China power struggles. In Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master's Insights on China, the United States, ... more China power struggles. In Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master's Insights on China, the United States, and the World, Lee pulls no punches in expressing his views on China's future. Asked whether China is serious about replacing the U.S. as the number one power in Asia and the world, Lee said, "Of course. Why not?" (See more on China, page 4.) Spring 2013 www.belfercenter.org T he Belfer Center's faculty and fellows are mounting a multi-pronged academic campaign on China, hoping to influence U.S. policy on how to deal with the rising Asian power. A dizzying array of initiatives is under way. One effort builds on the U.S.-China Relations Project begun in 2006 by Belfer Center Adjunct Professor Richard Rosecrance and the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences to reduce potential conflict between a current and a rising power.
watcher. Lee, who has advised many Chinese and U.S. presidents, is a pithy analyst of U.S.China p... more watcher. Lee, who has advised many Chinese and U.S. presidents, is a pithy analyst of U.S.China power struggles. In Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master’s Insights on China, the United States, and the World, Lee pulls no punches in expressing his views on China’s future. Asked whether China is serious about replacing the U.S. as the number one power in Asia and the world, Lee said, “Of course. Why not?” (See more on China, page 4.) Spring 2013 www.belfercenter.org
U.S. science policy since World War II has in large measure been driven by Vannevar Bush’s famous... more U.S. science policy since World War II has in large measure been driven by Vannevar Bush’s famous paper Science—The Endless Frontier. Bush’s separation of research into “basic” and “applied” domains has been enshrined in much of U.S. science and technology policy over the past seven decades, and this false dichotomy has become a barrier to the development of a coherent national innovation policy. Much of the debate centers on the appropriate federal role in innovation. Bush argued successfully that funding basic research was a necessary role for government, with the implication that applied research should be left to the auspices of markets. However, the original distinction does not reflect what actually happens in research, and its narrow focus on the stated goals of an individual research project prevents us from taking a more productive holistic view of the research enterprise.
China power struggles. In Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master's Insights on China, the United States, ... more China power struggles. In Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master's Insights on China, the United States, and the World, Lee pulls no punches in expressing his views on China's future. Asked whether China is serious about replacing the U.S. as the number one power in Asia and the world, Lee said, "Of course. Why not?" (See more on China, page 4.) Spring 2013 www.belfercenter.org T he Belfer Center's faculty and fellows are mounting a multi-pronged academic campaign on China, hoping to influence U.S. policy on how to deal with the rising Asian power. A dizzying array of initiatives is under way. One effort builds on the U.S.-China Relations Project begun in 2006 by Belfer Center Adjunct Professor Richard Rosecrance and the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences to reduce potential conflict between a current and a rising power.
watcher. Lee, who has advised many Chinese and U.S. presidents, is a pithy analyst of U.S.China p... more watcher. Lee, who has advised many Chinese and U.S. presidents, is a pithy analyst of U.S.China power struggles. In Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master’s Insights on China, the United States, and the World, Lee pulls no punches in expressing his views on China’s future. Asked whether China is serious about replacing the U.S. as the number one power in Asia and the world, Lee said, “Of course. Why not?” (See more on China, page 4.) Spring 2013 www.belfercenter.org
U.S. science policy since World War II has in large measure been driven by Vannevar Bush’s famous... more U.S. science policy since World War II has in large measure been driven by Vannevar Bush’s famous paper Science—The Endless Frontier. Bush’s separation of research into “basic” and “applied” domains has been enshrined in much of U.S. science and technology policy over the past seven decades, and this false dichotomy has become a barrier to the development of a coherent national innovation policy. Much of the debate centers on the appropriate federal role in innovation. Bush argued successfully that funding basic research was a necessary role for government, with the implication that applied research should be left to the auspices of markets. However, the original distinction does not reflect what actually happens in research, and its narrow focus on the stated goals of an individual research project prevents us from taking a more productive holistic view of the research enterprise.
Uploads
Papers by Tolu Odumosu