Papers by Mpho Kaizer Mahlangu Mahlangu
Jurisprudence, 2017
Defenders of legislative supremacy against judicial review have primarily invoked various virtues... more Defenders of legislative supremacy against judicial review have primarily invoked various virtues of legislative processin particular, its deliberative qualities, the diverse perspectives and inputs it allows, and especially, its connection to a principle of democratic equality. However, I argue that such virtues have been overemphasised as justifications for legislative supremacy. Instead, I argue that insufficient attention has been paid to the form of legislation as a justification for giving legislatures the 'final say' on issues of fundamental rights. Firstly, I argue that legal philosophy has underemphasised the extent to which legislative form, rather than legislative process, can mediate 'majoritarian' rule, and how this undermines the most commonplace arguments for rightsbased judicial review of parliamentary legislation. Secondly, I suggest that the same formal attributes give legislation a virtue of political transparency which can be contrasted with the esotericism of constitutional jurisprudence, itself considered as a distinctive species of political domination.
Uploads
Papers by Mpho Kaizer Mahlangu Mahlangu