3
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $E$ is a Banach space and $p$ is a $\sigma$-subadditive semi-norm, that is, if $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}x_n$ converges in $E$, then \begin{equation} p(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}x_n) \leq \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}p(x_n) \leq \infty. \end{equation} Then we claim that $p$ is continuous: \begin{equation} \exists M>0 \quad \text{s.t.} \quad p(x)\leq M\Vert x \Vert, \quad \forall x \in E. \end{equation} I wanted to solve it by contradiction but was fruitless. This proposition can be used to prove three traditional theorems in functional analysis: The Banach-Steinhaus theorem, the open mapping theorem and the closed graph theorem, if we choose proper semi-norm $p$.

Any help will be appreciated. Thanks.

New contributor
Zhi-Chu Luo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Let $B :=\{x\in E : p(x) < 1\}$ be the open unit ball for $p$. For $t > 0$ we have $$ tB = \{x\in E : p(x) < t\} $$ (by the semi-norm property $p(\lambda x) = |\lambda| p(x)$). Hence, if $x \in E$ we can choose $t > p(x)$ and then we have $x \in tB$. This means $$ E= \bigcup_{t>0} tB, $$ that is $B$ is absorbing. Moreover $B$ is convex, since it is a ball with respect to a semi-norm. Now also its closure $\overline{B}$ is convex and absorbing. It is known that a closed, convex and absorbing subset of a Banach space has $0$ as an inner point, that is there is a closed norm-ball $K=K(0,r)$ with $K \subseteq \overline{B}$.

Now it is sufficient to find a number $s>0$ such that $p(x) \le s$ if $\|x\| \le r$, since then $$ \forall x \in E: ~ p(x) \le \frac{s}{r}\|x\|. $$

We fix $x \in K$. Since then $x \in \overline{B}$, we find some $x_1$ in $B$ such that $\|x − x_1\| \le r/2$. Now $$ x − x_1 \in \frac{1}{2} K ⊆ \frac{1}{2}\overline{B}= \overline{2^{-1}B}, $$ and we find some $x_2$ in $2^{-1}B$ such that $\|x − x_1 − x_2\| \le r/2^2$. Next, we find $x_3$ in $2^{-2}B$ such that $\|x − x_1 − x_2 − x_3\| \le r/2^3$, and by induction there is a sequence $(x_n)$ such that $$ x_n \in 2^{−n+1}B, \quad \|x − \sum_{j=1}^n x_j \| \le \frac{r}{2^n}, $$ for each $n \in \mathbb{N}$. It follows that $p(x_n) < 2^{-n+1}$ for each $n$ and that $$ x = \sum_{n=1}^\infty x_n. $$ The $\sigma$-subadditivity of $p$ yields $$ p(x) = p(\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_n) \le \sum_{n=1}^\infty p(x_n) < \sum_{n=1}^\infty 2^{-n+1} =2. $$ Thus we can choose $s=2$ and have $\forall x \in E: ~ p(x) \le \frac{2}{r}\|x\|$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ I am not sure if OP assumes homogeneity of $p$ $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 11 at 14:23
  • $\begingroup$ @EvangelopoulosFoivos In the title he writes "semi-norm". $\endgroup$
    – Gerd
    Commented Dec 11 at 14:24
  • $\begingroup$ That's true... Also note that this is false without completeness $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 11 at 14:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In the meantime I learned that this is a result of Zabreiko. A different proof using the open mapping theorem is here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/842870/zabreikos-lemma $\endgroup$
    – Gerd
    Commented Dec 11 at 15:08
  • $\begingroup$ (+) Your proof is similar to the proof of the open mapping theorem. The aim in OP is derive the open mapping theorem from the problem on seminorms so the asker didn't want to use that theorem. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 11 at 15:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .