Drafts by Arun Teja Polcumpally
Center for Security Studies, 2022
Center for Security Studies, 2022
Center for Security Studies, 2022
Center for Security Studies, 2022
This paper explores the true nature of deliberative democracy and the way to realize the latter. ... more This paper explores the true nature of deliberative democracy and the way to realize the latter. In order to evaluate the success of deliberation with individuation, three case studies viz. Anand model of milk cooperatives, Kerala’s Kutumbashri program, Industrial Area Local Authorities and Prakasam district irrigation project steered by public participation are considered within India. Paper shall analyze how deliberation and individuation has played an important role in these successful initiatives. Finally, it concludes with a way forward to implement deliberative democracy via digital platforms.
Papers by Arun Teja Polcumpally
Routledge eBooks, Mar 29, 2024
Routledge eBooks, Mar 29, 2024
Routledge eBooks, Mar 29, 2024
Routledge eBooks, Mar 29, 2024
Routledge eBooks, Mar 29, 2024
Routledge eBooks, Mar 29, 2024
Jindal Journal of International Affairs, Aug 22, 2023
AI & society, Apr 2, 2024
WGDT White paper, 2023
This paper delves into the realm of consent in the context of digital personal data protection in... more This paper delves into the realm of consent in the context of digital personal data protection in India, specifically examining the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act of 2023. This landmark legislation aims to oversee the collection, storage, and processing of personal data, with a focus on transparency, consent, and robust data protection protocols. The paper is structured into three distinct sections, each dedicated to enhancing the framework of consent mechanisms. Section A: Operational Definition of Consent and Related Challenges Initially, the paper sets out to define consent operationally, aligning this definition with global data protection standards. It highlights the essential characteristics of consent as outlined in Article 6(1) of the DPDP Act: freely given, specific, informed, unconditional, and unambiguous. The section further delves into three predominant challenges plaguing current consent mechanisms: unwitting, coerced, and incapacitated consent. Unwitting consent is often a result of convoluted terms and conditions, coerced consent emerges from manipulative practices or undue pressure, and incapacitated consent pertains to individuals, such as minors, who are legally unable to give consent. Section B: Exploring Various Consent Mechanisms In this segment, the paper introduces and evaluates two primary consent mechanisms: broad consent and precise consent. While broad consent offers wide-ranging coverage, it runs the risk of insufficient communication with data principals, potentially leading to unwitting consent. Precise consent, on the other hand, allows for detailed user control but may encounter practical difficulties and might not fully address the issue of coerced consent. The section also discusses the role of Consent Management Platforms (CMPs) in maintaining adherence to data privacy regulations. Section C: Framework for Consent Mechanism The concluding section proposes a detailed framework for consent management, addressing the issues raised in the previous sections. This framework incorporates elements crucial for effective consent, including strategies for obtaining and verifying consent, considerations for consent storage, methods for consent modification, and mechanisms for grievance resolution. It strives to be in harmony with the DPDP Act and incorporates international best practices. The focus is on user-centric consent notices, combating coerced consent through clear transparency, and establishing solid channels for grievance redressal. Overall, the paper offers insightful perspectives on the intricacies of consent mechanisms within the framework of India's DPDP Act and presents actionable recommendations for policymakers to consider.
White paper , 2023
The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 [“the Act”] was passed by the Parliament in August... more The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 [“the Act”] was passed by the Parliament in August 2023. It provides the guard rails for collecting and processing digital personal data which is either collected within India or processed outside India for offering goods and services in India. While the Act, formalized after extensive deliberations, multiple stakeholder meetings, committee reviews, and recommendations, establishes a comprehensive framework for personal data management, it requires the support of specific rules or operational guidelines. These are essential to ensure a clear and unambiguous interpretation and implementation of the Act.
This paper thoroughly examines select sections of the current Act to identify areas of concern and ambiguity, explores best practices from other jurisdictions that could provide solutions, and offers recommendations for resolving these ambiguities. The initial section addresses issues such as specifying the format for consent notices, defining 'reasonable security safeguards,' and elucidating what qualifies as 'sufficient grounds of enquiry' for investigations under the Act. These aspects could be effectively clarified through rules established under the Act or through guidelines issued by the Ministry.
The subsequent section highlights concerns that require more substantial measures, such as granting suomotu powers to the Data Protection Board and introducing a specific classification for sensitive personal information. Addressing these issues may necessitate amendments to the Act or rely on judicial interpretations for resolution.
