Thx @corneliusroemer great work i think when epi-conditions change quickly this kind of multiple issues are very useful.
My suggestion is to wait a bit before start designating fast sublineages unless they corresponds to branches starting directly from the politomy. Soon we will see which are the successful branches and where (and if) they are geo located

@corneliusroemer many thanks! Maybe #963 could be added to the list? All the best!

I built an UShER tree based around a few BA.2.75+ORF1a:3959A GenBank samples. UShER put that into 2 different branches from BA.2.75. But just in case others may find it helpful in finding BA.2.75 sublineages, here's the link to the interactive tree: https://nextstrain.org/fetch/github.com/alurqu/pango-designation-support-alurqu/raw/main/subtreeAuspice1_BA.2.75_20220818.json?c=gt-S_574&label=nuc%20mutations:C4586T,A22001G. I've set the initial coloring to highlight the BA.2.75.1 S:D574V mutation.

Of course, as more data comes in the UShER tree may evolve and shift. Please note that I did include the date in the file name, so I plan for this tree should remain as a record of the UShER tree produced today. As the tree evolves with new data, it may be appropriate to post a new version of the tree.

Edit: Corrected grammar.

We've figured BA.2.75 out now, so this can be closed.