J Faundez and C Tan (eds), International Law, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development (Edward Elgar,now also in paperback), 2017
With its focus on Afghanistan, this chapter considers the practical dimension of the relationship... more With its focus on Afghanistan, this chapter considers the practical dimension of the relationship between investment and human rights. It discusses the protection of the right to water in Afghanistan within the context of the country’s booming extractive sector, in order to outline how conflict areas represent a worst-case scenario for the practical implementation of both investment and human rights protections. In order to identify ways to harness investment for sustainable development, the chapter considers the relevance of the United Nations (UN) Frame- work and Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (respec- tively, the Framework and the GPs; GPs, A/HRC/17/31, 2011: 10–11), as developed by the former UN Special Representative of the Secretary General (SRSG), Professor John Ruggie. The Framework consists of three complementary pillars: the state duty to protect against human rights abuses by third parties, including business; the corporate respons- ibility to respect human rights; and the availability of effective remedies (Framework, A/HRC/8/5, 2008). According to the commentary to GP 7, in conflict contexts home states ‘should review whether their policies, legislation, regulations and enforcement measures effectively address this heightened risk, including through provisions for human rights due diligence by business. Where they identify gaps, States should take appropriate steps to address them’ (A/HRC/17/31, 2011: 11). The com- mentary does not exclude the possibility for home states to introduce ‘civil, administrative or criminal liability for enterprises domiciled or operating in their territory and/or jurisdiction’ (ibid). Taking the position of the commentary as a starting point for further analysis, this chapter focuses on the extraterritorial dimension of the obligations enshrined in pillar one of the Framework, and outlines the home state’s duty (rather than the possibility) to protect human rights when investors operate in conflict contexts.
Uploads
Papers by Daria Davitti