanding and expressing reality. It highlights the discomfort and counterintuitive nature of metamodernism, while inviting further contributions, expansions, and even rejections to the discourse.
Science Fiction in Ukraine: 1920–2020, 2023
The variability in the genre of Ukrainian science fiction (SF) has always been determined by the ... more The variability in the genre of Ukrainian science fiction (SF) has always been determined by the requirements of the time and the political situation. That is why the fiction of the 1920s promoted the ideology of naive techno-communism, but during the next forty years it became obvious that the Soviet project had reached a dead end, and its positivist component had not brought the desired results. Ukrainian SF writers then turned to mysticism and denial of a rational view of the world.
Ukrainian Media After Euromaidan, 2014
This paper presents the situation in the Ukrainian media space in the context of its broader deve... more This paper presents the situation in the Ukrainian media space in the context of its broader development before and after Euromaidan in 2014. On the basis of evaluation of empirical data, analytical findings and conclusions, the author formulates a set of recommendations.
The research project is realised within the Ilko Kucheriv Democracy Fellowship Programme, which is a project of PASOS (Policy Association for an Open Society), carried out in conjunction with the Insitute for Public Affairs (IVO), Slovakia. The programme has been made possible with the financial support of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).
November 2014
Book Reviews by Oleh Shynkarenko
Поборюваний Львів: тридцять три роки взаємної ненависті, 2024
Oleh Shynkarenko's review of Christoph Mick’s book, "Lemberg, Lwów, L'viv, 1914–1947: Violence an... more Oleh Shynkarenko's review of Christoph Mick’s book, "Lemberg, Lwów, L'viv, 1914–1947: Violence and Ethnicity in a Contested City", examines the tumultuous history of Lviv (Lemberg/Lwów) as a city torn by ethnic and national conflicts during the first half of the 20th century. Mick, a historian from Indiana University, uses the term "contested" to describe Lviv’s history, emphasizing its uncertain ownership due to competing claims by various empires and nations. The book focuses on how the city’s identity shifted during three key periods: World War I, the interwar years, and World War II, exploring the transformation of ethnic and national dynamics.
The review highlights Mick’s examination of Lviv’s diverse population, including Poles, Jews, and Ukrainians, and their struggles for dominance in the city’s socio-political landscape. It underscores how nationalistic ideologies and modernization efforts fueled these tensions, leading to violence, forced expulsions, and demographic changes. By the end of World War II, Lviv’s demographic makeup was drastically altered, with Ukrainians emerging as the dominant group while Poles and Jews were largely displaced through Soviet and Nazi policies, including the Holodomor, ethnic cleansings, and the Holocaust.
Shynkarenko appreciates Mick’s balanced methodology and reliance on extensive archival research across multiple countries. He also praises Mick’s ability to contextualize Lviv’s history within broader narratives of nationalism and imperialism. However, the review notes the lack of visual materials in the book, which could have enhanced its presentation of contentious events.
Ultimately, Shynkarenko concludes that Mick’s work is valuable for both historians and general readers, offering a nuanced perspective on Lviv’s past. It challenges simplistic narratives of victimhood and underscores the importance of examining history from multiple viewpoints to understand the complexities of national and ethnic identities in a contested space.
Talks by Oleh Shynkarenko
Metamodernity and human mind, 2024
The article discusses the concept of metamodernity and its influence on human consciousness, fram... more The article discusses the concept of metamodernity and its influence on human consciousness, framed as a dialogue with philosopher László Ropolyi. It explores how the dominant communication mediums of different eras—text, radio, television, and the Internet—have shaped collective and individual perceptions. Metamodernity is presented as a response to postmodernism, emphasizing plurality, virtuality, and the relativity of truth while grappling with the complexities of an interconnected, information-saturated digital world.
Key themes include the Internet's impact on communication, the evolution of trust and truth in the digital age, and the emergence of hybrid consciousness shaped by rapid information streams. The article contrasts philosophical traditions—romanticism, modernism, postmodernism, and metamodernism—highlighting their distinct relationships with reality, trust, and artistic representation. Metamodernism, marked by a synthesis of seemingly contradictory perspectives, is seen as a framework for navigating the uncertainties of a pluralistic world while addressing the need for shared understanding amidst fragmented realities.
Uploads
Papers by Oleh Shynkarenko
The manifesto contrasts metamodernism with earlier cultural paradigms: romanticism, which trusts what is seen; modernism, which values the unseen; and postmodernism, which trusts nothing. Metamodernism, by contrast, trusts everything, embracing a complexity that defies intuitive understanding. It introduces the concept of "snippets," borrowed from programming, as a method of creating highly detailed and modular artistic representations, exemplified by works like Wes Anderson's films.
