Switch ApacheConf to a maintained upstream #7135
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Nope. Why? Because we only support TextMate compatible grammars.
Yup, or find another actively maintained fork or VSCode version. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for the pointers! I’ve updated Apache.plist for Apache 2.4.62/2.5 and tested it on TextMate. It’s now ready to be pulled: https://github.com/nisbet-hubbard/apache.tmbundle. I’ll make sure this fork gets regularly maintained. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
After comparing the VSCode version, I found it to be a better basis for future updates. Since the maintainer of that version is still active, in #7143 I’ve changed the source to his version and will contribute to that repo. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The upstream project for ApacheConf hasn’t been maintained for the past nine years, and is unlikely to see more work done because the product it was originally created for was also abandoned: https://github.com/textmate/apache.tmbundle
The ApacheConf grammar, however, is still very much incomplete. Shall we switch to a different upstream such as apache.vim?
If not, someone would need to fork textmate/apache.tmbundle so it can start accepting PRs again.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions