Ever since the beginning of modern era of science 300 years ago, the scientist has been embarrass... more Ever since the beginning of modern era of science 300 years ago, the scientist has been embarrassed at times when they undertook to describe the scope and objective of science. Part of this embarrassment was the difficulty of setting up the scope and limitation of science in such a way as to leave room for future development and at the same time to give room for the seeing of its limitation more clearly and more truly. It is not so easy to outline the scope, objective and limitation of science. This owes chiefly from the difficulty of establishing some simple entity that will contain all conjugate terms as well as the reminders that must be included and that involve the limitations of science chiefly (Edgar J. Witzemann 1947)[1]
This difficulty which further limits science arises from the nature of science itself especially modern science which is I mathesis and as such axiomatically assuming. Modern science as a science of the enthronement of the self as the matrix of reality brings out more than ever its ‘shortsightedness’ in the 21st century. Despite its crave and posture for exactitude, a closer examination of its nature reveals that apart from numbers which is still a form of I mathesis, all its postulations cannot be exactly exact in the absolute sense of the word since its chiefly a subjective science. Mankind has never devised a better tool for solving the mysteries of the universe than science. However, there are some kinds of questions for which scientific problem solving is unsuited. This is another way of saying that it has limitations.
Ever since the beginning of modern era of science 300 years ago, the scientist has been embarrass... more Ever since the beginning of modern era of science 300 years ago, the scientist has been embarrassed at times when they undertook to describe the scope and objective of science. Part of this embarrassment was the difficulty of setting up the scope and limitation of science in such a way as to leave room for future development and at the same time to give room for the seeing of its limitation more clearly and more truly. It is not so easy to outline the scope, objective and limitation of science. This owes chiefly from the difficulty of establishing some simple entity that will contain all conjugate terms as well as the reminders that must be included and that involve the limitations of science chiefly (Edgar J. Witzemann 1947)[1]
This difficulty which further limits science arises from the nature of science itself especially modern science which is I mathesis and as such axiomatically assuming. Modern science as a science of the enthronement of the self as the matrix of reality brings out more than ever its ‘shortsightedness’ in the 21st century. Despite its crave and posture for exactitude, a closer examination of its nature reveals that apart from numbers which is still a form of I mathesis, all its postulations cannot be exactly exact in the absolute sense of the word since its chiefly a subjective science. Mankind has never devised a better tool for solving the mysteries of the universe than science. However, there are some kinds of questions for which scientific problem solving is unsuited. This is another way of saying that it has limitations.
Uploads
Papers by Chris Uko
This difficulty which further limits science arises from the nature of science itself especially modern science which is I mathesis and as such axiomatically assuming. Modern science as a science of the enthronement of the self as the matrix of reality brings out more than ever its
‘shortsightedness’ in the 21st century. Despite its crave and posture for exactitude, a closer examination of its nature reveals that apart from numbers which is still a form of I mathesis, all its postulations cannot be exactly exact in the absolute sense of the word since its chiefly a subjective science.
Mankind has never devised a better tool for solving the mysteries of the universe than science. However, there are some kinds of questions for which scientific problem solving is unsuited. This is another way of saying that it has limitations.
This difficulty which further limits science arises from the nature of science itself especially modern science which is I mathesis and as such axiomatically assuming. Modern science as a science of the enthronement of the self as the matrix of reality brings out more than ever its
‘shortsightedness’ in the 21st century. Despite its crave and posture for exactitude, a closer examination of its nature reveals that apart from numbers which is still a form of I mathesis, all its postulations cannot be exactly exact in the absolute sense of the word since its chiefly a subjective science.
Mankind has never devised a better tool for solving the mysteries of the universe than science. However, there are some kinds of questions for which scientific problem solving is unsuited. This is another way of saying that it has limitations.