Wikidata:Property proposal/Wikia Article URL 2

Wikia Article URL 2

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work

Not done

Description	Wikia Article URL
Data type	URL
Domain	fictional character (Q95074), television series episode (Q21191270)… things that have articles in wikia
Allowed values	`^https?:\/\/(?:[^@\n]+@)?([^:\/\n?]+)\.(wikia\|fandom)\.com\/wiki\/.+` (any subdomain of wikia.com or fandom.com)
Example 1	Kermit the Frog (Q1107971) ↳ `https://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/Kermit`
Example 2	Professor Moriarty (Q283111) ↳ `https://bakerstreet.fandom.com/wiki/James_Moriarty` ↳ `http://de.sherlockholmes.wikia.com/wiki/James_Moriarty` ↳ `http://es.sherlockholmes.wikia.com/wiki/James_Moriarty` ↳ `http://pt-br.sherlockholmes.wikia.com/wiki/James_Moriarty` ↳ `http://de.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/James_Moriarty` ↳ `http://es.startrek.wikia.com/wiki/James_Moriarty` ↳ `http://fr.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/James_Moriarty` ↳ `http://it.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/James_Moriarty`
Example 3	Mortynight Run (Q22807440) ↳ `https://rickandmorty.wikia.com/wiki/Mortynight_Run` ↳ `http://it.rickandmorty.wikia.com/wiki/Episodio_13`
Source	P973 (with any subdomain of wikia.com or fandom.com)
Planned use	a lot of items use already use described at URL (P973) to point to wikia pages. these could be automatically replaced
Number of IDs in source	2283 yet (see query)
See also	Fandom wiki ID (P4073), Fandom article ID (P6262)

Motivation

Following the withdrawal of Wikidata:Property proposal/Wikia Article URL and the closure of the proposal by a property creator as "withdrawn". Here is a new proposal. Still think this is preferable over Fandom article ID (P6262), @Cwf97: if you are still interested. --- Jura 17:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Question Why is this better than Fandom article ID (P6262)? NMaia (talk) 02:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

P6262 is a redirect to a wiki page title, not a generally unique external identifier for a concept. Users other than Wikia themselves might not even be able to resolve the address correctly. --- Jura 11:58, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Cwf97, NMaia: Given the lack of interest, I'd withdraw this. What do you think? --- Jura 03:19, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Trade (talk) 23:50, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
marking as ~~Not done~~, just like the previous proposal. Please do not duplicate previously closed proposals if nothing has changed and no new argument is given. − Pintoch (talk) 08:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pintoch: I think you don't read or don't understand the proposals you are closing. Have you considered resign your property creator right? --- Jura 08:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hi Jura1, if you have concerns about my administrative actions, feel free to bring this up on the appropriate forum. Cheers − Pintoch (talk) 08:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Pintoch: Please provide a policy to support your closing decision. --- Jura 08:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Jura1: for me this is common sense: if a proposal was closed, reopening it in identical form with no new argument will lead to the same closure decision. − Pintoch (talk) 08:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      - Can you link the proposal you have in mind? --- Jura 08:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        Wikidata:Property proposal/Wikia Article URL − Pintoch (talk) 08:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        @Pintoch: Why would I have to withdraw this proposal because Shisma withdrew theirs? --- Jura 08:54, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        @Jura1: because it was already created under a different form at Fandom article ID (P6262) − Pintoch (talk) 09:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        @Pintoch: I don't see why this would require me to withdraw my proposal. This proposal is clearly different from what you created at P6262 and you didn't consider closing Wikidata:Property proposal/Wikia Article URL when doing so. --- Jura 09:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        @Jura1: okay, let's reopen this then, I will let someone else decide and turn my own decision into an oppose vote. − Pintoch (talk) 09:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as a duplicate of Fandom article ID (P6262) which is already widely used − Pintoch (talk) 09:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Pintoch. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jura1, Pintoch, Pigsonthewing: marking as Not done due to lack of support also not response by Cwf97 and NMaia. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 14:45, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @ZI Jony: as it was re-opened just recently, featured in the weekly news and new arguments brought up, should we let people respond? --- Jura 15:05, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jura1: Sorry, I don't think more discussion needed. So far that's been enough. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 14:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ZI Jony: don't you want people to be able to address the concerns recently raised? It's seems odd that it was open for so long, gained support and gets closed shortly after someone raised a new objection they hadn't made in all the months before and without letting other contributors the time to respond. --- Jura 14:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No positive consensus to create the property as proposed, almost 8 months, and this is third closing. If you think that the close was inappropriate, please head to WD:AN. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 16:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]