Jump to content

Falsafar zamani

Daga Wikipedia, Insakulofidiya ta kyauta.

Falsafar zamani ita ce lokacin da ake ciki a cikin tarihin falsafar Yammacin Turai tun daga farkon karni na 20 tare da haɓaka ƙwarewar horo da haɓakar nazari da falsafar nahiyar . [lower-alpha 1]

Kalmar "falsafa ta zamani" wani yanki ne na fasaha na fasaha a falsafa wanda ke nufin wani lokaci na musamman a cikin tarihin falsafar Yammacin Turai (wato falsafar karni na 20 da 21). [2] Duk da haka, kalmar sau da yawa tana rikicewa da falsafar zamani (wanda ke nufin wani lokaci na farko a falsafar Yammacin Yamma), falsafar zamani (wanda ke nufin sukan falsafar falsafar falsafar zamani), tare da amfani da kalmar da ba ta fasaha ba tana nufin kowane abu. aikin falsafa na baya-bayan nan.

 

Ƙwarewa shine tsarin zamantakewa wanda kowane kasuwanci ko sana'a ya kafa ƙa'idodin ƙungiya, cancantar cancanta don zama memba na sana'a, ƙwararrun ƙungiya ko ƙungiya don kula da halayen membobin sana'a, da kuma wani mataki na ƙaddamar da cancanta daga wadanda basu cancanta ba. Canji zuwa sana'a yana haifar da sauye-sauye masu yawa a fagen bincike, amma ɗayan mafi saurin ganewa na ƙwarewa shine ƙara rashin mahimmancin "littafin" ga filin: "bayanin bincike zai fara canzawa ta hanyoyi wanda na zamani karshen kayayyakin ne bayyananne ga kowa da kowa da kuma zalunta ga mutane da yawa Ba za a ƙara yawan binciken [memba] a cikin littattafan ga duk wanda zai iya sha'awar batun na filin maimakon haka yawanci suna fitowa ne a matsayin taƙaitaccen labarai da ake magana da su ga abokan aikin ƙwararru kawai, mutanen da za a iya ɗaukan ilimin da aka haɗa da su kuma waɗanda ke tabbatar da cewa su kaɗai ne ke iya karanta takaddun da aka yi musu magana." Falsafa ta gudanar da wannan tsari a ƙarshen karni na 19, kuma yana ɗaya daga cikin mahimman abubuwan banbance-banbance na zamanin falsafar zamani a falsafar Yammacin Turai.

Jamus ita ce ƙasa ta farko da ta haɓaka ilimin falsafa. [3] A ƙarshen 1817, Hegel shine masanin falsafa na farko da aka nada Farfesa ta Jiha, wato ta Ministan Ilimi na Prussian, a matsayin tasirin sake fasalin Napoleon a Prussia . A {asar Amirka, ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ta taso ne daga gyare-gyare ga tsarin ilimin Amirka, wanda ya dogara da tsarin Jamusanci. [4] James Campbell ya bayyana ƙwarewar falsafar a Amurka kamar haka:

The list of specific changes [during the late 19th-century professionalization of philosophy] is fairly brief, but the resultant shift is almost total. [...] No longer could the [philosophy] professor function as a defender of the faith or an expounder of Truth. The new philosopher had to be a leader of inquires and a publicizer of results. This shift was made obvious when certified (often German-certified) philosophy Ph.D.'s replaced theology graduates and ministers in the philosophy classroom. The period between the time when almost no one had a Ph.D. to when almost everyone did was very brief. [...] The doctorate, moreover, was more than a license to teach: it was a certificate that the prospective philosophy instructor was well, if narrowly, trained and ready to undertake independent work in the now specializing and restricted field of academic philosophy. These new philosophers functioned in independent departments of philosophy [...] They were making real gains in their research, creating a body of philosophic work that remains central to our study even now. These new philosophers also set their own standards for success, publishing in the recognized organs of philosophy that were being founded at the time: The Monist (1890), The International Journal of Ethics (1890), The Philosophical Review (1892), and The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods (1904). And, of course, these philosophers were banding together into societies – the American Psychological Association (1892), the Western Philosophical Association (1900), and the American Philosophical Association (1900) – to consolidate their academic positions and advance their philosophic work.[5]

