Execution of exercises with weights can be unilateral or bilateral. Studies show a sum of force u... more Execution of exercises with weights can be unilateral or bilateral. Studies show a sum of force unilateral greater than bilateral values, presenting a bilateral deficit (DBL). This study aimed to evaluate and check for existence of DBL in elbow flexion exercises and knee extension in young men, with the magnitude of this deficit. Your sample is constituted in 24 male subjects with a mean age of 23.58 ± 0.67 years. For the knee extension exercise were used only 20 subjects. We recorded the force values from the maximum load and maximum number of repetitions, respectively, in the 1RM test and 60% of 1RM. Through the software SPSS 17.0 was found nonsignificant higher mean values in the 1RM test for bending elbows on the bench Scott unilateral (28.29 ± 0.79) p> 0.05 compared to values for the same year so bilateral (27.79 ± 0.84) p> 0.05. The values for knee extension 1RM were significant in the upper and unilaterally (62.95 ± 0.97) p <0.01 compared with bilateral values (70.8 ± 1.97) p <0.01. The deficit results were-1.66 ± 1.04 and-10.3 ± 1.85, respectively for elbow flexion and knee extension. We checked also not significant lower average values in the test 60% of 1RM for unilateral elbow flexion (17.67 ± 0.63) p> 0.05 compared to a bilateral (17.87 ± 0.89) p>0.05. For the knee extension exercise at 60% 1RM were significant lower average values presented in unilaterally (9.95 ± 0.31) p <0.05 compared with the bilaterally (10.9 ± 0.22) p <0.05. The results of the bilateral facilitation were 3.54 ± 4.33 and 11.15 ± 3.44 respectively for elbow flexion and knee extension. Finally, these results suggest that exercise loads with intensities show a larger gain when performed unilaterally, unlike performed at intensities lower, with higher gain on a bilateral basis.
Execution of exercises with weights can be unilateral or bilateral. Studies show a sum of force u... more Execution of exercises with weights can be unilateral or bilateral. Studies show a sum of force unilateral greater than bilateral values, presenting a bilateral deficit (DBL). This study aimed to evaluate and check for existence of DBL in elbow flexion exercises and knee extension in young men, with the magnitude of this deficit. Your sample is constituted in 24 male subjects with a mean age of 23.58 ± 0.67 years. For the knee extension exercise were used only 20 subjects. We recorded the force values from the maximum load and maximum number of repetitions, respectively, in the 1RM test and 60% of 1RM. Through the software SPSS 17.0 was found nonsignificant higher mean values in the 1RM test for bending elbows on the bench Scott unilateral (28.29 ± 0.79) p> 0.05 compared to values for the same year so bilateral (27.79 ± 0.84) p> 0.05. The values for knee extension 1RM were significant in the upper and unilaterally (62.95 ± 0.97) p <0.01 compared with bilateral values (70.8 ± 1.97) p <0.01. The deficit results were-1.66 ± 1.04 and-10.3 ± 1.85, respectively for elbow flexion and knee extension. We checked also not significant lower average values in the test 60% of 1RM for unilateral elbow flexion (17.67 ± 0.63) p> 0.05 compared to a bilateral (17.87 ± 0.89) p>0.05. For the knee extension exercise at 60% 1RM were significant lower average values presented in unilaterally (9.95 ± 0.31) p <0.05 compared with the bilaterally (10.9 ± 0.22) p <0.05. The results of the bilateral facilitation were 3.54 ± 4.33 and 11.15 ± 3.44 respectively for elbow flexion and knee extension. Finally, these results suggest that exercise loads with intensities show a larger gain when performed unilaterally, unlike performed at intensities lower, with higher gain on a bilateral basis.
Execution of exercises with weights can be unilateral or bilateral. Studies show a sum of force u... more Execution of exercises with weights can be unilateral or bilateral. Studies show a sum of force unilateral greater than bilateral values, presenting a bilateral deficit (DBL). This study aimed to evaluate and check for existence of DBL in elbow flexion exercises and knee extension in young men, with the magnitude of this deficit. Your sample is constituted in 24 male subjects with a mean age of 23.58 ± 0.67 years. For the knee extension exercise were used only 20 subjects. We recorded the force values from the maximum load and maximum number of repetitions, respectively, in the 1RM test and 60% of 1RM. Through the software SPSS 17.0 was found nonsignificant higher mean values in the 1RM test for bending elbows on the bench Scott unilateral (28.29 ± 0.79) p> 0.05 compared to values for the same year so bilateral (27.79 ± 0.84) p> 0.05. The values for knee extension 1RM were significant in the upper and unilaterally (62.95 ± 0.97) p <0.01 compared with bilateral values (70.8 ± 1.97) p <0.01. The deficit results were-1.66 ± 1.04 and-10.3 ± 1.85, respectively for elbow flexion and knee extension. We checked also not significant lower average values in the test 60% of 1RM for unilateral elbow flexion (17.67 ± 0.63) p> 0.05 compared to a bilateral (17.87 ± 0.89) p>0.05. For the knee extension exercise at 60% 1RM were significant lower average values presented in unilaterally (9.95 ± 0.31) p <0.05 compared with the bilaterally (10.9 ± 0.22) p <0.05. The results of the bilateral facilitation were 3.54 ± 4.33 and 11.15 ± 3.44 respectively for elbow flexion and knee extension. Finally, these results suggest that exercise loads with intensities show a larger gain when performed unilaterally, unlike performed at intensities lower, with higher gain on a bilateral basis.
