Dan M Mrejeru
Self-trained in multi-disciplinary sciences. Original degree (MS) in Geography and Geology .Special interest in neuroscience and geophysics.
Independent researcher in multidisciplinary domains connected to human evolution and Complex System Theory.
More information about my activity is on my website danmirceamrejeru.com.
Phone: 8475302276
Address: 1710 W. Touhy Ave., Unit E, Park Ridge, IL 60068
Independent researcher in multidisciplinary domains connected to human evolution and Complex System Theory.
More information about my activity is on my website danmirceamrejeru.com.
Phone: 8475302276
Address: 1710 W. Touhy Ave., Unit E, Park Ridge, IL 60068
less
Interests
Uploads
Papers by Dan M Mrejeru
To my surprise, when I check on it later, I found a very large number of errors introduced by the formatting process.
Thus, the PDF uploaded now is the corrected version of the formatting document.
The book will be displayed on Amazon and 20 other media platforms starting with the first week of December, 2024.
About at the end of December, 2024, the book will be displayed in the Barnes& Noble bookstores.
The book is in the publishing process with Author Publishing Experts, and it will be displayed on Amazon and 9 other social platforms starting with the week of November 18, 2024.
Thus, I decided to make an analogy between the mentioned universal rule and our brain functional switching that has occurred twice in the last 70,000 years.
As it seems to me, complexification originated in the generative processes that we call Big Bang and Black Holes. Thus, I decided to give a novel interpretation of these mentioned processes, which may contribute in understanding some fundamental rules complexification may obeys.
In the meantime, our civilization follows such universal rules, and its development may reflect them.
However, the original paper uploaded here several hours ago had some errors that I corrected, and this new version is the corrected one. But, in the process I erased previous version, its views (37 views) and comments by mistake.
Maybe the analogy I draw is a little superficial and not very convincing, but the idea was to indicate about the possibility of such radical switching.
This is a revised and updated version that will be published next week (August 18, 2024) by Ingram Spark's branch Publishing Spot.
This paper relates two Holocene geomagnetic excursions with our civilization evolution. Also it relates Renaissance, Scientific, Industrial revolutions with a chain of solar minima cycles. It adds to solar minima the occurrence of pandemics, including the Black Death.
In the end it related the atmospheric Atomic Bomb experiments with the chain of generations that appeared after the WWII. It discusses these generations, their significance, and their impact on society.
In the last part of this paper, I try to explain the imaginary and physical reality.
Now, the paper covers all needed issues to be addressed.
Also, for the first time in my work I have addressed here the parallel evolution of primitive linearity, nonlinear thinking, and linear thinking.
The paper ends by citating and quoting on the influence of temperature on human behavior that discusses a study on this topic elaborated by the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in May 2022.
Also, there are behavioral differences, anatomical and culturally driven, which are differences between the Western and Eastern cultures, which are expressed as distinct levels of linearization.
In contrast, the bottom-up neural processing was slightly diminished from around 99% (before 30,000 years ago) to current 95%. It combines the neural input into a nonlinear complex output that has an emergent result.
Here, would a question to answer: does the bottom-up output qualifies for intuition, creativity, and the rest of nonlinear contributions, or they come directly from the unconsciousness? The research determined that from the frontal lobe come what we call intuition. Thus, the unconscious and subconscious may be two distinct neural operators, one filtering the perceived info to produce unconsciousness, while the other one is generated by the top-down processing that seems to produce the subconsciousness.
Many other things are also debated about what nonlinear and linear can generate in a distinct way, and all of them are in our mind.
However, the "linear" vs. "nonlinear" are responsible for distinct types of evolutions.
The scope of this paper is to enhance the main aspects of human evolution, which are poorly debated by mainstream science literature.
In over 25 years of surfing scientific literature I found very little or no research on the main subjects discussed in my papers and in my books.
These subjects are:
-I favor the opinion that recently (the last 30,000 years) humans turned into a new species; but this designation requires a distinct view on speciation
-I found that "linearization" is the main character that allowed the transition toward a new species; nearly every sound (acoustic) system is linear to a high degree; in modern brain the visual signals are inhibited or their frequency being diminished by acoustic signals; all species that do not speak are nonlinear; eventually modern humans became the first species that is now entirely "linear"
-the static language that existed until 40,000-30,000 was not sequential, hence it still was nonlinear, like the rest of Paleolithic behaviors of all hominins and animals
-the Paleolithic consciousness, before the dynamic language, was not sequential, either
-with the advent of the dynamic language appeared a sequential consciousness that is "linear"
-"linearity" makes the distinction between Homo sapiens and Homo loquens; however, "linearity" turned associated with "quantification" and "latency."