Kwarewar ƙwarewa a Ingila ta kasance daidai da ci gaba a cikin babban ilimi. A cikin aikinsa a kan TH Green, Denys Leighton ya tattauna waɗannan canje-canje a falsafar Burtaniya da da'awar Green ga taken ƙwararren masanin falsafa na farko na Biritaniya:

Henry Sidgwick, in a generous gesture, identified [T.H.] Green as Britain's first professional academic philosopher. Sidgwick's opinion can certainly be questioned: William Hamilton, J.F. Ferrier and Sidgwick himself are among the contenders for that honour. [...] Yet there can be no doubt that between the death of Mill (1873) and the publication of G.E.Moore's Principia Ethica (1903), the British philosophical profession was transformed, and that Green was partly responsible for the transformation. [...] Bentham, the Mills, Carlyle, Coleridge, Spencer, as well as many other serious philosophical thinkers of the nineteenth century were men of letters, administrators, active politicians, clergy with livings, but not academics. [...] Green helped separate the study of philosophical from that of literary and historical texts; and by creating a philosophy curriculum at Oxford he also established a rationale for trained teachers of philosophy. When Green began his academic career much of the serious writing on philosophical topic was published in journals of opinion devoted to a broad range of [topics] (rarely to 'pure' philosophy). He helped professionalize philosophical writing by encouraging specialized periodicals, such as 'Academy' and 'Mind', which were to serve as venues for the results of scholarly research.[6]

Sakamakon ƙwararrun ƙwararrun falsafa na nufin cewa aikin da ake yi a fannin yanzu kusan malaman jami'o'in da ke da digirin digirgir a fannin buga littattafai a cikin fasahar fasaha, mujallun da aka yi bita na ƙwararru . Duk da yake ya zama ruwan dare a tsakanin al'umma gabaɗaya mutum ya kasance yana da tsarin ra'ayi na addini, siyasa ko falsafa waɗanda suke la'akari da "falsafancinsu", waɗannan ra'ayoyin ba safai ake ba da labari ko alaƙa da aikin da ake yi a cikin falsafar ƙwararru a yau. Bugu da ƙari kuma, ba kamar yawancin ilimin kimiyya waɗanda aka sami ingantacciyar masana'antar littattafai, mujallu, da shirye-shiryen talabijin waɗanda ke nufin haɓaka kimiyya da isar da sakamakon fasaha na filin kimiyya ga jama'a gabaɗaya, ayyukan da kwararrun masana falsafa suka yi umarni a kan Masu sauraro a waje da sana'a sun kasance da wuya. Littafin Philosopher Michael Sandel "Adalci: Menene Abinda Ya Kamata Ya Yi?" da Harry Frankfurt 's " On Bullshit " misalai ne na ayyukan da ke riƙe da bambancin da ƙwararrun masana falsafa suka rubuta amma sun ba da umarni kuma a ƙarshe sun shahara tsakanin ɗimbin masu sauraro na waɗanda ba falsafa ba. Duk ayyukan biyu sun zama New York Times mafi kyawun siyarwa .

Ƙwararrun falsafar yau

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Ba da daɗewa ba bayan kafuwar su, Ƙungiyar Falsafa ta Yamma da wasu sassan Ƙungiyar Ƙwararrun Ƙwararru a Amurka. Ƙungiyar tana da sassa uku: Pacific, Tsakiya da Gabas. Kowane yanki yana shirya babban taro na shekara-shekara. Mafi girma daga cikinsu shi ne taron Sashen Gabas, wanda yawanci ke jan hankalin masana falsafa kusan 2,000 kuma yana faruwa a wani birni na gabas daban-daban a kowane Disamba. Taron Sashen Gabas kuma shine babban taron daukar ma'aikata na Amurka don ayyukan falsafa, tare da jami'o'i da yawa suna aika ƙungiyoyi don yin tambayoyi ga masu neman mukaman ilimi. Daga cikin ayyukanta da dama, kungiyar ce ke da alhakin gudanar da da yawa daga cikin manyan kwarjinin wannan sana’a. Misali, Shugabancin Sashen Ƙungiyar Falsafa ta Amurka ana ɗaukarsa a matsayin ƙwararriyar karramawa kuma lambar yabo ta Ƙungiyar Falsafa ta Amurka tana ɗaya daga cikin tsoffin kyaututtuka a falsafar. Babbar ƙungiyar ilimi da ta keɓe musamman haɓaka nazarin falsafar nahiyar ita ce Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy .

Dangane da mujallolin ƙwararru a yau, wani bincike na 2018 na ƙwararrun masana falsafa ya umarce su da su ba da mafi kyawun mujallolin falsafa na “janar” a cikin Turanci, suna ba da manyan 20 masu zuwa:

Dangane da falsafar nahiyar musamman, wani bincike na 2012 na galibin ƙwararrun masana falsafa ya umarce su da su ba da matsayi mafi girma na mujallolin falsafar falsafa "nahiya ta al'ada". Jerin manyan sakamakon binciken guda 6:

Cibiyar Rubuce-rubucen Falsafa tana buga sanannen Littafin Jagora na Falsafa na Amurka wanda shine daidaitaccen aikin tunani don bayani game da ayyukan falsafa a Amurka da Kanada. [7] Ana buga littafin a kowace shekara biyu, yana musanya tare da ƙarar abokinsa, Littafin Jagoran Falsafa da Falsafa na Duniya (Madogararsa kaɗai da aka gyara don ɗimbin bayanai kan ayyukan falsafa a Afirka, Asiya, Australasia, Turai, da Latin Amurka).

Tun farkon karni na 21, masana falsafa kuma sun ga karuwar amfani da shafukan yanar gizo a matsayin hanyar musayar sana'a. Wasu fitattun abubuwan ci gaba a cikin wannan ci gaban sun haɗa da jeri na yau da kullun na shafukan falsafa na falsafa wanda masanin falsafa David Chalmers ya fara wanda tun daga lokacin ya zama tushen amfani da wannan sana'a, [8] kafa haɗin gwiwa tsakanin ɗabi'a blog na PEA Soup da fitacciyar mujallar Ethics to. Buga abubuwan da aka gabatar don tattaunawa akan layi akan blog, [9] da kuma rawar blogs kamar Menene Kamar zama Mace a Falsafa? wajen kawo hankali ga gogewar mata a cikin wannan sana'a. [10] [11] [12]

Rabe-raben nazari – nahiya

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Farkon rarraba

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Falsafar nahiyar ta zamani ta fara ne da aikin Franz Brentano, Edmund Husserl, Adolf Reinach, da Martin Heidegger da haɓaka hanyar falsafar abubuwan mamaki . Wannan ci gaban ya yi kusan daidai da aikin Gottlob Frege da Bertrand Russell suna ƙaddamar da sabuwar hanyar falsafa dangane da nazarin harshe ta hanyar dabaru na zamani (don haka kalmar "falsafar nazari"). [13]

Falsafar nazari ta mamaye Burtaniya, Kanada, Australia da duniyar masu magana da Ingilishi. Falsafa na Nahiyar ta yi rinjaye a Turai, ciki har da Jamus, Faransa, Italiya, Spain, Portugal da wasu sassan Amurka.

Wasu masana falsafa, irin su Richard Rorty da Simon Glendinning, suna jayayya cewa wannan "nazari-nahiyar" rabe yana da ma'ana ga horo gaba ɗaya. Wasu, irin su John Searle, sun yi iƙirarin cewa falsafar Nahiyar, musamman ma falsafar Nahiyar ta bayan-tsari, ya kamata a kawar da ita, bisa dalilin cewa ba ta da tushe kuma ba ta da tushe.

Falsafar nazari da nahiya suna da al'adar falsafar Yammacin Turai gama gari har zuwa Immanuel Kant . Bayan haka, masana falsafa da nahiya sun bambanta a kan mahimmanci da tasirin masana falsafa a kan al'adunsu daban-daban. Misali, makarantar akidar Jamusanci ta samo asali ne daga aikin Kant a cikin 1780s da 1790s kuma ta ƙare a Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, wanda yawancin masana falsafa na nahiyar ke kallonsa sosai. Akasin haka, ana kallon Hegel a matsayin ɗan ƙaramin adadi na aikin masana falsafa.[ana buƙatar hujja]</link>[ <span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources. (September 2010)">abubuwan da ake bukata</span> ]

Falsafar nazari

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Shirin nazarce-nazarce a falsafa ya kasance yana da kwanan watan da aikin masana falsafa na Ingilishi Bertrand Russell da GE Moore a farkon karni na 20, suna gina aikin masanin falsafar Jamus kuma masanin lissafi Gottlob Frege . Sun kau da kai daga manyan nau'o'in Hegelianism (suna fuskantar musamman ga manufarta da kuma tunanin da ba a sani ba) [14] [15] kuma sun fara haɓaka wani sabon nau'i na nazarin ra'ayi dangane da abubuwan da suka faru a kwanan nan a cikin tunani. Babban misali mafi shahara na wannan sabuwar hanyar nazarin ra'ayi ita ce takarda ta Russell ta 1905 mai suna " On Denoting ", takarda da ake ganin ta zama abin koyi na shirin nazari a falsafa.

Kodayake masana falsafa na zamani waɗanda suka bayyana kansu a matsayin "nazari" suna da buƙatu daban-daban, zato, da hanyoyin - kuma sun ƙi yarda da mahimman wuraren da suka ayyana motsin nazari tsakanin 1900 da 1960 - falsafar nazari, a cikin halin da ake ciki, yawanci ana ɗauka zuwa ga. za a ayyana shi da wani salo na musamman [16] wanda ke da madaidaici da cikakku game da ƙunƙuntaccen maudu'i, da juriya ga "tattaunawar da ba daidai ba ko fa'ida na batutuwa masu faɗi."

Wasu masana falsafa na nazari a ƙarshen karni na 20, irin su Richard Rorty, sun yi kira da a yi wani babban gyara na al'adar falsafar nazari. Musamman ma, Rorty ya bayar da hujjar cewa dole ne masana falsafa na nazari su koyi muhimman darussa daga ayyukan masana falsafa na nahiyar. [17] Wasu mawallafa, irin su Paul M. Livingston [18] da Shaun Gallagher sun yi iƙirarin cewa akwai fahimi masu mahimmanci ga al'adun biyu yayin da wasu, irin su Timothy Williamson, suka yi kira ga maƙarƙashiyar riko da manufofin falsafar nazari:

We who classify ourselves as "analytic" philosophers tend to fall into the assumption that our allegiance automatically grants us methodological virtue. According to the crude stereotypes, analytic philosophers use arguments while "continental" philosophers do not. But within the analytic tradition many philosophers use arguments only to the extent that most "continental" philosophers do [...] How can we do better? We can make a useful start by getting the simple things right. Much even of analytic philosophy moves too fast in its haste to reach the sexy bits. Details are not given the care they deserve: crucial claims are vaguely stated, significant different formulations are treated as though they were equivalent, examples are under-described, arguments are gestured at rather than properly made, their form is left unexplained, and so on. [...] Philosophy has never been done for an extended period according to standards as high as those that are now already available, if only the profession will take them seriously to heart.[19]

“Danyen ra’ayi” da Williamson ya yi nuni da su a cikin wannan nassi na sama su ne: cewa masana falsafa suna samar da gardama a hankali da tsattsauran ra’ayi na ƙwararrun ƙwaƙƙwaran falsafa, yayin da masana falsafa na nahiyoyi ke samar da sakamako mai zurfi da ƙima amma ta hanyar fitar da su daga faffadan tsarin falsafa waɗanda kansu. rashin dalilai masu goyan baya ko bayyanannu a cikin maganganunsu. Da alama Williamson da kansa a nan ya nisanta kansa daga waɗannan ra'ayoyin, amma yana zargin masana falsafar da yawa da dacewa da mahimmin ra'ayi na falsafar nahiyoyi ta hanyar matsawa "da sauri" don samun sakamako mai mahimmanci ta hanyar rashin fahimta.

Falsafar Nahiyar

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
Zamantakewa wata muhimmiyar makaranta ce a al'adar falsafar nahiyar. Maɓalli huɗu masu wanzuwa waɗanda aka kwatanta daga sama zuwa hagu na agogo: Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Kafka, Dostoevsky . [20]

Tarihin falsafar nahiyar an fara farawa ne a farkon shekarun 1900 saboda tushen cibiyoyinta sun zo ne kai tsaye daga na abubuwan da ke faruwa. [21] A sakamakon haka, Edmund Husserl sau da yawa ana yaba shi a matsayin wanda ya kafa falsafar nahiyar. Ko da yake, tun da analytic da falsafar nahiyoyi suna da irin wannan ra'ayi daban-daban na falsafa bayan Kant, falsafar nahiyoyi kuma ana fahimtar falsafar nahiyoyi ta wata ma'ana mai zurfi don haɗawa da duk wani masana falsafa na bayan Kant ko ƙungiyoyi masu mahimmanci ga falsafar nahiyar amma ba falsafar nazari ba.

