Wikidata:Property proposal/meronym
meronym
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Lexemes
Not done
| Description | word the meaning of which designates a part of it |
|---|---|
| Represents | meronomy (Q12122752) |
| Data type | Sense |
| Example 1 | house (en) → roof (en) |
| Example 2 | MISSING |
| Example 3 | MISSING |
| See also | Wikidata:Property proposal/holonym |
Tubezlob (🙋) 15:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Different language handle concepts a bit differently and as a result it can be useful to specifically link words within a given language. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 17:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Relationships between concepts should be modeled on lexemes, not on senses. Modeling this on senses means duplicating this information in all languages. Instead, senses should be connected to items via P5137 (see also #evokes). That way, the meronym relationship can be constructed automatically for all languages. -- Duesentrieb (talk) 11:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)- Support. This is an important semantic relation. This property will connect senses, not words. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 15:55, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- The relationship is important, sure. But I'm unconvinced that it's useful to model it separately for each language. Do you have an example when this would add extra value over just connecting the sense to an item, and that item having part-of relationships to other items? -- Duesentrieb (talk) 13:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose this should be modelled on Q-items. KaMan (talk) 05:18, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose unless there's a clear example where just using properties on related items isn't sufficient. ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Comment agree with Arthur, but I don't think we will necessarily have an item to link for each sense. Maybe should see how senses go and then re-visit the question. --- Jura 11:38, 13 October 2018 (UTC)- @Tubezlob: I think it would be good to complete the samples with 3 actual ones. --- Jura 06:38, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Not done No consensus.--Micru (talk) 09:50, 22 December 2018 (UTC)