Andres Bonifacio
Andres Bonifacio
Andres Bonifacio
Andrés Bonifacio
Portrait photograph, c. 1896
In office
Government)
Personal details
Born Andrés Bonifacio y de Castro
Philippines, Spanish Empire
Cause of death Execution
Nationality Filipino
Katipunan
in infancy)
Education Self-educated
Signature
Nickname(s) Maypagasa
Military service
Allegiance Katipunan
Contents
Marriages[edit]
Bonifacio's first wife, Monica (surname unknown), was his neighbor in Palomar, Tondo.
[26]
She died of leprosy[27][28] and they had no recorded children.
In 1892, Bonifacio, a 29-year-old widower, met the 18-year-old Gregoria de
Jesús[29] through his friend Teodoro Plata, who was her cousin. Gregoria, also called
Oriang, was the daughter of a prominent citizen and landowner from Caloocan.
[30]
Gregoria's parents did not agree at first to their relationship, for Andrés was
a Freemason, and Freemasons were at that time considered enemies of the Catholic
Church.[31] Her parents eventually acquiesced, and Andrés and Gregoria were married in
a Catholic ceremony in Binondo Church in March 1893 or 1894. The couple also were
married through Katipunan rites in a friend's house in Santa Cruz, Manila on the same
day of their church wedding.[32]
They had one son, born in early 1896,[33] who died of smallpox in infancy.[28][34]
In 1892, Bonifacio was one of the founding members [35] of José Rizal's La Liga Filipina,
[36]
an organization which called for political reforms in Spain's colonial government of
the Philippines.[37] However, La Liga disbanded[38] after only one meeting, for Rizal was
arrested and deported to Dapitan in the Western Mindanao region.[39]
[40]
Bonifacio, Apolinario Mabini and others revived La Liga[41] in Rizal's absence and
Bonifacio was active at organizing local chapters in Manila. He would become the chief
propagandist of the revived Liga.[40]
La Liga Filipina contributed moral and financial support to the Propaganda Movement of
Filipino reformists in Spain.[42]
Katipunan[edit]
Main article: Katipunan
On the night of July 7, 1892, the day after Rizal's deportation was announced, Bonifacio
and others officially "founded" the Katipunan, or in full, Kataas-taasan, Kagalang-galang
na Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan ("Highest and Most Respected Society of the
Country's Children"; Bayan can also denote community, people, and nation).
[43]
The secret society sought independence from Spain through armed revolt.[44][45] It was
influenced by Freemasonry through its rituals and organization, and several members
including Bonifacio were also Freemasons. [46] Within the society Bonifacio used the
pseudonym May pag-asa ("There is Hope").[47] Newly found documents though suggest
that Katipunan has already been existing as early as January 1892. [48][49][50]
For a time, Bonifacio worked with both the Katipunan and La Liga Filipina. La
Liga eventually split because some members like Bonifacio lost hope for peaceful
reform and stopped their monetary aid.[46] The more conservative members, mostly
wealthy members, who still believed in peaceful reforms set up the Cuerpo de
Compromisarios, which pledged continued support to the reformists in Spain. The
radicals were subsumed into the Katipunan.[44] From Manila, the Katipunan expanded to
several provinces, including Batangas, Laguna, Cavite, Bulacan, Pampanga,
and Nueva Ecija.[51] Most of its members, called Katipuneros, came from the lower and
middle classes, and many of its local leaders were prominent figures in their
municipalities.[52] At first exclusively male, membership was later extended to females,
with Bonifacio's wife Gregoria de Jesús as a leading member. [53]
From the beginning, Bonifacio was one of the chief Katipunan officers, although he did
not become its Presidente Supremo (Supreme President)[54] until 1895. He was the third
head of the Katipunan after Deodato Arellano and Román Basa. Prior to this, he served
as the society's comptroller and then as its 'fiscal' (advocate/procurator). [55][56] The society
had its own laws, bureaucratic structure and elective leadership. For
each province involved, the Katipunan Supreme Council coordinated with provincial
councils in charge of public administration and military affairs, and with local councils in
charge of affairs on the district or barrio level.[57][58]
Within the society, Bonifacio developed a strong friendship with Emilio Jacinto, who
served as his adviser and confidant, as well as a member of the Supreme Council.
