Marina Fiori
Industrial and organizational psychologist with a Ph.D. in Social and Personality psychology.
The research I conduct can be subsumed under three main areas: 1) Organizational behavior; 2) Personality and individual differences; 3) Social psychology.
1) Organizational Behavior. In this area I have been investigating personality antecedents and situational determinants of perception of deviant workplace behavior and economical decision-making.
2) One of the drivers of my research is the interest in understanding how individuals differ in processing emotion information and how such differences may be related to behavioral outcomes. I apply this process-oriented approach to investigate the construct of emotional intelligence (EI).The basic idea is that the distinction between automatic and conscious processing in emotional experience is fundamental to both understanding the psychological dynamics of EI and accounting for additional variability in emotionally intelligent behavior.
3) My activity in this domain is related to understanding the role of different emotional aspects in biased perception and judgment.
The research I conduct can be subsumed under three main areas: 1) Organizational behavior; 2) Personality and individual differences; 3) Social psychology.
1) Organizational Behavior. In this area I have been investigating personality antecedents and situational determinants of perception of deviant workplace behavior and economical decision-making.
2) One of the drivers of my research is the interest in understanding how individuals differ in processing emotion information and how such differences may be related to behavioral outcomes. I apply this process-oriented approach to investigate the construct of emotional intelligence (EI).The basic idea is that the distinction between automatic and conscious processing in emotional experience is fundamental to both understanding the psychological dynamics of EI and accounting for additional variability in emotionally intelligent behavior.
3) My activity in this domain is related to understanding the role of different emotional aspects in biased perception and judgment.
less
InterestsView All (12)
Uploads
Papers by Marina Fiori
In this chapter, we provide a general framework for understanding EI conceptualized as an ability. We start by identifying the origins of the construct routed in the intelligence literature and the foundational four-branch model of ability EI, then describe the most commonly employed measures of EI as ability, critically review predictive validity evidence. We further approach current challenges, including the difficulties of scoring answers as “correct” in the emotional sphere, and open a discussion on how to increase the incremental validity of ability EI. We finally suggest new directions by introducing a distinction between a crystallized component of EI, based on knowledge of emotions, and a fluid component, based on the processing of emotion-information.
In this chapter, we provide a general framework for understanding EI conceptualized as an ability. We start by identifying the origins of the construct routed in the intelligence literature and the foundational four-branch model of ability EI, then describe the most commonly employed measures of EI as ability, critically review predictive validity evidence. We further approach current challenges, including the difficulties of scoring answers as “correct” in the emotional sphere, and open a discussion on how to increase the incremental validity of ability EI. We finally suggest new directions by introducing a distinction between a crystallized component of EI, based on knowledge of emotions, and a fluid component, based on the processing of emotion-information.
In this chapter, we provide a general framework for understanding EI conceptualized as an ability. We start by identifying the origins of the construct routed in the intelligence literature and the foundational four-branch model of ability EI, then describe the most commonly employed measures of EI as ability, and critically review predictive validity evidence. We further approach current challenges, including the difficulties of scoring answers as “correct” in the emotional sphere, and open a discussion on how to increase the incremental validity of ability EI. We finally suggest new directions by introducing a distinction between a crystallized component of EI, based on knowledge of emotions, and a fluid component, based on the processing of emotion information.