Execution of exercises with weights can be unilateral or bilateral. Studies show a sum of force u... more Execution of exercises with weights can be unilateral or bilateral. Studies show a sum of force unilateral greater than bilateral values, presenting a bilateral deficit (DBL). This study aimed to evaluate and check for existence of DBL in elbow flexion exercises and knee extension in young men, with the magnitude of this deficit. Your sample is constituted in 24 male subjects with a mean age of 23.58 ± 0.67 years. For the knee extension exercise were used only 20 subjects. We recorded the force values from the maximum load and maximum number of repetitions, respectively, in the 1RM test and 60% of 1RM. Through the software SPSS 17.0 was found nonsignificant higher mean values in the 1RM test for bending elbows on the bench Scott unilateral (28.29 ± 0.79) p> 0.05 compared to values for the same year so bilateral (27.79 ± 0.84) p> 0.05. The values for knee extension 1RM were significant in the upper and unilaterally (62.95 ± 0.97) p <0.01 compared with bilateral values (70.8 ± 1.97) p <0.01. The deficit results were-1.66 ± 1.04 and-10.3 ± 1.85, respectively for elbow flexion and knee extension. We checked also not significant lower average values in the test 60% of 1RM for unilateral elbow flexion (17.67 ± 0.63) p> 0.05 compared to a bilateral (17.87 ± 0.89) p>0.05. For the knee extension exercise at 60% 1RM were significant lower average values presented in unilaterally (9.95 ± 0.31) p <0.05 compared with the bilaterally (10.9 ± 0.22) p <0.05. The results of the bilateral facilitation were 3.54 ± 4.33 and 11.15 ± 3.44 respectively for elbow flexion and knee extension. Finally, these results suggest that exercise loads with intensities show a larger gain when performed unilaterally, unlike performed at intensities lower, with higher gain on a bilateral basis.
Execution of exercises with weights can be unilateral or bilateral. Studies show a sum of force u... more Execution of exercises with weights can be unilateral or bilateral. Studies show a sum of force unilateral greater than bilateral values, presenting a bilateral deficit (DBL). This study aimed to evaluate and check for existence of DBL in elbow flexion exercises and knee extension in young men, with the magnitude of this deficit. Your sample is constituted in 24 male subjects with a mean age of 23.58 ± 0.67 years. For the knee extension exercise were used only 20 subjects. We recorded the force values from the maximum load and maximum number of repetitions, respectively, in the 1RM test and 60% of 1RM. Through the software SPSS 17.0 was found nonsignificant higher mean values in the 1RM test for bending elbows on the bench Scott unilateral (28.29 ± 0.79) p> 0.05 compared to values for the same year so bilateral (27.79 ± 0.84) p> 0.05. The values for knee extension 1RM were significant in the upper and unilaterally (62.95 ± 0.97) p <0.01 compared with bilateral values (70.8 ± 1.97) p <0.01. The deficit results were-1.66 ± 1.04 and-10.3 ± 1.85, respectively for elbow flexion and knee extension. We checked also not significant lower average values in the test 60% of 1RM for unilateral elbow flexion (17.67 ± 0.63) p> 0.05 compared to a bilateral (17.87 ± 0.89) p>0.05. For the knee extension exercise at 60% 1RM were significant lower average values presented in unilaterally (9.95 ± 0.31) p <0.05 compared with the bilaterally (10.9 ± 0.22) p <0.05. The results of the bilateral facilitation were 3.54 ± 4.33 and 11.15 ± 3.44 respectively for elbow flexion and knee extension. Finally, these results suggest that exercise loads with intensities show a larger gain when performed unilaterally, unlike performed at intensities lower, with higher gain on a bilateral basis.
Execution of exercises with weights can be unilateral or bilateral. Studies show a sum of force u... more Execution of exercises with weights can be unilateral or bilateral. Studies show a sum of force unilateral greater than bilateral values, presenting a bilateral deficit (DBL). This study aimed to evaluate and check for existence of DBL in elbow flexion exercises and knee extension in young men, with the magnitude of this deficit. Your sample is constituted in 24 male subjects with a mean age of 23.58 ± 0.67 years. For the knee extension exercise were used only 20 subjects. We recorded the force values from the maximum load and maximum number of repetitions, respectively, in the 1RM test and 60% of 1RM. Through the software SPSS 17.0 was found nonsignificant higher mean values in the 1RM test for bending elbows on the bench Scott unilateral (28.29 ± 0.79) p> 0.05 compared to values for the same year so bilateral (27.79 ± 0.84) p> 0.05. The values for knee extension 1RM were significant in the upper and unilaterally (62.95 ± 0.97) p <0.01 compared with bilateral values (70.8 ± 1.97) p <0.01. The deficit results were-1.66 ± 1.04 and-10.3 ± 1.85, respectively for elbow flexion and knee extension. We checked also not significant lower average values in the test 60% of 1RM for unilateral elbow flexion (17.67 ± 0.63) p> 0.05 compared to a bilateral (17.87 ± 0.89) p>0.05. For the knee extension exercise at 60% 1RM were significant lower average values presented in unilaterally (9.95 ± 0.31) p <0.05 compared with the bilaterally (10.9 ± 0.22) p <0.05. The results of the bilateral facilitation were 3.54 ± 4.33 and 11.15 ± 3.44 respectively for elbow flexion and knee extension. Finally, these results suggest that exercise loads with intensities show a larger gain when performed unilaterally, unlike performed at intensities lower, with higher gain on a bilateral basis.
Uploads
Papers by Juliano Moure