Bonifacio adopted Jacinto's Kartilya primer as the official teachings of the society in
place of his own Decalogue, which he judged as inferior. Bonifacio, Jacinto and Pío
Valenzuela collaborated on the society's organ, Kalayaan (Freedom), which had only
one printed issue. Bonifacio wrote several pieces for the paper, including the
poem Pag-ibig sa Tinubúang Lupà (approx. "Love for One's Homeland[59]) under the
pseudonym Agapito Bagumbayan. The publication of Kalayaan in March 1896 led to a
great increase in the society's membership. The Katipunan movement spread
throughout Luzon, to Panay in the Visayas and even as far as Mindanao.[60] From less
than 300 members in January 1896,[51] it had 30,000 to 40,000 by August 1896.[60]
The rapid increase in Katipunan activity drew the suspicion of the Spanish authorities.
By early 1896, Spanish intelligence was aware of the existence of a seditious secret
society, and suspects were kept under surveillance and arrests were made. On May 3,
Bonifacio held a general assembly of Katipunan leaders in Pasig, where they debated
when to start the revolution. While some officers, especially Bonifacio, believed a
revolution was inevitable, some members, especially Santiago Alvarez and Emilio
Aguinaldo both of Cavite, expressed reservations and disagreement regarding the
planned revolt due to lack of firearms. The consensus was to consult José
Rizal in Dapitan before launching armed action, so Bonifacio sent Pío Valenzuela to
Rizal. Rizal turned out to be against the revolution, believing it to be premature. He
recommended more preparation, but suggested that, in the event the revolution did
break out, they should seek the leadership of Antonio Luna, who was widely regarded
as a brilliant military leader.[61]
Philippine Revolution[edit]
Main article: Philippine Revolution
On March 22, 1897, the revolutionary leaders held an important meeting in a Friar
Estate Residence at Tejeros to resume their discussions regarding the escalating
tension between the Magdalo and Magdiwang forces; And also to settle once-and-for-all
the issue of governance within the Katipunan through an election.[92] Amidst implications
on whether the government of the "Katipunan" should be established as a monarchy or
as a republic, Bonifacio maintained that it should be established as a republic.
According to him, they were all in opposition to the King of Spain, and all of the
government's members of any given rank should serve under the principle of liberty,
equality, and fraternity, upon which republicanism was founded.[54][6] Despite Bonifacio's
concern on the lack of officials and representatives from other provinces, he was
obliged to proceed with the election.[93]
Before the election began, he asked that the results be respected by everyone, and all
agreed. The Magdalo faction voted their own Emilio Aguinaldo President in absentia, as
he was involved in the battle of Perez Dasmariñas, which was then ongoing.[92][94][95] The
resulting revolutionary government established at Tejeros, calling itself the Republica
de Filipinas (Republic of the Philippines) around a month later, was later superseded by
a number of reorganized revolutionary governments also headed by Aguinaldo. These
included the Republica de Filipinas of November 1897, commonly known today as the
"Republic of Biak-na-Bato", the Hong Kong Junta government-in-exile, the dictatorial
government under which Philippine independence was proclaimed on June 12, 1898,
and the revolutionary government now commonly known as the First Philippine
Republic or "Malolos Republic", inaugurated on January 23, 1899 [96] as the Republica
Filipina (Philippine Republic). The 1899 government is now officially considered to be
the true "first" Republic of the Philippines, with the present-day government of the
Philippines thus being the "fifth" Republic.
Bonifacio received the second-highest number of votes for president. Though it was
suggested that he be automatically be awarded the Vice Presidency, no one seconded
the motion and the Election continued. Mariano Trías of the Magdiwang was elected
vice president. Bonifacio was the last to be elected, as Director of the Interior. Daniel
Tirona, protested Bonifacio being appointed as Director of the Interior on the grounds
that the position should not be occupied by a person without a lawyer's diploma. Tirona
suggested a prominent lawyer for the position such as Jose del Rosario. Insulted and
angered, Bonifacio demanded an apology, since the voters had agreed to respect the
election results. Tirona ignored Bonifacio's demand for apology which drove Bonifacio to
draw his gun and again he nearly shot Tirona, who hid among the people, but he was
restrained by Artemio Ricarte of the Magdiwang, who had been elected Captain-
General.[97] Bonifacio declared: "In my capacity as chairman of this convention, and
as Presidente Supremo of the Most Venerable Katipunan of the Sons of the People,
which association is known and acknowledged by all, I hereby declare null and void all
matters approved in this meeting."[98] He then promptly left the premises.[97][99]
The Bonifacio shrine at the foot of Mount Nagpatong and Mount Buntis in Maragondon, Cavite where it is
believed he was executed, on May 10, 1897.