Kalmar "falsafar nahiya", kamar "falsafar nazari", tana nuna faffadan ra'ayoyin falsafa da hanyoyin da ba a iya kama su cikin ma'ana ba. Har ma an ba da shawarar cewa kalmar na iya zama mai fa'ida fiye da sifaita, tana aiki azaman lakabin nau'ikan falsafar yammaci waɗanda masana falsafar nazari suka ƙi ko kuma suka ƙi. [22] Duk da haka, an ga wasu sifofi maimakon juzu'i kawai don yawanci suna nuna falsafar nahiyar: [23]

  • Na farko, masana falsafa na nahiyoyi gabaɗaya sun ƙi kimiyya, ra'ayin cewa kimiyyar halitta ita ce hanya mafi kyau ko mafi inganci ta fahimtar duk abubuwan mamaki. [24]
  • Na biyu, falsafar nahiyar tana ɗaukar gogewa kamar yadda aka ƙaddara aƙalla ta hanyar abubuwa kamar mahallin, sarari da lokaci, harshe, al'ada, ko tarihi. Don haka falsafar nahiyar tana karkata zuwa ga tarihi, inda falsafar nazari ta ke kula da falsafar ta fuskar matsaloli daban-daban, masu iya yin nazari baya ga asalinsu na tarihi. [24]
  • Na uku, masana falsafa na Nahiyar kan yi matukar sha'awar hadin kan ka'ida da aiki, kuma suna ganin bincikensu na falsafa yana da alaka ta kut-da-kut da sauyi na mutum, dabi'u, ko siyasa.
  • Na hudu, falsafar nahiyar tana da fifiko kan metaphilosophy (watau nazarin yanayi, manufa, da hanyoyin falsafa). Hakanan ana iya samun wannan girmamawa a cikin falsafar nazari, amma tare da sakamako daban-daban.

Wata hanyar da za ta kusantar da ma'anar falsafar nahiyar ita ce ta jera wasu ƙungiyoyin falsafa waɗanda suke ko kuma sun kasance tsakiya a falsafar nahiyar: manufa ta Jamusanci, phenomenology, existentialism (da magabatansa, irin su tunanin Kierkegaard da Nietzsche ), hermeneutics, , hermeneutics. Tsarin tsari, post-structuralism, rushewa, Faransanci mata, da kuma mahimmin ka'idar Makarantar Frankfurt da wasu rassa na Marxism na Yamma . [25]

Ƙaddamar da rarraba

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

PAdadin masana falsafa na wannan zamani sun yi adawa da kima da fa'idar bambance falsafar nazari da nahiya. [26] Wasu masana falsafa, kamar Richard J. Bernstein da AW Moore sun fito fili sun yi ƙoƙarin daidaita waɗannan hadisai, suna ɗaukar wasu jigogi waɗanda manyan malamai suka yi tarayya a cikin kowace al'ada.