This is how "linearization" conquered our mind in the last 30,000 years by the intermediation of a dynamic language
-I found that functional "latency" plays one of the most important role in the achievements of the modern brain because it stands for all our "discoveries" we ever made.
P.S. I would like to acknowledge the readers of this paper that in the discussion section I provided several posts where I documented the "process of linearization" and the crucial role played by precuneus and parietal recent and exceptional evolution in humans for processes of "linearization" and "quantification."
It also discussed the role of quantification, the transition process from quality to quantity, and the reverse process.
It insists on "functional latency" that manifests in all sensorial human perception. It relates "latency" to entropy and the brain's reaction time.
It discussed the means of brain-produced "linearization" and the perspectives of such a process.
Basically, the new hypothesis establishes a direct connection between the solar cycles and the configuration of the Earth's geomagnetic field.
However, many other aspects interrelated to the functions of the geomagnetic field are discussed in this 20-page-long paper. Especially the aspect of the C14 isotope's influence on human brain evolution is enlightened.
The paper considers a specific pulsation of the geomagnetic and natural neural phenomena, which might lead to genetic and neurogenesis outcomes.
However, the changes in the hominin brain of the last 450,000 years have been crucial for gradually generating the modern brain. On the other hand, the changes in the Homo sapiens brain were distinct from those occurring in the Neanderthals, indicating a significant turning of the Homo sapiens neurogenesis.
It goes to mapping, coupling the state and contents of consciousness, functional "latency," a brain anatomic skull comparison of the Last Clade species, symbolic thinking, entropic brain, pooling effect, brain complexity, and emotional dominance in the brain functioning.
I concluded that the "latencies" in the brain's functional and sensory processing led to decreased brain entropy. Interestingly, the increase in "latencies" makes more details of the surrounding reality available.
The "latencies" manifestation affects brain performance by diminishing the processing speed, while the retarded entropy, the latency causes, decreases the intelligent response to environmental stimuli. It may be the case that latency may affect the general complexity of the brain.
Another conclusion regards the precuneus, which contains spindle-shaped cells distinct from pyramidal cells but embedded in the same cortical layer V (five) as the L5p cells, indicating conscious activity. Such neurons play a unique role in social awareness and interoception. Interoception collects and redistributes information; they compose and decompose. The significant evolution of human precuneus in the last 70,000 years may explain why we took a radical behavioral turn compared to other animals.
In the meantime, Dr. Emiliano Bruner's studies explain that the precuneus differs from person to person and between races. Therefore, it implies that its configuration modifies among individuals slightly while differentially evolving.
Christof Kock and colleagues found experimentally that in the posterior part of the brain exists a "hot spot" that processes conscious information. This location relates to the cerebellar area that encountered significant development in the last 500,000 years, helping the species of the Last Clade to become distinct from monkeys.
In writing this material, I tried not to exceed twenty-five pages because readers lose interest in longer texts.
After uploading it, I realized I had missed several pieces of relevant information. Hence, I completed the material by adding them to the Discussion section.
P.S. Two references that I omitted in this paper I added at "more information."
Here, regarding the mentioned figures, there are a lot of questions to address and answer. Therefore, I aim in this paper to provide my answers.
Somehow, this paper is a development of my previous article, titled Our civilization originates into a hierarchical regression of vertical complexity, uploaded on academia.edu about one month ago.
To my surprise, when I check on it later, I found a very large number of errors introduced by the formatting process.
Thus, the PDF uploaded now is the corrected version of the formatting document.
The book will be displayed on Amazon and 20 other media platforms starting with the first week of December, 2024.
About at the end of December, 2024, the book will be displayed in the Barnes& Noble bookstores.
The book is in the publishing process with Author Publishing Experts, and it will be displayed on Amazon and 9 other social platforms starting with the week of November 18, 2024.
Thus, I decided to make an analogy between the mentioned universal rule and our brain functional switching that has occurred twice in the last 70,000 years.
As it seems to me, complexification originated in the generative processes that we call Big Bang and Black Holes. Thus, I decided to give a novel interpretation of these mentioned processes, which may contribute in understanding some fundamental rules complexification may obeys.
In the meantime, our civilization follows such universal rules, and its development may reflect them.