Historical controversies[edit]
The historical assessment of Bonifacio involves several controversial points. His death
is alternately viewed as a justified execution for treason, and a "legal murder" fueled by
politics. Some historians consider him to be the rightful first President of the
Philippines instead of Aguinaldo. Some historians have also advocated that Bonifacio
share or even take the place of José Rizal as the (foremost) Philippine national hero.
The purported discovery of Bonifacio's remains has also been questioned.
Trial and execution[edit]
Historians have condemned the trial of the Bonifacio brothers as unjust. The jury was
entirely composed of Aguinaldo's men; Bonifacio's defense lawyer acted more like a
prosecutor as he himself declared Bonifacio's guilt and instead appealed for less
punishment; and Bonifacio was not allowed to confront the state witness for the charge
of conspiracy on the grounds that the latter had been killed in battle, but later the
witness was seen with the prosecutors.[118][119]
Teodoro Agoncillo writes that Bonifacio's declaration of authority in opposition to
Aguinaldo posed a danger to the revolution, because a split in the rebel forces would
result in almost certain defeat by their united and well-armed Spanish foe. [116] In
contrast, Renato Constantino contends that Bonifacio was neither a danger to the
revolution in general for he still planned to fight the Spanish, nor to the revolution in
Cavite since he was leaving; but Bonifacio was definitely a threat to the Cavite leaders
who wanted control of the Revolution, so he was eliminated. Constantino contrasts
Bonifacio who had no record of compromise with the Spanish with the Cavite leaders
who did compromise, resulting in the Pact of Biak-na-Bato whereas the revolution was
officially halted and its leaders exiled, though many Filipinos continued to fight
especially Katipunan leaders used to be close to Bonifacio (Aguinaldo eventually,
unofficially allied with the United States, did return to take charge of the revolution
during the Spanish–American War).[120]
Historians have also discussed the motives of the Cavite government to replace
Bonifacio, and whether it had the right to do so. The Magdalo provincial council which
helped establish a republican government led by one of their own was only one of many
such councils in the pre-existing Katipunan government.[121][122] Therefore, Constantino
and Alejo Villanueva write that Aguinaldo and his faction may be considered counter-
revolutionary as well – as guilty of violating Bonifacio's constituted authority just as they
considered Bonifacio to violate theirs.[121][123] Aguinaldo's own adviser and official
Apolinario Mabini writes that he was "primarily answerable for insubordination against
the head of the Katipunan of which he was a member".[82] Aguinaldo's authority was not
immediately recognized by all rebels. If Bonifacio had escaped Cavite, he would have
had the right as the Katipunan leader to prosecute Aguinaldo for treason instead of the
other way around.[124] Constantino and Villanueva also interpret the Tejeros
Convention as the culmination of a movement by members of the upper class
represented by Aguinaldo to wrest power from Bonifacio who represented the middle
and lower classes.[123][125] Regionalism among the Cavite rebels, dubbed "Cavitismo" by
Constantino, has also been put forward as motivation for the replacement of Bonifacio.
[126][127][128]
Mabini considered the execution as criminal and "assassination...the first victory
of personal ambition over true patriotism."[citation needed] He also noted that "All the electors [at
the Tejeros Convention] were friends of Don Emilio Aguinaldo and Don Mariano Trías,
who were united, while Bonifacio, although he had established his integrity, was looked
upon with distrust only because he was not a native of the province: this explains his
resentment."[82]
Writing retrospectively in 1948, Aguinaldo explained that he initially commuted the
sentence of death but rescinded his commutation at the urging of Generals Mariano
Noriel and General Pio del Pilar.[129]
There are differing accounts of Bonifacio's manner of execution. The commanding
officer of the execution party, Lazaro Macapagal, said in two separate accounts that the
Bonifacio brothers were shot to death, which is the orthodox interpretation. Macapagal's
second account has Bonifacio attempting to escape after his brother is shot, but he is
also killed while running away. Macapagal writes that they buried the brothers in shallow
graves dug with bayonets and marked by twigs. [130]
However, another account states that after his brother was shot, Bonifacio was stabbed
and hacked to death. This was allegedly done while he lay prone in a hammock in
which he was carried to the site, being too weak to walk. [84] This version was maintained
by Guillermo Masangkay, who claimed to have gotten this information from one of
Macapagal's men.[130] Also, one account used to corroborate this version is of an alleged
eyewitness, a farmer who claimed he saw five men hacking a man in a hammock.
