Wikidata:Property proposal/EPA Ecoregion Level 3 Code

EPA Ecoregion Level 3 Code

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science

Not done

Description	part of a classification system for ecological areas with similar habitat in North America
Represents	Level III ecoregion (Q52111338)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	Level III ecoregion (Q52111338)
Allowed values	([1-9]\|1[0-6])\.[1-6]\.([1-9]\|1[0-5])
Example 1	Colorado Plateaus (Q2984378) → 10.1.6
Example 2	Columbia Plateau (Q3391942) → 10.1.2
Example 3	Coast Range (Q5138204) → 7.1.8
Source	https://www.epa.gov/eco-research/ecoregions
Planned use	I will create instances of Q52111338 for the 182 identities in this class of ecoregions. See my code here for building the WikiData item information and links for all EPA Ecoregions.
Number of IDs in source	182
Expected completeness	eventually complete (Q21873974)
See also	EPA Ecoregion Level 1 Code EPA Ecoregion Level 2 Code EPA Ecoregion US Level 3 Code EPA Ecoregion US Level 4 Code

Motivation

User TimK_MSI started creating items for two of the classes of EPA ecoregions some time ago (User_talk:TimK_MSI). Without an identifier property, he incorporated an identifier into some of the items by including a series ordinal on the instance of property in cases like Q5330161. I am now finishing out the work to generate items and linkages for all EPA ecoregion classifications as a persistent, resolvable, online resource for work in my lab and by others who work with these data for various analytical purposes. I would like to put identifiers on each item, properly registered to official properties, such that we can execute queries from external data systems that already have the original EPA Ecoregion codes in use. Skybristol (talk) 14:13, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Weak oppose @Skybristol: Regex improved but my weak oppose at this stage on the proposal is due to the level1.level2.level3 syntax. Could the format instead just be changed to ([1-9]|1[0-5]) (a number between 1 and 15) so it doesn't mix level 1, level 2 and level 3 identifiers together? If there is a reason for using a level1.level2.level3 syntax I would argue that only one property proposal would be required. --Dhx1
Comment The description at [1] indicates this identifier was issued by Commission for Environmental Cooperation (Q2986468) and not United States Environmental Protection Agency (Q460173). I suggest that the name of this property could therefore be "CEC 2006 Ecoregion Level 3 Code" and the source URI/official website becomes [2]. --Dhx1 (talk) 16:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dhx1, Artoria2e5: The original proposer seems to have a lost interest in these. If you are interested, maybe you want to go ahead with a proposal for a single property? Artoria2e5 who commented on Wikidata:Property_proposal/EPA_Ecoregion_Level_1_Code. @Arbnos, Skybristol: --- Jura 07:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done it seems to be stale for quite some time. If there is still interest, it's worth going through the five or so pages and formulate a new proposal with the input there. --- Jura 19:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]