  • Falsafar nazari
    • Falsafar gwaji – Filin binciken ilimin falsafa da ya kunno kai wanda ke yin amfani da bayanai masu ma'ana - galibi ana tattara su ta hanyar binciken da ke bin diddigin tunanin talakawa - don sanar da bincike kan tambayoyin falsafar da suka daɗe da rashin kwanciyar hankali.
    • Ma'ana positivism – Makaranta na farko kuma mafi rinjaye a falsafar nazari na farkon rabin karni na 20.
    • Halitta - Ra'ayin cewa dokoki na halitta da karfi ne kawai ke aiki a sararin samaniya.
    • Falsafar harshe na yau da kullun – Babbar makaranta a falsafar nazari a tsakiyar karni na 20.
    • Natsuwa - A cikin metaphilosophy, ra'ayin cewa aikin falsafar shine warkewa ko gyarawa.
    • Falsafar postanalytic - Falsafar bayan nazari ta bayyana rabewa da ƙalubalen falsafar falsafa ta yau da kullun ta masana falsafa kamar Richard Rorty.
  • Falsafar Nahiyar
    • Rushewa – Hanya (ko a falsafa, nazarin adabi, ko a wasu fagage) inda mutum zai gudanar da karatun nassi da nufin nuna cewa nassin ba cikakke ba ne, a maimakon haka yana kunshe da ma’anoni da dama da ba za su iya daidaitawa ba, masu cin karo da juna.
    • Halin wanzuwa – Falsafar wanzuwa ita ce “bayyanar ra’ayi na zahiri na halin wanzuwa” [27] wanda ke farawa da yanayin ruɗani da ruɗani a fuskar duniyar da babu ma’ana ko rashin hankali. [28] [29]
    • Ilimin halittu - Phenomenology da farko ya shafi yin sifofin sani, da kuma abubuwan da suka bayyana a cikin ayyukan sani, abubuwa na tunani da bincike na tsari.
    • Poststructuralism - Tsarin tsari wani motsi ne na gaye a Faransa a cikin 1950s da 1960s, wanda yayi nazarin tushen tsarin da ke cikin samfuran al'adu (kamar matani), bayan-tsari ya samo asali daga sukar wuraren gine-gine. Musamman, post-structuralism yana riƙe da cewa nazarin tsarin da ke ƙasa yana da yanayin al'ada don haka yana ƙarƙashin ɗimbin son zuciya da fassarori.
    • Falsafa ta zamani – Falsafa ta zamani tana da shakku ko tauye wa da yawa daga cikin dabi’u da zato na falsafar da suka samo asali daga zamani, kamar dan’adam yana da ma’anar da ta bambanta mutum da dabbobi, ko kuma zaton cewa wani nau’i na gwamnati ya fi wani.
    • Gine-gine na zamantakewa - Mahimmin ra'ayi na tsakiya a cikin falsafar nahiyar, ginin zamantakewa shine ra'ayi ko aiki wanda shine ƙirƙirar (ko kayan tarihi) na wani rukuni.
    • Haƙiƙanin Haƙiƙa - Haƙiƙanin haƙiƙanin ƙaƙƙarfan motsi ne na falsafa wanda ke neman ya shawo kan iyakokin tunanin ɗan adam da daidaitawa ta hanyar bincika gaskiyar abubuwa fiye da tsinkayen ɗan adam da wakilci.
    • Ka'idar mahimmanci - Mahimman ka'idar ita ce jarrabawa da sukar al'umma da al'adu, ta hanyar ilimi a cikin ilimin zamantakewa da bil'adama.
    • Makarantar Frankfurt - Kalmar "Makarantar Frankfurt" kalma ce ta yau da kullun da ake amfani da ita don zayyana masu tunani da ke da alaƙa da Cibiyar Nazarin Zamantakewa ko kuma waɗanda hakan ya rinjaye su.
  • Falsafar Yamma

Bayanan kula

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
  1. The publication of Husserl's Logical Investigations (1900–01) and Russell's The Principles of Mathematics (1903) is considered to mark the beginning of 20th-century philosophy.[1]