[84]
Historian Milagros Guerrero also says Bonifacio was bayoneted, and that the brothers
were left unburied.[131] After bones said to be Bonifacio's – including a fractured skull
– were discovered in 1918, Masangkay claimed the forensic evidence supported his
version of events.[130] Writer Adrian Cristobal notes that accounts of Bonifacio's captivity
and trial state he was very weak due to his wounds being left untreated; he thus doubts
that Bonifacio was strong enough to make a last dash for freedom as Macapagal
claimed.[84] Historian Ambeth Ocampo, who doubts the Bonifacio bones were authentic,
thus also doubts the possibility of Bonifacio's death by this manner. [130]
Bonifacio as first Philippine President[edit]
See also: List of unofficial presidents of the Philippines
Andrés Bonifacio Monument in Caloocan is considered the most symbolic of all the monuments in the country,
even grander than Motto Stella. It is sculpted by National Artist Guillermo Tolentino.
José Rizal is generally considered the foremost of the national heroes of the Philippines
and often "the" national hero, albeit not in law, but Bonifacio has been suggested as a
more worthy candidate on the grounds of having started the Philippine Revolution.
[112]
Teodoro Agoncillo notes that the Philippine national hero, unlike those of other
countries, is not "the leader of its liberation forces". [135] Renato Constantino writes that
Rizal is a "United States-sponsored hero" who was promoted as the greatest Filipino
hero during the American colonial period of the Philippines – after Aguinaldo lost
the Philippine–American War. The United States promoted Rizal, who was taken to
represent peaceful political advocacy, instead of more radical figures whose ideas could
inspire resistance against American rule. [136] Specifically, Rizal was selected over
Bonifacio who was viewed as "too radical" and Apolinario Mabini who was
"unregenerate."[137]
Historian Ambeth Ocampo gives the opinion that arguing for Bonifacio as the "better"
hero on the grounds that he, not Rizal, began the Philippine Revolution, is moot since
Rizal inspired Bonifacio, the Katipunan, and the Revolution. Even prior to his
banishment to Dapitan, Rizal was already regarded by the Filipino people as a national
hero, having been elected as honorary president by the Katipunan.[112] Other historians
also detail that Bonifacio was a follower of Rizal's La Liga Filipina. León María
Guerrero notes that while Rizal did not give his blessing to the Katipunan because he
believed the time was premature, he did not condemn the aim of independence per se.
[138]
Teodoro Agoncillo gives the opinion that Bonifacio should not replace Rizal as
national hero, but they should be honored "side by side". [135]
Despite popular recognition of Rizal as "the Philippine national hero", the title itself has
no explicit legal definition in present Philippine law. Rizal and Bonifacio, however, are
given the implied recognition of being national heroes because they are
commemorated annually nationwide – Rizal Day on December 30 and Bonifacio Day on
November 30.[139] According to the website of the National Center for Culture and the
Arts:
Despite the lack of any official declaration explicitly proclaiming them as national
heroes, [Rizal and Bonifacio] remain admired and revered for their roles in Philippine
history. Heroes, according to historians, should not be legislated.
Their appreciation should be better left to academics. Acclamation for heroes, they felt,
would be recognition enough.[139]
Bonifacio's bones[edit]
In 1918, the American colonial government of the Philippines mounted a search for
Bonifacio's remains in Maragondon. A group consisting of government officials, former
rebels, and a man reputed to be Bonifacio's servant found bones which they claimed
were Bonifacio's in a sugarcane field on March 17. The bones were placed in an urn
and put into the care of the National Library of the Philippines. They were housed at the
Library's headquarters in the Legislative Building in Ermita, Manila, together with some
of Bonifacio's papers and personal belongings. The authenticity of the bones was much
disputed at the time and has been challenged as late as 2001 by Ambeth Ocampo.
When Emilio Aguinaldo ran for President of the Commonwealth of the Philippines in
1935, his opponent Manuel L. Quezon (the eventual victor) invoked the memory of
Bonifacio against him, the bones being the result of Bonifacio's execution by the
revolutionary government headed by Aguinaldo. During World War II, the Philippines
was invaded by Japan beginning on December 8, 1941. The bones were lost due to the
widespread destruction and looting during the Allied capture of Manila in February 1945.
[130][140][141]