Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 9, 2020 at 7:19 history edited MAS CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body
Sep 10, 2019 at 20:09 vote accept Laurent Claessens
Aug 19, 2019 at 16:57 answer added Torsten Schoeneberg timeline score: 5
Aug 11, 2019 at 10:44 history edited Laurent Claessens CC BY-SA 4.0
added 843 characters in body
Aug 11, 2019 at 10:34 comment added Laurent Claessens For me, the definition of an hermitian operator $A$ is that $<Av,w>=<v,Aw>$ for every vectors $v,w$. Since a representation is a purely algebraic thing, when a representation $(\rho,V)$ is given, I can craft a scalar product on $V$ for which the equality $<\rho(J)v,w>=<v,\rho(J)w>$ does not hold. The point is that the conditions about "being a representation" do not mention the scalar product on the representation space. I edit my question to make it more clear.
Aug 11, 2019 at 10:03 comment added Cosmas Zachos In the algebra of the Js you wrote, Hermitean transposition has them Hermitean. The rep satisfies the same algebra.
Aug 11, 2019 at 6:24 comment added Laurent Claessens About my previous comment, the answer is "no". The represented operators do not have to be hermitian. If $(\rho, V)$ is a representation, I can craft a scalar product on V such that the matrices $\rho(J_i)$ are not (anti)hermitian.
Aug 11, 2019 at 6:21 comment added Laurent Claessens The matrices of su(2) are (anti)hermitian, ok. But my question is : why the REPRESENTED matrices have to be (anti)hermitian ?
Aug 10, 2019 at 22:53 comment added Cosmas Zachos Most physics texts address those. The J s are hermitean, and not antihermitean, as you started with, so the group elements are ~$\exp (i\theta J)$. The eigenvalues of all eigenvectors are thus real, no?
Aug 10, 2019 at 8:30 history asked Laurent Claessens CC BY-SA 4.0