Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators

	Biography portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This page is supported by the science and academia work group.

Education

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation

Higher education

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

Daniel Hasidim page

Hello

Why did you deleted Daniel Hasidim page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Hasidim)?

Their is no problem with copyright issue with the page of the zionist billionaire forum [8].

Both pages were writen by the same man.

I added the page as a source.

What is the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel12121 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The copying was the issue for the April and May deletions, but not for the latest one. In any case Hasidim should not be writing about himself here; see WP:AUTOBIO. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sasan Adibi

Could someone have a look at Sasan Adibi and share their opinion? The wikipedia article defines him as an "expert in health informatics". He seems to have published a decent amount, but the sum total of his citations is 940 [1]. The field is trendy, so is this a lot? His two claims to notability appear to be receiving an award for a best PhD thesis from the IEEE Society (can't seem to locate info about that on ieee.org) and the fact that he's a senior member of the IEEE (this sort of membership is described over there: this requires some achievement in the field, but is something that individuals apply for, it's not granted like an award). – Uanfala (talk) 01:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't yet looked at the article, but neither a best thesis award nor senior membership are enough to pass WP:PROF. WP:PROF specifically rules out student awards, and to pass through having a selective membership grade he would need to be fellow, not just senior member. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sabu Thomas

Hi, I came across this draft in the WP:AFC queue and am unsure of notability. If a member of this project could have a look and advise, that would be great. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:09, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would say he passes WP:PROF due to high citation counts and being a Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:34, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; that was helpful. I accepted the draft. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Response to David Eppstein

Hi David, I did not make that edit, it was done automatically by Twinkle through the AfD I proposed. Best Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 06:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]