Wikipedia:WikiProject Somerset/Assessment
This is the assessment area for WikiProject Somerset.
The project banner needs to be put on all Somerset related articles by adding {{WikiProject Somerset}} to the TALK PAGE of relevant articles. Assessment is explained below
Quality
[edit]Once they have this they need to be assessed using the criteria at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment to get the class FA, A, GA, B, Start and Stub. Then this can be added to the talk page template by adding |class = level. This will make them appear in the relevant categories.
Quality scale
[edit]| Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 FA |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
| FL |
The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
 A |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
 GA |
The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
| B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
| C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
| Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
| Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
| List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Importance
[edit]This page is a guide to assessing the importance levels of articles that are maintained by WikiProject Somerset. There are four levels of importance that give an indication as to the priority of articles to this WikiProject, as opposed to Wikipedia as a whole.
The importance levels are Top, High, Mid and Low, and are assigned by adding |importance = level to the {{WikiProject Somerset}} template on the article's talk page. A guide to the type of articles that should be placed in each category is given below, but these are not hard and fast rules. Any individual article should be assessed on its own merits. If you are unable to decide which importance level to use, please go to the WP:Somerset talk page and leave a message there.
Remember:
- Anyone can assess the class or importance of an article, you don't need special permission to do it.
- If you feel that an article has been assessed wrongly, feel free to change it.
- Any problems or questions should be left at the WP:Somerset talk page, as that is monitored by more people that the talk page here.
| Importance | Type of article | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Top | Articles that are central to WikiProject Somerset Articles about the whole county |
Somerset History of Somerset Economy of Somerset, etc. |
| High | Settlements, typically cities or towns, with a population in excess of 50,000 Districts & unitary authority areas Nationally significant buildings Large rivers and primary roads, canals and railways World Heritage sites Major landmarks and/or areas National Parks Seas, channels, firths, major estuaries, major lakes and other large bodies of water National Trails Mountain ranges, mountains with a relative height of over 300 metres (980 ft) World-famous residents Professional sport teams |
Taunton, Weston-super-Mare Sedgemoor, BANES Wells Cathedral River Parrett Bath Somerset Levels Exmoor Bristol Channel South West Coast Path Mendip Hills John Cleese Somerset County Cricket Club |
| Mid | Settlements, typically towns, with a population in excess of 5,000 but less than 50,000 Grade I listed buildings and Scheduled Ancient Monuments Sites of Special Scientific Interest Less important roads, rivers, canals and railways AONBs Bays, inlets, small lakes and reservoirs Long-distance footpaths of 20 kilometres (12 mi) or more Nationally known residents Nationally-known secondary schools Parliamentary constituencies Top-level non-professional sport teams |
Bridgwater, Wells Cothay Manor Ebbor Gorge A38, River Chew Blackdown Hills Bridgwater Bay Coleridge Way Ned Sherrin ? Weston-super-Mare (UK Parliament constituency) ? |
| Low | Settlements, typically villages, with a population of less than 5,000 Civil and ecclesiastical parishes Grade II* & II listed buildings Minor streams, roads, canals and railways Local footpaths and cycle routes Minor areas of the county Most schools Miscellaneous articles |
Chew Stoke Luccombe Cranmore Tower Wellow Brook Quantock Greenway Brompton Regis, Ham Hill West Somerset Community College Punkie Night |
| None | Unassessed, importance still to be determined | — |
Log
[edit]November 29, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Somerset Premier renamed to Counties 2 Somerset.
Assessed
[edit]- Counties 2 Somerset (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)