However, the original paper uploaded here several hours ago had some errors that I corrected, and this new version is the corrected one. But, in the process I erased previous version, its views (37 views) and comments by mistake.
Maybe the analogy I draw is a little superficial and not very convincing, but the idea was to indicate about the possibility of such radical switching.
This is a revised and updated version that will be published next week (August 18, 2024) by Ingram Spark's branch Publishing Spot.
This paper relates two Holocene geomagnetic excursions with our civilization evolution. Also it relates Renaissance, Scientific, Industrial revolutions with a chain of solar minima cycles. It adds to solar minima the occurrence of pandemics, including the Black Death.
In the end it related the atmospheric Atomic Bomb experiments with the chain of generations that appeared after the WWII. It discusses these generations, their significance, and their impact on society.
In the last part of this paper, I try to explain the imaginary and physical reality.
Now, the paper covers all needed issues to be addressed.
Also, for the first time in my work I have addressed here the parallel evolution of primitive linearity, nonlinear thinking, and linear thinking.
The paper ends by citating and quoting on the influence of temperature on human behavior that discusses a study on this topic elaborated by the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in May 2022.
Also, there are behavioral differences, anatomical and culturally driven, which are differences between the Western and Eastern cultures, which are expressed as distinct levels of linearization.
In contrast, the bottom-up neural processing was slightly diminished from around 99% (before 30,000 years ago) to current 95%. It combines the neural input into a nonlinear complex output that has an emergent result.
Here, would a question to answer: does the bottom-up output qualifies for intuition, creativity, and the rest of nonlinear contributions, or they come directly from the unconsciousness? The research determined that from the frontal lobe come what we call intuition. Thus, the unconscious and subconscious may be two distinct neural operators, one filtering the perceived info to produce unconsciousness, while the other one is generated by the top-down processing that seems to produce the subconsciousness.
Many other things are also debated about what nonlinear and linear can generate in a distinct way, and all of them are in our mind.
However, the "linear" vs. "nonlinear" are responsible for distinct types of evolutions.
The scope of this paper is to enhance the main aspects of human evolution, which are poorly debated by mainstream science literature.
In over 25 years of surfing scientific literature I found very little or no research on the main subjects discussed in my papers and in my books.
These subjects are:
-I favor the opinion that recently (the last 30,000 years) humans turned into a new species; but this designation requires a distinct view on speciation
-I found that "linearization" is the main character that allowed the transition toward a new species; nearly every sound (acoustic) system is linear to a high degree; in modern brain the visual signals are inhibited or their frequency being diminished by acoustic signals; all species that do not speak are nonlinear; eventually modern humans became the first species that is now entirely "linear"
-the static language that existed until 40,000-30,000 was not sequential, hence it still was nonlinear, like the rest of Paleolithic behaviors of all hominins and animals
-the Paleolithic consciousness, before the dynamic language, was not sequential, either
-with the advent of the dynamic language appeared a sequential consciousness that is "linear"
-"linearity" makes the distinction between Homo sapiens and Homo loquens; however, "linearity" turned associated with "quantification" and "latency."
This is how "linearization" conquered our mind in the last 30,000 years by the intermediation of a dynamic language
-I found that functional "latency" plays one of the most important role in the achievements of the modern brain because it stands for all our "discoveries" we ever made.
P.S. I would like to acknowledge the readers of this paper that in the discussion section I provided several posts where I documented the "process of linearization" and the crucial role played by precuneus and parietal recent and exceptional evolution in humans for processes of "linearization" and "quantification."
It also discussed the role of quantification, the transition process from quality to quantity, and the reverse process.
It insists on "functional latency" that manifests in all sensorial human perception. It relates "latency" to entropy and the brain's reaction time.
It discussed the means of brain-produced "linearization" and the perspectives of such a process.
Basically, the new hypothesis establishes a direct connection between the solar cycles and the configuration of the Earth's geomagnetic field.
However, many other aspects interrelated to the functions of the geomagnetic field are discussed in this 20-page-long paper. Especially the aspect of the C14 isotope's influence on human brain evolution is enlightened.
The paper considers a specific pulsation of the geomagnetic and natural neural phenomena, which might lead to genetic and neurogenesis outcomes.
However, the changes in the hominin brain of the last 450,000 years have been crucial for gradually generating the modern brain. On the other hand, the changes in the Homo sapiens brain were distinct from those occurring in the Neanderthals, indicating a significant turning of the Homo sapiens neurogenesis.