Through its discussion of authorial purity and the "Triad of Uncertainty," the manifesto critiques outdated paradigms and calls for a new approach to understanding and expressing reality. It highlights the discomfort and counterintuitive nature of metamodernism, while inviting further contributions, expansions, and even rejections to the discourse.
The research project is realised within the Ilko Kucheriv Democracy Fellowship Programme, which is a project of PASOS (Policy Association for an Open Society), carried out in conjunction with the Insitute for Public Affairs (IVO), Slovakia. The programme has been made possible with the financial support of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).
November 2014
Book Reviews by Oleh Shynkarenko
The review highlights Mick’s examination of Lviv’s diverse population, including Poles, Jews, and Ukrainians, and their struggles for dominance in the city’s socio-political landscape. It underscores how nationalistic ideologies and modernization efforts fueled these tensions, leading to violence, forced expulsions, and demographic changes. By the end of World War II, Lviv’s demographic makeup was drastically altered, with Ukrainians emerging as the dominant group while Poles and Jews were largely displaced through Soviet and Nazi policies, including the Holodomor, ethnic cleansings, and the Holocaust.
Shynkarenko appreciates Mick’s balanced methodology and reliance on extensive archival research across multiple countries. He also praises Mick’s ability to contextualize Lviv’s history within broader narratives of nationalism and imperialism. However, the review notes the lack of visual materials in the book, which could have enhanced its presentation of contentious events.
Ultimately, Shynkarenko concludes that Mick’s work is valuable for both historians and general readers, offering a nuanced perspective on Lviv’s past. It challenges simplistic narratives of victimhood and underscores the importance of examining history from multiple viewpoints to understand the complexities of national and ethnic identities in a contested space.
Talks by Oleh Shynkarenko
Key themes include the Internet's impact on communication, the evolution of trust and truth in the digital age, and the emergence of hybrid consciousness shaped by rapid information streams. The article contrasts philosophical traditions—romanticism, modernism, postmodernism, and metamodernism—highlighting their distinct relationships with reality, trust, and artistic representation. Metamodernism, marked by a synthesis of seemingly contradictory perspectives, is seen as a framework for navigating the uncertainties of a pluralistic world while addressing the need for shared understanding amidst fragmented realities.
The manifesto contrasts metamodernism with earlier cultural paradigms: romanticism, which trusts what is seen; modernism, which values the unseen; and postmodernism, which trusts nothing. Metamodernism, by contrast, trusts everything, embracing a complexity that defies intuitive understanding. It introduces the concept of "snippets," borrowed from programming, as a method of creating highly detailed and modular artistic representations, exemplified by works like Wes Anderson's films.
Through its discussion of authorial purity and the "Triad of Uncertainty," the manifesto critiques outdated paradigms and calls for a new approach to understanding and expressing reality. It highlights the discomfort and counterintuitive nature of metamodernism, while inviting further contributions, expansions, and even rejections to the discourse.
The research project is realised within the Ilko Kucheriv Democracy Fellowship Programme, which is a project of PASOS (Policy Association for an Open Society), carried out in conjunction with the Insitute for Public Affairs (IVO), Slovakia. The programme has been made possible with the financial support of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).
November 2014
The review highlights Mick’s examination of Lviv’s diverse population, including Poles, Jews, and Ukrainians, and their struggles for dominance in the city’s socio-political landscape. It underscores how nationalistic ideologies and modernization efforts fueled these tensions, leading to violence, forced expulsions, and demographic changes. By the end of World War II, Lviv’s demographic makeup was drastically altered, with Ukrainians emerging as the dominant group while Poles and Jews were largely displaced through Soviet and Nazi policies, including the Holodomor, ethnic cleansings, and the Holocaust.
Shynkarenko appreciates Mick’s balanced methodology and reliance on extensive archival research across multiple countries. He also praises Mick’s ability to contextualize Lviv’s history within broader narratives of nationalism and imperialism. However, the review notes the lack of visual materials in the book, which could have enhanced its presentation of contentious events.
Ultimately, Shynkarenko concludes that Mick’s work is valuable for both historians and general readers, offering a nuanced perspective on Lviv’s past. It challenges simplistic narratives of victimhood and underscores the importance of examining history from multiple viewpoints to understand the complexities of national and ethnic identities in a contested space.
Key themes include the Internet's impact on communication, the evolution of trust and truth in the digital age, and the emergence of hybrid consciousness shaped by rapid information streams. The article contrasts philosophical traditions—romanticism, modernism, postmodernism, and metamodernism—highlighting their distinct relationships with reality, trust, and artistic representation. Metamodernism, marked by a synthesis of seemingly contradictory perspectives, is seen as a framework for navigating the uncertainties of a pluralistic world while addressing the need for shared understanding amidst fragmented realities.