Advances in Human Services and Public Health
This chapter provides a conceptual understanding of the impact of advanced digital technologies o... more This chapter provides a conceptual understanding of the impact of advanced digital technologies on democracy with a special focus on artificial intelligence (AI). The explanation of the impact of the internet and allied technologies is themed into 1) power at the hands of the state or 2) diffuses from the state. In the current global politics, almost all the major powers of the world are vying for an upper hand in developing advanced digital technologies, especially AI. Among these, AI is the major technological development that brings the dichotomy in state's behaviour pitching surveillance against freedom. Anchored to AI, this chapter provides a good understanding of technology impact on the sustenance of democracy. The chapter concludes by providing a co-protectionist approach in formulating a new conceptual framework for digital democracy.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Feb 21, 2023
CDPP Working Paper, 2023
This paper aims to provide a comparative analysis of the policies drafted
by the US, the EU, Chin... more This paper aims to provide a comparative analysis of the policies drafted
by the US, the EU, China, and India that would somehow regulate
misinformation and mitigate the social impacts of the hyper-
consumption of online information. The US, EU, and China are selected
for the comparative analysis as they are considered the pioneers of data
regulation and innovations in advanced digital technologies. In addition
to the comparative analysis, this paper argues that in India, hate crimes
when wedded to the uncontrolled spread of information across the
internet require legislative, judicial, and educational interventions. This
paper helps policymakers and academia nd the best practices
worldwide. Apart from identifying best practices, it also aids in
formulating a tailored policy to control the misinformation in the internet
channels of communication.
Jindal Journal of International Affairs, Jun 1, 2021
Uploads
Drafts by Arun Teja Polcumpally
Papers by Arun Teja Polcumpally
This paper thoroughly examines select sections of the current Act to identify areas of concern and ambiguity, explores best practices from other jurisdictions that could provide solutions, and offers recommendations for resolving these ambiguities. The initial section addresses issues such as specifying the format for consent notices, defining 'reasonable security safeguards,' and elucidating what qualifies as 'sufficient grounds of enquiry' for investigations under the Act. These aspects could be effectively clarified through rules established under the Act or through guidelines issued by the Ministry.
The subsequent section highlights concerns that require more substantial measures, such as granting suomotu powers to the Data Protection Board and introducing a specific classification for sensitive personal information. Addressing these issues may necessitate amendments to the Act or rely on judicial interpretations for resolution.
by the US, the EU, China, and India that would somehow regulate
misinformation and mitigate the social impacts of the hyper-
consumption of online information. The US, EU, and China are selected
for the comparative analysis as they are considered the pioneers of data
regulation and innovations in advanced digital technologies. In addition
to the comparative analysis, this paper argues that in India, hate crimes
when wedded to the uncontrolled spread of information across the
internet require legislative, judicial, and educational interventions. This
paper helps policymakers and academia nd the best practices
worldwide. Apart from identifying best practices, it also aids in
formulating a tailored policy to control the misinformation in the internet
channels of communication.
This paper thoroughly examines select sections of the current Act to identify areas of concern and ambiguity, explores best practices from other jurisdictions that could provide solutions, and offers recommendations for resolving these ambiguities. The initial section addresses issues such as specifying the format for consent notices, defining 'reasonable security safeguards,' and elucidating what qualifies as 'sufficient grounds of enquiry' for investigations under the Act. These aspects could be effectively clarified through rules established under the Act or through guidelines issued by the Ministry.
The subsequent section highlights concerns that require more substantial measures, such as granting suomotu powers to the Data Protection Board and introducing a specific classification for sensitive personal information. Addressing these issues may necessitate amendments to the Act or rely on judicial interpretations for resolution.
by the US, the EU, China, and India that would somehow regulate
misinformation and mitigate the social impacts of the hyper-
consumption of online information. The US, EU, and China are selected
for the comparative analysis as they are considered the pioneers of data
regulation and innovations in advanced digital technologies. In addition
to the comparative analysis, this paper argues that in India, hate crimes
when wedded to the uncontrolled spread of information across the
internet require legislative, judicial, and educational interventions. This
paper helps policymakers and academia nd the best practices
worldwide. Apart from identifying best practices, it also aids in
formulating a tailored policy to control the misinformation in the internet
channels of communication.