Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 26

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 26, 2024.

Mr. Bland

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8#Mr. Bland

Cool Tapes

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Homestar Runner characters#Marzipan. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 17:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. There are Cool Tape Vol. 2 and Cool Tape Vol. 3, but I doubt these are useful for any kind of disambiguation/set index. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UPD: I apparently missed List of Homestar Runner characters#Marzipan. Retarget there, I suppose? 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:57, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

H*R Wiki

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete H*R Wiki; retarget HRWiki. wbm1058 (talk) 13:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki is not discussed at the target apart from an external link (which it probably shouldn't be either per WP:EL), so these are not useful. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

retarget to croatian wikipedia per thryduulf cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That should certainly not apply to the former redirect. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
oh yeah whoops, delete that one cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Grood

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Grood

Kerrek

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Kerrek

Asplode

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Asplode

Melonade

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 4#Melonade

'Cause ain't no such things as halfway crooks

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "halfway" or "crooks" at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Redirects from sufficiently well-known song lyrics can be useful even if the lyric in question is not mentioned in the article. This particular lyric is one of the song's best-known lines, and is part of the chorus, meaning it recurs regularly throughout the song's runtime. Accordingly, I believe it meets the threshold of usefulness. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Yippie-yi-o, yippie-yi-yay, ghost riders in the sky

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "yippie" or "yay" at the target article. Highly implausible and seemingly subjective onomatopoeia baked into the title, not just prose. It doesn't appear in the prose. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - It does have the title baked in, but it is the opening of the chorus, and it's possible someone might not realize what the title is and just hope for typing in the chorus they know. It's WP:CHEAP anyway, and the target is unambiguous. Fieari (talk) 03:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Arrowed

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 4#Arrowed

Your mater

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These seem to be as implausible as #Ur mater. Web search results mostly give rather irrelevant results (such as "Tokyo Mater" or "Bozh'ya Mater'", as well as entirely different languages). 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all as trivial or implausible. -1ctinus📝🗨 00:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all: implausible as English term, the "Yo mama" joke gives already the corresponding expression in other languages' Wikipedia. None of the expressions is given in "Yo mama" joke. --Cyfal (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hanyo

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. wbm1058 (talk) 18:24, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Linked from an article and receives decent page views and search results might have some target alternatives, though I personally do not know what I should be looking for. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

LGBT in the USA

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to LGBTQ people in the United States and keep the second redirect since it already targets there. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:47, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These should point at the same target. Looking at Special:PrefixIndex/LGBT in, LGBTQ rights in the United States would reflect current consensus. Note that a LGBT in the United States (disambiguation) page already exists in case no primary topic is determined. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Your Mom Goes to College

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 02:42, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this specific joke at the target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to not mentioned in the target. There exists already a redir Your Mom which is sufficient. --Cyfal (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of yo momma jokes

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 02:42, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No such list at the target, and we don't need to suggest to readers that we do. (As with the nomination below, the copyright status of the initial revisions might be questionable too.) 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As already mentioned: no such list. --Cyfal (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Yomamajokes

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 02:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UNNATURAL spelling of the page title with no spaces. (The copyright status of the list which was originally posted under this title might also be questionable.) 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deletepernomcogsan(nagme)(stalkme) 11:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: with this spelling implausible as search term. --Cyfal (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Deine Mudda

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 02:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE; target does not mention German. See also #Mamma tua below. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -1ctinus📝🗨 00:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no use to create all foreign language analogues for "Yo mama" joke, especially because they are not mentioned in this article. The article already has links to the other languages. --Cyfal (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

KGVC (FM)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#KGVC (FM)

North Takoma

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#North Takoma

North Tacoma (The Simpsons)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Never mind, it is mentioned at the target page, but spelled as "North Takoma". (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 21:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"North Tacoma", also most likely represented by "NT" in two of the nominated redirects, is not mentioned in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 21:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Capstan Station (SkyTrain)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brand new (last 48 hours) unnecessary redirects created by newer editor. May have been created in error based on related elements that do require disambiguation (cf. Expo Line (SkyTrain) and Edmonds station (SkyTrain)). Existing titles not ambiguous and no incoming links from mainspace. Joeyconnick (talk) 21:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Misbehaviour

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 4#Misbehaviour

Ur mater

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 02:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible variant not mentioned in article. 80 page views in almost a decade. Not helpful. DELETE. -1ctinus📝🗨 18:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-plausible search term, not mentioned in the target article. --Cyfal (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Universal Studios

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Universal Studios

Mamma tua

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 02:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

per WP:RFDOUTCOMES, none of these phrases are mentioned in the target article and violate the idea that foreign language redirects should be closely related to the article. Delete all. -1ctinus📝🗨 18:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

they're not even direct translations of the article title. mother would be an equally plausible target. delete per rlang cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:RLOTE. Note that I have only just bundled the diacriticised version Votre mère into this nomination. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no use to create all foreign language analogues for "Yo mama" joke, especially because they are not mentioned in this article. The article already has links to the other languages. --Cyfal (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

MrBro

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#MrBro

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Awantipora

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Awantipora

Diffusion semigroup

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Diffusion semigroup

Paraguay men's national under-19 basketball team

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 18:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to delete these three redirects. Paraguayan youth national basketball teams play only in categories: U15, U16 and U17. They never played in the U18 category, not even in the U19 category. Maiō T. (talk) 16:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Santa Maria Beach

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. wbm1058 (talk) 20:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem to be mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia in the context of GTA. There is, however, an article on a beach called Praia de Santa Maria, as well as content on some beaches located in places named Santa Maria, such as Santa_Maria,_Ilocos_Sur#Santa_Maria_Beach, Santa María del Mar District (Peru), Capo_Vaticano#Geography, Beach_cleaning#Cleanest_beaches, as well as some image captions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is turned into a disambiguation page, we don't need to worry about that. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Independence of Path

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 4#Independence of Path

Wii GameCube

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a classic WP:XY to me. I don't see this as a plausible search term. Delete. -1ctinus📝🗨 14:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

mhm. delete per nom cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The authorities

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Authority (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-target to authority, re-target to government, redirect to Wiktionary, keep, disambiguate or delete? I would prefer the first one. -1ctinus📝🗨 14:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

first one cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gamma-ut

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Guidonian hand. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem plausible anyone could confuse any of the uses of gamut with "ut" with a Greek letter prefix. If it is plausible, then perhaps it should target gamut directly instead of the dab page. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

God of the New Testament

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to God in Abrahamic religions#Christianity. Multiple targets have been suggested for this title. However, I find consensus to be leaning towards retargeting to God in Abrahamic religions#Christianity, mirroring the Old Testament variant. There was thought about improving the New Testament article to explain the concept of this search term, but such actions have not been taken. With the discussion going on for a month at this point, this title about "God [in] New Testament" will target an article about "God [in Christianity]", which discusses the New Testament deeply and links to the overarching article of God in Christianity. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 22:06, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When the God of the Old Testament (also a recently created redirect) is contrasted with the God of the New Testament, this is not generally the sentiment being expressed. Certainly not attempting to start a trinitarian debate though -- ha. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 05:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The New Testament God is Greek and doesn't equate with the Hebrew Yahweh. Trinity is at odds with the Old Testament. Jesus is a better re-direct that the "Trinity."--Arbeiten8 (talk) 08:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Change target to Names and titles of God in the New Testament. Definitely not "keep", as either the Trinity or God the Father are more obvious synonyms than Jesus. Fram (talk) 08:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget, either as suggested by Fram (though that article is solely about naming) or to God in Christianity. Rosbif73 (talk) 08:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget as suggested by Fram. At best the phrase is ambiguous, and "Jesus" is not usually described as "God" in the New Testament, but treated as a separate entity. P Aculeius (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I actually don't think we have a good target here. The nominator is correct that Jesus is not really an appropriate target. I don't think the target suggested by Fram is that helpful, as searchers would probably not be looking for information on the name of God IMO. My preference would be for a red link, because having an article about the concept of God in the New Testament specifically seems like a plausible article topic. (Rosbif73's suggestion of God in Christianity is a better target than the other two articles but still not my first preference). - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is also New Testament theology. Surprisingly, we don't seem to have a lot of content on the topic of this redirect anywhere. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I considered that as a target as well, but that article is more about academic studies than discussing the theology per se. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Let's take a step back a moment and consider the context of these two phrases. In modern English discourse, when someone says "God of the Old Testament" they, rightly or wrongly, are referring to the concept of an angry vengeful god that actively destroys the wicked, or just anyone insufficiently respectful. When someone says "God of the New Testament", they, rightly or wrongly, are referring to a "peace and love", "hippie" style pacifist, non-interventionalist, forgiving god. Again, I'm not talking theology right now (if I was, I would vehemently disagree with both of the previous statements) I'm simply talking about what these phrases mean in the English language. Given that this is what the phrases mean, I think both links should go to an article that discusses these specific aspects or perceptions of god... I'm sure we have some, or should have some, given how extensively these topics have been discussed and written on by all manner of scholars. There may be more than one good target, in which case a disambiguation page might be appropriate. I think I would object to simply targeting Jesus or God in Christianity, as these don't really cover the plain meanings of how the phrases are used in English. I don't think we should delete, because this is a VERY plausible search term, and we DO have information on it... the problem is just pointing the user to the correct spots they are looking for. I don't have specific suggestions for where to go though, as... quite frankly, there's a lot. But the status quo doesn't seem right. Fieari (talk) 04:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, again several different retarget pages are being proposed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

God of the Old Testament

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to God in Abrahamic religions#Judaism. Multiple targets have been suggested for this title. However, I find consensus to be leaning towards retargeting to God in Abrahamic religions#Judaism, mirroring the New Testament variant. While the article for the Old Testament mentions the phrase "God of the Old Testament", the target of "God in Abrahamic religions" is fundamentally about "God", and features much of the same information about God as the Old Testament article does, without diverting to the various themes described in Old Testament#Themes. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 22:22, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created alongside God of the New Testament (also under discussion at RfD). I don't think that Yahweh is the best target, as it's hard to know if readers will be looking for the ancient interpretation as discussed in the current target or more contemporary ones. I suggest retargeting to God of Israel (a disambiguation page), which is a synonymous phrase IMO. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We have several different retarget pages proposed. If this is to be closed, participants need to find consensus on one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Łódź 1

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete 1. (I live to serve.) asilvering (talk) 02:40, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As opposed to Łódź 2 and Łódź 3? The city is not known as "Łódź 1," though there is a rather normal office building called Łódź 1 that is not mentioned at the target. The redirect appears to be a leftover from a now blocked account incorrectly moving the page from Łódź to Lodz and has only received 8 page views in 2 years. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 00:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you don't have sequels to your cities? delete as... i'm not entirely sure if it's malformed or just collateral damage from a typo, but get it out of my sight cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. New and improved—now made with organic materials and 100% asbestos-free! Cremastra (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[citation needed] cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ostpreußenlied

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. asilvering (talk) 02:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-wiki redirect C F A 💬 00:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I am the creator of this redirect, but still, this seems like a very useful cross-wiki redirect. There's no article for Ostprussenlied on the English Wikipedia yet, so having this redirect will most likely make things much more convienent... Also there's no rule against cross-wiki redirects, is there? Kxeon (talk) 01:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, more dumbness from me. As it turns out, there is a rule on that: "Soft redirects to non-English language editions of Wikipedia should be avoided because they are generally unhelpful to English-language readers. Instead, editors should link to the alternate language Wikipedia directly with one of various forms of interlanguage links."
So I Oppose deletion but it seems best to Change to interlanguage links.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kxeon (talk • contribs) 02:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
return to red per juniper cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ostprussenlied

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. asilvering (talk) 02:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-wiki redirect C F A 💬 00:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I am the creator of this redirect, but still, this seems like a very useful cross-wiki redirect. There's no article for Ostprussenlied on the English Wikipedia yet, so having this redirect will most likely make things much more convienent... Also there's no rule against cross-wiki redirects, is there? Kxeon (talk) 01:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Oops, looks like I immediately thought this was about deletion. It doesn't have to be about that. Once more, I'm dumb.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kxeon (talk • contribs) 01:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, more dumbness from me. As it turns out, there is a rule on that: "Soft redirects to non-English language editions of Wikipedia should be avoided because they are generally unhelpful to English-language readers. Instead, editors should link to the alternate language Wikipedia directly with one of various forms of interlanguage links."
So I Oppose deletion but it seems best to Change to interlanguage links.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kxeon (talk • contribs) 02:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
return to red per the nomination above. tpyo seems plausible-ish tbh cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jimmy Neutron Happy Family Happy Hour

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. asilvering (talk) 02:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-notable YouTube video based on the series where the quote "The pizza is aggressive" comes from. It's not mentioned in the target article, so I'm not sure if we still need this redirect lying around. Regards, SONIC678 00:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete indiscriminate vanity redirect. Not mentioned in the target. -1ctinus📝🗨 13:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

LGBT in Mexico

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to LGBTQ people in Mexico. There's a thin consensus for this. LGBTQ topics in Mexico has been proposed for merge into LGBTQ people in Mexico, which would make this matter moot. There's much inconsistency in primary topics for "LGBTQ in...", which might be better addressed by discussing conventions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies. wbm1058 (talk) 19:17, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't LGBT people in Mexico be the Wikipedia:Broad-concept article? --MikutoH talk! 00:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine by me. It currently redirects to LGBTQ topics in Mexico, which is broader. I'd have no objections changing it. I believe it originally redirected to LGBT topics in Mexico and I just added the Q for WP:CONSUB. Lewisguile (talk) 06:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at Special:PrefixIndex/LGBT in, I would say retarget to LGBTQ rights in Mexico unless we want to change the entire list of redirects. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4 check this and this, there are few country articles with LGBTQ people in prefix, and only two with LGBTQ topics in. --MikutoH talk! 23:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, this is probably less consistent than I thought; might need a mass-nomination in the future. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The need to improve consistency in the organization of our articles on LGBTQ people by country came up recently at WT:LGBT#"LGBT rights in country" vs "LGBT in country".--Trystan (talk) 01:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would retarget to LGBTQ people in Mexico, consistent with the name of the broad concept article for other countries (for those that have one). The topics article could be merged into the other existing articles.--Trystan (talk) 03:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_26&oldid=1250688784"