Bayanan ƙafa da nassoshi

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
  1. Spindel Conference 2002–100 Years of Metaethics. The Legacy of G.E. Moore, University of Memphis, 2003, p. 165
  2. M. E. Waithe (ed.), A History of Women Philosophers: Volume IV: Contemporary Women Philosophers, 1900–Today, Springer, 1995.
  3. Peter Simons "Open and Cloded Culture" in Phenomenology and analysis: essays on Central European philosophy. Edited by Arkadiusz Chrudzimski and Wolfgang Huemer. Page 18.
  4. Campbell, James (2006) A Thoughtful Profession, Open Court Publishing
  5. Campbell, James (2006) A Thoughtful Profession, Open Court Publishing pp. 35–37
  6. Leighton, Denys (2004) 'The Greenian moment' pp. 70–71
  7. "Directory of American Philosophers". Archived from the original on 2 February 2011. Retrieved 2011-02-01.
  8. "Philosophical Weblogs – David Chalmers". consc.net. Archived from the original on 29 October 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  9. "PEA Soup: The Next Chapter: Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup". peasoup.typepad.com. Archived from the original on 11 January 2012. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  10. "What is it like to be a woman in philosophy?". What is it like to be a woman in philosophy?. Archived from the original on 26 April 2011. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  11. "Philosophy Departments Are Full of Sexual Harassment". Archived from the original on 12 February 2012. Retrieved 2011-12-31.
  12. "A Call to Shun". insidehighered.com. Archived from the original on 31 October 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  13. See, e.g., Michael Dummett, The Origins of Analytical Philosophy (Harvard University Press, 1994), or C. Prado, A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy (Prometheus/Humanity Books, 2003).
  14. See for example Moore's A Defence of Common Sense and Russell's critique of the Doctrine of internal relations,
  15. Jonkers, Peter. "Perspectives on twentieth century philosophy: A Reply to Tom Rockmore" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 November 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-19. ...analytic philosophy opposed right from its beginning English neo-Hegelianism of Bradley's sort and similar ones. It did not only criticize the latter's denial of the existence of an external world (anyway an unjust criticism), but also the bombastic, obscure style of Hegel's writings.
  16. See, e.g., Brian Leiter. "'Analytic' philosophy today names a style of doing philosophy, not a philosophical program or a set of substantive views. Analytic philosophers, crudely speaking, aim for argumentative clarity and precision; draw freely on the tools of logic; and often identify, professionally and intellectually, more closely with the sciences and mathematics, than with the humanities."
  17. Rorty, Richard. (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.
  18. Bryant, Levi R. (2012-04-13). "Review of The Politics of Logic: Badiou, Wittgenstein, and the Consequences of Formalism". Archived from the original on 21 May 2012. Retrieved 2012-07-12. Cite journal requires |journal= (help) Paul M. Livingston, The Politics of Logic: Badiou, Wittgenstein, and the Consequences of Formalism, Routledge, 2012
  19. Williamson, Timothy "The Philosophy of Philosophy"
  20. Hubben, William. (1952) Four Prophets of Our Destiny.
  21. E.g., the largest academic organization devoted to furthering the study of continental philosophy is the Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy.
  22. Glendinning 2006.
  23. The following list of four traits is adapted from Michael Rosen, "Continental Philosophy from Hegel", in A. C. Grayling (ed.), Philosophy 2: Further through the Subject, Oxford University Press (1998), p. 665.
  24. 24.0 24.1 Critchley 2001.
  25. The above list includes only those movements common to both lists compiled by Critchley 2001 and Glendinning 2006.
  26. Owen, David (2016). "Reasons and practices of reasoning: On the analytic/Continental distinction in political philosophy". European Journal of Political Theory. 15 (2): 172–188. doi:10.1177/1474885115587120. S2CID 148015656.
  27. Empty citation (help)
  28. Robert C. Solomon, Existentialism (McGraw-Hill, 1974, pp. 1–2)
  29. D.E. Cooper Existentialism: A Reconstruction (Basil Blackwell, 1999, p. 8).
  • Empty citation (help)
  •  

Kara karantawa

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
  • Campbell, James, Sana'a Mai Tunani: Shekarun Farko na Ƙungiyar Falsafa ta Amirka . Buɗe Kotu (2006)

Rarraba Nahiyar / Nahiyar

Falsafar Nazari

  • Dummett, Michael Asalin Falsafar Nazari . Jami'ar Harvard Press (1996)
  • Floyd, Juliet Future Pasts: Al'adun Nazari a cikin Falsafa na Jami'ar Oxford ta Karni na Ashirin (2001)
  • Glock, Hans-Johann Menene Falsafar Nazari? . Jami'ar Jami'ar Cambridge (2008)
  • Martinich, AP Analytic Falsafa: Anthology (Blackwell Falsafa Anthologies) . Wiley-Blackwell (2001)
  • Martinich, AP Abokin Falsafa na Analytic (Shabbai na Blackwell zuwa Falsafa) . Wiley-Blackwell (2005)
  • Soames, Scott, Nazarin Falsafa a cikin Karni na Ashirin, Juzu'i na 1: Alfijir na Bincike . Jami'ar Princeton Press (2005)
  • Soames, Scott, Nazarin Falsafa a cikin Karni na Ashirin, Juzu'i na 2: Zamanin Ma'ana . Jami'ar Princeton Press (2005)
  • Stroll, Avrum Falsafar Analytic na Karni na Ashirin . Jami'ar Columbia Press (2001)
  • Williamson, Timothawus Falsafar Falsafa (Lectures na Blackwell / Brown a Falsafa) . Wiley-Blackwell (2008)

Falsafar Nahiyar

  • Cutrofello, Andrew Nahiyar Falsafa: Gabatarwar Zamani . Jagora (2005)

Hanyoyin haɗi na waje

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]