Wikidata:Property proposal/Musixmatch album ID

Musixmatch album ID

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control

Not done

Description	identifier for a album on Musixmatch
Represents	Musixmatch (Q6942717)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	album (Q482994)
Allowed values	\d+
Example 1	Reputation (Q37814092) → 26806100 or 26806100 (the value are same)
Example 2	This Is Acting (Q19314211) → 20885699 or 20885699 (the value are same)
Example 3	Recovery (Q274533) → 11080463 or 11080463 (the value are same)
Source	The site's unique identifier for the music album can be found in the metadata in the song page and is recorded in the tag like `<meta property="og:album_id" content="26806100"/>`.(其專輯ID可以在網頁中的的標頭找到，記載於類似`<meta property="og:album_id" content="26806100"/>`的網頁標籤中。)
Planned use	using in infobox, help readers find the album of the song. like Musixmatch track ID (P6742).
Formatter URL	http://mxmt.ch/r/$1 or http://lyr.cx/r/$1
See also	Musixmatch track ID (P6742)

Motivation

Like Musixmatch track ID (P6742), the music album also has authority control identifier in Musixmatch (Q6942717) -- 宇帆（talk·留言·歡迎簽到_R₁R₂NKC） 16:26, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- see Wikidata:Property_proposal/Musixmatch_track_ID. -- 宇帆（talk·留言·歡迎簽到_R₁R₂NKC） 16:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - and Musixmatch (Q6942717) also has a authority control identifier, <meta property="og:artist_id" content="321069">, that is authority control identifier for singer or artist. We can consider also creating a property for it. -- 宇帆（talk·留言·歡迎簽到_R₁R₂NKC） 16:44, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Support. "Society Person" Peppa Pig (talk) 04:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support David (talk) 09:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We talked about linking to Musixmatch albums in MusicBrainz (Q14005) and decided not to because they don't seem to have a clear idea of what their album is supposed to mean. Looking at the page for Taylor Swift they have one entry per album (no reissues etc), but looking at the page for Nine Inch Nails there are plenty of duplicates for reissues with bonus tracks etc. As such, we couldn't figure out at what level to link to it. I suspect the same issue exists in Wikidata: which of these should be linked to The Hand That Feeds (Q2418351)? [1] [2] [3]--Reosarevok (talk) 15:47, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @社会我佩奇:. -- 宇帆（talk·留言·歡迎簽到_R₁R₂NKC） 15:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Trade (talk) 08:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Following the comment of Reosarevok: For MusicBrainz, there is MusicBrainz release group ID (P436) which allows to have the different precise outputs. In this case, a title, an explanatory subtitle, a date and (sometimes) a photo give us differences. We can not know every time a main output (for example: media support). If required qualifier constraint (Q21510856) and multi-value constraint (Q21510857) could help us, there is too little information and they are too vague. Sorry. —Eihel (talk) 16:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Album id same as Apple Music, Google Play Music or Spotify. @Eihel: What is the problem? Eurohunter (talk) 22:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The concerns above haven't been addressed. I'm leaning towards closing this request as not done. Multichill (talk) 10:33, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support. LiaFla (talk) 14:40, 14 Jan 2020 (UTC)
Not done no consensus. per Multichill - there is reasoned opposition and no response as to the concerns raised, with most supporters not providing any explanation. No prejudice against another proposal, but please keep the issues raised here in mind and ping those who commented in this discussion. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 23:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]