
K.A. Kassapi
Water, Land and Environment.
less
Related Authors
Merih Kerestecioglu
COWI Denmark
Stina Powell
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Rosie Simpson
University of Gloucestershire
JANET DWYER
University of Gloucestershire
Tommy Dalgaard
Aarhus University
Etienne Josien
Vetagro SUP
InterestsView All (20)
Uploads
Papers by K.A. Kassapi
resources that present high variability in quality and quantity characteristics, related mainly to the hydrogeological setup and the land use. Groundwater systems’ status assessment was performed utilizing a methodological approach developed mainly in accordance to the Water Framework and the Groundwater Daughter Directives. Status assessment was performed in all 27 identified groundwater systems. Chemical status was based on calculations of the average and the P90 values for the entire
time series of every available monitoring point. Only basic, commonly found parameters in most of the identified groundwater systems were considered (EC, Cl-, SO4, NO3, NH4); those however reflect the main anticipated pollution issues in the region. Pressures and trend analyses were also conducted. Determination of the quantitative status was based on the water budget analysis and the study of borehole hydrographs and spring and river runoff hydrographs for every monitoring point. Results of the assessments performed suggest that four groundwater systems are in bad chemical status, and nine in bad quantitative status. Differentiating the natural background concentrations owed to the hydrogeological setup, agriculture, over-pumping and salinisation highlight the main deterioration factors in the region. Specific protection and restoration measures to alleviate the identified problems are proposed which are tailored to the socio-economic structure of the region and the hydrologic potential of the basin.
waters according to reference conditions in each type and to define the ecological quality of water
resources in each river catchment area, including also the transboundaries rivers and lakes. At the
present study, the Greek part of the catchment area of the transboundary river Nestos was examined.
System B was selected, as the most qualified classification method for the surface water of river
Nestos, according to the Water Frame Directive (Systems A and B). It reflects the diversity of the
landscape and apart from the mandatory factors, other alternative factors can be used. G.I.S. was
used for the designation of typology and proved a valuable tool. The abiotic factors used were height,
geology, catchment area size and slope. The catchment area was divided into twenty-three types,
four of which were on the main river channel. The twenty-three types fall into three out of five
Mediterranean River Types (R-M 2, 3, 4).
resources that present high variability in quality and quantity characteristics, related mainly to the hydrogeological setup and the land use. Groundwater systems’ status assessment was performed utilizing a methodological approach developed mainly in accordance to the Water Framework and the Groundwater Daughter Directives. Status assessment was performed in all 27 identified groundwater systems. Chemical status was based on calculations of the average and the P90 values for the entire
time series of every available monitoring point. Only basic, commonly found parameters in most of the identified groundwater systems were considered (EC, Cl-, SO4, NO3, NH4); those however reflect the main anticipated pollution issues in the region. Pressures and trend analyses were also conducted. Determination of the quantitative status was based on the water budget analysis and the study of borehole hydrographs and spring and river runoff hydrographs for every monitoring point. Results of the assessments performed suggest that four groundwater systems are in bad chemical status, and nine in bad quantitative status. Differentiating the natural background concentrations owed to the hydrogeological setup, agriculture, over-pumping and salinisation highlight the main deterioration factors in the region. Specific protection and restoration measures to alleviate the identified problems are proposed which are tailored to the socio-economic structure of the region and the hydrologic potential of the basin.
waters according to reference conditions in each type and to define the ecological quality of water
resources in each river catchment area, including also the transboundaries rivers and lakes. At the
present study, the Greek part of the catchment area of the transboundary river Nestos was examined.
System B was selected, as the most qualified classification method for the surface water of river
Nestos, according to the Water Frame Directive (Systems A and B). It reflects the diversity of the
landscape and apart from the mandatory factors, other alternative factors can be used. G.I.S. was
used for the designation of typology and proved a valuable tool. The abiotic factors used were height,
geology, catchment area size and slope. The catchment area was divided into twenty-three types,
four of which were on the main river channel. The twenty-three types fall into three out of five
Mediterranean River Types (R-M 2, 3, 4).