It goes to mapping, coupling the state and contents of consciousness, functional "latency," a brain anatomic skull comparison of the Last Clade species, symbolic thinking, entropic brain, pooling effect, brain complexity, and emotional dominance in the brain functioning.
I concluded that the "latencies" in the brain's functional and sensory processing led to decreased brain entropy. Interestingly, the increase in "latencies" makes more details of the surrounding reality available.
The "latencies" manifestation affects brain performance by diminishing the processing speed, while the retarded entropy, the latency causes, decreases the intelligent response to environmental stimuli. It may be the case that latency may affect the general complexity of the brain.
Another conclusion regards the precuneus, which contains spindle-shaped cells distinct from pyramidal cells but embedded in the same cortical layer V (five) as the L5p cells, indicating conscious activity. Such neurons play a unique role in social awareness and interoception. Interoception collects and redistributes information; they compose and decompose. The significant evolution of human precuneus in the last 70,000 years may explain why we took a radical behavioral turn compared to other animals.
In the meantime, Dr. Emiliano Bruner's studies explain that the precuneus differs from person to person and between races. Therefore, it implies that its configuration modifies among individuals slightly while differentially evolving.
Christof Kock and colleagues found experimentally that in the posterior part of the brain exists a "hot spot" that processes conscious information. This location relates to the cerebellar area that encountered significant development in the last 500,000 years, helping the species of the Last Clade to become distinct from monkeys.
In writing this material, I tried not to exceed twenty-five pages because readers lose interest in longer texts.
After uploading it, I realized I had missed several pieces of relevant information. Hence, I completed the material by adding them to the Discussion section.
P.S. Two references that I omitted in this paper I added at "more information."
Here, regarding the mentioned figures, there are a lot of questions to address and answer. Therefore, I aim in this paper to provide my answers.
Somehow, this paper is a development of my previous article, titled Our civilization originates into a hierarchical regression of vertical complexity, uploaded on academia.edu about one month ago.
It will be republished at the beginning of May 2023.
This book is intended to be a basic structure for a long-science documentary movie.
It has a two-page book abstract explaining the ideas embedded in it.
The book enhances the most significant moments that, in my opinion, have occurred in human evolution. Such information is little debated or not mentioned in scientific literature.
I like to mention a few of such issues:
-the hominin brain begins to differentiate from monkey brain only in the last 500,000 years
-the Homo sapiens brain entered the path toward modernity only in the last 70,000 years
-it is demonstrated that the swarm intelligence is generated by the van der Waals forces
-the role of latency in human brain functioning is largely diminished
-the hierarchical change of our mental complexity and its implications are mostly omitted
-the high dimensional origin of emotions and their translation and alteration in consciousness is little explained
-changes that generated the modern brain have been directed to avoid the species extinction
The book starts with the role played by the planetary climate and geomagnetic changes, and other changes (geophysical and geological), which radically influenced human evolution.
The book insists on the epoch 120-23,000 years ago, when the most anatomical changes occurred in the Homo sapiens brain. Other biological evolutions are also considered.
Part two makes several estimates on the determinants of human migration.
Part three debates evolutionary biological events and considerations.
Part four refers to the evolution of conscious, unconscious, and human thinking.
Part five debates the most significant features which may affect our future.
-the diminishing of our brain volume: causes and consequences;
-the role played by the digital technology;
-the case of swarming and its role in the near future;
-the speed of brain processing and the role of saccade latency;
-the need to confront the complexity we have created around us;
-another discussion on swarming;
-several quotes from the leading scientists in regard to our future.
It describe the functioning of the oculomotor system that was altered toward a slower speed of processing, leading to unveil more details of the environment.
This alteration in the oculomotor system upended a path to discoveries.
The first result was the creation of three hominin species, and the second result led to generate a modern brain in Homo sapiens.
On the side, the paper discusses other issues like bipedalism, the use of fire and tools. I also discusses the extend of consciousness in the era 75-27 ka.
It is a 59 pages long paper.
The main goal is to discuss how the high-space-dimension processed by the unconscious are reduced to low-space dimensions of the working conscious.
Here, I made a hyperplane hypotheses.
Conclusion:
-swarming is self-organization
-dissipation causes boundary overlapping that allows quantum entanglement
-swarming shows fractal self-similarity
-individual intelligence is a neural combinatory swarming
-individual intelligence, unique to humans, is a result of recursive combination behavior and Frontoparietal Synthesis
I just added on this site a modified version of this paper.
However, all four appeared to manifest at one time in our brain, around 30,000 years ago.